Malaria, VivaxPhase 2/3NCT05232227
Primaquine Double Dose for Radical Cure of Plasmodium Vivax in Colombia
A Phase 2/3 study testing Primaquine double dose over 14 days and Primaquine single dose over 14 days in people with Malaria, Vivax and Relapse, run by University of California, San Francisco.
Trial summary
Primaquine (PQ) is the only widely available treatment to prevent P. vivax relapses. World Health Organization recommends increased PQ doses in East Asia and Oceania, frequently relapsing strains. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria, Vivax, Relapse
- What is being tested?
- Primaquine double dose over 14 days and Primaquine single dose over 14 days
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2023to 30 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥5 years
- Fever (T≥37.5 ⁰C, oral) and/or history of fever in the previous 48 hours
- P. vivax mono-infection
- Normal G6PD status using Biosensor™ (SD Bioline, ROK) (G6PD activity ≥ 70% of the adjusted male median (AMM))
- Written informed consent
- Living in the study area and willing to be followed for six months
Who cannot join
- Malaria treatment in the previous 30 days,
- Self-reported chronic disease (including severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal disorders, malnutrition, or HIV),
- Clinically significant concurrent illness,
- Use of medications known to interfere with the pharmacokinetics of PQ or CQ,
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs,
- Use of an investigational drug within the previous 30 days or five half-lives (whichever was longer),
Show all 27Show fewer
- History of moderate or severe adverse reaction to any of the study drugs,
- Hemoglobin < 7 g/dL,
- Pregnancy (by urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding,
- Not able to take oral treatment,
- Signs of severe malaria:
- Unable to drink
- Vomiting (more than twice in the previous 24 hours)
- Recent history of convulsions (one or more in the previous 24 hours)
- Impaired consciousness
- Unable to sit or stand
- Cerebral malaria (unarousable coma)
- Severe anemia (hematocrit <15% or clinical signs) hemoglobin <5 mg/ml) (Note: we will use hemoglobin less than 7 mg/ml as exclusion criteria)
- Renal failure (serum creatinine >3 mg/dL or clinical signs)
- Pulmonary edema
- Hypoglycemia (blood glucose <40mg/dL or clinical signs)
- Shock (systolic blood pressure <70 mm Hg in adults; 50 mm Hg in children)
- Spontaneous bleeding/disseminated intravascular coagulation.
- Repeated generalized convulsions
- Acidemia/acidosis (clinical signs)
- Macroscopic hemoglobinuria
- Jaundice●
About this study
Primaquine (PQ) is the only widely available treatment to prevent P. vivax relapses. World Health Organization recommends increased PQ doses in East Asia and Oceania, frequently relapsing strains. In 2005, the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention began also recommending higher dose PQ to treat infections from all parts of the world.
In Latin America, PQ for a radical cure has been largely implemented as 3.5 mg/kg over 14 days (standard dose, long-course, PQsd14) or 3.5 mg/kg over 7 days (short-course, or PQsd7) in combination with chloroquine (CQ). A recent randomized controlled trial in Brazil showed that a 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14) was superior in preventing relapses compared to the standard of care regimen in Brazil of 3.5 mg/kg over 7 PQsd7 Direct Observed Therapy (DOT) and PQsd7 without DOT and with or 14 days PQsd14 with DOT (92% versus 66% were relapse-free in the 6-month follow-up in adjusted analyses). These data were presented at the 2019 PAHO Malaria Technical Advisory Group (TAG) meeting. To inform whether there should be a policy change by Panamerican Health Organization, the Malaria TAG recommended more evidence from the results of another trial to confirm the efficacy of high versus low-dose PQ. This project aims to generate the necessary evidence to inform a policy decision regarding high-dose PQ.
Impact Malaria (IM) proposes to conduct another trial, per the PAHO Malaria TAG's recommendation, assessing the efficacy of high-dose PQ compared to low-dose PQ. The objective is to compare a standard regimen, which in Colombia is PQsd14 (3,5mg/kg divided in 14 days), to a double dose alternative PQ 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14).
Read the detailed description
Malaria due to Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax) is still a public health challenge in the Americas. In recent years, the rate of decline in the incidence of P. vivax malaria has stalled in the Americas. To address this challenge and support countries in Latin America \& the Caribbean (LAC) aiming for malaria elimination, effective treatment strategies against P. vivax are needed. Primaquine (PQ) is the only widely available treatment to prevent P. vivax relapses. WHO recommends increased PQ doses in East Asia and Oceania, where strains are frequently-relapsing. In 2005, the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) began also recommending higher dose PQ to treat infections from all parts of the world.
