Anesthesia, LocalNCT05237479
Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty
A study testing Suprainguinal fascia ilica block in people with Anesthesia, Local and Block, run by Montefiore Medical Center.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to determine whether or not a suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment nerve block is effective at improving postoperative pain control in patients receiving an anterior approach hip replacement surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Local, Block
- What is being tested?
- Suprainguinal fascia ilica block
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2022to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing primary elective total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach
- ASA Class I-III
- Age > 18 years old
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal
- Inability to understand and sign an informed consent
- Infection at the injection site
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to ropivacaine or other amide local anesthetics
- Contraindication or patient refusal to get spinal anesthesia
- Thrombocytopenia (Platelets < 100, 000)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Coagulopathy (INR > 1.4)
- Use of anticoagulant drugs that have not been discontinued in an appropriate amount of time - according to American Society of Regional Anesthesia guidelines, prior to surgery
- End-Stage Renal Disease
- ASA Class IV-V
- Patients on chronic opioid therapy on most days for > 3 months [19].
- BMI>40
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Pilot Study
The goal of this study is to determine whether or not a suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment nerve block is effective at improving postoperative pain control in patients receiving an anterior approach hip replacement surgery. In general, postoperative pain control has a significant impact on earlier ambulation, initiation of physical therapy, better functional recovery, and overall patient satisfaction. The hypothesis is that providing patients with this nerve block will decrease opioid requirements in patients undergoing this surgery as compared to patients that do not receive the block.
Read the detailed description
Study Design: Interventional Trial
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Treatment groups: Group A: Control Group - DAA THA under spinal anesthesia ( standard of care at Montefiore)
Group B: Intervention Group - DAA THA under spinal anesthesia and a preoperative supra-inguinal fascia iliac compartment block (S-FICB)
Blinding Procedures:
- On the day of surgery, a sealed envelope with group allocation (Group A- Control vs. Group B - Intervention) will be opened by a team member not involved with data collection.
- For patients allocated to Group B - Intervention: A regional anesthesia block team consisting of a regional anesthesiologist, regional fellow, and resident will carry out the S-FICB in the preoperative area prior to surgery
- A separate anesthesia team consisting of an anesthesiologist and certified nurse anesthetist will be responsible for the spinal anesthetic and monitored anesthesia care for both groups in the operating room
- A separate acute pain service team will follow the patients in both groups on postoperative day 1 and evaluate sensory and motor distribution of LFCN, FN, and ON for both groups
- A research assistant blinded to the allocation of both groups will collect data from the EMR for analysis. In addition, a research assistant blinded to the allocation of both groups will call patients via telephone 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey.
Hypothesis: The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block will decrease 24 hours post-surgery opioid requirements in patients undergoing elective direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty.
Target Population: Patients undergoing primary elective total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach
Recruitment methods: Participants who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study will be approached to participate in the study at the preoperative visit at the Orthopedic Surgeon's Office. Informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained during the preoperative visit.
The planned interventions and their timing:
- On the day of surgery, patients who have been randomized to Group B - Intervention will receive a preoperative S-FICB using 35 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (max dose of 3mg/kg) under ultrasound guidance by the regional anesthesia block team once the patient has been marked by the surgeon
- The sensory and motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, and ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery. For those patients who received a S-FICB in preop, approximately 15 minutes after the block, sensory and motor distribution of LFCN, FN, and ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia block team prior to going to the operating room.
- All patients, regardless of group allocation, will be followed by the acute pain service team on postoperative day one to assess sensory and motor distribution of LFCN, FN, and ON and adjustment of pain medication regimens
- All patients will receive a telephone call from a research assistant blinded to group allocation 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey.
- Postoperatively all patients will be placed on the following pain regimen:
- All patients will be started on a Hydromorphone intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 24 hours, with starting parameters: 0.2mg q10 min bolus dosing without a basal rate.
- A standardized regimen of non-opioid adjuvants will include: Acetaminophen 975mg po q8h, Pregabalin 50mg po BID, Ketorolac 15mg q8h IV x 24 hours followed by Celebrex 200mg po BID.
