COVID-19COVID SAFE 2NCT05216627
COVID-19 Screening Program
An observational study of COVID-19, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In view of the recent COVID surge and difficulties in obtaining testing, we aim to increase Point of Care (POC) testing, whereby University of Pennsylvania (Penn) faculty, staff, and trainees who are working in person at Perelman School of Medicine (PSOM) laboratories can self-test. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COVID-19
- What is being tested?
- Self-administered saliva-based viral testing
- How many people
- 61 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Feb 2022to 1 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: PSOM staff, faculty, or trainees who work in person on campus in a PSOM laboratory
To be eligible, participants must:
- Be 18 years or older
- Be University of Pennsylvania staff, faculty or trainee who is working in person on campus at a PSOM laboratory
- Have knowledge of safe practices in and access to a biological safety cabinet
- Have knowledge and access to pipet and PCR machine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: COVID SAFE 2.0: COVID-19 Screening Program
In view of the recent COVID surge and difficulties in obtaining testing, we aim to increase Point of Care (POC) testing, whereby University of Pennsylvania (Penn) faculty, staff, and trainees who are working in person at Perelman School of Medicine (PSOM) laboratories can self-test. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of this POC testing program. We will not be collecting any samples as part of this study. This will ensure that individuals can rapidly identify if they have COVID-19 while balancing use, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We will start with a pilot phase whereby we will evaluate the implementation of a POC version of COVID-19 screening program that will coordinate several existing systems at the University of Pennsylvania including voluntary, self-administered saliva-based viral testing. We will pilot this program to a small cohort of PSOM labs and then test implementation of the self-testing of the POC version of COVID-19 screening across all PSOM labs for those who wish to participate. All results will be self-reported and will not be used to validate any tests or support any future approval from the FDA. No data from this study will go into the participants' Electronic Medical Record (EMR).
Read the detailed description
Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in close to 300,000,000 reported cases worldwide, including more than 58,000,000 reported cases and 800,000 deaths in the United States [1,2]. Initial efforts to address the COVID-19 pandemic were aimed at testing symptomatic individuals, implementing stay-in-place orders, and at increasing hospital capacity to meet surge demands [3]. Currently, we are going through an unprecedented surge in the total number of cases - mostly due to the spread of the Omicron variant. While we continue to confront the current crisis, a complete lockdown as seen in 2020 is not desirable or being planned. We must address the current issue and also plan for the future by putting in place tools to enhance our ability to conduct effective screening, containment, and case management. Future variants may cause similar delays in testing availability.
Widespread COVID-19 testing is needed to safely and effectively operate schools, workplaces, and businesses across the US. However, currently approved clinical testing options require reagents that are limited in supply and expensive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) machines, severely hindering scalability [4] coupled with acute shortage of person-power. In response to limited clinical testing options, rapid antigen tests that are available to purchase over-the-counter and can be self-administered have become recently a popular testing approach; however, these tests are expensive, in short supply, and may not be as sensitive in detecting Omicron variant compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests [5]. Emerging evidence indicates that saliva testing with the option of self-administration of testing can accurately identify COVID-19 viral infection [6]. Moreover, this approach provides an option for the easy, safe and convenient collection of samples required for testing without traveling to a doctor's office, hospital, or testing site. Point of care testing (i.e. using saliva-based self-collection to administer screening for COVID-19 in one's own laboratory setting) utilizes testing equipment that is readily available to our workforce, leverages their existing training, and benefits from existing institutional health and safety infrastructure.
Self-administration of saliva testing also reduces exposure of health care workers to the virus and preserves limited personal protective equipment [7]. Additional diagnostic testing options will continue to increase staff access.
For these reasons, we propose to evaluate the implementation of a COVID-19 POC screening program that uses saliva-based self-testing and to pilot test approaches to improve program enrollment.
Objective: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the use, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementing a voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) screening program with Penn faculty, staff, and trainees that uses saliva-based self-collection followed by testing in their own PSOM laboratories. A secondary objective is to learn about self-reported test results, program usability, user burden, participant experience, program ease, program continuation and availability. Another secondary objective is to learn about individual's perspectives about the program.