In Latin America, PQ for a radical cure has been largely implemented as 3.5 mg/kg over 14 days (standard dose, long-course, PQsd14) or 3.5 mg/kg over 7 days (short-course, or PQsd7) in combination with chloroquine (CQ). A recent randomized controlled trial in Brazil showed that a 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14) was superior in preventing relapses compared to the standard of care regimen in Brazil of 3.5 mg/kg over 7 PQsd7 Direct Observed Therapy (DOT) and PQsd7 without DOT and with or 14 days PQsd14 with DOT (92% versus 66% were relapse-free in the 6-month follow-up in adjusted analyses). These data were presented at the 2019 PAHO Malaria Technical Advisory Group (TAG) meeting.
To inform whether there should be a policy change by PAHO, the Malaria TAG recommended more evidence from the results of another trial to confirm the efficacy of high versus low-dose PQ. This project aims to generate the necessary evidence to inform a policy decision regarding high-dose PQ.
Impact Malaria (IM) proposes to conduct another trial, per the PAHO Malaria TAG's recommendation, assessing the efficacy of high-dose PQ compared to low-dose PQ. The objective is to compare a standard regimen, which in Colombia is PQsd14 (3,5mg/kg divided in 14 days), to a double dose alternative: PQ 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14).
PQ, the mainstay for a radical cure for P. vivax, induces a dose-dependent acute hemolytic anemia in individuals with Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Where available, WHO recommends G6PD deficiency testing prior to PQ administration. In LAC countries, where G6PD deficiency testing is not widely available, Low-dose PQ without G6PD deficiency testing has been a standard approach regimen for more than 60 years. Low prevalence of G6PD deficiency, a predominance of less severe variants, and the absence of historical reports of hemolysis with the 14-day Low-dose regimen have allowed for this unsystematic, standard approach without testing. Nevertheless, PAHO promotes pharmacovigilance and early recognition of signs of hemolysis to enable stopping PQ to prevent more severe outcomes. However, countries are not implementing these approaches systematically. Improved pharmacovigilance and G6PD deficiency testing may be needed if higher dose PQ regimens are recommended, as these regimens have a higher potential to cause severe hemolysis and other adverse events. Higher dose regimens may also be less well tolerated, and therefore compromise adherence. At the same time, where quality G6PD deficiency testing is not reliable or available, a risk-benefit assessment may suggest that the benefits of using high dose PQ without G6PD deficiency testing may still outweigh such risks.
Following current recommendations that G6PD deficiency testing is conducted prior to PQ or TQ administration, low G6PD activity, measured by a quantitative rapid test (Standard Diagnostics (SD) Biosensor), will be an exclusion criterion. As the primary goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of the new regimens, all regimens will be administered by directly observed therapy (DOT).
- Conditions
- Malaria, Vivax, Relapse
- Being tested
- Primaquine double dose over 14 days, Primaquine single dose over 14 days
- Keywords
- Plasmodium vivax, Radical cure regimen, Primaquine double dose (PQdd), Colombia
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria, Vivax, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Primaquine double dose over 14 daysDrug
Also called Primaquine Phosphate tablets
Primaquine Phosphate tablets New Drug Application (NDA): 008316 Company: SANOFI AVENTIS US Chloroquine Phosphate tablets
Primaquine single dose over 14 daysDrug
Also called Primaquine Phosphate tablets
Primaquine Phosphate tablets New Drug Application (NDA): 008316 Company: SANOFI AVENTIS US
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard regimen Primaquine single dose over 14 days | Active comparator | The standard regimen consists of administering Chloquine Phosphate 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 2, and 5 mg/kg on day 3 plus Primaquine Phosphate 3.5 mg/kg divided over 14 days (0.25mg/kg/day) Receives: Drug: Primaquine single dose over 14 days |
| Treatment regimen Primaquine double dose over 14 days | Experimental | The treatment regimen consists of administering Chloquine Phosphate 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 2, and 5 mg/kg on day 3 plus Primaquine Phosphate 7 mg/kg divided over 14 days Receives: Drug: Primaquine double dose over 14 days |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence risk of microscopy-detectable P. vivax infections
The incidence risk (time to first event) of microscopy-detectable P. vivax infection (sexual and asexual parasitemias), comparing PQdd14 to PQsd14.