- After the first 24 hours, patients will be transitioned off the hydromorphone PCA with oxycodone 5mg PO q4h prn for moderate pain and 10mg PO q4h prn for severe pain, hydromorphone 0.2mg IV q4h prn for breakthrough pain. These doses may be increased or decreased thereafter at the discretion of the acute pain service team based on patient evaluation and reported pain scores.
Study Population
- Patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach with neuraxial anesthesia
Participant Recruitment
Participants will be recruited during their preoperative visit to the office of the orthopedic surgery team performing the patient's surgery. At this visit, where the patient will be consented for the surgery itself, the orthopedic surgery team will present the opportunity to participate in this study during the perioperative period to patients who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. The informed consent document will be presented to the patient at this time for review. Contact information to the study's primary investigator and anesthesia associates will be provided on the informed consent documentation if the patient should require any further information about the study. If after reviewing the study details in the consent documentation, the patient is amenable to participating, they may provide consent by signing the consent form at the orthopedic surgeon's office free from coercion. Following enrollment in the study, patient data will be collected by the primary investigator's research team, stored securely, and all patient information and data will be de-identified prior to publication.
Risks/Benefits Anticipated risks of this study include the risks associated with the S-FICB procedure itself. These include infection, bleeding, injury to surrounding structures including nerves, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity which can occur if a large amount of local anesthetic is inadvertently injected intravascularly. This procedure is performed under sterile conditions, minimizing the risk of infection. In addition, patients who have local infection at the site of injection will be excluded as participants. The risks of major bleeding is rare for patients who do not have preexisting coagulopathies, and is low for patients who are on anticoagulation that has been discontinued an appropriate amount of time prior to surgery according to the American Society for Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) guidelines. Furthermore, the risk of nerve injury is greatly mitigated using ultrasound guidance in performing this type of nerve block where nerve tissue can be identified visually. Additionally, because this is a fascial plane block, the investigators do not aim to inject local anesthetic directly adjacent to nerve structures, minimizing risk of nerve injury or damage. The use of ultrasound guidance also mitigates the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity as blood vessels can be visualized and avoided. The practice of frequent aspiration during injection of local anesthetic also protects against this risk.
Another risk to participants of this study is the possible loss of confidentiality; however, the investigators have designed this study to include protocols for keeping patient information private. In addition, strict storage and de-identification of data will be used to protect patient information.
This study presents several possible benefits to participants and future patients who must undergo this surgery. It presents a potential avenue for decreasing opioid requirements in the perioperative period. Adverse events associated with opioids cause significant morbidity to the patient in the postoperative period. These include nausea, vomiting, sedation and dizziness that can lead to falls during attempted ambulation and inability to participate in physical therapy, and respiratory depression requiring intervention. All of these possible events can hinder recovery significantly and contribute to longer hospital lengths of stay.
Improved pain control overall is also a potential benefit to patients participating in this study. Decreasing the levels of pain experienced by patients is often instrumental in improving a patient's satisfaction with their surgery and in-hospital recovery. Decreased pain also makes it less challenging for a patient to participate fully in physical therapy, aiding in the recovery process after major orthopedic surgery.
If the results of this study support the use of the S-FICB showing improved outcomes for patients in the postoperative period, this peripheral nerve block can be more widely employed and incorporated as part of a multimodal perioperative opioid sparing pathway to improve outcomes for this patient population in the future.
The S-FICB is a relatively low-risk procedure, while the potential benefits to participants in this study, as well as future participants, is substantial.
Randomization On the day of surgery, an envelope containing the randomization code will be given to the regional team responsible for the study patient. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive S-FICB or standard of care using a 1:1 allocation ratio. --- BMI.--- A research associate who is not directly involved with the study procedures will maintain the randomization codes.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Local, Block
- Being tested
- Suprainguinal fascia ilica block, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Bites and Stings
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Suprainguinal fascia ilica blockProcedure or surgery
Patients who have been randomized to Group B Intervention will receive a preoperative S-FICB using 35ml of 0.5% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance by the regional anesthesia block team once patient has been marked by surgeon. Sensory \& motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, \& ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery. Patients who received a S-FICB in preop, approximately 15 minutes after the block, sensory \& motor distribution of LFCN, FN, \& ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia block team prior to going to the operating room. All patients, regardless of group allocation, will be followed by the acute pain service team on postoperative day one to assess sensory \& motor distribution of LFCN, FN, \& ON \& adjustment of pain medication regimens. All patients will receive a call from a research assistant blinded to group allocation 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey.
