AzTrials
AzTrials

TuberculosisNCT05220163

Evaluating the Impact of Computer-assisted X-ray Diagnosis and Other Triage Tools to Optimise Xpert Orientated Community-based Active Case Finding for TB and COVID-19

A study testing CAD and Xpert in people with Tuberculosis and COVID-19, run by University of Cape Town at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Tuberculosis (TB) is now the commonest cause of death in many African countries. Globally, ~35% (almost 1 in 3) of TB cases are 'missed' (remain undiagnosed or undetected). In sub-Saharan Africa, 40-50% of the TB case burden remains undiagnosed within the community. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tuberculosis, COVID-19, HIV Infections
What is being tested?
CAD and Xpert
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26,200 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
23 Feb 2022to 30 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants willing to complete community-based symptom screening, finger-prick and venepuncture blood sampling, urine testing, and/or undergo TB and/or COVID-19 diagnostic testing.
  • Provision of informed consent.
  • Participant 18 years or above.
  • HIV-positive or negative participants will be included.

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide informed consent (e.g., mentally impaired).
  • Participants who have completed TB treatment in the last two months, or who have self-presented to their local TB clinic and are currently being worked up for suspected TB.
  • Participants already diagnosed with active TB on treatment.
  • Participants unable to commit to at least a two-month follow-up.
  • Female participants who are pregnant or who refuse a urine pregnancy test.
  • Participants in the community who cannot access healthcare due to severe ill health or lack of access to the local clinic.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

3 sites in 3 countries

South Africa1 site
  • University of Cape Town

    Cape Town, Western Cape

Other trials in South Africa

Zambia1 site
  • Helen Ayles

    Lusaka

Other trials in Zambia

Zimbabwe1 site
  • Junior Mutsvangwa

    Harare

Other trials in Zimbabwe

About this study

Tuberculosis (TB) is now the commonest cause of death in many African countries. Globally, ~35% (almost 1 in 3) of TB cases are 'missed' (remain undiagnosed or undetected). In sub-Saharan Africa, 40-50% of the TB case burden remains undiagnosed within the community. These 'missed' TB cases (at primary care level) serve as a reservoir, which severely undermines TB control. With rapid advances in the development of TB screening tests, the investigators aim to determine the pragmatic utility of computer-assisted x-ray diagnosis (CAD). Recent data suggest that CAD performs on par with experienced radiologists to identify potential TB cases, hereby reducing the frequency at which Xpert tests are requested and helps to focus limited resources on the relevant cases. In addition, the investigators aim to test nascent screening technologies for TB diagnosis such as evaluating urine-based TB screening biosignatures. The COVID-19 pandemic has ravaged African peri-urban communities where TB is also common. With the pressing need to improve screening and diagnosis of COVID-19, the investigators plan to explore the potential for urine- and blood-based COVID-19 screening assays. Symptoms of COVID-19 and TB overlap, and limited affordability, as well as the stigma associated with both diseases, severely limits testing. Data are now urgently needed about the feasibility of co-screening and testing for TB and COVID-19. The utility of such an approach, if any, has not been studied in African communities.

Read the detailed description

Tuberculosis (TB) is now the commonest cause of death in many African countries. Several factors drive this; however, transmission is the mechanism by which these risk factors translate into active TB. Globally, ~35% (almost 1 in 3) of TB cases are 'missed' (remain undiagnosed or undetected). In sub-Saharan Africa, 40-50% of the TB case burden remains undiagnosed within the community and ~30% of such cases are microscopically smear-positive. These 'missed' TB cases (at primary care level) serve as a reservoir, which severely undermines TB control. Thus, primary care and community-based case finding should be a critical component for TB control.

Detecting cases in the community, however, has been restricted by the lack of sensitive and user-friendly Point-of-Care (POC) diagnostic tools. To address this unmet need, in 2013 the investigators planned a programme of activities (sequential interlinked studies) with the overarching aim of optimising a model for Xpert-related community-based active case finding (ACF) for TB (XACT). By 2017, through the EDCTP-funded XACT-I study, the investigators solved the impasse of rapid POC diagnosis by showing that molecular Xpert-based community-based screening was effective in identifying missing TB cases in the peri-urban 'slums' of Cape Town and Harare using a mini-truck with a generator. However, such an approach was neither broadly affordable nor scalable. The investigators therefore derived a scalable model using portable battery-operated Xpert Edge installed within a low-cost (< US$) 15 000 Nissan panel van manned by two health care workers (thus making the ACF model affordable and scalable). This completed study, XACT-II, screened over 5 000 participants in the community. The model worked well and was more effective than smear microscopy. Based on these successes, and to translate the XACT concept into policy, the Wellcome Trust and UK MRC has funded the XACT-III study. Currently commenced, XACT-III was initiated as a multi-country demonstration project in four sub-Saharan African countries.

