Spinal Cord InjuriesSCI-FITNCT05221723
Functional Interval Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury and Their Care Partners
A study testing High Intensity Interval Exercise Training Group in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Arkansas Colleges of Health Education at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Functional Interval Training for People with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Care Partners (SCI-FIT) aims to address barriers to physical activity for people with spinal cord injury and their care partners. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- High Intensity Interval Exercise Training Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Feb 2022to 24 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Spinal Cord Injury: Must have a clinical diagnosis of spinal cord injury at level C5 (ASIA A-D) and/or must possess at least 4/5 elbow flexion muscular strength
- Care Partners: self-identified care partner of a person with spinal cord injury participating in the study
- Must be at least 18 years of age
- Must be able to communicate and read in English
- Must have physician or advanced practice provider clearance to exercise
- Must provide their own transportation to and from the research study
- Must be able to ambulate independently and/or propel a power or manual wheelchair independently
- Care Partners: self-identified care partner of a person with spinal cord injury participating in the study
Who cannot join
- Less than 4/5 elbow flexion muscular strength
- Unable to ambulate independently or propel a power or manual wheelchair independently
- Unable to provide transportation to and from the research study
- Unable to communicate in English
- Unable to present documented medical clearance to exercise from physician or advanced practice provider
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Arkansas Colleges of Health Education
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72916
About this study
Functional Interval Training for People with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Care Partners (SCI-FIT) aims to address barriers to physical activity for people with spinal cord injury and their care partners. This research study provides free, twice weekly group-based, adaptable exercise classes for people with spinal cord injury and their care partners.
Read the detailed description
Regular physical activity, and more specifically exercise, is beneficial for people with and without spinal cord injury (SCI). Unfortunately, people with spinal cord injury (pSCI) are less physically active than adults without SCI and are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Care partners, or those who provide frequent assistance to those living with SCI, also achieve low physical activity levels and share similar health risks as a result. Often there are limited opportunities for pSCI to engage in regular exercise. In addition, pSCI and their care partners often face significant barriers to exercise including 1) lack of exercise participation opportunities; 2) cost of quality exercise instruction; 3) inaccessible exercise equipment or environments; 4) lack of social support from family and peers. This study, Functional Interval Training for People with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Care Partners (SCI-FIT) will explicitly address the barriers to exercise pSCI and their care partners often face with the primary goals of improving the health, physical activity levels, and quality of life of pSCI and their care partners. In order to address these goals, SCI-FIT will provide no-cost, twice weekly, group-based, adaptable exercise programming for pSCI and their care partners. All participants will be required to have physician or advanced practice provider clearance to exercise and will be evaluated by a physical therapist at no-cost prior to beginning the intervention to assess eligibility for the study. All eligible participants will complete a demographics questionnaire and will undergo a battery of baseline outcome assessments prior to undergoing the exercise intervention. Participants will complete 6-months of twice weekly group exercise classes aimed and hypothesized to increase physical activity levels, muscular strength, social support for exercise, functional mobility, peak power output, aerobic capacity, and quality of life for people with spinal cord injury and their care partners. Participants will repeat baseline outcome assessments at study midpoint (3-months) and study completion (6-months).
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- High Intensity Interval Exercise Training Group
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, exercise, physical activity
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Intensity Interval Exercise Training GroupBehavioural
Participants will participate in a maximum of twice weekly exercise classes (90 minutes each class) for a total of 6 months. While participants will be encouraged to attend as many classes as able, there is no minimum requirement for class attendance. During the exercise classes, participants will participate in a 10-minute warm up, followed by 30-60 minutes of aerobic, resistance and/or balance training up to a maximum intensity of 8/10 on the rating of perceived exertion scale. Participants will finish each class with a 10-minute cool-down consisting of lower intensity exercise.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise Group | Experimental | In this single group design, all participants will be provided with 6 months of twice weekly supervised group exercise. Receives: Behavioral: High Intensity Interval Exercise Training Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Participant Attendance
The percentage of interventions sessions attended by participants.
