Spinal Cord InjuriesDOORSCINCT05218447
Dosing of Overground Robotic Gait Training With Functional Outcomes and Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Robotic Gait Training in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Baylor Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects of robotic gait training (RGT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continued through early outpatient rehabilitation Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Robotic Gait Training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 98 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 May 2022to 14 Sep 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All types of motor incomplete SCI (traumatic and non-traumatic)
- Acute/Subacute phase of recovery
- Medically stable as deemed by physician
- Undergoing medical care and rehabilitation at Baylor Scott \& White Institute for Rehabilitation
- Both genders and all races and ethnicities
- Meet the Ekso robotic exoskeleton frame limitations
- Continence of or a program for bladder and bowel management
Who cannot join
- Concurrent moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Degenerative diagnoses
- Pre-morbid developmental disability, significant psychological diagnosis, or other cognitive impairment
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation
Dallas, Texas, 75246
About this study
The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects of robotic gait training (RGT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continued through early outpatient rehabilitation
Read the detailed description
Emerging evidence indicates that robotic exoskeleton use results in positive outcomes for those with chronic SCI, yet limited evidence exists for the acute setting. The potential benefit of RGT initiated during inpatient rehabilitation when recovery is greatest is unknown yet appears promising due to established principles of neuroplasticity and the fact that RGT incorporates the critical components of gait training. As a result of the lack of evidence, no clinical practice guidelines exist that delineate which gait retraining approach or dose during early phases of recovery results in the best outcomes for people with motor incomplete SCI. The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects on 5 occasions over 9 months: (1) inpatient rehabilitation admission and (2) discharge, (3) after completing 24 RGT sessions, (4) 1-month post RGT, and (5) 9-months post SCI). To test the overarching goal, investigators propose three specific aims:
Aim 1: Using a randomized controlled trial, prospectively examine whether the dosing frequency [24 sessions delivered as high, moderate, or low frequency, defined by number days/week (4, 3, or 2 days/week over 6, 8, 12 weeks)] of RGT therapy provided during the acute/subacute recovery phase after motor incomplete SCI impacts outcomes compared to usual care only.
Aim 2: Investigate the difference over 9 months of the neuroplastic effect of RGT dosing as measured by single pulse TMS.
Aim 3: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of delivering different dosing frequencies of RGT from inpatient to outpatient rehabilitation settings.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Robotic Gait Training, Usual Care (UC) Gait Training
- Keywords
- Exoskeleton, Wearable assistive technology, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Robotic gait training
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Robotic Gait TrainingDevice
Also called Ekso GT™ robotic exoskeleton
Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting.
Subjects will wear an exoskeleton device and receive robotic gait training (RGT) with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will complete 24 robotic gait training sessions over different durations during outpatient rehabilitation. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.
Usual Care (UC) Gait TrainingOther
Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting.
Subjects will complete gait training with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Low Frequency | Experimental | Subjects will receive 2 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 12 weeks Receives: Device: Robotic Gait Training |
| Moderate Frequency | Experimental | Subjects will receive 3 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 8 weeks Receives: Device: Robotic Gait Training |
| High Frequency | Experimental | Subjects will receive 4 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 6 weeks Receives: Device: Robotic Gait Training |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Subjects will receive usual care gait training without robotic gait training Receives: Other: Usual Care (UC) Gait Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury - II (WISCI-II) from baseline
The WISCI-II defines the physical limitation for gait secondary to impairment at the person level and indicates the ability of a person to walk after SCI. The WISC-II rank orders the ability a person to walk on a scale of 0-20 with 0 representing no ability to stand or participate in assisted walking and 20 representing an ability to walk 10 meters with no devices, no braces, and no physical assistance.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
The 10MWT assesses gait speed (m/s) over a short duration.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
The SCIM assesses the ability of a person with spinal cord injury (SCI) to preform specified tasks independently, with assistance, or with assistive devices.