Measured: 6-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (1)
relapse efficacy
The incidence risk of symptomatic, microscopy-detectable P. vivax infection, The incidence risk of severe anemia (Hb < 7g/dl) and/or requiring blood transfusion comparing PQdd14 to PQsd14.
- The incidence rate (events per person-time) of microscopy-detectable P. vivax infection, comparing PQdd14 to PQsd14.
- The incidence rate (events per person-time) of symptomatic, microscopy-detectable P. vivax infection, comparing PQdd14 to PQsd14.
Measured: 6-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2022
- Study start20 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion5 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2023 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Trial terminated by funder
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Malaria, VivaxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pan American Health Organization
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05232227
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21-34422
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2021
- Last updated
- 11 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Primaquine Double Dose for Radical Cure of Plasmodium Vivax in Colombia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05232227
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 21-34422
- Conditions
- Malaria, Vivax, Relapse
- Keywords
- Plasmodium vivax, Radical cure regimen, Primaquine double dose (PQdd), Colombia
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Trial terminated by funder
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pan American Health Organization
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primaquine (PQ) is the only widely available treatment to prevent P. vivax relapses. World Health Organization recommends increased PQ doses in East Asia and Oceania, frequently relapsing strains. In 2005, the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention began also recommending higher dose PQ to treat infections from all parts of the world.
In Latin America, PQ for a radical cure has been largely implemented as 3.5 mg/kg over 14 days (standard dose, long-course, PQsd14) or 3.5 mg/kg over 7 days (short-course, or PQsd7) in combination with chloroquine (CQ). A recent randomized controlled trial in Brazil showed that a 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14) was superior in preventing relapses compared to the standard of care regimen in Brazil of 3.5 mg/kg over 7 PQsd7 Direct Observed Therapy (DOT) and PQsd7 without DOT and with or 14 days PQsd14 with DOT (92% versus 66% were relapse-free in the 6-month follow-up in adjusted analyses). These data were presented at the 2019 PAHO Malaria Technical Advisory Group (TAG) meeting. To inform whether there should be a policy change by Panamerican Health Organization, the Malaria TAG recommended more evidence from the results of another trial to confirm the efficacy of high versus low-dose PQ. This project aims to generate the necessary evidence to inform a policy decision regarding high-dose PQ.
Impact Malaria (IM) proposes to conduct another trial, per the PAHO Malaria TAG's recommendation, assessing the efficacy of high-dose PQ compared to low-dose PQ. The objective is to compare a standard regimen, which in Colombia is PQsd14 (3,5mg/kg divided in 14 days), to a double dose alternative PQ 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14).
Detailed description
Malaria due to Plasmodium vivax (P. vivax) is still a public health challenge in the Americas. In recent years, the rate of decline in the incidence of P. vivax malaria has stalled in the Americas. To address this challenge and support countries in Latin America \& the Caribbean (LAC) aiming for malaria elimination, effective treatment strategies against P. vivax are needed. Primaquine (PQ) is the only widely available treatment to prevent P. vivax relapses. WHO recommends increased PQ doses in East Asia and Oceania, where strains are frequently-relapsing. In 2005, the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) began also recommending higher dose PQ to treat infections from all parts of the world.
In Latin America, PQ for a radical cure has been largely implemented as 3.5 mg/kg over 14 days (standard dose, long-course, PQsd14) or 3.5 mg/kg over 7 days (short-course, or PQsd7) in combination with chloroquine (CQ). A recent randomized controlled trial in Brazil showed that a 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14) was superior in preventing relapses compared to the standard of care regimen in Brazil of 3.5 mg/kg over 7 PQsd7 Direct Observed Therapy (DOT) and PQsd7 without DOT and with or 14 days PQsd14 with DOT (92% versus 66% were relapse-free in the 6-month follow-up in adjusted analyses). These data were presented at the 2019 PAHO Malaria Technical Advisory Group (TAG) meeting.
To inform whether there should be a policy change by PAHO, the Malaria TAG recommended more evidence from the results of another trial to confirm the efficacy of high versus low-dose PQ. This project aims to generate the necessary evidence to inform a policy decision regarding high-dose PQ.
Impact Malaria (IM) proposes to conduct another trial, per the PAHO Malaria TAG's recommendation, assessing the efficacy of high-dose PQ compared to low-dose PQ. The objective is to compare a standard regimen, which in Colombia is PQsd14 (3,5mg/kg divided in 14 days), to a double dose alternative: PQ 7 mg/kg double dose regimen over 14 days (PQdd14).
