AzTrials
AzTrials

Emergency Cesarean SectionNCT05208515

The Effect of Independent Obstetric Operating Room on Decision-to-delivery Interval for Emergency Cesarean Section

A study testing independent obsteric operating center and general operating center in people with Emergency Cesarean Section, run by Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is to investigate whether the establishing independent obstetric operating centre can shorten the decision-to-delivery interval and improve delivery outcomes of emergency cesarean section. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Emergency Cesarean Section
What is being tested?
independent obsteric operating center and general operating center
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jul 2021to 30 Aug 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • over 18 years old, meet the conditions of vaginal delivery, decided to give birth vaginally

Who cannot join

  • with missing data

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan

    Foshan, Guangdong, 528000

    Zhengping Liu, MD, 86 757 82969772, liuzphlk81@outlook.com

    Dazhi Fan, MD, 86 757 82969772, fandazhigw@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Standard-controlled Study of Establishing Independent Obstetric Operating Centre and Decision-to-delivery Interval for Emergency Cesarean Section

The study is to investigate whether the establishing independent obstetric operating centre can shorten the decision-to-delivery interval and improve delivery outcomes of emergency cesarean section.

Read the detailed description

The newest define of decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) is the interval between the time at which the senior obstetrician makes the decision that a caesarean section is required and the time at which the fetus (or first fetus in the case of multiples) is delivered. The recommended DDI by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is within 30 minutes. The 30 minutes rule is also used to measure the overall performance of an obstetric unit in our country. Lower rate of DDI over 30 minutes will improve the outcome of neonatal outcomes.

Affiliated Foshan Maternity \& Child Healthcare Hospital is a tertiary care hospital in south of our country. Obstetric operations in this hospital are used to perform in a big general operating center, which is shared by all departments of the hospital. In December 23, 2020, a new wing of the hospital opened in response to the growing number of patients. In the new wing, an independent obstetric operating center was established to provide health care for obstetric operating. The original and new obstetric units were built according to the same standard. The medical staff shifts between original and new obstetric units every three months. Six months after the new wing of hospital opened, we set off a randomized and controlled trial (RCT). The RCT is aimed to investigate whether the independent obstetric operating center can shorten the DDI, decrease the rate of DDI over 30 minutes and improve neonatal outcomes.

Women who are over 18 years old, meet the conditions of vaginal delivery and decided to give birth vaginally by doctor and patient will be random distributed to original or new obstetric unit from July 1, 2021 to June 30,2022. Women need ECS in original obstetric unit will be send to the general operating center (named standard group), those need ECS in the new wing will be send to the obstetric operating center (named new group). DDI and other related variables of those who need ECS will be recorded. Data of a total of 60 ECS in each group will be collected and analyzed at last. Women who with missing data should be excluded.

Being tested
independent obsteric operating center, general operating center
Keywords
independent obstetric operating room, emergency cesarean section, decision-to-delivery interval

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • independent obsteric operating centerOther

    send emergency cesarean section needing women from labor room to independent obstetric operating center

  • general operating centerOther

    send emergency cesarean section needing women from labor room to general operating center

Study groups in NCT05208515
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
stardard groupOtherwowen who need emergency cesarean section will be send to the general operating center.
Receives: Other: general operating center
new groupExperimentalwomen who need emergency cesarean section will be send to the obstetric operating center
Receives: Other: independent obsteric operating center

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. decision to delivery interval

    the interval between the time at which the senior obstetrician makes the decision that a caesarean section is required and the time at which the fetus (or first fetus in the case of multiples) is delivered.

    Measured: labor day

  2. transfer time

    Time of decision to time of arrival of the patient in theatre

    Measured: labor day

  3. anesthetic time

    Arrival of the patient in theatres to anaesthetic ready time

    Measured: labor day

  4. Operation waiting time

    Time at which the anaesthetic is ready to the first skin incision

    Measured: labor day

  5. delivery time

    Skin incision-to-delivery of the first fetus

    Measured: labor day

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. number of still birth

    number of a birth in which the baby is born dead

    Measured: labor day

  2. number of neonatal death

    number of newborn died after birth

    Measured: labor day

  3. first minute Apgar score

    Apgar score is a measure of the physical condition of a newborn infant. It is obtained by adding points (2, 1, or 0) for heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, response to stimulation, and skin coloration; a score of ten represents the best possible condition. The 1-minute score determines how well the baby tolerated the birthing process.

    Measured: labor day

  4. five minutes Apgar score

    Apgar score is a measure of the physical condition of a newborn infant. It is obtained by adding points (2, 1, or 0) for heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, response to stimulation, and skin coloration; a score of ten represents the best possible condition. The 5-minute score tells the health care provider how well the baby is doing outside the mother's womb.

    Measured: labor day

  5. degree of neonatal asphyxia

    neonatal asphyxia is divied into no (8~10), mild(4~7) and sever(0~3) accroding to the Apgar score evaluated in one minute.

    Measured: labor day

  6. number of newborn transferred to NICU

    number of newborn transferred to neonatal intensive care unit

    Measured: From delivery to one week after delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Jul 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05208515
Sponsor's protocol ID
MCHHFoshan-2199
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
23 Dec 2021
Last updated
26 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing independent obsteric operating center and general operating center in people with Emergency Cesarean Section, run by Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Foshan at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

decision to delivery interval (time frame: labor day). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in