Diabetic Foot UlcerDIASSISTNCT05236660
Personalised Assistive Devices Approach for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention
A study testing Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimized, Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimized and Foot temperature monitoring in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 5 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Preventing foot ulcers in people with diabetes can reduce costs and increase quality of life. Despite availability of various interventions to prevent foot ulcers, recurrence rates remain high. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimized, Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimized and Foot temperature monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 126 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2022to 30 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2
- Age 18 years or above
- Loss of protective sensation based on the presence of peripheral neuropathy
- A healed plantar foot ulcer or foot amputation in the preceding 4 years until two weeks before study inclusion
- In possession of custom-made orthopaedic shoes, defined as "Orthopaedic shoes type A" or "Orthopaedic shoes type B" , or Orthopaedic Provision in Regular Footwear (OVAC), according to the Dutch healthcare system
- Ability to provide informed consent
Who cannot join
- Foot ulcer or open amputation site(s)
- Active Charcot's neuroarthropathy
- Foot infection, based on criteria of the PEDIS classification
- Amputation proximal to the metatarsal bones in both feet
- Healed ulcer on the apex of digitus 2-5 as the only ulcer location in the past 4 years, as surgical intervention (flexor tenotomy) is a more likely and guideline-recommended treatment for such patients, rather than the multimodal care under investigation
- Severe illness that would make 12-months survival unlikely, based on the clinical judgment by the physician
- Concomitant severe physical or mental conditions that limit the ability to follow instructions for the study, based on clinical judgment
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Netherlands5 sites
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam
Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis
Beverwijk
Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis
Delft
Spaarne Gasthuis
Hoofddorp
Máxima Medisch Centrum
Veldhoven
About this study
Official title: Cost-utility of an Integrated Personalised Assistive Devices Approach to Reduce Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Diabetes (DIASSIST): a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Preventing foot ulcers in people with diabetes can reduce costs and increase quality of life. Despite availability of various interventions to prevent foot ulcers, recurrence rates remain high. We hypothesise that a multimodal approach incorporating a variety of orthotic interventions that matches an individual person's need can reduce ulcer recurrence with beneficial cost-effectiveness and cost-utility.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- Being tested
- Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimized, Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimized, Foot temperature monitoring, Education
- Keywords
- diabetes, foot ulcer, prevention, cost-utility
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Foot, Diabetes Mellitus, Foot Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimizedDevice
Pressure-optimized custom-made shoes: evaluated and optimized using in-shoe pressure analysis, and re-evaluated after 6 months.
Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimizedDevice
Pressure-optimized custom-made indoor shoes: evaluated and optimized using in-shoe pressure analysis, and re-evaluated after 6 months. Specifically designed for indoor use.
Foot temperature monitoringDevice
Personalised at-home daily foot temperature monitoring at high-risk regions.
EducationBehavioural
Personalised patient education consisting of quantitative feedback on in-shoe pressures, temperature measurements and footwear use and, in addition, motivational interviewing where indicated and needed to improve device use.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multimodal care | Experimental | Multimodal personalised treatment Receives: Device: Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimized; Device: Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimized; Device: Foot temperature monitoring; Behavioral: Education |
| Usual care | No intervention | Usual care as offered to high-risk patients as offered in the Netherlands |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cost-utility (as the primary economic outcome)
defined as the ratio between costs related to foot care and quality-adjusted life years, based on the health utilities associated with the scoring profiles on the EQ-5D-5L with Dutch reference scores
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Adherence to wearing custom-made footwear (as the primary patient-related outcome)
defined as the percentage of steps taken in prescribed footwear, calculated by combining physical activity and wearing time measurements
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Foot ulcer recurrence during the 12-months follow-up (as the primary clinical outcome)
defined as "a break of the skin of the foot that involves as a minimum the epidermis and part of the dermis, in a person who has a history of foot ulceration, irrespective of location and time since the previous foot ulcer", with the first ulcer in the study period recorded as primary outcome and percentage participants with ulcer recurrence on group level as primary outcome
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Cost-effectiveness
defined as the ratio between costs related to foot care and foot ulcer recurrence on any location of the foot
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Plantar foot ulcer recurrence
following the definition of foot ulcer recurrence (outcome 3), but then limited to the plantar side of the foot
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Foot ulcer recurrence at three predefined high-risk locations
following the definition of foot ulcer recurrence (outcome 3), but then limited to a maximum 3 high risk locations per participant, specified at the start of the study, based on barefoot pressures, ulcer history, pre-ulcerative lesions or signs of abundant callus
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Costs related to foot care (from a societal and medical perspective)
Costs will be calculated for each participant as the product sum of resource volume data and their respective unit costs. Resource volume data will be obtained from the completed study specific versions of the institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), as these contain the volume data on healthcare resource utilization, out-of-pocket expenses and loss of productivity related to foot care. Foot care includes both care for ulcer prevention (e.g. podiatry appointments, rehabilitation physician consultations) and for ulcer treatment (e.g. multidisciplinary treatment, hospitalization, surgery). Reference prices for unit costs will be based on the most recent Dutch manual for costing in healthcare research available at the time of analysis. All costs will be summed during the entire study period.
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Quality-adjusted life years
based on the health utilities associated with the scoring profiles on the EQ-5D-5L with Dutch reference scores. This will be monitored during the entire study period.
