AzTrials
AzTrials

ManiaOSANNCT05206747

Ottawa Sunglasses at Night for Mania Study

A study testing Blue-blocking glasses and Lightly-tinted glasses in people with Mania and Sleep, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 2 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mania is a serious condition. Symptoms of mania include decreased sleep, increased energy, changes in mood, thinking, and behavior. Dark therapy, which involves placing patients in a dark room for 14 hours overnight, can effectively treat mania, but is not practical. Dark therapy is also unpleasant. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Mania, Sleep, Bipolar Disorder
What is being tested?
Blue-blocking glasses and Lightly-tinted glasses
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
42 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
7 Sep 2022to 9 Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Be 18 to 70 years of age
  • Have a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Edition) defined manic symptoms that persist beyond the physiological effects of a substance
  • Be willing to have investigators obtain information from the treatment team and electronic medical record
  • Participants must be able to read and understand English or French.
  • Be willing and able to provide informed consent.
  • (Sub-study only): Meet the safety specifications for the devices in the sub-study, according to their user manuals

Who cannot join

  • Have severe eye disease or trauma
  • Have a history of traumatic brain injury.
  • Have sleep apnea
  • (Sub-study only): Have current exogenous melatonin intake

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Canada2 sites
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Insitute

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9

  • L'Hôpital Montfort

    Ottawa, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Control Trial of the Effectiveness of Blue-blocking Glasses for Mania in Inpatients With Bipolar Disorder

Mania is a serious condition. Symptoms of mania include decreased sleep, increased energy, changes in mood, thinking, and behavior. Dark therapy, which involves placing patients in a dark room for 14 hours overnight, can effectively treat mania, but is not practical. Dark therapy is also unpleasant. However, similar effects on the brain can be created from blocking only blue light with glasses. This preserves the wearer's ability to see and move safely. A trial of blue-blocking glasses for mania in Norway produced dramatic improvements in manic symptoms within three days of hospitalization. Mania both disrupts the sleep-wake cycle and is triggered by short and interrupted sleep. Examples of triggers include shift work and travel across time zones. Therefore, mania involves the "day-night" clock in the brain. The rhythm of the brain's clock is set by special sensors in the eye that identify daytime from blue light. If light does not include this blue spectrum, this informs the brain it is nighttime. In spite of the obvious potential of blue blocking glasses for mania, there has been no confirmatory study of this simple treatment in the five years since the initial Norwegian trial. Without a second study, this treatment will not find its way into routine clinical care. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial of blue-blocking glasses for mania in hospitalized patients. The investigators will also assess activity, sleep, and saliva melatonin (a hormone secreted in the brain at night) to see how this treatment works. If our trial confirms that blue-blocking glasses are effective, this treatment could help those suffering with mania return to their life more quickly. Medications for mania can also cause serious side-effects and having glasses as a treatment option might also reduce the amount of medicine needed to get well. Blue-blocking glasses could be a low-cost non-medication treatment. The investigators will look at how they could put this treatment into practice as part of everyday care.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this research project is to determine the effectiveness of blue-blocking glasses as adjunctive treatment for mania in bipolar disorder, assess circadian mechanisms, and provide information to improve translation to real-world practice settings. The investigators propose to conduct a confirmatory and more definitive clinical trial of blue-blocking glasses for mania and explore the putative role of circadian factors in mechanisms of action.

The primary objective is to specifically determine whether blue-blocking glasses are effective at reducing manic symptoms in inpatients beyond any general reduction in light exposure. This represents an advance on prior study, which compared them to clear lenses. For reasons outlined in the background, the investigators hypothesis that adding blue-blocking glasses to pharmacological treatment as usual for mania will improve symptoms, as measured by the clinician administered rating scales.

The secondary objectives relate to understanding how the reduction in manic symptoms with blue blocking glasses corresponds to changes in circadian rhythms. Not all patient with mania will be able to participate in this portion of the protocol (relevant to Aim 2 below) and it will subsequently be performed in a subset of patients, who are both capable and interested in adhering to the protocol, and at sites able to implement. At this time, the investigators anticipate this portion of the protocol being administered at the two campuses of The Ottawa Hospital. The investigators hypothesize that changes in circadian rhythms will be correlated to improvement in manic symptoms and thus a likely mechanisms of action.

The investigators also plan to conduct qualitative interviews to inform future implementation of this or related interventions (Aim 3).

Aim 1 (Effectiveness): To compare the effectiveness (change in Young Mania Rating Scale) of blue-blocking glasses to lightly tinted glasses as an adjunctive therapy with treatment as usual for psychiatric inpatients with mania.

