Cesarean Section ComplicationsAA-PRPNCT05224726
Platelet Rich Plasma for Uterine Scar
A study testing Platelet Rich Plasma in people with Cesarean Section Complications and Uterine Bleeding, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
When vessel wall injury occurs, platelets become activated, releasing more than 30 bioactive proteins, many of which have a fundamental role in hemostasis, inflammation and ultimate wound healing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 52 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cesarean Section Complications, Uterine Bleeding, Pelvic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Platelet Rich Plasma
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 19 Jul 2025to 1 Jul 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 52 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women undergoing elective cesarean delivery
- Term pregnancy (≥37 weeks of gestation)
Who cannot join
- Thrombocytopenia (CBC Platelet count <70,000)
- Connective tissue disease
- Uterine scars other than cesarean (s/p myomectomy, s/p cornual resection)
- Malformed uterus (unicornuate, bicornuate, didelphic)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, Center, 55030
Jigal Haas, MD, 972-3-5302777, jigal.Haas@Sheba.health.gov.il
Aya Mohr-Sasson, MD, 1-346-270-4682, mohraya@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Platelet Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Uterine Scar
When vessel wall injury occurs, platelets become activated, releasing more than 30 bioactive proteins, many of which have a fundamental role in hemostasis, inflammation and ultimate wound healing. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a modification of fibrin glue made from autologous blood, is being used to deliver growth factors in high concentration to sites requiring wound healing. PRP is obtained from a sample of patients' blood drawn at the time of treatment. As the rate of cesarean deliveries has been rising, long-term adverse sequelae due to uterine scar defects have been increasing. PRP might be a simple preventive treatment that potentially can reduce morbidity following cesarean deliveries.
Read the detailed description
Introduction
Platelets are cytoplasmic fragments of megakaryocytes, formed in the marrow and approximately 2 μm in diameter. When vessel wall injury occurs, they become activated, releasing more than 30 bioactive proteins, many of which have a fundamental role in hemostasis, inflammation and ultimate wound healing. Growth factors released from the platelets include platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor beta, platelet-derived epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived angiogenesis factor, insulin-like growth factor 1, and platelet factor 4. These factors signal the local mesenchymal and epithelial cells to migrate, divide, and increase collagen and matrix synthesis.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a modification of fibrin glue made from autologous blood, is being used to deliver growth factors in high concentration to sites requiring wound healing. Its clinical uses have dramatically increased in the last decade in various fields of medicine including orthopedics, cardiothoracic surgery, plastic surgery, dermatology, dentistry, and diabetic wound healing. Recently, its positive effects in promoting endometrial and follicular growth and gestation in assisted reproduction cycles have also been demonstrated.
PRP is obtained from a sample of patients' blood drawn at the time of treatment. A 30-20 cc venous blood draw will yield 3-5 cc of PRP depending on the baseline platelet count of an individual, the device used, and the technique employed. The blood draw occurs with the addition of an anticoagulant, such as citrate dextrose to prevent platelet activation prior to its use. The preparation process requires centrifugation to separate the red blood cells (RBC) and to concentrate the platelets, which are suspended in the smallest final plasma volume. The upper 2/3 portion of the volume that is composed mostly of platelet-poor plasma (PPP) is removed. Pellets are homogenized in lower 1/3rd (5 ml of plasma) to create the Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP). A count of 1 million /mL has become the working definition for therapeutic PRP. Activation of the platelets before their application is not required as there is no consensus for better results.
Caesarean delivery is the commonest operation performed on women worldwide with progressively rising incidence. Consequently, long-term adverse sequelae due to uterine scar defect have been increasing. Common gynecological complains include chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea and postmenstrual spotting and infertility. Obstetric sequelae seem to be increasing such as cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, placenta previa, and placenta accrete, all associated with major maternal morbidity and even mortality. Given the association between uterine scar defect and gynecological symptoms, obstetric complications and potentially subfertility, it is important to develop preventive strategies.
To the best of knowledge studies using PRP for uterine scars treatment have not been published. Due to the aforementioned, the aim of our study is to learn the effect of PRP use on uterine scar healing.
