Spinal Cord Injuriestscs_LokomatNCT05210166
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Robotic Therapy
A study testing Active tSCS and Lokomat in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of Castilla-La Mancha at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Lumbosacral spinal stimulation activates the neural network involved in the control of locomotion at the spinal level. However, its effects are limited to the production of robust rhythmic patterns of alternating movement, being currently in the absence of therapeutic value. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Active tSCS and Lokomat
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 10 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- AIS C or D.
- 2-6 months after injury.
- Neurological level of injury between C4-T11.
- Ashworth less or equal 2.
- Penn less or equal 2.
- To understand and to sign the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Metal implants over T11-T12
- Electronic device implants.
- Epilepsy
- Allergy to the electrode material
- Pregnancy
- Concomitant pathologies
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pathology or fracture of the lower limbs
- Musculoskeletal injury in the lower limbs
- Lower limbs dysmetria
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Robot-assisted Therapy in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
Lumbosacral spinal stimulation activates the neural network involved in the control of locomotion at the spinal level. However, its effects are limited to the production of robust rhythmic patterns of alternating movement, being currently in the absence of therapeutic value. On the other hand, the use of robotic technology for gait rehabilitation has experienced significant growth during the last years and its clinical efficacy is similar to others traditional interventions.
Read the detailed description
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in complete or partial paralysis below the level of lesion, having a profound physical, psychological and socioeconomic impact on the affected person's life. Between the different approaches for the rehabilitation of SCI, we can find robot therapy. Robot-assisted gait training has emerged as a promising therapy for improving walking ability, balance and motor function in neurological patients. The underlying principle of this therapy is based on the execution of repetitive and task-specific training able to generate appropriate afferent inputs, activating the central pattern generators in the lumbosacral spinal cord. Another novel therapy is the use of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), applied through self-adhesive electrodes in the skin. tSCS activates similar mechanisms than epidural stimulation and is able to stimulate the spinal locomotor circuits in SCI patients. It allows the activation of rhythmic, flexo-extension movements in the paralyzed lower limbs.
The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility, safety and efectiveness of a program of 20 sessions of 30 Hz-tSCS applied over T11-12 intervertebral space combined with Lokomat training in patients with incomplete SCI.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Active tSCS and Lokomat, Sham tSCS and Lokomat
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Spinal cord injury, Robotics, Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Lokomat
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active tSCS and LokomatDevice
Also called Experimental
A symmetrical biphasic 30 Hz current of 1 ms pulse-width with an electro-stimulator will be applied.
For the stimulation intensity, the maximum intensity tolerated by the patient will be selected. The intensity will be increased in case of habituation to the current.
Sham tSCS and LokomatDevice
Also called Controlled
The protocol and device of sham tSCS combined with Lokomat will be the same as active tSCS except for the stimulus intensity, which will be set at the sensory threshold, maintained for 30 seconds and then slowly will be decreased to zero, being this intensity maintained for the remaining 20 minutes of stimulation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active tSCS and Lokomat | Active comparator | 20 sessions, 5 sessions per week of active transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) combined with Lokomat will be performed.
The duration of Lokomat will be 30 minutes, of which the first 20 minutes tSCS will be applied at the beginning of each session. Receives: Device: Active tSCS and Lokomat |
| Sham tSCS and Lokomat | Placebo comparator | 20 sessions, 5 sessions per week of sham transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (sham-tSCS) combined with Lokomat will be performed.