Aim 2 (Support of Mechanism): To assess whether the reduction in manic symptoms with blue blocking glasses relates to the degree of changes in circadian rhythms (based on melatonin release curves, body temperature, heart rate, and the rest-activity cycle derived from actigraphy) and sleep (subjective and based on actigraphy).

Aim 3 (Translation to Practice): To improve translation to real-world practice settings, qualitative interviews with staff and patients will be performed using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation (RE-AIM) model.

Being tested
Blue-blocking glasses, Lightly-tinted glasses
Keywords
Blue Blocking Glasses, Randomized
Medical subject headings
Mania, Bipolar Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blue-blocking glassesDevice

    It will transmit 45% of visible light with the following light transmission profile.

  • Lightly-tinted glassesDevice

    It will also filter short wavelength light but at a lower threshold with near identical transmission above this threshold. It will transmit 91% of visible light with the following light transmission profile.

Study groups in NCT05206747
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blue-blocking glassesExperimentalParticipants will wear orange/amber colored lenses that filter wavelengths of light in the blue spectrum while awake from 6 p.m. to 8 a.m.
Receives: Device: Blue-blocking glasses
Lightly-tinted glassesSham comparatorThis control will involve glasses that selectively filter short wavelength (e.g., ultraviolet), but not visible blue light during the same time window. Participants will wear these glasses while awake from 6 p.m. to 8 a.m.
Receives: Device: Lightly-tinted glasses

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the Young Mania Rating Scale

    The Young Mania Rating Scale is used to evaluate the severity of manic symptoms at baseline and over time in individuals with mania. It is an 11-item scale and total score ranges from 0 to 60 where higher scores indicate more severe mania, thus, a negative change (or decrease) from baseline indicates a reduction (or improvement) in manic symptoms. Total score ≤12 indicates remission (13-19=minimal symptoms; 20-25=mild mania, 26-37=moderate mania, 38-60=severe mania). We will model differences between groups in the primary outcome using linear mixed models (group by time interaction) including a random intercept term for participant.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 2 (End of Study)

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Amount of antipsychotic (in chlorpromazine equivalents) and benzodiazepine used (in lorazepam equivalents)

    Medication use will be abstracted from the medication administration record to assess need for scheduled and as needed antipsychotics and benzodiazepines.

    Measured: Baseline to Week Two (End of Study)

  2. Total number of medications needed

    Medication use will be abstracted from Medication Administration Records of the Electronic Medical Record.

    Measured: Baseline to Week Two (End of Study)

  3. Differences in sleep efficiency as estimated from actigraphy

    In a subsample of the study, validated monitors will also be used for non-invasive and wireless continuous monitoring of movements through wrist actigraphy (Actiwatch Spectrum Plus, Philips Healthcare, Bend, USA)

    Measured: Baseline to Two Weeks (End of Study)

  4. Change in the Patient Mania Questionnaire - 9-Item Scale for Assessing and Monitoring Manic Symptoms (PMQ-9)

    All items in the Patient Mania Questionnaire included time frame and stem-phrase format of "Over the past week, how often have you….". The Patient Mania Questionnaire item responses ranged from 0 to 3 with 0 indicating "not at all," 1 indicating "several days," 2 indicating "more than half of days," and 3 indicating "nearly every day." Item scores were added so that the total score ranged from 0 to 27 with higher scores representing greater severity.

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  5. Change in the Digital Self-Report Survey of Mood for Bipolar Disorder - 6-Item Digital Survey Measuring Mood Changes in Bipolar Disorder (digiBP)

    The survey contains six items three items measure depressive symptoms (depressed mood, fidgeting, and fatigue), two items measure manic symptoms (increased energy, rapid speech), and one item measures both (irritability). Participants rate symptoms on an ordinal scale: 0 = absent/normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. Items can be aggregated into two scores to reflect depressive symptom severity and manic symptom severity. Higher depression and manic scores reflect more severe depressive and manic symptoms, respectively. Since item responses range from 0 to 3, the depression score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (all depressive symptoms are severe), whereas the manic score ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 15 (all manic symptoms are severe).

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  6. Change in Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale - 5-Item Self Rating Mania Scale (ASRM)

    The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale is a 5-item self-rating mania scale designed to assess the presence and/or severity of manic symptoms. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (i.e., 1 to 5) with the response categories having different anchors depending on the item. The Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale score range from 5 to 25 with higher scores indicating greater severity of manic symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  7. Change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - 21-Item for the Assessment of Depression Severity (HAM-D)

    The scale is widely available and has two common versions with either 1 and is scored between 0 and 4 points. Scoring is based on the 17-item scale and scores of 0-7 are considered as being normal, 8-16 suggest mild depression, 17-23 moderate depression and scores over 24 are indicative of severe depression; the maximum score being 52 on the 17-point scale.

