Hemodynamic ResponsePhase 4NCT05238506
Lidocaine VS Hemodynamic, Metabolic and Hormonal Response
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous lidocaine and Normal saline infusion in people with Hemodynamic Response and Acute Appendicitis, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
Intravenous lidocaine - a potent local anesthetic with analgesic and anti- inflammatory properties has been shown to be an effective adjunct that reduces intra and postoperative opioid consumption and facilitates pain management in adults. In children population promising but limited evidence is available. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 months to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemodynamic Response, Acute Appendicitis, Complication of Treatment
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous lidocaine and Normal saline infusion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 132 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 12 Mar 2022to 8 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 months to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA physical status class 1E, 2E, 3E;
- Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.
Who cannot join
- Allergy to local anesthetics or contraindications for the use of lidocaine;
- ASA physical status class 4E or higher;
- Severe cardiovascular disease;
- Preoperative bradycardia;
- Preoperative atrioventricular block;
- Renal failure;
- Chronic treatment with analgesics;
- Legal guardians' refusal.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site
University Clinic Centre of Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, 02-091
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Hemodynamic Reaction to Tracheal Intubation, as Well as Metabolic and Hormonal Response to Laparoscopic Procedure in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Intravenous lidocaine - a potent local anesthetic with analgesic and anti- inflammatory properties has been shown to be an effective adjunct that reduces intra and postoperative opioid consumption and facilitates pain management in adults. In children population promising but limited evidence is available. The study has been planned to evaluate the efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine in alleviation of hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation, as well as metabolic and hormonal response to laparoscopic procedure in children.
Read the detailed description
Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are associated with noxious stimulation. Exacerbated circulatory system response may present as hypertension or arrhythmias including cardiac arrest. A sudden change in hemodynamic status connected with painful stimulation may precipitate deterioration in cerebral blood flow, especially in patients with intracranial hypertension (traumatic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, active hydrocephalus, etc). Many interventions have been applied to attenuate harmful hemodynamic reaction. One of them is intravenous lidocaine infusion. According to available data lidocaine is superior to placebo in attenuating systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure changes in children. Our study will focus on assessing hemodynamic stability preserving properties during induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation. Blood pressure will be recorded and analyzed. The secondary aim is to examine intravenous lidocaine infusion in terms of reducing systemic response to surgical stress. Cortisol and glucose levels will be measured before skin incision, and immediately after the end of surgery. Side effects and serum lidocaine levels will be recorded to determine safety of the examined intervention. Similar pattern of infusion was investigated in RCT concerning children population - the toxic plasma level of 5 mcg/ml was not reached. Studies on children population have promising results but high quality randomized controlled trials are still missing. The proposed study has been planned to evaluate the efficacy of continuous infusion of lidocaine as an adjunct to standard general anesthesia (involving intravenous induction and opioid with sevoflurane maintenance) in attenuating hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation, as well as metabolic and hormonal response to surgical procedure in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.
- Conditions
- Hemodynamic Response, Acute Appendicitis, Complication of Treatment, Opioid Consumption, Pneumoperitoneum
- Being tested
- Intravenous lidocaine, Normal saline infusion
- Keywords
- multimodal analgesia, lidocaine, intravenous lidocaine, laparoscopic appendectomy, children, pediatric population, adjuvant, metabolic stress response, hormonal response
- Medical subject headings
- Appendicitis, Pneumoperitoneum
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous lidocaineDrug
Also called IVL
Intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion.
Normal saline infusionDrug
Also called Placebo
Intraoperative intravenous normal saline infusion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine | Experimental | 1% lidocaine intravenous bolus of 0.15 ml/kg over 5 min before induction of anesthesia followed by lidocaine infusion at 0.15 ml/kg/h intraoperatively will be administered. The infusion will be discontinued before the patients' transfer to the postanesthesia care unit. Receives: Drug: Intravenous lidocaine |
| Control | Placebo comparator | 0.9% NaCl intravenous bolus of 0.15 ml/kg over 5 min before induction of anesthesia followed by 0.9% NaCl infusion at 0.15 ml/kg/h intraoperatively will be administered. The infusion will be discontinued before the patients' transfer to the postanesthesia care unit. Receives: Drug: Normal saline infusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation
A change in arterial blood pressure more than 20% from baseline. The fractions of patients in each group will be compared.