The duration of Lokomat will be 30 minutes, of which the first 20 minutes sham-tSCS will be applied at the beginning of each session. Receives: Device: Sham tSCS and Lokomat |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in isometric maximal voluntary contraction strength
Isometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction Strength of quadriceps and tibialis anterior will be measured by hand-held dynamometer Micro Fet 2TM (Hoggan Scientific, LLC, Utah, USA) and will be expressed in Kgs.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in lower limbs muscle strength (LEMS)
Lower limb muscle strength will be measured by Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS). The scores vary from 0-5 for each of five key muscles of the right and left lower limbs, with a maximum score of 50 for both lower extremities.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in lower limbs spasticity
Spasticity will be measured by the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Scores range from 0 to 4, where lower scores represent normal muscle tone and higher scores represent spasticity.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in peak-to-peak amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials
Motor evoked potentials (MEP) will be elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS, Magstim Rapid) using a double-cone coil. The optimal stimulation site will be identified for the anterior rectus and tibialis anterior muscles individually with reference to the standard CZ point.
MEP threshold will be defined as the minimal TMS intensity required to evoke a motor response (>0.1 mV peak-to-peak amplitude) during slight tonic contraction of the target muscle (approximately 20% of the isometric MVC). Test MEPs during the protocol will be recorded during 20% MVC as an average of in response to 10 single-pulse stimuli that will be applied at 120% of the MEP threshold.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in gait function
10-meter walk test (10MWT) will be expressed in seconds.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in balance and fall risk
Test timed up and go (TUG) will be expressed in seconds. ≥12 seconds to complete the TUG means a higher risk for falling.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in aerobic capacity and endurance
The six-minute walk test will be expressed in meters. An increase in the distance walked indicates improvement in basic mobility.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in walking ability
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI-II) assess the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as devices required, for walking following paralysis that results from Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in daily function
The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III) is a scale for the assessment of achievements of the daily function of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The third version (SCIM III) contains 19 tasks organized in 3 subscales: self-care, respiration and sphincter management, and mobility. Scores range from 0-100, where a score of 0 defines total dependence and a score of 100 is indicative of complete independence.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Blinding assesment
The success of participant and assessor blinding will be evaluated through a questionnaire after each intervention (active-tSCS and sham-tSCS) with five questions:
(1) "Strongly believe the applied intervention is new treatment"; (2) "Somewhat believe the applied intervention is new treatment"; (3) "Somewhat believe the applied intervention is a placebo", (4) "Strongly believe the applied intervention is a placebo", or (5) "Do not know".
Measured: At follow-up at 4 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jan 2022
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion10 Apr 2023
- Study completion10 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- It is a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. There will be two groups: Group A (n=15): tSCS combined with Lokomat Group B (n=15): Sham-tSCS combined with Lokomat
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Castilla-La Mancha
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundacion del Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos para la Investigacion y la Integracion
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Julio Gómez-Soriano, PhD, Study director, Castilla La Mancha University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05210166
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ExoStim Project
- Acronym
- tscs_Lokomat
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 12 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Comino-Suarez N, Moreno JC, Megia-Garcia A, Del-Ama AJ, Serrano-Munoz D, Avendano-Coy J, Gil-Agudo A, Alcobendas-Maestro M, Lopez-Lopez E, Gomez-Soriano J. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 30;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8.
PubMed 39885542
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With Robot-assisted Therapy in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Patients.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05210166
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tscs_Lokomat / ExoStim Project
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Spinal cord injury, Robotics, Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, Lokomat
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Castilla-La ManchaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fundacion del Hospital Nacional de Paraplejicos para la Investigacion y la Integracion
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lumbosacral spinal stimulation activates the neural network involved in the control of locomotion at the spinal level. However, its effects are limited to the production of robust rhythmic patterns of alternating movement, being currently in the absence of therapeutic value. On the other hand, the use of robotic technology for gait rehabilitation has experienced significant growth during the last years and its clinical efficacy is similar to others traditional interventions.
Detailed description
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in complete or partial paralysis below the level of lesion, having a profound physical, psychological and socioeconomic impact on the affected person's life. Between the different approaches for the rehabilitation of SCI, we can find robot therapy. Robot-assisted gait training has emerged as a promising therapy for improving walking ability, balance and motor function in neurological patients. The underlying principle of this therapy is based on the execution of repetitive and task-specific training able to generate appropriate afferent inputs, activating the central pattern generators in the lumbosacral spinal cord. Another novel therapy is the use of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), applied through self-adhesive electrodes in the skin. tSCS activates similar mechanisms than epidural stimulation and is able to stimulate the spinal locomotor circuits in SCI patients. It allows the activation of rhythmic, flexo-extension movements in the paralyzed lower limbs.