    Measured: Baseline; Day 1-2; Day 3-5; Week One; Day 9-10; Day 11-12; Week Two (End of Study)

  8. Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9-Item Measuring the Severity of Depression Symptoms (PHQ-9)

    Self-reported measurement of the severity of depression symptoms experienced within the last two weeks. The survey consists of 9 items. Participants are asked to rate each symptom of depression on a Likert scale, providing a score between 0 (not at all) and 3 (nearly every day). This yields a total score ranging from 0 (minimal depression) to 27 (severe depression). Higher scores thus indicate a greater severity of depressive symptoms, and are interpreted in the following manner: a score of 0-4 indicates minimal depression, a score of 5-9 indicates mild depression, a score of 10-14 indicates moderate depression, a score of 15-19 indicates moderately severe depression, and a score of 20-27 indicates severe depression.

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  9. Change in the General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire- 7-Item Measuring Severity of Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7)

    Self-reported measurement of the severity of anxiety symptoms experienced within the last two weeks. It consists of 7 scored items and one follow-up question. Each of the 7 scored items generates a value from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of anxiety. These scores are interpreted in the following manner: a score of 0-4 indicates little or no anxiety, a score of 5-9 indicates mild anxiety, a score of 10-14 indicates moderate anxiety, and a score of 15-21 indicates severe anxiety. Generally, a score of 10 or above is considered to be a clinical cutoff implying that the respondent may be suffering from a general anxiety disorder.

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  10. Change in The Morning Evening Questionnaire - 19-Item Self-Assessment Questionnaire for Sleep Rhythms, Habits and Fatigue (MEQ)

    This questionnaire has 19 questions, each with a number of points. Scores can range from 16-86. Scores of 41 and below indicate "evening types." Scores of 59 and above indicate "morning types." Scores between 42-58 indicate "intermediate types."

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  11. Change in The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index - 18-Item Self-Assessment to Evaluate Sleep Quality (PSQI)

    The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire is self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate sleep quality consisting of 18 items that in turn are comprised of seven components, which include subjective sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep onset, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications and daytime dysfunction. Each weighted equally on a 0-3 scale to be summed to yield a global PSQI score, which ranges between 0 and 21, where the higher the scores, the worse the sleep quality. The investigators will only be using questions 1-4 and 6.

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  12. Change in The Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire - 10-Item Self-Rating Scale of Sleep Behavior (LEEDS)

    The Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire comprises ten self-rating 100-mm-line analogue questions concerned with aspects of sleep and early morning behavior. A 10-cm line separates the two halves of each question. The questionnaire instructions are" "Each question is answered by placing a vertical mark on the answer line. If no change was experienced then place your mark in the middle of the line. If a change was experienced then the position of your mark will indicate the nature and extent of the change, i.e. large charges near the ends of the line, small changes near the middle." The questionnaire monitors subjectively perceived changes in sleep. Improvements in the self-reported ratings relate to improved perceived quality of sleep.

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  13. Change in the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale - 16-Item Self-Rated Scale of Symptoms of Arousal at Bedtime (PSAS)

    The Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale contains 16 items, each rated on a 5-point scale that describes symptoms of arousal at bedtime. Eight items evaluates cognitive arousal and eight evaluates somatic arousal. Total score scores range from 16 to 80, with higher scores suggest higher pre-sleep arousal.

    Measured: Baseline; Week One; Two Week (End of Study)

  14. Change Circadian Rhythms

    Substudy for subsample (measured at Baseline and Week One)

    Measured: Inferred from melatonin/cortisol curves, rest-activity cycle (wrist actigraphy), heart rate/temperature monitoring, Electroencephalography

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jan 2022
  2. Study start7 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion6 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion9 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The investigators plan to conduct an up to two-week single-blind, randomized controlled trial of blue-blocking glasses added to treatment as usual for mania. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to wearing blue blocking glasses or lightly-tinted glasses. To ensure temporal and geographic balance, randomization will be stratified by the three sites in blocks of four.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05206747
Sponsor's protocol ID
20210790-01H
Acronym
OSAN
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
7 Jan 2022
Last updated
17 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No plan to share individual participant data to other researchers.

Publications

  • Fiedorowicz JG, Mikhail E, Solmi M, Burns JK, Yu J, Siddiqi S, Nguyen T, Smith AL, Robillard R; Ottawa Sunglasses at Night Investigators and Coordinators. The Ottawa sunglasses at night study: A randomized controlled trial of blue-blocking glasses for mania. J Affect Disord. 2026 Apr 1;398:120910. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120910. Epub 2025 Dec 18.

    PubMed 41421618

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blue-blocking glasses and Lightly-tinted glasses in people with Mania and Sleep, run by Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the Young Mania Rating Scale (time frame: Baseline to Week 2 (End of Study)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05206747, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in