SCIM is composed of 19 items with total SCIM scores ranging from 0 (required assistance) to 100 (independence). A higher score means greater independence.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Pain is a significant problem in many individuals with SCI. A 0-10 Point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) is recommended as the outcome measure for pain intensity after SCI during acute and subacute phases. Pain severity can be categorized into 3 distinct groups as relates to pain interference: 1-3 (mild), 4-7 (moderate), 8-10 (severe). A higher score means greater pain severity.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is used to measure fatigue in neurologic disorders and measures the effects of fatigue on function. It is measure on the following scale:
- - Strongly Disagree
- - Disagree
- - Slightly Disagree
- - Neutral
- - Slightly Agree
- - Agree
- - Strongly Agree A higher score means greater fatigue.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)
The PSFS is a self-report measure to assess a patient's perception of spasticity frequency and severity following a SCI. With excellent internal consistency (ICC = 0.90), the current version was modified from the original to include both frequency and severity. A higher score means greater magnitude in spasms.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 is a self-report measure to assess the presence of depressive symptoms. Each items is scored on the following scale:
0 - not at all
- - several days
- - more than half the days
- - nearly daily
Total scores are calculated by adding all the score and provides a possible depression severity score:
none (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), and severe (20-27). A higher score means greater severity in depressive symptoms.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LISAT)
The LISAT is a nine-item quality of life questionnaire suitable for SCI populations containing a single item assessing overall life satisfaction, along with eight additional domain-specific items. Items are answered on a 6-point likert scale that ranges from 1 (very dissatisfied), to 6 (very satisfied). The total Life Satisfaction score is computed as the mean of the item scores and the results are divided into dissatisfied (1-4) and satisfied (5-6). A higher score score means greater life satisfaction.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Physical Activity by GT9x Actigraph accelerometer
Active energy expenditure will be measured in counts per day using a GT9x Actigraph accelerometer. Patient will be instructed to wear the watch on an unaffected wrist for one week. Higher counts represent greater physical activity.
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Neurophysiologic biomarkers by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes will be measured and indexed from lower extremity muscle by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Measured: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Feb 2022
- Study start20 May 2022
- Primary completion3 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Sep 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Subjects will be randomly assigned into one of 4 gait training groups: usual care (UC) gait training only; high frequency RGT - 4 sessions/week for 6 weeks; moderate frequency RGT - 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks; or low frequency RGT - 2 sessions/week for 12 weeks
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, Texas Woman's University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Seema Sikka, MD, Principal investigator, Baylor Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05218447
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BSWRI IRB 021-205
- Other IDs
- SC200117
- Acronym
- DOORSCI
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Swank C, Trammell M, Bennett M, Ochoa C, Callender L, Sikka S, Driver S. The utilization of an overground robotic exoskeleton for gait training during inpatient rehabilitation-single-center retrospective findings. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Sep;43(3):206-213. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000409.
PubMed 32282573Swank C, Sikka S, Driver S, Bennett M, Callender L. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 May;15(4):409-417. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1587014. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
PubMed 30887864DiPasquale J, Trammell M, Clark K, Fowler H, Callender L, Bennett M, Swank C. Intensity of usual care physical therapy during inpatient rehabilitation for people with neurologic diagnoses. PM R. 2022 Jan;14(1):46-57. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12577. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
PubMed 33599119Swank C, Galvan C, DiPasquale J, Callender L, Sikka S, & Driver D. Lessons Learned with Robotic Exoskeleton Use During Rehabilitation - therapeutic and medical severity considerations. Technology & Disability. 2020; 32(2): 103-110.
Suhalka A, da Silva Areas FZ, Meza F, Ochoa C, Driver S, Sikka S, Hamilton R, Goh HT, Callender L, Bennett M, Shih HT, Swank C. Dosing overground robotic gait training after spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial protocol. Trials. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08503-0.
PubMed 39425122
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dosing of Overground Robotic Gait Training With Functional Outcomes and Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05218447
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DOORSCI / BSWRI IRB 021-205
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- Exoskeleton, Wearable assistive technology, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Robotic gait training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 98 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, Texas Woman's University
- Study start
- 20 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects of robotic gait training (RGT) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) initiated during inpatient rehabilitation and continued through early outpatient rehabilitation
Detailed description
Emerging evidence indicates that robotic exoskeleton use results in positive outcomes for those with chronic SCI, yet limited evidence exists for the acute setting. The potential benefit of RGT initiated during inpatient rehabilitation when recovery is greatest is unknown yet appears promising due to established principles of neuroplasticity and the fact that RGT incorporates the critical components of gait training. As a result of the lack of evidence, no clinical practice guidelines exist that delineate which gait retraining approach or dose during early phases of recovery results in the best outcomes for people with motor incomplete SCI. The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects on 5 occasions over 9 months: (1) inpatient rehabilitation admission and (2) discharge, (3) after completing 24 RGT sessions, (4) 1-month post RGT, and (5) 9-months post SCI). To test the overarching goal, investigators propose three specific aims:
Aim 1: Using a randomized controlled trial, prospectively examine whether the dosing frequency [24 sessions delivered as high, moderate, or low frequency, defined by number days/week (4, 3, or 2 days/week over 6, 8, 12 weeks)] of RGT therapy provided during the acute/subacute recovery phase after motor incomplete SCI impacts outcomes compared to usual care only.
