DivorceNCT05209932
An Internet Based Adaptation of a Divorce Intervention Beginnings Program for Divorced Parents
A study testing Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP) in people with Divorce, run by Family Transitions: Programs that Work at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is a two-armed randomized controlled trial of the eNew Beginnings Program (eNBP)'s effects on children's mental health problems as well as interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Divorce
- What is being tested?
- Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 131 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Feb 2020to 31 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Parents divorced, divorcing or separated
- Parents separated but never married
- One or more children aged 6 to 18
- Parents spoke English
- Parents spend at least 3 hours a week with children or have one overnight every other week with their children
- Parents have access to a computer with high speed internet access of a smart phone
Who cannot join
- Parents who do not meet all of the inclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Family Transitions- Programs that Work, LLC
Mesa, Arizona, 85209
About this study
Official title: Development and Evaluation of an Internet Based Adaptation of the New Beginnings Program for Divorced Parents
This study is a two-armed randomized controlled trial of the eNew Beginnings Program (eNBP)'s effects on children's mental health problems as well as interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline. The eNBP is an asynchronous, fully web-based program that was based on the in-person, group NBP, which has been found to strengthen parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline and reduce children's mental health problems in three randomized controlled trials of the NBP involving over 1,800 children. The investigators hypothesized that parents in the eNBP intervention condition would have less interparental conflict and higher parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline than those in the wait-list control condition. The investigators also expected the children whose parents were in the eNBP intervention condition would have fewer internalizing problems and externalizing problems and higher prosocial skills than those with parents in the wait-list control.
Read the detailed description
This study is a two-armed intervention randomized controlled trial of the eNew Beginnings Program (eNBP)'s effects on children's mental health problems as well as interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline. The eNBP is an asynchronous, fully web-based program that was based on the in-person, group-based NBP. Three randomized controlled trials of the NBP involving over 1,800 children found positive effects to strengthen parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline and reduce children's mental health problems. The eNBP teaches all the skills in the 10-session NBP. The investigators hypothesized that parents in the eNBP would have less interparental conflict and higher parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline than those in the wait-list control condition following the intervention. The investigators also expected the children whose parents were in the eNBP would have fewer internalizing problems and externalizing problems and higher prosocial skills than those with parents in the wait-list control following the intervention.
Parents and their offspring were recruited using Qualtrics, a leading-edge sample acquisition technology that partners with 20 online panel providers and recruits nationally. Initial sampling criteria were parent was divorced, separated but never married, divorcing, or separating; had one or more children aged 6 to 18; and spoke English. Parents who met these criteria were sent an email with information about the study and a web-based survey that assessed contact with child/ren, access to a computer with high-speed internet or a smart phone and demographics. Interested parents were provided additional information about the study and screened for eligibility by phone. To be eligible, parents had to be divorced, separated but never married, divorcing or separating; have one or more child between 6 and 18; be English speaking; spend at least three hours/week or at least one overnight every other week with their child(ren); and have access to a computer with high-speed internet or a smart phone. The sample consisted of 131 parents randomized to eNBP (N = 81) or wait-list condition (N = 50) and 102 of their adolescent offspring.
Primary outcome measures were measures of interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality, effective discipline and children's internalizing and externalizing problems and prosocial behavior.
- Conditions
- Divorce
- Being tested
- Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP)
- Keywords
- divorce, intervention, positive child outcomes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP)Behavioural
The eNBP is a five-hour, asynchronous, fully web-based adaptation of the group-based NBP that can be used on a smart phone, tablet or computer. Separate versions for fathers and mothers consist of the same didactic content and interactive exercises, with gender appropriate references, testimonials and video skills demonstrations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP) | Experimental | The eNBP is a five-hour, asynchronous, fully web-based adaptation of the group NBP. Separate versions for fathers and mothers consist of the same didactic content and interactive exercises, with gender appropriate references, testimonials and video skills demonstrations. Units are highly interactive. Sessions began with a check-in in which parents responded to questions about use of the program skills and were provided with ways to address the challenges they experienced. The skill was then taught using modeling videos, interactive exercises, and testimonials from prior participants. The program then prompted parents to set times to use the skill, identify barriers to using it and select strategies to reduce these barriers. Parents were provided with tip sheets to address challenges in using the skill, downloadable sheets to record use of and competence in using the skill and a downloadable handbook that summarized what was covered in the unit. Receives: Behavioral: Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP) |
| wait-list control condition | No intervention | Parents in the waitlist-control condition were told that they would have access to the eNBP 12 weeks after they completed the pre-test. Twelve weeks after assignment to condition, parents and children were sent links to the posttest |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (Grych et al., 1992) -- Children Report Version
15-item scale assessing frequency and intensity of interparental conflict as reported by children. Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 3. High score is worse outcome
Measured: 1 month
Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (Grych et al., 1992) -- Parent Report Version
15-item scale assessing frequency and intensity of interparental conflict as reported by parents. Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 3. High score is worse outcome
Measured: One month
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Acceptance Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Acceptance Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Rejection Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Rejection Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Consistency Discipline Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Consistency Discipline Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Oregon Discipline Scale - Follow-Through (Oregon Social Learning Center, 1991) -- Parent Report Version
11-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Oregon Discipline Scale - Follow-Through (Oregon Social Learning Center, 1991) -- Child Report Version
7-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Child Monitoring Scale (Hetherington et al., 1992) -- Parent Report Version
9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Child Monitoring Scale (Hetherington et al., 1992) -- Child Report Version
9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Parent Adolescent Communication Scale (Barnes & Olson, 1985) -- Parent Report
10-item scale to assess parent-child communication completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Caught in the Middle Scale (Buchanan et al., 1991) -- Child Report
7-item scales to assess children being caught in the middle between parents completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 4. High score is worse outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Brief Problem Monitor -- Externalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Parent Report Version
7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by parents. The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). High score is worse outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Brief Problem Monitor -- Externalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Child Report Version
7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by children. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach \& Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.
