AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Low-back PainNCT05232487

Comparison of Swiss Versus Standard Low Back Acupuncture in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

A study testing Swiss low back acupuncture (SLBA) and Standard acupuncture (SA) in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Li Yiming at 1 site in Switzerland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Low back pain (LBP) is very common, widespread, and represents a multidimensional syndrome. It affects physical activity and function, health-related quality of life, and employment status. The lifetime prevalence of acute low back pain is approximately 80%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Low-back Pain
What is being tested?
Swiss low back acupuncture (SLBA) and Standard acupuncture (SA)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
116 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Jan 2023to Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female and male participants;
  • Age between 18 and 75 years;
  • Clinical diagnosis of CLBP with a disease duration of more than 3 months and an average pain intensity of minimally 4 points on a 11-point pain-numerical rating scale (pain-NRS) on the previous 7 days;
  • Sufficient knowledge of German to complete the questionnaires.

Who cannot join

  • All participants who do not meet the above-mentioned inclusion criteria;
  • History or known severe concomitant diseases (e.g. abdominal aortic aneurysm, heart disease, cancer, psychiatric disorders).
  • Other causes of low back pain not related to the clinical diagnosis of CLBP including inflammatory, malignant, or autoimmune disease;
  • Planned or previous back surgery within 6 months
  • Use of corticosteroids and/or other pain-relieving drugs that act through the central nervous system;
  • Initiation of another therapy for CLBP within the last 4 weeks, e.g. physiotherapy;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Preceding acupuncture treatment for CLBP during the past 6 months;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Participation in another clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Michael Furian, PhD contact

+ 41 079 403 75 86

michael.furian@usz.ch

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Swiss TCM UNI

    Bad Zurzach, Canton of Aargau, 5330

    Michael Furian, Phd, +41 78 209 81 42, michael.furian@tcmuni.ch

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Swiss Versus Standard Low Back Acupuncture in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain. A Randomized, Controlled, Single-blind, Monocentric Clinical Study

Low back pain (LBP) is very common, widespread, and represents a multidimensional syndrome. It affects physical activity and function, health-related quality of life, and employment status. The lifetime prevalence of acute low back pain is approximately 80%. The prevalence of chronic low back pain (CLBP) in the general population is reported to be 8% to 21%. Several clinical trials have provided evidence to support the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of LBP, however, the optimal acupuncture treatment for CLBP has not been extensively studied.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is a common, widespread and multifaceted syndrome and represents one of the leading sources of years lived with disability. In Switzerland, patients with LBP generated mean annual costs of 467 million Euro in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Moreover, quantity of prescriptions per patient was reported to be 5 - 6 per year, causing pain medication costs of 4.7 million Euro. It is estimated that 20% of acute LBP can manifest as chronic LBP (CLBP), defined as pain lasting longer than three months. CLBP does not only negatively impact the quality of life, functional status, and working capability of those suffering, but also plays a pivotal role of the large annual health care costs for LBP in Switzerland and worldwide. Pharmacological therapies with at least a small magnitude of effect for pain relief in CLBP include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, Tramadol and antidepressants. Additionally, non-pharmacological therapies with at least a small magnitude of effect for pain relief in CLBP include exercise, motor control exercise, Yoga, mindfulness-based stress reduction, electromyography biofeedback, cognitive-behavioral therapy, multidisciplinary rehabilitation and acupuncture.

In this context and during the last decades and centuries, different acupuncture methods evolved, among others, the acupuncture method newly termed "Swiss low back acupuncture" (SLBA). The SLBA originates from Jiu Gong Points (九宫穴), which is the abbreviation for "Nine Spinal Points" (脊椎九宫穴). The particular sites of Jiu Gong Points were evolved from the eight trigrams and nine palaces square (Ba Gua Jiu Gong fang 八卦九宫方). The eight trigrams (Ba Gua 八卦) are a set of metaphysical and philosophical sigmas composed of three components of yin and yang, which are the essential concept of all-natural phenomena. Nine palaces (Jiu Gong, 九宫), an element of the eight trigrams, correspond to the nine regions in ancient China (Jiu Ye, 九野). They represent the four main (North=kidney; South=heart; East=liver; West=lung; Earth=spleen) and four secondary cardinal points and the earth as the center. In 825 patients with LBP due to lumbar herniated disc, it has been shown that hot needle acupuncture (热针) using Jiu Gong Points around the most significant lesion of the lumbar vertebrae results in good improvements of pain. The uncontrolled study reported a cure of LBP in 65.2% of cases and an improvement of clinical symptoms of 32.4%. Due to the positive report, the hot needle acupuncture using Jiu Gong Points has further evolved in Switzerland and might be a promising tool to treat CLBP, since the optimal method of acupuncture against CLBP remains to be elucidated. However, the efficacy of SLBA has never been quantitatively compared to SA and a randomized clinical trial is warranted to provide first robust evidence on its performance in CLBP.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct the first randomized clinical trial comparing SLBA and SA on pain relief in patients with CLBP.