Material and Methods
This is a prospective randomized double blinded study. Study population will include all women planned to undergo elective cesarean delivery at term with singleton pregnancy. Women meeting inclusion criteria will be offered to participate in the study. After signing informed consent, block randomization will be completed, including: A- administration of PRP following uterine incision repair, B - administration of placebo (0.9% normal saline) on the uterine incision. Women will be blinded to the group they have been randomized to. Blood will be drawn to all women 30 minutes before operation for platelet count and preparation of PRP (in case randomization was for group A). All operations will be performed by highly skilled surgeons of the same team. All other stages of operations will be similar in both of the groups. Operative and post-operative data will be collected from the medical files, including operation duration, estimated blood loss, operation complications (hypotension, bladder gut or vascular perforation), post-operative complications (hemorrhage, endometritis, vascular - thromboembolic event, ileus). All women will be invited to the gynecologic clinics at six weeks, 3 months and 6 months post operation for trans-vaginal sonographic evaluation of the uterine scar. Measurement will include uterine scar residual myometrial thickness (RMT), adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT), depth, length, and RMT/AMT ratio.
Women's reports regarding possibility of uterine scar defect symptoms (heavy menstrual bleeding, intermenstrual spotting, pelvic pain) will additionally be collected on follow-up visit
- Being tested
- Platelet Rich Plasma, Placebo
- Keywords
- uterine scar defect, cesarean delivery, pelvic pain, spotting, niche, cesarean section complication, uterine scar, Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Hemorrhage, Pelvic Pain, Menstruation Disturbances, Metrorrhagia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Platelet Rich PlasmaOther
Injection of 5cc of PRP preparation at the myometrium around the uterine incision after it has been sutured.
PlaceboOther
Injection of 5cc of 0.9% Normal Saline at the myometrium around the uterine incision after it has been sutured.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PRP Treatment | Experimental | PRP preparation will be injected to the myometrium around the uterine incision after closure of the first layer. Receives: Other: Platelet Rich Plasma |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | 0.9% of Normal Saline will be injected to the myometrium around the uterine incision after closure of the first layer. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Depth of the uterine scar (mm)
Depth of the uterine scar evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound
Measured: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Secondary outcomes (3)
Residual myometrial thickness/Adjacent myometrial thickness
Ratio between adjacent and residual myometrial thickness
Measured: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Niche length
Niche length (mm)
Measured: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Niche width
Niche width evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound
Measured: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2022
- Study start19 Jul 2025
- Primary completion1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cesarean Section ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized control study
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sheba Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aya Mohr Sasson, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05224726
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AA-PRP
- Acronym
- AA-PRP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Dhurat R, Sukesh M. Principles and Methods of Preparation of Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Review and Author's Perspective. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):189-97. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.150734.
PubMed 25722595Schilephake H. Bone growth factors in maxillofacial skeletal reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;31(5):469-84. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0244.
PubMed 12418561Sanchez AR, Sheridan PJ, Kupp LI. Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):93-103.
PubMed 12608674Sharara FI, Lelea LL, Rahman S, Klebanoff JS, Moawad GN. A narrative review of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in reproductive medicine. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1003-1012. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02146-9. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
PubMed 33723748Goncalves NJN, Frantz N, de Oliveira RM. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy: An approach in reproductive medicine based on successful animal models. Anim Reprod. 2020 May 22;16(1):93-98. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-093.
PubMed 33299482Lin Y, Qi J, Sun Y. Platelet-Rich Plasma as a Potential New Strategy in the Endometrium Treatment in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 18;12:707584. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.707584. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34733236Ferrari AR, Cortrezzi S, Borges E Junior, Braga D, Souza MDCB, Antunes RA. Evaluation of the Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Follicular and Endometrial Growth: A Literature Review. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021 Oct 4;25(4):601-607. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210036.
PubMed 34415119Petryk N, Petryk M. Ovarian Rejuvenation Through Platelet-Rich Autologous Plasma (PRP)-a Chance to Have a Baby Without Donor Eggs, Improving the Life Quality of Women Suffering from Early Menopause Without Synthetic Hormonal Treatment. Reprod Sci. 2020 Nov;27(11):1975-1982. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00266-8. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
PubMed 32700285Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405.
PubMed 19565535Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PubMed 27393285Semenova LS, Evlashko IuP, Sorkina NS. [Concentration of lead and several components of porphyrin metabolism in the blood and urine of persons with no industrial contact with lead]. Lab Delo. 1987;(2):11-4. No abstract available. Russian.
