Clinical OutcomesNCT05207202
Effect of EIT-guided PEEP Titration on the Prognosis of Patients with Moderate to Severe ARDS
A study testing electrical impedance tomography in people with Clinical Outcomes, run by Southeast University, China at 5 sites in China.
Trial summary
Acute respiratory syndrome distress (ARDS) is a clinical common syndrome with high mortality. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the cornerstone of management of ARDS but can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Clinical Outcomes
- What is being tested?
- electrical impedance tomography
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 190 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2022to 20 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age≥18 years
- Moderate-to-severe ARDS, defined by the ARDS Definition Task Force in the Berlin definition (partial pressure of arterial oxygen [PaO2]:FiO2 ratio ≤200 mmHg with a PEEP ≥5 cmH2O)
- Diagnosis of ARDS less than 72 hours
Who cannot join
- Expected to be mechanically ventilated for less than 48 hours
- Severe chronic respiratory diseases requiring long-term home oxygen therapy or noninvasive MV
- Undrained pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema
- Undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) before enrollment
- Contraindication to the use of EIT (pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and implantable pumps)
- Severe neuromuscular disease
Show all 13Show fewer
- Hemodynamic instability
- Contraindications to hypercapnia, such as intracranial hypertension or acute coronary syndrome
- Severe other organs dysfunction with a low expected survival (7 days) or palliative care
- Solid organ or hematologic tumors with the expected survival time less than 30 days
- Participating in other clinical trials within 30 days
- Pregnancy
- Refusal to sign the informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
China5 sites
Department of ICU, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610072
the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Department of Critical Care Medicine
Guangzhou, Guangdong, sonysang999@aliyun.com
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University
Shangha, Shangha, 200032
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Renji Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200120
About this study
Acute respiratory syndrome distress (ARDS) is a clinical common syndrome with high mortality. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the cornerstone of management of ARDS but can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), as one of main component of MV, has been widely used in the clinical practice. However, the PEEP selection is still a difficult problem for moderate to severe ARDS patients. EIT, an imaging tool evaluating the regional ventilation distribution at the bedside, can achieve the individual PEEP selection for all mechanically ventilated patients. This article compared the effect of PEEP titrated guided by EIT with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)-PEEP table on the clinical outcomes.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, parallel-group, adaptive randomized controlled trial (RCT) with intention-to-treat analysis which aims to determine the effects of PEEP setting guided by EIT on the clinical outcomes for moderate or severe ARDS patients ventilated with lung protective ventilation strategy. Adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS less than 72 hours after diagnosis will be included in this study. Patients in the intervention group will receive PEEP titrated by EIT with a stepwise decrease PEEP trial, whereas patients in the control group will select PEEP based on the FiO2-PEEP table. Other ventilator parameters will be set according to the ARDSnet strategy. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality. The secondary outcomes include ventilator-free days and shock-free days at day 28, length of ICU and hospital stay, the rate of successful weaning, proportion requiring rescue therapies, compilations, respiratory variables, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). This study will also perform the interim analysis and subgroup analysis.