Measured: 12 months (full study period)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2022
- Study start2 Mar 2022
- Primary completion2 Oct 2025
- Study completion30 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Foot UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sicco Bus, PhD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
- Investigators
- Sicco Bus, Prof, Principal investigator, Amsterdam UMC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05236660
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL78943.018.21
- Acronym
- DIASSIST
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data can be made available after an embargo period, to allow the research team to write all prespecified publications. The embargo period is required, as publications may often follow once the project has already ended. The embargo period will be a maximum 2 years, to allow the research sufficient time to finish the publications as specified in the protocol. If publications are available earlier, the embargo will end earlier. Conditions for reuse will apply, but have yet to be finalized.
Publications
Vossen LE, van Netten JJ, Bakker CD, Berendsen HA, Busch-Westbroek TE, Peters EJG, Sabelis LWE, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bus SA. An integrated personalized assistive devices approach to reduce the risk of foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes (DIASSIST): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Oct 12;24(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07635-z.
PubMed 37828618
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cost-utility of an Integrated Personalised Assistive Devices Approach to Reduce Foot Ulcer Recurrence in Diabetes (DIASSIST): a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05236660
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DIASSIST / NL78943.018.21
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer
- Keywords
- diabetes, foot ulcer, prevention, cost-utility
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Preventing foot ulcers in people with diabetes can reduce costs and increase quality of life. Despite availability of various interventions to prevent foot ulcers, recurrence rates remain high. We hypothesise that a multimodal approach incorporating a variety of orthotic interventions that matches an individual person's need can reduce ulcer recurrence with beneficial cost-effectiveness and cost-utility.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multimodal care | Experimental | Device: Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimized, Device: Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimized, Device: Foot temperature monitoring, Behavioral: EducationMultimodal personalised treatment |
| Usual care | No intervention | –Usual care as offered to high-risk patients as offered in the Netherlands |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2
- Age 18 years or above
- Loss of protective sensation based on the presence of peripheral neuropathy
- A healed plantar foot ulcer or foot amputation in the preceding 4 years until two weeks before study inclusion
- In possession of custom-made orthopaedic shoes, defined as "Orthopaedic shoes type A" or "Orthopaedic shoes type B" , or Orthopaedic Provision in Regular Footwear (OVAC), according to the Dutch healthcare system
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Foot ulcer or open amputation site(s)
- Active Charcot's neuroarthropathy
- Foot infection, based on criteria of the PEDIS classification
- Amputation proximal to the metatarsal bones in both feet
- Healed ulcer on the apex of digitus 2-5 as the only ulcer location in the past 4 years, as surgical intervention (flexor tenotomy) is a more likely and guideline-recommended treatment for such patients, rather than the multimodal care under investigation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimizedPressure-optimized custom-made shoes: evaluated and optimized using in-shoe pressure analysis, and re-evaluated after 6 months. | Device | Multimodal care |
| Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimizedPressure-optimized custom-made indoor shoes: evaluated and optimized using in-shoe pressure analysis, and re-evaluated after 6 months. Specifically designed for indoor use. | Device | Multimodal care |
| Foot temperature monitoringPersonalised at-home daily foot temperature monitoring at high-risk regions. | Device | Multimodal care |
| EducationPersonalised patient education consisting of quantitative feedback on in-shoe pressures, temperature measurements and footwear use and, in addition, motivational interviewing where indicated and needed to improve device use. | Behavioural | Multimodal care |
Primary outcome
Cost-utility (as the primary economic outcome)
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
defined as the ratio between costs related to foot care and quality-adjusted life years, based on the health utilities associated with the scoring profiles on the EQ-5D-5L with Dutch reference scores
Adherence to wearing custom-made footwear (as the primary patient-related outcome)
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
defined as the percentage of steps taken in prescribed footwear, calculated by combining physical activity and wearing time measurements
Foot ulcer recurrence during the 12-months follow-up (as the primary clinical outcome)
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
defined as "a break of the skin of the foot that involves as a minimum the epidermis and part of the dermis, in a person who has a history of foot ulceration, irrespective of location and time since the previous foot ulcer", with the first ulcer in the study period recorded as primary outcome and percentage participants with ulcer recurrence on group level as primary outcome
5 secondary outcomes
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
Plantar foot ulcer recurrence
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
Foot ulcer recurrence at three predefined high-risk locations
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
Costs related to foot care (from a societal and medical perspective)
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
Quality-adjusted life years
Time frame: 12 months (full study period)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37828618Vossen LE, van Netten JJ, Bakker CD, Berendsen HA, Busch-Westbroek TE, Peters EJG, Sabelis LWE, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bus SA. An integrated personalized assistive devices approach to reduce the risk of foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes (DIASSIST): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Oct 12;24(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07635-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data can be made available after an embargo period, to allow the research team to write all prespecified publications. The embargo period is required, as publications may often follow once the project has already ended. The embargo period will be a maximum 2 years, to allow the research sufficient time to finish the publications as specified in the protocol. If publications are available earlier, the embargo will end earlier. Conditions for reuse will apply, but have yet to be finalized.
Related trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy Evaluation of Turmeric-Derived Nanoparticle Hydrogel for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Wounds
Diabete Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Better Care Closer to Home: Enhancing Primary and Community Care
Diabetic Foot Disease, Recurrence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sicco Bus, Prof principal investigator
Amsterdam UMC
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Custom-made shoes: pressure-optimized, Custom-made indoor shoes: pressure optimized and Foot temperature monitoring in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 5 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cost-utility (as the primary economic outcome) (time frame: 12 months (full study period)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05236660, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.