Spinal Muscular AtrophyNCT05237544
Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) - a Proof of Principle Study Using Anonymised Blood Spots.
An observational study of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 2 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- How many people
- 5,065 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 11 Nov 2019to 30 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 2 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: All samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital. No extra material will be collected and all blood spots will be completely anonymised. The anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen), in order to determine the accuracy of the assay in detecting SMA positives.
Who may be able to join
- newborn babies
Who cannot join
- non-newborn
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. Newborn blood spot screening (NBS)to detect SMA has been implemented in public health laboratories in some countries already. In the UK dried blood spots are collected within a few days of birth on all babies and subsequent newborn screening is currently carried out for other diseases but not for SMA. The investigators would like to carry out a proof of principal testing to show that an assay for SMA can be carried out on these routinely collected dried blood spots (completely anonymised). The investigators would also run some known anonymised SMA positive dried blood spots. The aim is to demonstrate that a simple robust test can be used in a routine diagnostic laboratory to accurately screen for SMA. The investigators will not have access to identifiable data or samples for this project.
Read the detailed description
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. The majority of babies born with SMA become symptomatic as babies (type I) or as toddlers (type II). Type I children will never sit unsupported, require ventilated support in the first year of life and usually die before 2 years of age. Type II children can survive to early adulthood but will never walk. They almost invariably develop severe curvature of the spine, feeding and respiratory insufficiency that require appropriate intervention. Cognitive abilities are not impaired and children are generally bright and sociable.
Several new therapies have recently been developed for children with SMA and have shown remarkable success in clinical trials. One of these therapies, spinraza, has received both FDA and EMA approval and is commercially available in most EU countries and in the US, and is being currently evaluated by NICE. Because of the early onset and rapid progression of infantile SMA, prompt detection of the disease is essential to enable successful treatment. It is now recommended that infants be screened for SMA, enabling early drug treatment thus preventing further neuron damage2. The recently published work on the development of spinraza indeed supports the view that children with shorter disease duration had much better outcome [the 2 NEJM papers] a concept that is also emphasised by the interim analysis of infants who received spinraza presymptomatically as part of an ongoing study sponsored by Biogen (Nurture study). The majority of these children had met the age appropriate milestones by the age of 1 year, a clearly remarkable outcome. Similar very promising results were obtained in a recently published AAV gene therapy study in which a number of the severe infants affected by type 1 SMA achieved even the ability to walk unsupported (Mendell SMA gene therapy NEJM 2017). Also in this manuscript, the children who had a shorter disease duration and those treated shortly after the diagnosis had a much better outcome compared to children treated later. While the findings from this early gene therapy study are currently being extended in a larger global phase 3 study, these dramatic results from emerging therapies have led many countries to include SMA in their respective newborn screening programmes.
A previous study (Adams et al. 2014, J. Clin. Imm) was carried out in an almost identical way to the study planned here. The previous study utilised 5000 anonymised leftover blood spots from a routine NBS lab to test the robustness and practicality of running a NBS assay for SCID. This study was scientifically critiqued leading to publication in a respected relevant scientific journal. The study planned here is identical in the approach (5000 normal leftover blood spots) to test the robustness and practicality of using a commercial assay for NBS for SMA in a routine clinical lab environment. As in the previous SCID study we plan to use a number of retrospective known positive samples as well as all the necessary positive/negative controls contained in the commercial kit. The sole aim of the study is to assess the performance of the commercial kit to provide evidence that NBS screening for SMA could feasibly be carried out in routine NBS screening labs.
The investigators therefore believe this is the correct route to take with SMA Newborn Screening as well. Assays for detection of SMA using the dried blood spots collected for Newborn Screening (NBS) have now been developed. This utilises the amplification of the SMN1 gene and subsequent detection of the deleted section that causes SMA. Newborn blood spot screening to detect SMA has been implemented in public health laboratories in some countries already. In the UK, dried blood spots are collected within a few days of birth on all babies and subsequent newborn screening is currently carried out for other diseases but not for SMA.