PubMed 2437359
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Platelet Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Uterine Scar
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05224726
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AA-PRP / AA-PRP
- Keywords
- uterine scar defect, cesarean delivery, pelvic pain, spotting, niche, cesarean section complication, uterine scar, Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sheba Medical Center
- Study start
- 19 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
When vessel wall injury occurs, platelets become activated, releasing more than 30 bioactive proteins, many of which have a fundamental role in hemostasis, inflammation and ultimate wound healing. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a modification of fibrin glue made from autologous blood, is being used to deliver growth factors in high concentration to sites requiring wound healing. PRP is obtained from a sample of patients' blood drawn at the time of treatment. As the rate of cesarean deliveries has been rising, long-term adverse sequelae due to uterine scar defects have been increasing. PRP might be a simple preventive treatment that potentially can reduce morbidity following cesarean deliveries.
Detailed description
Introduction
Platelets are cytoplasmic fragments of megakaryocytes, formed in the marrow and approximately 2 μm in diameter. When vessel wall injury occurs, they become activated, releasing more than 30 bioactive proteins, many of which have a fundamental role in hemostasis, inflammation and ultimate wound healing. Growth factors released from the platelets include platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor beta, platelet-derived epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived angiogenesis factor, insulin-like growth factor 1, and platelet factor 4. These factors signal the local mesenchymal and epithelial cells to migrate, divide, and increase collagen and matrix synthesis.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a modification of fibrin glue made from autologous blood, is being used to deliver growth factors in high concentration to sites requiring wound healing. Its clinical uses have dramatically increased in the last decade in various fields of medicine including orthopedics, cardiothoracic surgery, plastic surgery, dermatology, dentistry, and diabetic wound healing. Recently, its positive effects in promoting endometrial and follicular growth and gestation in assisted reproduction cycles have also been demonstrated.
PRP is obtained from a sample of patients' blood drawn at the time of treatment. A 30-20 cc venous blood draw will yield 3-5 cc of PRP depending on the baseline platelet count of an individual, the device used, and the technique employed. The blood draw occurs with the addition of an anticoagulant, such as citrate dextrose to prevent platelet activation prior to its use. The preparation process requires centrifugation to separate the red blood cells (RBC) and to concentrate the platelets, which are suspended in the smallest final plasma volume. The upper 2/3 portion of the volume that is composed mostly of platelet-poor plasma (PPP) is removed. Pellets are homogenized in lower 1/3rd (5 ml of plasma) to create the Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP). A count of 1 million /mL has become the working definition for therapeutic PRP. Activation of the platelets before their application is not required as there is no consensus for better results.
Caesarean delivery is the commonest operation performed on women worldwide with progressively rising incidence. Consequently, long-term adverse sequelae due to uterine scar defect have been increasing. Common gynecological complains include chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea and postmenstrual spotting and infertility. Obstetric sequelae seem to be increasing such as cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, placenta previa, and placenta accrete, all associated with major maternal morbidity and even mortality. Given the association between uterine scar defect and gynecological symptoms, obstetric complications and potentially subfertility, it is important to develop preventive strategies.
To the best of knowledge studies using PRP for uterine scars treatment have not been published. Due to the aforementioned, the aim of our study is to learn the effect of PRP use on uterine scar healing.
Material and Methods
This is a prospective randomized double blinded study. Study population will include all women planned to undergo elective cesarean delivery at term with singleton pregnancy. Women meeting inclusion criteria will be offered to participate in the study. After signing informed consent, block randomization will be completed, including: A- administration of PRP following uterine incision repair, B - administration of placebo (0.9% normal saline) on the uterine incision. Women will be blinded to the group they have been randomized to. Blood will be drawn to all women 30 minutes before operation for platelet count and preparation of PRP (in case randomization was for group A). All operations will be performed by highly skilled surgeons of the same team. All other stages of operations will be similar in both of the groups. Operative and post-operative data will be collected from the medical files, including operation duration, estimated blood loss, operation complications (hypotension, bladder gut or vascular perforation), post-operative complications (hemorrhage, endometritis, vascular - thromboembolic event, ileus). All women will be invited to the gynecologic clinics at six weeks, 3 months and 6 months post operation for trans-vaginal sonographic evaluation of the uterine scar. Measurement will include uterine scar residual myometrial thickness (RMT), adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT), depth, length, and RMT/AMT ratio.
