AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Cord InjuriesDOORSCINCT05218447

Dosing of Overground Robotic Gait Training With Functional Outcomes and Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury

A study testing Robotic Gait Training in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Baylor Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects of robotic gait training (RGT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continued through early outpatient rehabilitation Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Cord Injuries
What is being tested?
Robotic Gait Training
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 May 2022to 14 Sep 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All types of motor incomplete SCI (traumatic and non-traumatic)
  • Acute/Subacute phase of recovery
  • Medically stable as deemed by physician
  • Undergoing medical care and rehabilitation at Baylor Scott \& White Institute for Rehabilitation
  • Both genders and all races and ethnicities
  • Meet the Ekso robotic exoskeleton frame limitations
  • Continence of or a program for bladder and bowel management

Who cannot join

  • Concurrent moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)
  • Degenerative diagnoses
  • Pre-morbid developmental disability, significant psychological diagnosis, or other cognitive impairment
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

Other trials in United States

About this study

The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects of robotic gait training (RGT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continued through early outpatient rehabilitation

Read the detailed description

Emerging evidence indicates that robotic exoskeleton use results in positive outcomes for those with chronic SCI, yet limited evidence exists for the acute setting. The potential benefit of RGT initiated during inpatient rehabilitation when recovery is greatest is unknown yet appears promising due to established principles of neuroplasticity and the fact that RGT incorporates the critical components of gait training. As a result of the lack of evidence, no clinical practice guidelines exist that delineate which gait retraining approach or dose during early phases of recovery results in the best outcomes for people with motor incomplete SCI. The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects on 5 occasions over 9 months: (1) inpatient rehabilitation admission and (2) discharge, (3) after completing 24 RGT sessions, (4) 1-month post RGT, and (5) 9-months post SCI). To test the overarching goal, investigators propose three specific aims:

Aim 1: Using a randomized controlled trial, prospectively examine whether the dosing frequency [24 sessions delivered as high, moderate, or low frequency, defined by number days/week (4, 3, or 2 days/week over 6, 8, 12 weeks)] of RGT therapy provided during the acute/subacute recovery phase after motor incomplete SCI impacts outcomes compared to usual care only.

Aim 2: Investigate the difference over 9 months of the neuroplastic effect of RGT dosing as measured by single pulse TMS.

Aim 3: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of delivering different dosing frequencies of RGT from inpatient to outpatient rehabilitation settings.

Being tested
Robotic Gait Training, Usual Care (UC) Gait Training
Keywords
Exoskeleton, Wearable assistive technology, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Robotic gait training
Medical subject headings
Spinal Cord Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Robotic Gait TrainingDevice

    Also called Ekso GT™ robotic exoskeleton

    Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting.

    Subjects will wear an exoskeleton device and receive robotic gait training (RGT) with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will complete 24 robotic gait training sessions over different durations during outpatient rehabilitation. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.

  • Usual Care (UC) Gait TrainingOther

    Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting.

    Subjects will complete gait training with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.

Study groups in NCT05218447
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Low FrequencyExperimentalSubjects will receive 2 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 12 weeks
Receives: Device: Robotic Gait Training
Moderate FrequencyExperimentalSubjects will receive 3 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 8 weeks
Receives: Device: Robotic Gait Training
High FrequencyExperimentalSubjects will receive 4 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 6 weeks
Receives: Device: Robotic Gait Training
Control GroupActive comparatorSubjects will receive usual care gait training without robotic gait training
Receives: Other: Usual Care (UC) Gait Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury - II (WISCI-II) from baseline

    The WISCI-II defines the physical limitation for gait secondary to impairment at the person level and indicates the ability of a person to walk after SCI. The WISC-II rank orders the ability a person to walk on a scale of 0-20 with 0 representing no ability to stand or participate in assisted walking and 20 representing an ability to walk 10 meters with no devices, no braces, and no physical assistance.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)

    The 10MWT assesses gait speed (m/s) over a short duration.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  2. Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)

    The SCIM assesses the ability of a person with spinal cord injury (SCI) to preform specified tasks independently, with assistance, or with assistive devices.