Being tested
Swiss low back acupuncture (SLBA), Standard acupuncture (SA)
Keywords
chronic low back pain, Acupuncture, Standard acupuncture, Swiss low back acupuncture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Swiss low back acupuncture (SLBA)Other

    Participants are placed in the prone position (if required with a pillow under the abdomen). Then acupuncture is applied to the back of the body. The treatment takes place for the duration of 9 weeks (2x per week from week 1 to 6 and 1x a week from week 7 to 9). One treatment session lasts about 50-60 minutes.

    Swiss low back pain acupuncture The SLBA method is a further developed method from the Jiu Gong acupuncture technique, also known as the Nine Palace-Points on the spine. The following acupuncture points will be used: LV3/ LV5, Tai Xi (Kl 3), Fe Yang (BL 58), Tai Chong (LR 3), Guang Ming (GB 37), Tai Xi (Kl 3) and Fe Yang (BL 58).

  • Standard acupuncture (SA)Other

    Participants are placed in the prone position (if required with a pillow under the abdomen). Then acupuncture is applied to the back of the body. The treatment takes place for the duration of 9 weeks (2x per week from week 1 to 6 and 1x a week from week 7 to 9). One treatment session lasts about 50-60 minutes. The SA method is described in the acupuncture textbook for TCM in China and all acupuncture points are selected based on TCM principles, international literature, and the opinion of national and international TCM experts. The following points have been selected: Ming Men (GV 4), Zhi Shi (BL 52), Tai Xi (KI 3) Yao Guan (GV 3), Guan Yuan Shu (BL 26), Ge Shu (BL 17), Ci Liao (BL 32), Wei Zhong (BL 40), Ji Zhong (GV 6), Yao Yang Guan (GV 3), Shen Shu (BL 23), Da Chang Shu (BL 25) and A-Shi points.

Study groups in NCT05232487
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Swiss low back acupuncture groupExperimentalParticipants in this group will be treated with the Swiss low back acupuncture method.
Receives: Other: Swiss low back acupuncture (SLBA)
Standard acupuncture groupActive comparatorParticipants in this group will be treated with the standard acupuncture method.
Receives: Other: Standard acupuncture (SA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Severeity rated by 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale

    Pain severity will be assessed by the 11-point numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 "No pain" to 10 "maximal pain".

    Measured: Difference in change between 9 weeks of treatment with SLBA compared to SA therapy.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Changes in biopsychosocial health and quality of life

    The Short Form 36 will be assessed at the start of the intervention (T1) and after completion of the last intervention (T2), as well as at follow-up (3 months after the end of intervention [T3] / 6 months after the end of intervention [T4]).

    Measured: Difference in change between 9 weeks of treatment with SLBA compared to SA therapy; after 3 and 6 months follow-up.

  2. Changes in symptomatic distress

    The SCL-90 R. Scales of Anxiety (10 items), Depression (13 items), and Somatization (12 items) will be assessed at the start of the intervention (T1) and after completion of the last intervention (T2), as well as at follow-up (3 months after the end of intervention [T3] / 6 months after the end of intervention [T4]).

    Measured: Difference in change between 9 weeks of treatment with SLBA compared to SA therapy; after 3 and 6 months follow-up.

  3. Changes in functional status and disability

    The score of the Oswestry Disability Index will be assessed at the start of the intervention (T1) and after completion of the last intervention (T2), as well as at follow-up (3 months after the end of intervention [T3] / 6 months after the end of intervention [T4]).

    Measured: Difference in change between 9 weeks of treatment with SLBA compared to SA therapy; after 3 and 6 months follow-up.

  4. Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) - pain severity score

    Pain severity score will be calculated from 3 items:

    • Rate the severity of your current pain (now, at the moment).
    • How severe was your pain in the last week? (average)
    • How much do you suffer from your pain?