More recently, there have been rapid advances in the development of triage testing for TB, which refers to screening tests that are generally applied in a community-based setting (either at individual community or primary care clinic level). These tests have very high sensitivity (>95%) but modest specificity (>70%) as defined by TB-specific target product profiles. A forerunner TB-orientated triage test is computer-assisted x-ray diagnosis (CAD). This entails using artificial intelligence-enabled software to read a digital x-ray and produce a probability of TB within seconds. Recent data suggest that CAD performs on par with experienced radiologists to identify potential TB cases, hereby reducing the frequency at which Xpert tests are requested and helps to focus limited resources on the relevant cases. Although these data appear promising, the feasibility of this strategy in a pragmatic field setting has not been extensively tested. There are several other unanswered questions. Is the strategy of CAD combined with Xpert cost-effective and can it reduce Xpert usage without missing an unacceptable number of TB cases? The investigators will therefore determine the utility of CAD as a triage tool to further optimise the XACT model.

The COVID-19 pandemic, due to SARS-CoV-2, has ravaged African peri-urban communities where TB is also common. Symptoms of COVID-19 and TB overlap, and limited affordability, as well as the stigma associated with both diseases, severely limits testing. Data are now urgently needed about the feasibility of co-screening and testing for TB and COVID-19. The utility of such an approach, if any, has not been studied in African communities. As Xpert POC TB testing and x-rays for CAD will be performed in the proposed study, it affords a unique and easy opportunity to seamlessly screen for both diseases when appropriate.

Other nascent screening technologies are rapidly emerging for TB and COVID-19, including urine- and blood-based triage tests. XACT-19 provides a unique opportunity to collect the relevant samples and test new technologies in a pragmatic community-based setting.

In summary, the XACT-19 study results will have substantial implications for public health policy and practice and will likely define a new standard for community-based ACF for TB, and potentially COVID-19 in tandem.

Being tested
CAD, Xpert
Keywords
Tuberculosis, Active case finding, Computer assisted diagnosis, Screening, COVID-19
Medical subject headings
Tuberculosis, COVID-19, HIV Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CADDiagnostic test

    Also called CAD4TB and/or other AI/CAD software

    It is an artificial intelligence (AI) system for detection of TB on CXR images. The system input is a frontal CXR, and the outputs are 1) a heatmap indicating suspicious regions on the image; and 2) a score (0-100) which implies the likelihood that the x-ray image shows TB.

  • XpertDiagnostic test

    Also called GeneXpert System

    A novel diagnostic for active case finding (GeneXpert MTB/RIF) for TB on sputum collected and performed at POC in a mobile van.

Study groups in NCT05220163
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CAD + POC XpertExperimentalCAD followed by Xpert in CAD-positive participants (performed at POC) employing a low-cost panel van that is staffed by three health care workers. CAD-negative participants will be followed up, while CAD-positive participants will be offered POC Xpert. Xpert-positive participants will be referred for TB treatment initiation, while Xpert-negative (but CAD-positive) participants will undergo a clinical review. Thus, the active case finding (ACF) interventional package is one of CAD + POC Xpert (only in CAD positive participants).
Receives: Diagnostic Test: CAD; Diagnostic Test: Xpert
POC Xpert onlyActive comparatorParticipants who are Xpert-positive will be referred for TB treatment initiation while Xpert-negative participants will be followed up. Thus, the active case finding (ACF) standard of care package is POC Xpert.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Xpert

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to detection of microbiologically proven TB

    The microbiological reference standard for TB will be culture and/or Xpert positivity. Thus, the overall time to detection (using a proportional hazards model) and the proportion of TB cases detected at a specific time-point (e.g., 14-, 30- and 60-days) with and without culture (Xpert alone) will be reported.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Feasibility of CAD + POC Xpert performed by minimally trained healthcare workers

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  2. Number of infectious TB cases detected (defined by cough aerosol sampling system [CASS] and/or smear and/or cavitatory disease positive)

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  3. Time-specific proportion of participants initiated on TB treatment up to 60 days post-sample donation in each arm (7-, 14-, 30- and 60-days)

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  4. Time to TB treatment initiation (both the median time to treatment in each group and time to event [treatment] analyses will be conducted)

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  5. Yield of culture positive TB in household contacts of index participants

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  6. NPV and false negative rate (TB cases missed per 1 000 persons screened) of CAD and other screening tests for TB

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  7. Reduction in number of sputum induction procedures and/or Xpert tests performed

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  8. Global and country-specific cost-effectiveness analysis for each strategy

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  9. Transmission and disease burden impact using modelling based on exposure scores, imaging, and CASS

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  10. Rates or prevalence of microbiological versus probable (clinical TB)

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  11. Proportion of culture-positive TB cases completing three- and six-months of TB treatment in each study arm

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  12. Middleware/dashboard design requirements and deployment models for each strategy

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  13. Feasibility and yield of POC Xpert (Xpress cartridge) for COVID-19 detection

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  14. Feasibility and performance of CAD4COVID for PCR-positive COVID-19 detection

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

  15. Feasibility of a novel mass screening strategy for COVID-19 that uses pooling of specimen from a group of COVID-19 suspects

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 48 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2022
  2. Study start23 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26,200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05220163
Sponsor's protocol ID
XACT-19
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
1 Feb 2022
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CAD and Xpert in people with Tuberculosis and COVID-19, run by University of Cape Town at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to detection of microbiologically proven TB (time frame: Through study completion, up to 48 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in