Study Design: This is an implementation clinical trial that we anticipate lasting up to two months. In the first phase, we will pilot the approach with four PSOM laboratories. We plan to enroll up to 50 people across these labs during the pilot phase. Labs will be located on Penn campus. We will pilot test the best manner to distribute saliva collection test kits and assay tests to participants and elicit rapid feedback for one week. We will apply feedback in real time to improve the distribution method. In the second phase, we will roll out the clinical trial more broadly across all interested PSOM laboratories. We anticipate enrolling up to 500 participants across all PSOM laboratories. All participants will be Penn employees (faculty, staff, and trainees) who work in a PSOM laboratory.
All participants will be required to provide informed consent and watch a training video before self-collecting their first saliva sample. All participants will be told they can collect saliva samples as much or as little as they want - but no more than daily for up to four weeks. They will also be asked to complete online surveys weekly for up to four weeks. These surveys are expected to take about 15 minutes to complete. See below for table of survey measures and frequency. A subset of participants will also be asked to participate in a one-time qualitative interview after the point of care testing program is over. This interview is expected to take about 30 minutes.
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Being tested
- Self-administered saliva-based viral testing
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Self-administered saliva-based viral testingDiagnostic test
Participants will be instructed on how to inactivate the virus and bring their sample to their laboratory's central PCR machine, where they will take an assay test. They will be instructed to collect saliva into a 1.5 milliliter (mL) collection tube containing inactivation buffer (TCEP and EDTA) using a small funnel and inactivate at 95°C for 10 minutes. Participants will then transfer 6ul of saliva into 2 PCR tubes containing amplification master mix and primers, put tubes in a heat block or PCR machine at 65°C for 45 minutes and assess fluorescence using a simple battery-powered fluorescence viewer. Once they assess their sample, they will be instructed to dispose of the saliva sample safely and in accordance with best laboratory practices. No saliva samples will be collected by the research team at any time as part of this study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PSOM staff, trainees, or faculty who participate in the point of care testing | The cohort will be offered access to a self-administered saliva-based viral test is a small funnel and a tube in which participants will put their saliva into. When they are ready to self-collect their saliva sample, they will be instructed to not eat or drink for 30 minutes prior to collecting their saliva and to collect saliva in an isolated room. We will evaluate the implementation of this viral test. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Self-administered saliva-based viral testing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Use of a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
How often they use the POC screening program
Measured: fourteen weeks
Acceptability of Implementing a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
Self-reported acceptability of implementing POC screening program using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (i.e., "Point of care testing is acceptable to me"). Scale values: 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).
Measured: fourteen weeks
Appropriateness of Implementing a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
Self-reported appropriateness of implementing POC screening program using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (i.e., "Point of care testing seems appropriate."). Scale values: 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).
Measured: fourteen weeks
Feasibility of Implementing a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
Self-reported feasibility of implementing POC screening program using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (i.e., "Point of care testing seems feasible."). Scale values: 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).
Measured: fourteen weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Self Report of Test Results
Self-report of if participant received any positive test results from saliva-based viral test or Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) approved test
Measured: four weeks
Program Usability
Self report of program usability using the Intervention Usability Scale. Scale values: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Measured: four weeks
User Burden
self report of user burden using the User Burden Scale. Scale values: 0 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).
