AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerNCT05220189

PENK Methylation Test for Detecting Bladder Cancer

An observational study of Bladder Cancer and Hematuria; Benign, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for bladder cancer among patients with hematuria by comparing it to the results of cystoscopy examinations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer, Hematuria; Benign
What is being tested?
EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test
How many people
1,549 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
3 Feb 2022to 31 Jan 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with hematuria

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals who agree to voluntarily sign an informed consent prior to the initiation of screening
  • Adults aged ≥40
  • Subjects who have had gross or microscopic hematuria within the 3 months
  • Subjects who had no history of bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Subjects who will undergo cystoscopy, NMP22 test, and urine cytology within 1 month after consent

Who cannot join

  • Individuals who do not agree to voluntarily sign an informed consent prior to the initiation of screening
  • Subjects aged <40 years
  • Subjects with a history of bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Female who are currently menstruating or who have had their last menstrual period within the last 3 days
  • Subjects who have undergone invasive procedures in the urinary tract system within the last 3 months
  • Subjects with suspected upper urothelial cancer lesions on ultrasound or CT scan
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Subjects who have previously received pelvic radiation therapy
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed with other cancers and have received or are currently receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 6 months
  • Subjects who require treatment for an active urinary tract infection or vaginitis
  • Subjects undergoing prostate cancer treatment or requiring a prostate biopsy
  • Subject has any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator should preclude participation in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Cheol Kwak, MD PhD contact

82-2-2072-0817

mdrafael@snu.ac.kr

In Gab Jeong, MD PhD contact

82-2-3010-5892

igjeong@amc.seoul.kr

South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

    In Gab Jeong, MD PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Single-blind, Prospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer Test in the Urine DNA for Detecting Bladder Cancer Among Hematuria Patients

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for bladder cancer among patients with hematuria by comparing it to the results of cystoscopy examinations.

The second objective is to compare the clinical performance of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test with a NMP22 test and urine cytology test with respect to bladder cancer. By histopathological examination, lesions identified during cystoscopy will be confirmed as malignant or non-malignant by histological examination.

Read the detailed description

Patients with hematuria who are scheduled for cystoscopy will be asked to collect a urine sample for EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test and will undergo NMP22 and urine cytology tests. The participants will undergo a cystoscopy within 30 days of enrollment. For confirmation of the diagnosis and stage of the tumor, representative histopathology slides from TURBT (Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors) may be retrieved and examined by the central pathology laboratory.

Being tested
EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test
Keywords
Bladder cancer, Hematuria, Methylation biomarker, EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test, Real-time PCR (LTE-qMSP), Urine
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Hematuria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer testDiagnostic test

    A highly accurate and sensitive real-time PCR employing Linear Target Enrichment and Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR (LTE-qMSP) for measuring PENK methylation in urine DNA to detect bladder cancer in hematuria patients.

Study groups in NCT05220189
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hematuria patients aged ≥40Device: EarlyTect Bladder Cancer test, PENK methylation assay by LTE (Linear Target Enrichment)-qMSP (quantitative methylation-specific real time PCR)
Receives: Diagnostic Test: EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test

    Sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for detecting bladder cancer (Stages Ta high-grade and T1-T4) in patients with hematuria compared to the cystoscopy examination, both in terms of detecting bladder cancer. The reference method is the cystoscopic procedure, and lesions will be assessed histopathologically.

    EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test includes a measurement of PENK methylation and COL2A1 as a DNA control.

    PENK methylation in urine DNA will be assessed quantitatively by Linear Target Enrichment-coupled Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR (LTE-qMSP) using the Real-time PCR method. The results will be dichotomized by the CT (cycle threshold) cutoff value as either positive or negative. Sensitivity = 100*(positive PENK methylation test/positive cystoscopy), Specificity = 100*(negative PENK methylation test/negative cystoscopy).

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The performance of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test

    The performance of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test in detecting Bladder cancer in hematuria patients will be compared with those of the NMP22 and urine cytology tests.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2022
  2. Study start3 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,549 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05220189
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-1626
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
7 Jan 2022
Last updated
4 Oct 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. 2. Charpentier M, Gutierrez C, Guillaudeux T, Verhoest G, Pedeux R. Noninvasive urine-based tests to diagnose or detect recurrence of bladder cancer. Cancers. 2021;13:1650. 3. Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC. Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA 2011; 306: 737-745. 4. Kitamura H, Kakehi Y. Treatment and management of high-grade T1 bladder cancer: what should we do after second TUR? Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015;45(4):315-322. 5. Sievert KD, Amend B, Nagele U, Schilling D, Bedke J, Horstmann M et al. Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs? World J Urol. 2009;27(3):295-300. 6. Nepple KG, O'Donnell MA. The optimal management of T1 high-grade bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc. 2009,3(suppl4):S188-92. 7. Wakui M, Shiigai T: Urinary tract cancer screening through analysis of urinary red blood cell volume distribution. Int J Urol. 2000,7(7):248-253. 8. Yafi FA, Aprikian AG, Tanguay S, Kassouf W. Patients with microscopic and gross hematuria: practice and referral patterns among primary care physicians in a universal health care system. Con Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(2):97-101. 9. Beukers W, Kandimalla R, van Houwelingen D, Kovacic H, Chin JF, Lingsma HF et al. The use of molecular analyses in voided urine for the assessment of patients with hematuria. PLOS One. 2013;8(10):e77657. 10. Chung W, Bondaruk J, Jelinek J, Lotan Y, Liang S, Czerniak B et al: Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011,20(7):1483-91. 11. Oeyen E, Hoekx L, Wachter SD, Baldewijins M, Ameye F, Mertens I. Bladder cancer diagnosis and follow-up: The current status and possible role of extracellular vesicels. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(4),821 12. Sullivan PS, Chan JB, Levin MR, Rao J. Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2(4):412-40. 13. Soria, F, Droller MJ, Lotan Y, Gontero P, D'Andrea D, Gust KM et al. An up-to-date catalog of available urinary biomarkers for the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2018;36:1981-95. 14. Hajdijak T. UroVysion FISH test for detecting urothelial cancers: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and comparison with urinary cytology testing. Urol Oncol 2008;26(6):646-51. 15. Mbeutcha A, Lucca I, Mathieu R, Lotan Y, Shariat SF. Current status of urinary biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Urol Clin N AM 2016;43:47-62 16. Chung W, Bondaruk J, Jelinek J, Lotan Y, Liang S, Czerniak B, Lssa JPJ. Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidermiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(7):1483-91

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bladder Cancer and Hematuria; Benign, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Cheol Kwak, MD PhD (82-2-2072-0817, mdrafael@snu.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05220189, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in