PlaceboOther
The sensory and motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, and ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | DAA THA under spinal anesthesia ( standard of care at Montefiore) Receives: Other: Placebo |
| Intervention Group | Active comparator | DAA THA under spinal anesthesia and a preoperative supra-inguinal fascia iliac compartment block (S-FICB) Receives: Procedure: Suprainguinal fascia ilica block |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME)
Morphine Milligram Equivalent use in PACU
Measured: In PACU (1-2 hours postoperatively)
Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME)
Morphine Milligram Equivalent use post-op
Measured: 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (8)
Sensory and Motor Distribution of LFCN, FN and ON
Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance.
To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline.
Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance.
To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline.
Measured: Preoperatively prior to surgery
Sensory and Motor Distribution of LFCN, FN and ON
Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance.
To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline.
Sensory assessment of the LCFN, FN and ON - Response to pinprick in the anterior, medial and lateral aspects of the thigh Motor assessment of FN and ON - To test FN: Investigator supports knee under popliteal fossa and patient is asked to extend knee against resistance.
To test ON: Patient's leg is abducted in the supine position and patient will be asked to adduct knee to the midline.
Measured: Postoperatively 24 hours after surgery
Length of Hospital Stay
To determine the average length of hospital stay (LOS) in Group A - control (did not receive the S-FICB) and Group B: Intervention (received S-FICB)
Measured: Up to 7 days
Patient satisfaction of acute postoperative pain management experience
Ordinal variables consisting of varying levels of satisfaction namely: Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Unsatisfied, and Very Unsatisfied
Measured: 24 hours post discharge
Pain scores in PACU
Numerical Pain rating, scale of 0-10
Measured: PACU stay
Pain scores at 24 hours Postoperatively
Numerical Pain rating, scale of 0-10
Measured: 24 hours postoperatively
Pain scores at 48 hours Postoperatively
Numerical Pain rating, scale of 0-10
Measured: 48 hours
Emergency Department Readmissions postoperatively
Emergency department visit or readmission within 7 days following surgery.
Measured: 1-7 days postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2022
- Study startJun 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Study never approved by IRB or initiated
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthesia, LocalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Montefiore Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sofia steinberg, DO, Principal investigator, Montefiore Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05237479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-13705
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kloppenburg M, Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Mar;28(3):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
PubMed 31945457Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
PubMed 17403800Zhang D, Pan L, Maimaitijuma T, Liu H, Wu H. Imaging Analysis of Prosthesis Angle after Hip Replacement with Direct Anterior Approach in Lateral Position. J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 17;2021:5540834. doi: 10.1155/2021/5540834. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33680413Galakatos GR. Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Mo Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;115(6):537-541.
PubMed 30643349Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
PubMed 26827847Kumar K, Kirksey MA, Duong S, Wu CL. A Review of Opioid-Sparing Modalities in Perioperative Pain Management: Methods to Decrease Opioid Use Postoperatively. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1749-1760. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002497.
PubMed 29049119Bugada D, Bellini V, Lorini LF, Mariano ER. Update on Selective Regional Analgesia for Hip Surgery Patients. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Sep;36(3):403-415. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
PubMed 30092937Xia Q, Ding W, Lin C, Xia J, Xu Y, Jia M. Postoperative pain treatment with transmuscular quadratus lumborum block and fascia iliaca compartment block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01413-7.
PubMed 34243719Nassar H, Hasanin A, Sewilam M, Ahmed H, Abo-Elsoud M, Taalab O, Rady A, Zoheir HA. Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. Local Reg Anesth. 2021 Apr 20;14:67-74. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S308964. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 33907462Desmet M, Balocco AL, Van Belleghem V. Fascia iliaca compartment blocks: Different techniques and review of the literature. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Mar;33(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
PubMed 31272654O'Reilly N, Desmet M, Kearns R. Fascia iliaca compartment block. BJA Educ. 2019 Jun;19(6):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 33456890Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg. 1989 Dec;69(6):705-13.