The investigators would like to carry out a proof of principal testing to show that an assay for SMA can be carried out on these anonymised routinely collected dried blood spots. We would also run some known anonymised SMA positive dried blood spots. The aim is to demonstrate that a simple robust test can be used in a routine diagnostic laboratory to accurately screen for SMA.
- Conditions
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- Medical subject headings
- Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| leftover dried blood spot material | All samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital. | |
| anonymous known SMA positive blood spots | The anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen), |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS
Numbers of false negatives.-This is defined as the number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS (Newborn Screening).
Measured: 6 months
Ease of use of the assay
Ease of use of the assay in a high-throughput Screening Lab environment. This is defined as the space for equipment and assay set up. It also includes hands-on time setting up and analysing the assay. These are measurable outcomes and will be measured in either dimensions (lab floor/bench space needed) and time (hours) per run.
Measured: 6 months
Number of failed blood spots samples
Number of failed samples. This is defined as the number of blood spots that fail to PCR amplify with the NBS (Newborn Screening) kit.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Assess if the screening assay picks up all known SMA positives
40 SMA positives to be run
Measured: 6 months
Assess if there any false positives with the assay
5000 spots to be run, not expected to be positive
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2022
- Study start11 Nov 2019
- Primary completion30 Mar 2021
- Study completion30 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Muscular AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 5,065 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05237544
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18NM20
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 14 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Adams SP, Gravett E, Kent N, Kricke S, Ifederu A, Scoto M, Samsuddin S, Muntoni F. Screening of Neonatal UK Dried Blood Spots Using a Duplex SMN1 Screening Assay. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021 Oct 26;7(4):69. doi: 10.3390/ijns7040069.
PubMed 34842601
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) - a Proof of Principle Study Using Anonymised Blood Spots.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05237544
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18NM20
- Conditions
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5,065 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. Newborn blood spot screening (NBS)to detect SMA has been implemented in public health laboratories in some countries already. In the UK dried blood spots are collected within a few days of birth on all babies and subsequent newborn screening is currently carried out for other diseases but not for SMA. The investigators would like to carry out a proof of principal testing to show that an assay for SMA can be carried out on these routinely collected dried blood spots (completely anonymised). The investigators would also run some known anonymised SMA positive dried blood spots. The aim is to demonstrate that a simple robust test can be used in a routine diagnostic laboratory to accurately screen for SMA. The investigators will not have access to identifiable data or samples for this project.
Detailed description
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a motor neuron disorder caused by the absence of a functional survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1) gene. Type I SMA, a lethal disease of infancy, accounts for the majority of cases. The majority of babies born with SMA become symptomatic as babies (type I) or as toddlers (type II). Type I children will never sit unsupported, require ventilated support in the first year of life and usually die before 2 years of age. Type II children can survive to early adulthood but will never walk. They almost invariably develop severe curvature of the spine, feeding and respiratory insufficiency that require appropriate intervention. Cognitive abilities are not impaired and children are generally bright and sociable.
Several new therapies have recently been developed for children with SMA and have shown remarkable success in clinical trials. One of these therapies, spinraza, has received both FDA and EMA approval and is commercially available in most EU countries and in the US, and is being currently evaluated by NICE. Because of the early onset and rapid progression of infantile SMA, prompt detection of the disease is essential to enable successful treatment. It is now recommended that infants be screened for SMA, enabling early drug treatment thus preventing further neuron damage2. The recently published work on the development of spinraza indeed supports the view that children with shorter disease duration had much better outcome [the 2 NEJM papers] a concept that is also emphasised by the interim analysis of infants who received spinraza presymptomatically as part of an ongoing study sponsored by Biogen (Nurture study). The majority of these children had met the age appropriate milestones by the age of 1 year, a clearly remarkable outcome. Similar very promising results were obtained in a recently published AAV gene therapy study in which a number of the severe infants affected by type 1 SMA achieved even the ability to walk unsupported (Mendell SMA gene therapy NEJM 2017). Also in this manuscript, the children who had a shorter disease duration and those treated shortly after the diagnosis had a much better outcome compared to children treated later. While the findings from this early gene therapy study are currently being extended in a larger global phase 3 study, these dramatic results from emerging therapies have led many countries to include SMA in their respective newborn screening programmes.