    The total score will be transformed into 0 (maximal pain) to 100 points (no pain) by the following equation: 100 - (scored points)/18 ×100

    MPI will be assessed at the start of the intervention (T1) and after completion of the last intervention (T2), as well as at follow-up (3 months after the end of intervention [T3] / 6 months after the end of intervention [T4]).

    Measured: Difference in change between 9 weeks of treatment with SLBA compared to SA therapy.

  5. Pain diary

    Patients will be asked to complete a daily pain diary during the 9-weeks of acupuncture therapy (completed at the end of each day, before going to bed). In this diary, the patients will rate their perceived pain severity from 0 (none) to 5 (almost intolerable pain) during pre-defined periods of the day. Furthermore, drug intake related to pain relief will be documented.

    Measured: During the 9 weeks of treatment with SLBA compared to SA therapy.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Feb 2022
  2. Study startJan 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study is a randomized, controlled, single-blind, parallel trial, allocating patients with CLBP 1:1 to either 9 weeks of SLBA or SA therapy.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
116 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05232487
Sponsor's protocol ID
Study ID: TCM_AKU01/2021
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
30 Dec 2021
Last updated
15 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with an academic interest in LBP. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no Protected Health Information included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.

Publications

  • Angst F, Verra ML, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A. Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Apr 25;8:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-26.

    PubMed 18439285
  • Angst F, Verra ML, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A, Angst J. Refined insights into the pain-depression association in chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain. 2008 Nov-Dec;24(9):808-16. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31817bcc5f.

    PubMed 18936599
  • Benz T, Lehmann S, Elfering A, Sandor PS, Angst F. Comprehensiveness and validity of a multidimensional assessment in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Mar 20;22(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04130-x.

    PubMed 33743669
  • Chan MWC, Wu XY, Wu JCY, Wong SYS, Chung VCH. Safety of Acupuncture: Overview of Systematic Reviews. Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 13;7(1):3369. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03272-0.

    PubMed 28611366
  • Hasenbring, M. (2004). Rückenschmerzen: Der Chronifizierung frühzeitig entgegenwirken. In Neuroorthopädie (pp. 13-21). Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1949-7_3

  • Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization). Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;6(1):103-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

    PubMed 24605197
  • Labots G, Jones A, de Visser SJ, Rissmann R, Burggraaf J. Gender differences in clinical registration trials: is there a real problem? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;84(4):700-707. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13497. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

    PubMed 29293280
  • Lee CP, Fu TS, Liu CY, Hung CI. Psychometric evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index in patients with chronic low back pain: factor and Mokken analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 3;15(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0768-8.

    PubMed 28974227
  • Leem J. Does acupuncture increase the risk of bleeding in patients taking warfarin? Integr Med Res. 2015 Jun;4(2):119-121. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 Apr 22. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28664117
  • Mcculloch M, Nachat A, Schwartz J, Casella-Gordon V, Cook J. Acupuncture safety in patients receiving anticoagulants: a systematic review. Perm J. 2015 Winter;19(1):68-73. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-057. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

    PubMed 25432001
  • Mu J, Furlan AD, Lam WY, Hsu MY, Ning Z, Lao L. Acupuncture for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 11;12(12):CD013814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013814.

    PubMed 33306198
  • Pignon JP, Arriagada R. Early stopping rules and long-term follow-up in phase III trials. Lung Cancer. 1994 Mar;10 Suppl 1:S151-9. doi: 10.1016/0169-5002(94)91677-2.

    PubMed 8087505
  • Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004 Aug;8(4):283-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.09.004.

    PubMed 15207508
  • Schmitz N, Hartkamp N, Kiuse J, Franke GH, Reister G, Tress W. The Symptom Check-List-90-R (SCL-90-R): a German validation study. Qual Life Res. 2000 Mar;9(2):185-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1008931926181.

    PubMed 10983482
  • Witt CM, Pach D, Brinkhaus B, Wruck K, Tag B, Mank S, Willich SN. Safety of acupuncture: results of a prospective observational study with 229,230 patients and introduction of a medical information and consent form. Forsch Komplementmed. 2009 Apr;16(2):91-7. doi: 10.1159/000209315. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

    PubMed 19420954

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Swiss low back acupuncture (SLBA) and Standard acupuncture (SA) in people with Chronic Low-back Pain, run by Li Yiming at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michael Furian, PhD (+ 41 079 403 75 86, michael.furian@usz.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Severeity rated by 11-Point Numerical Rating Scale (time frame: Difference in change between 9 weeks of treatment with SLBA compared to SA therapy.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05232487, which also lists 19 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in