PubMed 2589650Dolan J, Williams A, Murney E, Smith M, Kenny GN. Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block: a comparison with the loss of resistance technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;33(6):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.03.008.
PubMed 19258967Hebbard P, Ivanusic J, Sha S. Ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block: a cadaveric evaluation of a novel approach. Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06628.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
PubMed 21401544Vermeylen K, Desmet M, Leunen I, Soetens F, Neyrinck A, Carens D, Caerts B, Seynaeve P, Hadzic A, Van de Velde M. Supra-inguinal injection for fascia iliaca compartment block results in more consistent spread towards the lumbar plexus than an infra-inguinal injection: a volunteer study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Feb 22:rapm-2018-100092. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100092. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 30798268
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05237479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021-13705
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Local, Block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study never approved by IRB or initiated
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to determine whether or not a suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment nerve block is effective at improving postoperative pain control in patients receiving an anterior approach hip replacement surgery. In general, postoperative pain control has a significant impact on earlier ambulation, initiation of physical therapy, better functional recovery, and overall patient satisfaction. The hypothesis is that providing patients with this nerve block will decrease opioid requirements in patients undergoing this surgery as compared to patients that do not receive the block.
Detailed description
Study Design: Interventional Trial
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Treatment groups: Group A: Control Group - DAA THA under spinal anesthesia ( standard of care at Montefiore)
Group B: Intervention Group - DAA THA under spinal anesthesia and a preoperative supra-inguinal fascia iliac compartment block (S-FICB)
Blinding Procedures:
- On the day of surgery, a sealed envelope with group allocation (Group A- Control vs. Group B - Intervention) will be opened by a team member not involved with data collection.
- For patients allocated to Group B - Intervention: A regional anesthesia block team consisting of a regional anesthesiologist, regional fellow, and resident will carry out the S-FICB in the preoperative area prior to surgery
- A separate anesthesia team consisting of an anesthesiologist and certified nurse anesthetist will be responsible for the spinal anesthetic and monitored anesthesia care for both groups in the operating room
- A separate acute pain service team will follow the patients in both groups on postoperative day 1 and evaluate sensory and motor distribution of LFCN, FN, and ON for both groups
- A research assistant blinded to the allocation of both groups will collect data from the EMR for analysis. In addition, a research assistant blinded to the allocation of both groups will call patients via telephone 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey.
Hypothesis: The supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block will decrease 24 hours post-surgery opioid requirements in patients undergoing elective direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty.
Target Population: Patients undergoing primary elective total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach
Recruitment methods: Participants who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the study will be approached to participate in the study at the preoperative visit at the Orthopedic Surgeon's Office. Informed consent for participation in the study will be obtained during the preoperative visit.
The planned interventions and their timing:
- On the day of surgery, patients who have been randomized to Group B - Intervention will receive a preoperative S-FICB using 35 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (max dose of 3mg/kg) under ultrasound guidance by the regional anesthesia block team once the patient has been marked by the surgeon
- The sensory and motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, and ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery. For those patients who received a S-FICB in preop, approximately 15 minutes after the block, sensory and motor distribution of LFCN, FN, and ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia block team prior to going to the operating room.
- All patients, regardless of group allocation, will be followed by the acute pain service team on postoperative day one to assess sensory and motor distribution of LFCN, FN, and ON and adjustment of pain medication regimens
- All patients will receive a telephone call from a research assistant blinded to group allocation 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey.
- Postoperatively all patients will be placed on the following pain regimen:
- All patients will be started on a Hydromorphone intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for 24 hours, with starting parameters: 0.2mg q10 min bolus dosing without a basal rate.
- A standardized regimen of non-opioid adjuvants will include: Acetaminophen 975mg po q8h, Pregabalin 50mg po BID, Ketorolac 15mg q8h IV x 24 hours followed by Celebrex 200mg po BID.
- After the first 24 hours, patients will be transitioned off the hydromorphone PCA with oxycodone 5mg PO q4h prn for moderate pain and 10mg PO q4h prn for severe pain, hydromorphone 0.2mg IV q4h prn for breakthrough pain. These doses may be increased or decreased thereafter at the discretion of the acute pain service team based on patient evaluation and reported pain scores.