    SCIM is composed of 19 items with total SCIM scores ranging from 0 (required assistance) to 100 (independence). A higher score means greater independence.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  3. Change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Pain is a significant problem in many individuals with SCI. A 0-10 Point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) is recommended as the outcome measure for pain intensity after SCI during acute and subacute phases. Pain severity can be categorized into 3 distinct groups as relates to pain interference: 1-3 (mild), 4-7 (moderate), 8-10 (severe). A higher score means greater pain severity.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  4. Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is used to measure fatigue in neurologic disorders and measures the effects of fatigue on function. It is measure on the following scale:

    1. - Strongly Disagree
    2. - Disagree
    3. - Slightly Disagree
    4. - Neutral
    5. - Slightly Agree
    6. - Agree
    7. - Strongly Agree A higher score means greater fatigue.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  5. Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)

    The PSFS is a self-report measure to assess a patient's perception of spasticity frequency and severity following a SCI. With excellent internal consistency (ICC = 0.90), the current version was modified from the original to include both frequency and severity. A higher score means greater magnitude in spasms.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  6. Change in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 is a self-report measure to assess the presence of depressive symptoms. Each items is scored on the following scale:

    0 - not at all

    1. - several days
    2. - more than half the days
    3. - nearly daily

    Total scores are calculated by adding all the score and provides a possible depression severity score:

    none (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), and severe (20-27). A higher score means greater severity in depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  7. Change in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LISAT)

    The LISAT is a nine-item quality of life questionnaire suitable for SCI populations containing a single item assessing overall life satisfaction, along with eight additional domain-specific items. Items are answered on a 6-point likert scale that ranges from 1 (very dissatisfied), to 6 (very satisfied). The total Life Satisfaction score is computed as the mean of the item scores and the results are divided into dissatisfied (1-4) and satisfied (5-6). A higher score score means greater life satisfaction.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  8. Change in Physical Activity by GT9x Actigraph accelerometer

    Active energy expenditure will be measured in counts per day using a GT9x Actigraph accelerometer. Patient will be instructed to wear the watch on an unaffected wrist for one week. Higher counts represent greater physical activity.

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

  9. Change in Neurophysiologic biomarkers by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

    Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes will be measured and indexed from lower extremity muscle by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

    Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2022
  2. Study start20 May 2022
  3. Primary completion3 Sep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion14 Sep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Subjects will be randomly assigned into one of 4 gait training groups: usual care (UC) gait training only; high frequency RGT - 4 sessions/week for 6 weeks; moderate frequency RGT - 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks; or low frequency RGT - 2 sessions/week for 12 weeks
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05218447
Sponsor's protocol ID
BSWRI IRB 021-205
Other IDs
SC200117
Acronym
DOORSCI
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
20 Dec 2021
Last updated
13 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Swank C, Trammell M, Bennett M, Ochoa C, Callender L, Sikka S, Driver S. The utilization of an overground robotic exoskeleton for gait training during inpatient rehabilitation-single-center retrospective findings. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Sep;43(3):206-213. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000409.

    PubMed 32282573
  • Swank C, Sikka S, Driver S, Bennett M, Callender L. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 May;15(4):409-417. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1587014. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

    PubMed 30887864
  • DiPasquale J, Trammell M, Clark K, Fowler H, Callender L, Bennett M, Swank C. Intensity of usual care physical therapy during inpatient rehabilitation for people with neurologic diagnoses. PM R. 2022 Jan;14(1):46-57. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12577. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

    PubMed 33599119
  • Swank C, Galvan C, DiPasquale J, Callender L, Sikka S, & Driver D. Lessons Learned with Robotic Exoskeleton Use During Rehabilitation - therapeutic and medical severity considerations. Technology & Disability. 2020; 32(2): 103-110.

  • Suhalka A, da Silva Areas FZ, Meza F, Ochoa C, Driver S, Sikka S, Hamilton R, Goh HT, Callender L, Bennett M, Shih HT, Swank C. Dosing overground robotic gait training after spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial protocol. Trials. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08503-0.

    PubMed 39425122

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Robotic Gait Training in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Baylor Research Institute at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury - II (WISCI-II) from baseline (time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05218447, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in