A previous study (Adams et al. 2014, J. Clin. Imm) was carried out in an almost identical way to the study planned here. The previous study utilised 5000 anonymised leftover blood spots from a routine NBS lab to test the robustness and practicality of running a NBS assay for SCID. This study was scientifically critiqued leading to publication in a respected relevant scientific journal. The study planned here is identical in the approach (5000 normal leftover blood spots) to test the robustness and practicality of using a commercial assay for NBS for SMA in a routine clinical lab environment. As in the previous SCID study we plan to use a number of retrospective known positive samples as well as all the necessary positive/negative controls contained in the commercial kit. The sole aim of the study is to assess the performance of the commercial kit to provide evidence that NBS screening for SMA could feasibly be carried out in routine NBS screening labs.
The investigators therefore believe this is the correct route to take with SMA Newborn Screening as well. Assays for detection of SMA using the dried blood spots collected for Newborn Screening (NBS) have now been developed. This utilises the amplification of the SMN1 gene and subsequent detection of the deleted section that causes SMA. Newborn blood spot screening to detect SMA has been implemented in public health laboratories in some countries already. In the UK, dried blood spots are collected within a few days of birth on all babies and subsequent newborn screening is currently carried out for other diseases but not for SMA.
The investigators would like to carry out a proof of principal testing to show that an assay for SMA can be carried out on these anonymised routinely collected dried blood spots. We would also run some known anonymised SMA positive dried blood spots. The aim is to demonstrate that a simple robust test can be used in a routine diagnostic laboratory to accurately screen for SMA.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| leftover dried blood spot material | – | –All samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital. |
| anonymous known SMA positive blood spots | – | –The anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen), |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 2 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- All samples used will be leftover dried blood spot material from the Newborn Screening Lab at Great Ormond Street Hospital. No extra material will be collected and all blood spots will be completely anonymised. The anonymous known SMA positive blood spots will be provided by an external company (Biogen), in order to determine the accuracy of the assay in detecting SMA positives.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- newborn babies
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- non-newborn
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS
Time frame: 6 months
Numbers of false negatives.-This is defined as the number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS (Newborn Screening).
Ease of use of the assay
Time frame: 6 months
Ease of use of the assay in a high-throughput Screening Lab environment. This is defined as the space for equipment and assay set up. It also includes hands-on time setting up and analysing the assay. These are measurable outcomes and will be measured in either dimensions (lab floor/bench space needed) and time (hours) per run.
Number of failed blood spots samples
Time frame: 6 months
Number of failed samples. This is defined as the number of blood spots that fail to PCR amplify with the NBS (Newborn Screening) kit.
2 secondary outcomes
Assess if the screening assay picks up all known SMA positives
Time frame: 6 months
Assess if there any false positives with the assay
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Feb 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 34842601Adams SP, Gravett E, Kent N, Kricke S, Ifederu A, Scoto M, Samsuddin S, Muntoni F. Screening of Neonatal UK Dried Blood Spots Using a Duplex SMN1 Screening Assay. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021 Oct 26;7(4):69. doi: 10.3390/ijns7040069.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Risdiplam Administered as an Early Intervention in Pediatric Participants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy After Gene Therapy
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of Risdiplam in Participants With Type I and Type II Spinal Muscle Atrophy (SMA)
Spinal Muscle Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Investigational Drug Rinzimetostat (ORIC-944) in Patients With mCRPC Who Were Previously Treated With Abiraterone Acetate (Himalayas-1)
Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Recruiting
Assessment of a Portable Digital Device for Quantified Analysis of Markerless Walking in Volunteers With Neuromuscular Diseases or Asymptomatic Volunteers
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, run by Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of known SMA positive blood spots not detected by NBS (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05237544, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2022.