- Conditions
- Clinical Outcomes
- Being tested
- electrical impedance tomography
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
electrical impedance tomographyDevice
PEEP titrated by EIT will be performed with a decremental trial at the enrollment. Right after completing RM, PEEP will be set to 20cmH2O and then reduced in steps of 2cmH2O from 20 to zero every 2min.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EIT-PEEP strategy | Active comparator | Patients will receive PEEP titrated by EIT with a stepwise decrease PEEP trial Receives: Device: electrical impedance tomography |
| ARDSNet-PEEP strategy | Active comparator | PEEP will be set according to the low FiO2-PEEP table to keep the oxygenation goals: SpO2 between 88% and 95%, and PaO2 between 55mmHg and 80mmHg. Receives: Device: electrical impedance tomography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
28-day mortality
mortality in Day 28
Measured: at day 28
Secondary outcomes (12)
VFDs at day 28
defined as the number of days between successful weaning from MV and day 28 after study enrollment
Measured: at day 28
Shock-free days at day 28
Shock-free days at day 28
Measured: at day 28
Length of ICU stay
the survival rate(survival/total) during ICU stay
Measured: up to 24 months
Length of hospital stay
the survival rate(survival/total) during hospital stay
Measured: up to 24 months
The rate of successful weaning
Proportion of people who are not dependent on ventilator ventilation
Measured: at day 28
Proportion requiring rescue therapies
Proportion of people who require rescue therapies
Measured: day 28
Rate of pneumothorax
Rate of pneumothorax
Measured: day 28
driving pressure
measurement as one index of respiratory compliance at day 0, 1, 2, 3, and 7 from enrollment
Measured: day 0, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 7
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at the time of enrollment
SOFA range from three to eight. The higher the score, the worse the prognosis
Measured: at the time of enrollment
Blood pressure at day D1, 2, 3, and 7 from enrollment
Both systolic and diastolic pressure at day D1, 2, 3, and 7 from enrollment
Measured: up to 24 months
respiratory rate
respiratory rate
Measured: up to 7 days
number of shock and gastrointestinal hemorrhage
shock, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage
Measured: day 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2022
- Study start20 Feb 2022
- Primary completion20 Jul 2023
- Study completion20 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Clinical OutcomesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Southeast University, China
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ling Liu, Southeast University, China
- Investigators
- ling liu, phD, Study director, Southeast University, China
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05207202
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021010065
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Yuan X, Zhong M, Li Z, Sang L, Huang X, Zhang R, Chen H, Gao Y, Wang Y, Lin Z, Lu S, Yang F, Chen T, Guo L, Xie J, Zhao Z, Huang Y, Yang Y, Mauri T, Qiu H, Liu L; Chi-ARDS Net (Chinese ARDS Research Network). Electrical impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure and mortality of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome: the EITVent randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026 Mar 1;212(3):440-451. doi: 10.1093/ajrccm/aamaf125.
PubMed 41738148Yuan X, Zhang R, Wang Y, Chen D, Chao Y, Xu J, Guo L, Liu A, Xie J, Pan C, Yang Y, Qiu H, Liu L. Effect of EIT-guided PEEP titration on prognosis of patients with moderate to severe ARDS: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Apr 11;24(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07280-6.
PubMed 37041561
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of EIT-guided PEEP Titration on the Prognosis of Patients with Moderate to Severe ARDS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05207202
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021010065
- Conditions
- Clinical Outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Southeast University, ChinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute respiratory syndrome distress (ARDS) is a clinical common syndrome with high mortality. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is the cornerstone of management of ARDS but can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), as one of main component of MV, has been widely used in the clinical practice. However, the PEEP selection is still a difficult problem for moderate to severe ARDS patients. EIT, an imaging tool evaluating the regional ventilation distribution at the bedside, can achieve the individual PEEP selection for all mechanically ventilated patients. This article compared the effect of PEEP titrated guided by EIT with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2)-PEEP table on the clinical outcomes.