Measured: 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Secondary outcomes (18)
Change in 6-Minute Arm Test (6-MAT) at 6 Months
Assessment of aerobic capacity in individuals with spinal cord injury
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Five Times Sit to Stand Test at 6 Months
Participants who are able to stand will complete this assessment of lower extremity strength over three trials.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Upper Extremity Muscular Strength at 6 months
Muscular strength of the upper extremities will be assessed via 3-trials of hand-held dynamometry of the shoulder flexor, shoulder extensor, elbow flexor and elbow extensor muscle groups as well as grip strength via a dynamometer.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in The Spinal cord Injury Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale at 6 months
Measures perceived self-efficacy for various types of physical activities for people with spinal cord injury. The scale has a minimum score of 10 and a maximum score of 40. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in planning and carrying out physical activities and/or exercise based on their own volition.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Self Efficacy for Exercise Scale at 6 months
Self report measure for exercise self efficacy completed by care partner participants. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 90. A higher score indicates higher self-efficacy for exercise.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Social Support and Exercise Survey at 6 months
Self report measure for social support for exercise from family and friends. The scale has a minimum score of 46 and maximum score of 230. Higher scores indicate greater social support of friends and family for physical activity and exercise behaviors.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Gait Speed at 6 months
Measure of walking speed at both self-selected and fast walking speed for ambulatory participants.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Rand 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 at 6 months
Self-reported measure of health related quality of life for participants who are care partners. The measure assesses eight health concepts through eight subscales (physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions). Scores in each category are averaged and range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Quality of Life for People with Spinal Cord Injury as assessed by the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Measure [Emotional Health and Social Participation] at 6 months
Self report measure of quality of life related to Emotional Health (positive affect and well-being, resilience, self-esteem, and stigma) and Social Participation (independence) for people with spinal cord injury.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Spinal Cord Injury - Functional Index at 6 months
Self report measure of perceived functional abilities of people with spinal cord injury including self-care, basic mobility, ambulation, manual wheelchair, power wheelchair, and ambulation.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in One Minute Peak Power Test at 6 months
Measure of peak power assessed via a 1-minute skiergometer tests
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity Levels at 6 Months
Physical activity levels will be measured via wrist worn Actigraph GT9X Link. The Actigraph is able to detect acceleration in multiple planes of motion. Through collecting acceleration data, different intensities of physical activity will be inferred (i.e light, moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity), with moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity being used as the primary outcome measure. At the four time points, participants will wear the Actigraph for 7 consecutive days. The Actigraph will not need to be removed for activities such as bathing and showering, however the device will be removed for activities such as swimming.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Participant Retention
The number and percentage of participants who remain in the study through the final measurement point at 6 months.
Measured: After 6 months of exercise intervention
Change in lower extremity functional strength at 6 months
Lower extremity strength will be measured via functional test (Five Times Sit to Stand). This test records the amount of time taken to rise and sit to and from a chair five consecutive times. Faster times indicate greater lower extremity strength.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test at 6 months
The 6 Minute Walk Test measures a participants ability to cover as much distance (measured in meters) as possible while walking for 6 minutes. Participants will walk along a pre-defined pathway for 6 minutes, resting as needed. The test is a measure of walking endurance with further distances indicating greater endurance.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Global Rating of Change at 6 Months
Participants will rate their perceived level of change on a 15-point Likert Scale ranging from -7 (a very great deal less/worse to +7 (a very great deal more/better) with 0 representing no change. They will use this scale to answer 4 separate questions: 1) amount of physical activity performed in an average week, 2) ability to walk or push leisurely, 3) ability to walk or push fast, 4) ability to walk or push for a long period of time.
Measured: After 6 months of exercise intervention
Change in Self-Reported Physical Activity Level at 6 Months
Participants report their perceived physical activity levels compared to people their own age using a 5-point Likert Scale ranging from "much more active" to "much less active".
Measured: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Participant Recruitment Rate
The number of participants recruited will be reported as a percentage of total participants contacted for study participation.
Measured: Throughout the 6-month study period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2022
- Study start18 Feb 2022
- Primary completion24 Nov 2022
- Study completion24 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Arkansas Colleges of Health Education
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kaci Handlery, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education
- Investigators
- Kaci Handlery, DPT, Principal investigator, Arkansas Colleges of Health Education
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05221723
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PT-2021-024
- Acronym
- SCI-FIT
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hol AT, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Sproule S, Krassioukov AV. Reliability and validity of the six-minute arm test for the evaluation of cardiovascular fitness in people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;88(4):489-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.044.
PubMed 17398251Murray D, Hardiman O, Campion A, Vance R, Horgan F, Meldrum D. The effects of a home-based arm ergometry exercise programme on physical fitness, fatigue and activity in Polio survivors: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Jul;31(7):913-925. doi: 10.1177/0269215516661225. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
PubMed 27530605Totosy de Zepetnek JO, Au JS, Hol AT, Eng JJ, MacDonald MJ. Predicting peak oxygen uptake from submaximal exercise after spinal cord injury. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jul;41(7):775-81. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0670. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
PubMed 27363732Tawashy AE, Eng JJ, Krassioukov AV, Miller WC, Sproule S. Aerobic exercise during early rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2010 Mar;90(3):427-37. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090023. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
PubMed 20093326Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, Kirshblum SC, Fyffe D, Gershon R, Spungen AM, Bombardier CH, Dyson-Hudson TA, Amtmann D, Kalpakjian CZ, Choi SW, Jette AM, Forchheimer M, Cella D. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 May;38(3):257-69. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000023.
