AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Muscular AtrophyNCT05237544

Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) - a Proof of Principle Study Using Anonymised Blood Spots.

An observational study of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 2 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
How many people
5,065 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
11 Nov 2019to 30 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 2 weeks
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: All samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital. No extra material will be collected and all blood spots will be completely anonymised. The anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen), in order to determine the accuracy of the assay in detecting SMA positives.

Who may be able to join

  • newborn babies

Who cannot join

  • non-newborn

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre

    London, WC1N 1EH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. Newborn blood spot screening (NBS)to detect SMA has been implemented in public health laboratories in some countries already. In the UK dried blood spots are collected within a few days of birth on all babies and subsequent newborn screening is currently carried out for other diseases but not for SMA. The investigators would like to carry out a proof of principal testing to show that an assay for SMA can be carried out on these routinely collected dried blood spots (completely anonymised). The investigators would also run some known anonymised SMA positive dried blood spots. The aim is to demonstrate that a simple robust test can be used in a routine diagnostic laboratory to accurately screen for SMA. The investigators will not have access to identifiable data or samples for this project.

Read the detailed description

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. The majority of babies born with SMA become symptomatic as babies (type I) or as toddlers (type II). Type I children will never sit unsupported, require ventilated support in the first year of life and usually die before 2 years of age. Type II children can survive to early adulthood but will never walk. They almost invariably develop severe curvature of the spine, feeding and respiratory insufficiency that require appropriate intervention. Cognitive abilities are not impaired and children are generally bright and sociable.

Several new therapies have recently been developed for children with SMA and have shown remarkable success in clinical trials. One of these therapies, spinraza, has received both FDA and EMA approval and is commercially available in most EU countries and in the US, and is being currently evaluated by NICE. Because of the early onset and rapid progression of infantile SMA, prompt detection of the disease is essential to enable successful treatment. It is now recommended that infants be screened for SMA, enabling early drug treatment thus preventing further neuron damage2. The recently published work on the development of spinraza indeed supports the view that children with shorter disease duration had much better outcome [the 2 NEJM papers] a concept that is also emphasised by the interim analysis of infants who received spinraza presymptomatically as part of an ongoing study sponsored by Biogen (Nurture study). The majority of these children had met the age appropriate milestones by the age of 1 year, a clearly remarkable outcome. Similar very promising results were obtained in a recently published AAV gene therapy study in which a number of the severe infants affected by type 1 SMA achieved even the ability to walk unsupported (Mendell SMA gene therapy NEJM 2017). Also in this manuscript, the children who had a shorter disease duration and those treated shortly after the diagnosis had a much better outcome compared to children treated later. While the findings from this early gene therapy study are currently being extended in a larger global phase 3 study, these dramatic results from emerging therapies have led many countries to include SMA in their respective newborn screening programmes.

A previous study (Adams et al. 2014, J. Clin. Imm) was carried out in an almost identical way to the study planned here. The previous study utilised 5000 anonymised leftover blood spots from a routine NBS lab to test the robustness and practicality of running a NBS assay for SCID. This study was scientifically critiqued leading to publication in a respected relevant scientific journal. The study planned here is identical in the approach (5000 normal leftover blood spots) to test the robustness and practicality of using a commercial assay for NBS for SMA in a routine clinical lab environment. As in the previous SCID study we plan to use a number of retrospective known positive samples as well as all the necessary positive/negative controls contained in the commercial kit. The sole aim of the study is to assess the performance of the commercial kit to provide evidence that NBS screening for SMA could feasibly be carried out in routine NBS screening labs.

The investigators therefore believe this is the correct route to take with SMA Newborn Screening as well. Assays for detection of SMA using the dried blood spots collected for Newborn Screening (NBS) have now been developed. This utilises the amplification of the SMN1 gene and subsequent detection of the deleted section that causes SMA. Newborn blood spot screening to detect SMA has been implemented in public health laboratories in some countries already. In the UK, dried blood spots are collected within a few days of birth on all babies and subsequent newborn screening is currently carried out for other diseases but not for SMA.

The investigators would like to carry out a proof of principal testing to show that an assay for SMA can be carried out on these anonymised routinely collected dried blood spots. We would also run some known anonymised SMA positive dried blood spots. The aim is to demonstrate that a simple robust test can be used in a routine diagnostic laboratory to accurately screen for SMA.

Medical subject headings
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05237544
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
leftover dried blood spot materialAll samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital.
anonymous known SMA positive blood spotsThe anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen),

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS

    Numbers of false negatives.-This is defined as the number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS (Newborn Screening).

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Ease of use of the assay

    Ease of use of the assay in a high-throughput Screening Lab environment. This is defined as the space for equipment and assay set up. It also includes hands-on time setting up and analysing the assay. These are measurable outcomes and will be measured in either dimensions (lab floor/bench space needed) and time (hours) per run.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Number of failed blood spots samples

    Number of failed samples. This is defined as the number of blood spots that fail to PCR amplify with the NBS (Newborn Screening) kit.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Assess if the screening assay picks up all known SMA positives

    40 SMA positives to be run

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Assess if there any false positives with the assay

    5000 spots to be run, not expected to be positive

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2022
  2. Study start11 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
5,065 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05237544
Sponsor's protocol ID
18NM20
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
12 Jun 2019
Last updated
14 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Adams SP, Gravett E, Kent N, Kricke S, Ifederu A, Scoto M, Samsuddin S, Muntoni F. Screening of Neonatal UK Dried Blood Spots Using a Duplex SMN1 Screening Assay. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021 Oct 26;7(4):69. doi: 10.3390/ijns7040069.

    PubMed 34842601

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05237544, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in