The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Brief Problem Monitor -- Internalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Parent Report Version
6-item scale assessing child internalizing problems as reported by parents. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach \& Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.
The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome..
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (2)
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire -- Prosocial Subscale (Goodman, 2001) -- Parent Report Version
5-item scale assessing child prosocial skills as reported by parents. Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2. The score reported is the mean item score. A high score is a better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire -- Prosocial Subscale (Goodman, 2001) -- Child Report Version
Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2 (range 0-10). The score reported is the mean of the total scores. A higher score is a better outcome.
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2022
- Study start15 Feb 2020
- Primary completion15 Mar 2021
- Study completion31 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for DivorceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants were randomized to receive an online parenting program for divorced and separated parents (N=81) or a wait list control condition (N=50)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 131 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Family Transitions: Programs that Work
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Irwin N Sandler, PhD, Principal investigator, Family Transitions Programs that Work LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05209932
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R44HD082967
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data Sharing Plan Results from research conducted under this project will be shared in several ways. Manuscripts will be submitted for publication in high-quality peer-reviewed journals, following the NIH Public Access Policy guidelines. Findings will be presented at relevant national conferences for groups such as Association of Family Courts and Conciliators (AFCC), and Society for Prevention Research (SPR). We will also share the deidentified data with other researchers when requested.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Evaluation of an Internet Based Adaptation of the New Beginnings Program for Divorced Parents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05209932
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R44HD082967
- Conditions
- Divorce
- Keywords
- divorce, intervention, positive child outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 131 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Family Transitions: Programs that WorkIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jan 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a two-armed randomized controlled trial of the eNew Beginnings Program (eNBP)'s effects on children's mental health problems as well as interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline. The eNBP is an asynchronous, fully web-based program that was based on the in-person, group NBP, which has been found to strengthen parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline and reduce children's mental health problems in three randomized controlled trials of the NBP involving over 1,800 children. The investigators hypothesized that parents in the eNBP intervention condition would have less interparental conflict and higher parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline than those in the wait-list control condition. The investigators also expected the children whose parents were in the eNBP intervention condition would have fewer internalizing problems and externalizing problems and higher prosocial skills than those with parents in the wait-list control.
Detailed description
This study is a two-armed intervention randomized controlled trial of the eNew Beginnings Program (eNBP)'s effects on children's mental health problems as well as interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline. The eNBP is an asynchronous, fully web-based program that was based on the in-person, group-based NBP. Three randomized controlled trials of the NBP involving over 1,800 children found positive effects to strengthen parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline and reduce children's mental health problems. The eNBP teaches all the skills in the 10-session NBP. The investigators hypothesized that parents in the eNBP would have less interparental conflict and higher parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline than those in the wait-list control condition following the intervention. The investigators also expected the children whose parents were in the eNBP would have fewer internalizing problems and externalizing problems and higher prosocial skills than those with parents in the wait-list control following the intervention.
Parents and their offspring were recruited using Qualtrics, a leading-edge sample acquisition technology that partners with 20 online panel providers and recruits nationally. Initial sampling criteria were parent was divorced, separated but never married, divorcing, or separating; had one or more children aged 6 to 18; and spoke English. Parents who met these criteria were sent an email with information about the study and a web-based survey that assessed contact with child/ren, access to a computer with high-speed internet or a smart phone and demographics. Interested parents were provided additional information about the study and screened for eligibility by phone. To be eligible, parents had to be divorced, separated but never married, divorcing or separating; have one or more child between 6 and 18; be English speaking; spend at least three hours/week or at least one overnight every other week with their child(ren); and have access to a computer with high-speed internet or a smart phone. The sample consisted of 131 parents randomized to eNBP (N = 81) or wait-list condition (N = 50) and 102 of their adolescent offspring.