PQ, the mainstay for a radical cure for P. vivax, induces a dose-dependent acute hemolytic anemia in individuals with Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Where available, WHO recommends G6PD deficiency testing prior to PQ administration. In LAC countries, where G6PD deficiency testing is not widely available, Low-dose PQ without G6PD deficiency testing has been a standard approach regimen for more than 60 years. Low prevalence of G6PD deficiency, a predominance of less severe variants, and the absence of historical reports of hemolysis with the 14-day Low-dose regimen have allowed for this unsystematic, standard approach without testing. Nevertheless, PAHO promotes pharmacovigilance and early recognition of signs of hemolysis to enable stopping PQ to prevent more severe outcomes. However, countries are not implementing these approaches systematically. Improved pharmacovigilance and G6PD deficiency testing may be needed if higher dose PQ regimens are recommended, as these regimens have a higher potential to cause severe hemolysis and other adverse events. Higher dose regimens may also be less well tolerated, and therefore compromise adherence. At the same time, where quality G6PD deficiency testing is not reliable or available, a risk-benefit assessment may suggest that the benefits of using high dose PQ without G6PD deficiency testing may still outweigh such risks.
Following current recommendations that G6PD deficiency testing is conducted prior to PQ or TQ administration, low G6PD activity, measured by a quantitative rapid test (Standard Diagnostics (SD) Biosensor), will be an exclusion criterion. As the primary goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of the new regimens, all regimens will be administered by directly observed therapy (DOT).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard regimen Primaquine single dose over 14 days | Active comparator | Drug: Primaquine single dose over 14 daysThe standard regimen consists of administering Chloquine Phosphate 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 2, and 5 mg/kg on day 3 plus Primaquine Phosphate 3.5 mg/kg divided over 14 days (0.25mg/kg/day) |
| Treatment regimen Primaquine double dose over 14 days | Experimental | Drug: Primaquine double dose over 14 daysThe treatment regimen consists of administering Chloquine Phosphate 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 2, and 5 mg/kg on day 3 plus Primaquine Phosphate 7 mg/kg divided over 14 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥5 years
- Fever (T≥37.5 ⁰C, oral) and/or history of fever in the previous 48 hours
- P. vivax mono-infection
- Normal G6PD status using Biosensor™ (SD Bioline, ROK) (G6PD activity ≥ 70% of the adjusted male median (AMM))
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Malaria treatment in the previous 30 days,
- Self-reported chronic disease (including severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal disorders, malnutrition, or HIV),
- Clinically significant concurrent illness,
- Use of medications known to interfere with the pharmacokinetics of PQ or CQ,
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Primaquine double dose over 14 daysAlso: Primaquine Phosphate tabletsPrimaquine Phosphate tablets New Drug Application (NDA): 008316 Company: SANOFI AVENTIS US Chloroquine Phosphate tablets | Drug | Treatment regimen Primaquine double dose over 14 days |
| Primaquine single dose over 14 daysAlso: Primaquine Phosphate tabletsPrimaquine Phosphate tablets New Drug Application (NDA): 008316 Company: SANOFI AVENTIS US | Drug | Standard regimen Primaquine single dose over 14 days |
Primary outcome
Incidence risk of microscopy-detectable P. vivax infections
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
The incidence risk (time to first event) of microscopy-detectable P. vivax infection (sexual and asexual parasitemias), comparing PQdd14 to PQsd14.
1 secondary outcome
relapse efficacy
Time frame: 6-month follow-up
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Malaria, Vivax
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of the Recombinant Malaria Vaccines in Healthy Adults Aged 18-50 Years
Malaria Vaccine
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
This is a Clinical Study to Assess Whether the Combination of SJ733 and Tafenoquine Will be a Safe and Rapidly Acting Anti-malarial for the Radical Cure of P. Vivax Malaria
Malaria, Malaria Vivax
RecruitingPhase 4
Southeast Asia Dose Optimization of Tafenoquine
Plasmodium Vivax Malaria
RecruitingPhase 3
An Interventional Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Tafenoquine (TQ) and Primaquine (PQ) When Either Are Taken Together With Chloroquine (CQ) for the Treatment of P. Vivax Malaria in Indian Participants Aged 2 Years and Older
Malaria, Vivax
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ethiopian Antimalarial Therapeutic Efficacy Study 2026
Plasmodium Vivax Malaria Without Complication, Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria (Uncomplicated)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Primaquine double dose over 14 days and Primaquine single dose over 14 days in people with Malaria, Vivax and Relapse, run by University of California, San Francisco.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence risk of microscopy-detectable P. vivax infections (time frame: 6-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.