PubMed 26010962Crane DA, Hoffman JM, Reyes MR. Benefits of an exercise wellness program after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Mar;40(2):154-158. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000038. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
PubMed 26108561Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Craven C, Bugaresti J, McCartney N. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord. 2003 Jan;41(1):34-43. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101389.
PubMed 12494319Nash MS. Exercise as a health-promoting activity following spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005 Jun;29(2):87-103, 106. doi: 10.1097/01.npt.0000282514.94093.c6.
PubMed 16386165Post MW, Bloemen J, de Witte LP. Burden of support for partners of persons with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord. 2005 May;43(5):311-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101704.
PubMed 15685263Anneken V, Hanssen-Doose A, Hirschfeld S, Scheuer T, Thietje R. Influence of physical exercise on quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2010 May;48(5):393-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.137. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
PubMed 19841634Lynch J, Cahalan R. The impact of spinal cord injury on the quality of life of primary family caregivers: a literature review. Spinal Cord. 2017 Nov;55(11):964-978. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.56. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
PubMed 28653672LaVela SL, Landers K, Etingen B, Karalius VP, Miskevics S. Factors related to caregiving for individuals with spinal cord injury compared to caregiving for individuals with other neurologic conditions. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 Jul;38(4):505-14. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000240. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
PubMed 24993244
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Functional Interval Training for People With Spinal Cord Injury and Their Care Partners
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05221723
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCI-FIT / PT-2021-024
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, exercise, physical activity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Arkansas Colleges of Health EducationUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Functional Interval Training for People with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Care Partners (SCI-FIT) aims to address barriers to physical activity for people with spinal cord injury and their care partners. This research study provides free, twice weekly group-based, adaptable exercise classes for people with spinal cord injury and their care partners.
Detailed description
Regular physical activity, and more specifically exercise, is beneficial for people with and without spinal cord injury (SCI). Unfortunately, people with spinal cord injury (pSCI) are less physically active than adults without SCI and are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Care partners, or those who provide frequent assistance to those living with SCI, also achieve low physical activity levels and share similar health risks as a result. Often there are limited opportunities for pSCI to engage in regular exercise. In addition, pSCI and their care partners often face significant barriers to exercise including 1) lack of exercise participation opportunities; 2) cost of quality exercise instruction; 3) inaccessible exercise equipment or environments; 4) lack of social support from family and peers. This study, Functional Interval Training for People with Spinal Cord Injury and Their Care Partners (SCI-FIT) will explicitly address the barriers to exercise pSCI and their care partners often face with the primary goals of improving the health, physical activity levels, and quality of life of pSCI and their care partners. In order to address these goals, SCI-FIT will provide no-cost, twice weekly, group-based, adaptable exercise programming for pSCI and their care partners. All participants will be required to have physician or advanced practice provider clearance to exercise and will be evaluated by a physical therapist at no-cost prior to beginning the intervention to assess eligibility for the study. All eligible participants will complete a demographics questionnaire and will undergo a battery of baseline outcome assessments prior to undergoing the exercise intervention. Participants will complete 6-months of twice weekly group exercise classes aimed and hypothesized to increase physical activity levels, muscular strength, social support for exercise, functional mobility, peak power output, aerobic capacity, and quality of life for people with spinal cord injury and their care partners. Participants will repeat baseline outcome assessments at study midpoint (3-months) and study completion (6-months).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Exercise Group | Experimental | Behavioral: High Intensity Interval Exercise Training GroupIn this single group design, all participants will be provided with 6 months of twice weekly supervised group exercise. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Spinal Cord Injury: Must have a clinical diagnosis of spinal cord injury at level C5 (ASIA A-D) and/or must possess at least 4/5 elbow flexion muscular strength
- Care Partners: self-identified care partner of a person with spinal cord injury participating in the study
- Must be at least 18 years of age
- Must be able to communicate and read in English
- Must have physician or advanced practice provider clearance to exercise
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Less than 4/5 elbow flexion muscular strength
- Unable to ambulate independently or propel a power or manual wheelchair independently
- Unable to provide transportation to and from the research study
- Unable to communicate in English
- Unable to present documented medical clearance to exercise from physician or advanced practice provider
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity Interval Exercise Training GroupParticipants will participate in a maximum of twice weekly exercise classes (90 minutes each class) for a total of 6 months. While participants will be encouraged to attend as many classes as able, there is no minimum requirement for class attendance. During the exercise classes, participants will participate in a 10-minute warm up, followed by 30-60 minutes of aerobic, resistance and/or balance training up to a maximum intensity of 8/10 on the rating of perceived exertion scale. Participants will finish each class with a 10-minute cool-down consisting of lower intensity exercise. | Behavioural | Exercise Group |
Primary outcome
Participant Attendance
Time frame: 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
The percentage of interventions sessions attended by participants.