The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility, safety and efectiveness of a program of 20 sessions of 30 Hz-tSCS applied over T11-12 intervertebral space combined with Lokomat training in patients with incomplete SCI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- It is a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. There will be two groups: Group A (n=15): tSCS combined with Lokomat Group B (n=15): Sham-tSCS combined with Lokomat
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active tSCS and Lokomat | Active comparator | Device: Active tSCS and Lokomat20 sessions, 5 sessions per week of active transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) combined with Lokomat will be performed. The duration of Lokomat will be 30 minutes, of which the first 20 minutes tSCS will be applied at the beginning of each session. |
| Sham tSCS and Lokomat | Placebo comparator | Device: Sham tSCS and Lokomat20 sessions, 5 sessions per week of sham transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (sham-tSCS) combined with Lokomat will be performed. The duration of Lokomat will be 30 minutes, of which the first 20 minutes sham-tSCS will be applied at the beginning of each session. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- AIS C or D.
- 2-6 months after injury.
- Neurological level of injury between C4-T11.
- Ashworth less or equal 2.
- Penn less or equal 2.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Metal implants over T11-T12
- Electronic device implants.
- Epilepsy
- Allergy to the electrode material
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active tSCS and LokomatAlso: ExperimentalA symmetrical biphasic 30 Hz current of 1 ms pulse-width with an electro-stimulator will be applied. For the stimulation intensity, the maximum intensity tolerated by the patient will be selected. The intensity will be increased in case of habituation to the current. | Device | Active tSCS and Lokomat |
| Sham tSCS and LokomatAlso: ControlledThe protocol and device of sham tSCS combined with Lokomat will be the same as active tSCS except for the stimulus intensity, which will be set at the sensory threshold, maintained for 30 seconds and then slowly will be decreased to zero, being this intensity maintained for the remaining 20 minutes of stimulation. | Device | Sham tSCS and Lokomat |
Primary outcome
Change in isometric maximal voluntary contraction strength
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Isometric Maximal Voluntary Contraction Strength of quadriceps and tibialis anterior will be measured by hand-held dynamometer Micro Fet 2TM (Hoggan Scientific, LLC, Utah, USA) and will be expressed in Kgs.
Change in lower limbs muscle strength (LEMS)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Lower limb muscle strength will be measured by Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS). The scores vary from 0-5 for each of five key muscles of the right and left lower limbs, with a maximum score of 50 for both lower extremities.
8 secondary outcomes
Change in lower limbs spasticity
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in peak-to-peak amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in gait function
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in balance and fall risk
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in aerobic capacity and endurance
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in walking ability
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Change in daily function
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.
Blinding assesment
Time frame: At follow-up at 4 weeks.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39885542Comino-Suarez N, Moreno JC, Megia-Garcia A, Del-Ama AJ, Serrano-Munoz D, Avendano-Coy J, Gil-Agudo A, Alcobendas-Maestro M, Lopez-Lopez E, Gomez-Soriano J. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation combined with robotic-assisted body weight-supported treadmill training enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 30;22(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01545-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Implant for Walking After Incomplete SCI
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Gait
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Recruiting
tSCS Combined With Rehabilitation Training in Treating Paraplegic Patients After SCI
Spinal Cord Injury, Paraplegia, Spinal
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Neuromodulation for Metabolic Dysfunction
Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Prediabetes / Type 2 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julio Gómez-Soriano, PhD study director
Castilla La Mancha University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active tSCS and Lokomat in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of Castilla-La Mancha at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in isometric maximal voluntary contraction strength (time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (after 20 sessions) and follow-up at 4 weeks.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05210166, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2023.