Aim 2: Investigate the difference over 9 months of the neuroplastic effect of RGT dosing as measured by single pulse TMS.
Aim 3: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of delivering different dosing frequencies of RGT from inpatient to outpatient rehabilitation settings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- Subjects will be randomly assigned into one of 4 gait training groups: usual care (UC) gait training only; high frequency RGT - 4 sessions/week for 6 weeks; moderate frequency RGT - 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks; or low frequency RGT - 2 sessions/week for 12 weeks
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Low Frequency | Experimental | Device: Robotic Gait TrainingSubjects will receive 2 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 12 weeks |
| Moderate Frequency | Experimental | Device: Robotic Gait TrainingSubjects will receive 3 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 8 weeks |
| High Frequency | Experimental | Device: Robotic Gait TrainingSubjects will receive 4 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 6 weeks |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Usual Care (UC) Gait TrainingSubjects will receive usual care gait training without robotic gait training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- All types of motor incomplete SCI (traumatic and non-traumatic)
- Acute/Subacute phase of recovery
- Medically stable as deemed by physician
- Undergoing medical care and rehabilitation at Baylor Scott \& White Institute for Rehabilitation
- Both genders and all races and ethnicities
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Concurrent moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Degenerative diagnoses
- Pre-morbid developmental disability, significant psychological diagnosis, or other cognitive impairment
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Robotic Gait TrainingAlso: Ekso GT™ robotic exoskeletonSubjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will wear an exoskeleton device and receive robotic gait training (RGT) with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will complete 24 robotic gait training sessions over different durations during outpatient rehabilitation. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity. | Device | High Frequency, Low Frequency, Moderate Frequency |
| Usual Care (UC) Gait TrainingSubjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will complete gait training with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury - II (WISCI-II) from baseline
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
The WISCI-II defines the physical limitation for gait secondary to impairment at the person level and indicates the ability of a person to walk after SCI. The WISC-II rank orders the ability a person to walk on a scale of 0-20 with 0 representing no ability to stand or participate in assisted walking and 20 representing an ability to walk 10 meters with no devices, no braces, and no physical assistance.
9 secondary outcomes
Change in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LISAT)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Physical Activity by GT9x Actigraph accelerometer
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Change in Neurophysiologic biomarkers by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 32282573Swank C, Trammell M, Bennett M, Ochoa C, Callender L, Sikka S, Driver S. The utilization of an overground robotic exoskeleton for gait training during inpatient rehabilitation-single-center retrospective findings. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Sep;43(3):206-213. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000409.
- Background: PubMed 30887864Swank C, Sikka S, Driver S, Bennett M, Callender L. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 May;15(4):409-417. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1587014. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
- Background: PubMed 33599119DiPasquale J, Trammell M, Clark K, Fowler H, Callender L, Bennett M, Swank C. Intensity of usual care physical therapy during inpatient rehabilitation for people with neurologic diagnoses. PM R. 2022 Jan;14(1):46-57. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12577. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
- BackgroundSwank C, Galvan C, DiPasquale J, Callender L, Sikka S, & Driver D. Lessons Learned with Robotic Exoskeleton Use During Rehabilitation - therapeutic and medical severity considerations. Technology & Disability. 2020; 32(2): 103-110.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39425122Suhalka A, da Silva Areas FZ, Meza F, Ochoa C, Driver S, Sikka S, Hamilton R, Goh HT, Callender L, Bennett M, Shih HT, Swank C. Dosing overground robotic gait training after spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial protocol. Trials. 2024 Oct 18;25(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08503-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Seema Sikka, MD principal investigator
Baylor Research Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Robotic Gait Training in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Baylor Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury - II (WISCI-II) from baseline (time frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05218447, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.