Study Population
- Patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach with neuraxial anesthesia
Participant Recruitment
Participants will be recruited during their preoperative visit to the office of the orthopedic surgery team performing the patient's surgery. At this visit, where the patient will be consented for the surgery itself, the orthopedic surgery team will present the opportunity to participate in this study during the perioperative period to patients who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria. The informed consent document will be presented to the patient at this time for review. Contact information to the study's primary investigator and anesthesia associates will be provided on the informed consent documentation if the patient should require any further information about the study. If after reviewing the study details in the consent documentation, the patient is amenable to participating, they may provide consent by signing the consent form at the orthopedic surgeon's office free from coercion. Following enrollment in the study, patient data will be collected by the primary investigator's research team, stored securely, and all patient information and data will be de-identified prior to publication.
Risks/Benefits Anticipated risks of this study include the risks associated with the S-FICB procedure itself. These include infection, bleeding, injury to surrounding structures including nerves, and local anesthetic systemic toxicity which can occur if a large amount of local anesthetic is inadvertently injected intravascularly. This procedure is performed under sterile conditions, minimizing the risk of infection. In addition, patients who have local infection at the site of injection will be excluded as participants. The risks of major bleeding is rare for patients who do not have preexisting coagulopathies, and is low for patients who are on anticoagulation that has been discontinued an appropriate amount of time prior to surgery according to the American Society for Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) guidelines. Furthermore, the risk of nerve injury is greatly mitigated using ultrasound guidance in performing this type of nerve block where nerve tissue can be identified visually. Additionally, because this is a fascial plane block, the investigators do not aim to inject local anesthetic directly adjacent to nerve structures, minimizing risk of nerve injury or damage. The use of ultrasound guidance also mitigates the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity as blood vessels can be visualized and avoided. The practice of frequent aspiration during injection of local anesthetic also protects against this risk.
Another risk to participants of this study is the possible loss of confidentiality; however, the investigators have designed this study to include protocols for keeping patient information private. In addition, strict storage and de-identification of data will be used to protect patient information.
This study presents several possible benefits to participants and future patients who must undergo this surgery. It presents a potential avenue for decreasing opioid requirements in the perioperative period. Adverse events associated with opioids cause significant morbidity to the patient in the postoperative period. These include nausea, vomiting, sedation and dizziness that can lead to falls during attempted ambulation and inability to participate in physical therapy, and respiratory depression requiring intervention. All of these possible events can hinder recovery significantly and contribute to longer hospital lengths of stay.
Improved pain control overall is also a potential benefit to patients participating in this study. Decreasing the levels of pain experienced by patients is often instrumental in improving a patient's satisfaction with their surgery and in-hospital recovery. Decreased pain also makes it less challenging for a patient to participate fully in physical therapy, aiding in the recovery process after major orthopedic surgery.
If the results of this study support the use of the S-FICB showing improved outcomes for patients in the postoperative period, this peripheral nerve block can be more widely employed and incorporated as part of a multimodal perioperative opioid sparing pathway to improve outcomes for this patient population in the future.
The S-FICB is a relatively low-risk procedure, while the potential benefits to participants in this study, as well as future participants, is substantial.