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-blind, parallel-group, adaptive randomized controlled trial (RCT) with intention-to-treat analysis which aims to determine the effects of PEEP setting guided by EIT on the clinical outcomes for moderate or severe ARDS patients ventilated with lung protective ventilation strategy. Adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS less than 72 hours after diagnosis will be included in this study. Patients in the intervention group will receive PEEP titrated by EIT with a stepwise decrease PEEP trial, whereas patients in the control group will select PEEP based on the FiO2-PEEP table. Other ventilator parameters will be set according to the ARDSnet strategy. The primary outcome is 28-day mortality. The secondary outcomes include ventilator-free days and shock-free days at day 28, length of ICU and hospital stay, the rate of successful weaning, proportion requiring rescue therapies, compilations, respiratory variables, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). This study will also perform the interim analysis and subgroup analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EIT-PEEP strategy | Active comparator | Device: electrical impedance tomographyPatients will receive PEEP titrated by EIT with a stepwise decrease PEEP trial |
| ARDSNet-PEEP strategy | Active comparator | Device: electrical impedance tomographyPEEP will be set according to the low FiO2-PEEP table to keep the oxygenation goals: SpO2 between 88% and 95%, and PaO2 between 55mmHg and 80mmHg. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age≥18 years
- Moderate-to-severe ARDS, defined by the ARDS Definition Task Force in the Berlin definition (partial pressure of arterial oxygen [PaO2]:FiO2 ratio ≤200 mmHg with a PEEP ≥5 cmH2O)
- Diagnosis of ARDS less than 72 hours
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Expected to be mechanically ventilated for less than 48 hours
- Severe chronic respiratory diseases requiring long-term home oxygen therapy or noninvasive MV
- Undrained pneumothorax or subcutaneous emphysema
- Undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) before enrollment
- Contraindication to the use of EIT (pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and implantable pumps)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| electrical impedance tomographyPEEP titrated by EIT will be performed with a decremental trial at the enrollment. Right after completing RM, PEEP will be set to 20cmH2O and then reduced in steps of 2cmH2O from 20 to zero every 2min. | Device | ARDSNet-PEEP strategy, EIT-PEEP strategy |
Primary outcome
28-day mortality
Time frame: at day 28
mortality in Day 28
12 secondary outcomes
VFDs at day 28
Time frame: at day 28
Shock-free days at day 28
Time frame: at day 28
Length of ICU stay
Time frame: up to 24 months
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: up to 24 months
The rate of successful weaning
Time frame: at day 28
Proportion requiring rescue therapies
Time frame: day 28
Rate of pneumothorax
Time frame: day 28
driving pressure
Time frame: day 0, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 7
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at the time of enrollment
Time frame: at the time of enrollment
Blood pressure at day D1, 2, 3, and 7 from enrollment
Time frame: up to 24 months
respiratory rate
Time frame: up to 7 days
number of shock and gastrointestinal hemorrhage
Time frame: day 28
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41738148Yuan X, Zhong M, Li Z, Sang L, Huang X, Zhang R, Chen H, Gao Y, Wang Y, Lin Z, Lu S, Yang F, Chen T, Guo L, Xie J, Zhao Z, Huang Y, Yang Y, Mauri T, Qiu H, Liu L; Chi-ARDS Net (Chinese ARDS Research Network). Electrical impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure and mortality of patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome: the EITVent randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026 Mar 1;212(3):440-451. doi: 10.1093/ajrccm/aamaf125.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37041561Yuan X, Zhang R, Wang Y, Chen D, Chao Y, Xu J, Guo L, Liu A, Xie J, Pan C, Yang Y, Qiu H, Liu L. Effect of EIT-guided PEEP titration on prognosis of patients with moderate to severe ARDS: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Apr 11;24(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07280-6.
Related trials for Clinical Outcomes
Recruiting
The Effect of an Integrated Mobile Health Platform on Early Detection of Clinical Outcomes of Critical Ill Patients
Mobile Health Platform, Clinical Outcomes
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Pharmacotherapy Optimization in Polymedicated Lebanese Older Adults in Primary Health Care Centers
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Polypharmacy (People Under Treatment With 5 or More Drugs)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Prospective G7 Dual Mobility Total Hip PMCF
Clinical Outcomes, Functional Outcomes
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Routine Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO)Symptom Monitoring During Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients withPancreatic Adenocarcinoma on Patient Experience and ClinicalOutcomes: A Prospective Pre-Post Implementation Study
ePRO, Symptom Monitoring
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Clinical Time and Temporal Dynamics Study (CLIN-TIME)
Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ling liu, phD study director
Southeast University, China
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing electrical impedance tomography in people with Clinical Outcomes, run by Southeast University, China at 5 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
28-day mortality (time frame: at day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05207202, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.