Measured: four weeks
Participant Experience
self report of participant's experience in program using open ended qualitative questions
Measured: four weeks
Program Ease
self report of ease of program using open ended qualitative questions
Measured: four weeks
Program Continuation
self report of interest in program continuing using a Likert Scale. Scale values: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Measured: four weeks
Program Availability
self report of interest in program being more widely available using a Likert Scale. Scale values: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Measured: four weeks
Participant Perspective of Program Implementation and Change in Behavior or Decision-making Process
self report of perspectives of program implementation and change in behavior or decision-making using qualitative open ended questions
Measured: one time interview after four weeks of intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2022
- Study start7 Feb 2022
- Primary completion1 Jul 2022
- Study completion1 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for COVID-19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rinad Beidas, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05216627
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 850592
- Acronym
- COVID SAFE 2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 31 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No plan to share individual participant data (IPD) to other researchers
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- COVID SAFE 2.0: COVID-19 Screening Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05216627
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COVID SAFE 2 / 850592
- Conditions
- COVID-19
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 31 Jul 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In view of the recent COVID surge and difficulties in obtaining testing, we aim to increase Point of Care (POC) testing, whereby University of Pennsylvania (Penn) faculty, staff, and trainees who are working in person at Perelman School of Medicine (PSOM) laboratories can self-test. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of this POC testing program. We will not be collecting any samples as part of this study. This will ensure that individuals can rapidly identify if they have COVID-19 while balancing use, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. We will start with a pilot phase whereby we will evaluate the implementation of a POC version of COVID-19 screening program that will coordinate several existing systems at the University of Pennsylvania including voluntary, self-administered saliva-based viral testing. We will pilot this program to a small cohort of PSOM labs and then test implementation of the self-testing of the POC version of COVID-19 screening across all PSOM labs for those who wish to participate. All results will be self-reported and will not be used to validate any tests or support any future approval from the FDA. No data from this study will go into the participants' Electronic Medical Record (EMR).
Detailed description
Background: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in close to 300,000,000 reported cases worldwide, including more than 58,000,000 reported cases and 800,000 deaths in the United States [1,2]. Initial efforts to address the COVID-19 pandemic were aimed at testing symptomatic individuals, implementing stay-in-place orders, and at increasing hospital capacity to meet surge demands [3]. Currently, we are going through an unprecedented surge in the total number of cases - mostly due to the spread of the Omicron variant. While we continue to confront the current crisis, a complete lockdown as seen in 2020 is not desirable or being planned. We must address the current issue and also plan for the future by putting in place tools to enhance our ability to conduct effective screening, containment, and case management. Future variants may cause similar delays in testing availability.
Widespread COVID-19 testing is needed to safely and effectively operate schools, workplaces, and businesses across the US. However, currently approved clinical testing options require reagents that are limited in supply and expensive quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) machines, severely hindering scalability [4] coupled with acute shortage of person-power. In response to limited clinical testing options, rapid antigen tests that are available to purchase over-the-counter and can be self-administered have become recently a popular testing approach; however, these tests are expensive, in short supply, and may not be as sensitive in detecting Omicron variant compared to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests [5]. Emerging evidence indicates that saliva testing with the option of self-administration of testing can accurately identify COVID-19 viral infection [6]. Moreover, this approach provides an option for the easy, safe and convenient collection of samples required for testing without traveling to a doctor's office, hospital, or testing site. Point of care testing (i.e. using saliva-based self-collection to administer screening for COVID-19 in one's own laboratory setting) utilizes testing equipment that is readily available to our workforce, leverages their existing training, and benefits from existing institutional health and safety infrastructure.
Self-administration of saliva testing also reduces exposure of health care workers to the virus and preserves limited personal protective equipment [7]. Additional diagnostic testing options will continue to increase staff access.
For these reasons, we propose to evaluate the implementation of a COVID-19 POC screening program that uses saliva-based self-testing and to pilot test approaches to improve program enrollment.
Objective: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the use, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementing a voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) screening program with Penn faculty, staff, and trainees that uses saliva-based self-collection followed by testing in their own PSOM laboratories. A secondary objective is to learn about self-reported test results, program usability, user burden, participant experience, program ease, program continuation and availability. Another secondary objective is to learn about individual's perspectives about the program.