Randomization On the day of surgery, an envelope containing the randomization code will be given to the regional team responsible for the study patient. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive S-FICB or standard of care using a 1:1 allocation ratio. --- BMI.--- A research associate who is not directly involved with the study procedures will maintain the randomization codes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboDAA THA under spinal anesthesia ( standard of care at Montefiore) |
| Intervention Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Suprainguinal fascia ilica blockDAA THA under spinal anesthesia and a preoperative supra-inguinal fascia iliac compartment block (S-FICB) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients undergoing primary elective total hip arthroplasty under direct anterior surgical approach
- ASA Class I-III
- Age > 18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patient refusal
- Inability to understand and sign an informed consent
- Infection at the injection site
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to ropivacaine or other amide local anesthetics
- Contraindication or patient refusal to get spinal anesthesia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Suprainguinal fascia ilica blockPatients who have been randomized to Group B Intervention will receive a preoperative S-FICB using 35ml of 0.5% ropivacaine under ultrasound guidance by the regional anesthesia block team once patient has been marked by surgeon. Sensory \& motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, \& ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery. Patients who received a S-FICB in preop, approximately 15 minutes after the block, sensory \& motor distribution of LFCN, FN, \& ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia block team prior to going to the operating room. All patients, regardless of group allocation, will be followed by the acute pain service team on postoperative day one to assess sensory \& motor distribution of LFCN, FN, \& ON \& adjustment of pain medication regimens. All patients will receive a call from a research assistant blinded to group allocation 24 hours post-discharge for a patient satisfaction survey. | Procedure or surgery | Intervention Group |
| PlaceboThe sensory and motor distribution of the LFCN, FN, and ON will be assessed by the regional anesthesia team in the preop area for patients randomized to the control group prior to surgery. | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME)
Time frame: In PACU (1-2 hours postoperatively)
Morphine Milligram Equivalent use in PACU
Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME)
Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Morphine Milligram Equivalent use post-op
8 secondary outcomes
Sensory and Motor Distribution of LFCN, FN and ON
Time frame: Preoperatively prior to surgery
Sensory and Motor Distribution of LFCN, FN and ON
Time frame: Postoperatively 24 hours after surgery
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: Up to 7 days
Patient satisfaction of acute postoperative pain management experience
Time frame: 24 hours post discharge
Pain scores in PACU
Time frame: PACU stay
Pain scores at 24 hours Postoperatively
Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Pain scores at 48 hours Postoperatively
Time frame: 48 hours
Emergency Department Readmissions postoperatively
Time frame: 1-7 days postoperatively
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2022.
- Background: PubMed 31945457Kloppenburg M, Berenbaum F. Osteoarthritis year in review 2019: epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Mar;28(3):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
- Background: PubMed 17403800Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
- Background: PubMed 33680413Zhang D, Pan L, Maimaitijuma T, Liu H, Wu H. Imaging Analysis of Prosthesis Angle after Hip Replacement with Direct Anterior Approach in Lateral Position. J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 17;2021:5540834. doi: 10.1155/2021/5540834. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 30643349Galakatos GR. Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty. Mo Med. 2018 Nov-Dec;115(6):537-541.
- Background: PubMed 26827847Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
- Background: PubMed 29049119Kumar K, Kirksey MA, Duong S, Wu CL. A Review of Opioid-Sparing Modalities in Perioperative Pain Management: Methods to Decrease Opioid Use Postoperatively. Anesth Analg. 2017 Nov;125(5):1749-1760. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002497.
- Background: PubMed 30092937Bugada D, Bellini V, Lorini LF, Mariano ER. Update on Selective Regional Analgesia for Hip Surgery Patients. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Sep;36(3):403-415. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
- Background: PubMed 34243719Xia Q, Ding W, Lin C, Xia J, Xu Y, Jia M. Postoperative pain treatment with transmuscular quadratus lumborum block and fascia iliaca compartment block in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 10;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01413-7.
- Background: PubMed 33907462Nassar H, Hasanin A, Sewilam M, Ahmed H, Abo-Elsoud M, Taalab O, Rady A, Zoheir HA. Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. Local Reg Anesth. 2021 Apr 20;14:67-74. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S308964. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31272654Desmet M, Balocco AL, Van Belleghem V. Fascia iliaca compartment blocks: Different techniques and review of the literature. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Mar;33(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
- Background: PubMed 33456890O'Reilly N, Desmet M, Kearns R. Fascia iliaca compartment block. BJA Educ. 2019 Jun;19(6):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 24. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 2589650Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg. 1989 Dec;69(6):705-13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthesia, Local
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Recruiting
Minimum Effective Local Anesthetic Volume for Ultrasound Guided Superior Trunk Block
Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Changes to Prostate Procedures
Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant in Combined Costoclavicular Block and Suprascapular Block Versus Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopy
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sofia steinberg, DO principal investigator
Montefiore Medical Center
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Suprainguinal fascia ilica block in people with Anesthesia, Local and Block, run by Montefiore Medical Center.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Morphine Milligram Equivalent (MME) (time frame: In PACU (1-2 hours postoperatively)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05237479, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2022.