18 secondary outcomes
Change in 6-Minute Arm Test (6-MAT) at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Five Times Sit to Stand Test at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Upper Extremity Muscular Strength at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in The Spinal cord Injury Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Self Efficacy for Exercise Scale at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Social Support and Exercise Survey at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Gait Speed at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Rand 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Quality of Life for People with Spinal Cord Injury as assessed by the Spinal Cord Injury - Quality of Life Measure [Emotional Health and Social Participation] at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Spinal Cord Injury - Functional Index at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in One Minute Peak Power Test at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity Levels at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Participant Retention
Time frame: After 6 months of exercise intervention
Change in lower extremity functional strength at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Change in Global Rating of Change at 6 Months
Time frame: After 6 months of exercise intervention
Change in Self-Reported Physical Activity Level at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)
Participant Recruitment Rate
Time frame: Throughout the 6-month study period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jun 2023.
- Background: PubMed 17398251Hol AT, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Sproule S, Krassioukov AV. Reliability and validity of the six-minute arm test for the evaluation of cardiovascular fitness in people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr;88(4):489-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.044.
- Background: PubMed 27530605Murray D, Hardiman O, Campion A, Vance R, Horgan F, Meldrum D. The effects of a home-based arm ergometry exercise programme on physical fitness, fatigue and activity in Polio survivors: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Jul;31(7):913-925. doi: 10.1177/0269215516661225. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
- Background: PubMed 27363732Totosy de Zepetnek JO, Au JS, Hol AT, Eng JJ, MacDonald MJ. Predicting peak oxygen uptake from submaximal exercise after spinal cord injury. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Jul;41(7):775-81. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0670. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
- Background: PubMed 20093326Tawashy AE, Eng JJ, Krassioukov AV, Miller WC, Sproule S. Aerobic exercise during early rehabilitation for cervical spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2010 Mar;90(3):427-37. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090023. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 26010962Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, Kirshblum SC, Fyffe D, Gershon R, Spungen AM, Bombardier CH, Dyson-Hudson TA, Amtmann D, Kalpakjian CZ, Choi SW, Jette AM, Forchheimer M, Cella D. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 May;38(3):257-69. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000023.
- Background: PubMed 26108561Crane DA, Hoffman JM, Reyes MR. Benefits of an exercise wellness program after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Mar;40(2):154-158. doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000038. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 12494319Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, Latimer AE, Craven C, Bugaresti J, McCartney N. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord. 2003 Jan;41(1):34-43. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101389.
- Background: PubMed 16386165Nash MS. Exercise as a health-promoting activity following spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2005 Jun;29(2):87-103, 106. doi: 10.1097/01.npt.0000282514.94093.c6.
- Background: PubMed 15685263Post MW, Bloemen J, de Witte LP. Burden of support for partners of persons with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord. 2005 May;43(5):311-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101704.
- Background: PubMed 19841634Anneken V, Hanssen-Doose A, Hirschfeld S, Scheuer T, Thietje R. Influence of physical exercise on quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2010 May;48(5):393-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.137. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
- Background: PubMed 28653672Lynch J, Cahalan R. The impact of spinal cord injury on the quality of life of primary family caregivers: a literature review. Spinal Cord. 2017 Nov;55(11):964-978. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.56. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 24993244LaVela SL, Landers K, Etingen B, Karalius VP, Miskevics S. Factors related to caregiving for individuals with spinal cord injury compared to caregiving for individuals with other neurologic conditions. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 Jul;38(4):505-14. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000240. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kaci Handlery, DPT principal investigator
Arkansas Colleges of Health Education
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High Intensity Interval Exercise Training Group in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by Arkansas Colleges of Health Education at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Participant Attendance (time frame: 3 months (intervention midpoint), 6 months (immediately post intervention completion)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05221723, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jun 2023.