Study Design: This is an implementation clinical trial that we anticipate lasting up to two months. In the first phase, we will pilot the approach with four PSOM laboratories. We plan to enroll up to 50 people across these labs during the pilot phase. Labs will be located on Penn campus. We will pilot test the best manner to distribute saliva collection test kits and assay tests to participants and elicit rapid feedback for one week. We will apply feedback in real time to improve the distribution method. In the second phase, we will roll out the clinical trial more broadly across all interested PSOM laboratories. We anticipate enrolling up to 500 participants across all PSOM laboratories. All participants will be Penn employees (faculty, staff, and trainees) who work in a PSOM laboratory.
All participants will be required to provide informed consent and watch a training video before self-collecting their first saliva sample. All participants will be told they can collect saliva samples as much or as little as they want - but no more than daily for up to four weeks. They will also be asked to complete online surveys weekly for up to four weeks. These surveys are expected to take about 15 minutes to complete. See below for table of survey measures and frequency. A subset of participants will also be asked to participate in a one-time qualitative interview after the point of care testing program is over. This interview is expected to take about 30 minutes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PSOM staff, trainees, or faculty who participate in the point of care testing | – | Diagnostic Test: Self-administered saliva-based viral testingThe cohort will be offered access to a self-administered saliva-based viral test is a small funnel and a tube in which participants will put their saliva into. When they are ready to self-collect their saliva sample, they will be instructed to not eat or drink for 30 minutes prior to collecting their saliva and to collect saliva in an isolated room. We will evaluate the implementation of this viral test. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- PSOM staff, faculty, or trainees who work in person on campus in a PSOM laboratory
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Self-administered saliva-based viral testingParticipants will be instructed on how to inactivate the virus and bring their sample to their laboratory's central PCR machine, where they will take an assay test. They will be instructed to collect saliva into a 1.5 milliliter (mL) collection tube containing inactivation buffer (TCEP and EDTA) using a small funnel and inactivate at 95°C for 10 minutes. Participants will then transfer 6ul of saliva into 2 PCR tubes containing amplification master mix and primers, put tubes in a heat block or PCR machine at 65°C for 45 minutes and assess fluorescence using a simple battery-powered fluorescence viewer. Once they assess their sample, they will be instructed to dispose of the saliva sample safely and in accordance with best laboratory practices. No saliva samples will be collected by the research team at any time as part of this study. | Diagnostic test | PSOM staff, trainees, or faculty who participate in the point of care testing |
Primary outcome
Use of a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
Time frame: fourteen weeks
How often they use the POC screening program
Acceptability of Implementing a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
Time frame: fourteen weeks
Self-reported acceptability of implementing POC screening program using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (i.e., "Point of care testing is acceptable to me"). Scale values: 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).
Appropriateness of Implementing a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
Time frame: fourteen weeks
Self-reported appropriateness of implementing POC screening program using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (i.e., "Point of care testing seems appropriate."). Scale values: 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).
Feasibility of Implementing a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program
Time frame: fourteen weeks
Self-reported feasibility of implementing POC screening program using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (i.e., "Point of care testing seems feasible."). Scale values: 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree).
8 secondary outcomes
Self Report of Test Results
Time frame: four weeks
Program Usability
Time frame: four weeks
User Burden
Time frame: four weeks
Participant Experience
Time frame: four weeks
Program Ease
Time frame: four weeks
Program Continuation
Time frame: four weeks
Program Availability
Time frame: four weeks
Participant Perspective of Program Implementation and Change in Behavior or Decision-making Process
Time frame: one time interview after four weeks of intervention
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jul 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No plan to share individual participant data (IPD) to other researchers
Related trials for COVID-19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
SARS-CoV-2 and Herpesvirus Inhibition for Ending Long COVID Dysfunction
Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Long COVID
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Study to Learn About COVID-19 Antivirals in People With SARS-CoV-2 Infection From 2023-2026
COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Infection
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparative Immunogenicity of Respiratory Virus Vaccines (CIRV2) Study
COVID -19, COVID - 19
Enrolling by invitation
Fareon Open Label Device Clinical Trial
Cognitive Dysfunction, Acquired Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rinad Beidas, PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of COVID-19, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Use of a Voluntary COVID-19 Point of Care (POC) Screening Program (time frame: fourteen weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2024.