Primary outcome measures were measures of interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality, effective discipline and children's internalizing and externalizing problems and prosocial behavior.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants were randomized to receive an online parenting program for divorced and separated parents (N=81) or a wait list control condition (N=50)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP) | Experimental | Behavioral: Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP)The eNBP is a five-hour, asynchronous, fully web-based adaptation of the group NBP. Separate versions for fathers and mothers consist of the same didactic content and interactive exercises, with gender appropriate references, testimonials and video skills demonstrations. Units are highly interactive. Sessions began with a check-in in which parents responded to questions about use of the program skills and were provided with ways to address the challenges they experienced. The skill was then taught using modeling videos, interactive exercises, and testimonials from prior participants. The program then prompted parents to set times to use the skill, identify barriers to using it and select strategies to reduce these barriers. Parents were provided with tip sheets to address challenges in using the skill, downloadable sheets to record use of and competence in using the skill and a downloadable handbook that summarized what was covered in the unit. |
| wait-list control condition | No intervention | –Parents in the waitlist-control condition were told that they would have access to the eNBP 12 weeks after they completed the pre-test. Twelve weeks after assignment to condition, parents and children were sent links to the posttest |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Parents divorced, divorcing or separated
- Parents separated but never married
- One or more children aged 6 to 18
- Parents spoke English
- Parents spend at least 3 hours a week with children or have one overnight every other week with their children
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Parents who do not meet all of the inclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP)The eNBP is a five-hour, asynchronous, fully web-based adaptation of the group-based NBP that can be used on a smart phone, tablet or computer. Separate versions for fathers and mothers consist of the same didactic content and interactive exercises, with gender appropriate references, testimonials and video skills demonstrations. | Behavioural | Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP) |
Primary outcome
Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (Grych et al., 1992) -- Children Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
15-item scale assessing frequency and intensity of interparental conflict as reported by children. Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 3. High score is worse outcome
Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (Grych et al., 1992) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: One month
15-item scale assessing frequency and intensity of interparental conflict as reported by parents. Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 3. High score is worse outcome
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Acceptance Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Acceptance Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Rejection Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Rejection Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Consistency Discipline Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Consistency Discipline Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Oregon Discipline Scale - Follow-Through (Oregon Social Learning Center, 1991) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
11-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Oregon Discipline Scale - Follow-Through (Oregon Social Learning Center, 1991) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Child Monitoring Scale (Hetherington et al., 1992) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Child Monitoring Scale (Hetherington et al., 1992) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Parent Adolescent Communication Scale (Barnes & Olson, 1985) -- Parent Report
Time frame: 1 month
10-item scale to assess parent-child communication completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
Caught in the Middle Scale (Buchanan et al., 1991) -- Child Report
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scales to assess children being caught in the middle between parents completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 4. High score is worse outcome.
Brief Problem Monitor -- Externalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by parents. The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). High score is worse outcome.
Brief Problem Monitor -- Externalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by children. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach \& Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern. The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Brief Problem Monitor -- Internalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
6-item scale assessing child internalizing problems as reported by parents. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach \& Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern. The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome..
2 secondary outcomes
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire -- Prosocial Subscale (Goodman, 2001) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire -- Prosocial Subscale (Goodman, 2001) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data Sharing Plan Results from research conducted under this project will be shared in several ways. Manuscripts will be submitted for publication in high-quality peer-reviewed journals, following the NIH Public Access Policy guidelines. Findings will be presented at relevant national conferences for groups such as Association of Family Courts and Conciliators (AFCC), and Society for Prevention Research (SPR). We will also share the deidentified data with other researchers when requested.
Related trials for Divorce
Recruiting
Healing Hearts: A Mindfulness App for Parents Navigating Divorce or Separation
Mental Health, Parenting / Maternal Behavior
Recruiting
Pilot Study of an Interparental Conflict Intervention for Separating or Divorcing Parents
Interparental Conflict, Child Mental Health
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Marital Adjustment Strategies on Emotional Divorce Among Married Women
Marital Relationship
Recruiting
The New Beginnings Podcast: Brief Audio Intervention for Parents From Divorced and Separated Families
Parent Child Relationship, Parenting Intervention
Enrolling by invitation
Randomized Control Trial of the Co-Parenting for Resilience Program
Child Wellbeing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Irwin N Sandler, PhD principal investigator
Family Transitions Programs that Work LLC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP) in people with Divorce, run by Family Transitions: Programs that Work at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jan 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (Grych et al., 1992) -- Children Report Version (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 17 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2023.