Women's reports regarding possibility of uterine scar defect symptoms (heavy menstrual bleeding, intermenstrual spotting, pelvic pain) will additionally be collected on follow-up visit
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized control study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PRP Treatment | Experimental | Other: Platelet Rich PlasmaPRP preparation will be injected to the myometrium around the uterine incision after closure of the first layer. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo0.9% of Normal Saline will be injected to the myometrium around the uterine incision after closure of the first layer. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 52 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women undergoing elective cesarean delivery
- Term pregnancy (≥37 weeks of gestation)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Thrombocytopenia (CBC Platelet count <70,000)
- Connective tissue disease
- Uterine scars other than cesarean (s/p myomectomy, s/p cornual resection)
- Malformed uterus (unicornuate, bicornuate, didelphic)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Platelet Rich PlasmaInjection of 5cc of PRP preparation at the myometrium around the uterine incision after it has been sutured. | Other | PRP Treatment |
| PlaceboInjection of 5cc of 0.9% Normal Saline at the myometrium around the uterine incision after it has been sutured. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Depth of the uterine scar (mm)
Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Depth of the uterine scar evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound
3 secondary outcomes
Residual myometrial thickness/Adjacent myometrial thickness
Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Niche length
Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Niche width
Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 25722595Dhurat R, Sukesh M. Principles and Methods of Preparation of Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Review and Author's Perspective. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014 Oct-Dec;7(4):189-97. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.150734.
- Results publication: PubMed 12418561Schilephake H. Bone growth factors in maxillofacial skeletal reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;31(5):469-84. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0244.
- Results publication: PubMed 12608674Sanchez AR, Sheridan PJ, Kupp LI. Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jan-Feb;18(1):93-103.
- Results publication: PubMed 33723748Sharara FI, Lelea LL, Rahman S, Klebanoff JS, Moawad GN. A narrative review of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in reproductive medicine. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1003-1012. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02146-9. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 33299482Goncalves NJN, Frantz N, de Oliveira RM. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy: An approach in reproductive medicine based on successful animal models. Anim Reprod. 2020 May 22;16(1):93-98. doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-093.
- Results publication: PubMed 34733236Lin Y, Qi J, Sun Y. Platelet-Rich Plasma as a Potential New Strategy in the Endometrium Treatment in Assisted Reproductive Technology. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 18;12:707584. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.707584. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 34415119Ferrari AR, Cortrezzi S, Borges E Junior, Braga D, Souza MDCB, Antunes RA. Evaluation of the Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Follicular and Endometrial Growth: A Literature Review. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021 Oct 4;25(4):601-607. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210036.
- Results publication: PubMed 32700285Petryk N, Petryk M. Ovarian Rejuvenation Through Platelet-Rich Autologous Plasma (PRP)-a Chance to Have a Baby Without Donor Eggs, Improving the Life Quality of Women Suffering from Early Menopause Without Synthetic Hormonal Treatment. Reprod Sci. 2020 Nov;27(11):1975-1982. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00266-8. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 19565535Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405.
- Results publication: PubMed 27393285Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 2437359Semenova LS, Evlashko IuP, Sorkina NS. [Concentration of lead and several components of porphyrin metabolism in the blood and urine of persons with no industrial contact with lead]. Lab Delo. 1987;(2):11-4. No abstract available. Russian.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cesarean Section Complications
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Effect of Two Different Doses of Intravenous Oxytocin on Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Postpartum Hemorrhage, Uterine Atony
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 1
Ketamine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Postpartum Depression and Pain After Cesarean Delivery
Pain, Postpartum Depression
Recruiting
Clinical Impact of Uterine Repair During Cesarean Section With Barbed Suture on the Incidence of Isthmocele
Isthmocele, Cesarean Scar Defect
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Platelet Rich Plasma in people with Cesarean Section Complications and Uterine Bleeding, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aya A Mohr-Sasson, M.D (3462704682, mohraya@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Depth of the uterine scar (mm) (time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the cesarean delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05224726, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.