Measured: Before intubation - immediately after intubation.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Metabolic response to laparoscopic procedure
Glucose [mg/dl] levels will be measured and compared before and after laparoscopic procedure.
Measured: First blood sample will be taken 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Second blood sample will be taken just before extubation.
Lidocaine blood level
Lidocaine level [mcg/ml] will be measured after initial bolus and just before the end of its infusion.
Measured: First blood sample will be taken 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Second blood sample will be taken just before extubation.
Side effects of lidocaine
Side effects of lidocaine will be assessed by recording the rates of the following complications: arrythmia, hypotension (defined as <70th percentile for age), allergic reaction.
Measured: From the beginning of drug infusion until transfer to the postanesthesia care unit (10 minutes after extubation).
Hormonal response to laparoscopic procedure
Cortisol levels [mcg/dl] will be measured and compared before and after laparoscopic procedure.
Measured: First blood sample will be taken 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Second blood sample will be taken just before extubation.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2022
- Study start12 Mar 2022
- Primary completion8 Aug 2023
- Study completion8 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hemodynamic ResponseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Warsaw
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maciej Kaszyński, Medical University of Warsaw
- Investigators
- Maciej Kaszyński, Principal investigator, Medical University of Warsaw
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05238506
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Lido02
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The datasets used and/or analysed during the study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Publications
Qi DY, Wang K, Zhang H, Du BX, Xu FY, Wang L, Zou Z, Shi XY. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine versus placebo on attenuating cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Dec;79(12):1423-35. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
PubMed 23839320El-Deeb A, El-Morsy GZ, Ghanem AAA, Elsharkawy AA, Elmetwally AS. The effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion on hospital stay after major abdominal pediatric surgery. A randomized double-blinded study. Egypt J Anaesth. 2013;29(3):225-230, doi: 10.1016/j.egja.2013.02.005.
Kaszynski M, Lewandowska D, Sawicki P, Wojcieszak P, Pagowska-Klimek I. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusions for pain relief in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01218-0.
PubMed 33397287Kaszynski M, Stankiewicz B, Kalicka A, Mikolap K, Olszanecka M, Rybka Z, Witt P, Darowski M, Pagowska-Klimek I. Comparison of Opioid Consumption During Paediatric Anaesthesia with and Without a Mandatory Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2025 Oct 22;14(21):7481. doi: 10.3390/jcm14217481.
PubMed 41226876Kaszynski M, Kuczerowska A, Pietrzyk J, Sawicki P, Witt P, Stankiewicz B, Darowski M, Pagowska-Klimek I. Influence of intravenous lidocaine infusion on haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and metabolic-hormonal responses during laparoscopic procedures in children: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 10;25(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02885-z.
PubMed 39794723
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Hemodynamic Reaction to Tracheal Intubation, as Well as Metabolic and Hormonal Response to Laparoscopic Procedure in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05238506
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Lido02
- Conditions
- Hemodynamic Response, Acute Appendicitis, Complication of Treatment, Opioid Consumption, Pneumoperitoneum
- Keywords
- multimodal analgesia, lidocaine, intravenous lidocaine, laparoscopic appendectomy, children, pediatric population, adjuvant, metabolic stress response
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 132 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of WarsawUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intravenous lidocaine - a potent local anesthetic with analgesic and anti- inflammatory properties has been shown to be an effective adjunct that reduces intra and postoperative opioid consumption and facilitates pain management in adults. In children population promising but limited evidence is available. The study has been planned to evaluate the efficacy of continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine in alleviation of hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation, as well as metabolic and hormonal response to laparoscopic procedure in children.
Detailed description
Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are associated with noxious stimulation. Exacerbated circulatory system response may present as hypertension or arrhythmias including cardiac arrest. A sudden change in hemodynamic status connected with painful stimulation may precipitate deterioration in cerebral blood flow, especially in patients with intracranial hypertension (traumatic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, active hydrocephalus, etc). Many interventions have been applied to attenuate harmful hemodynamic reaction. One of them is intravenous lidocaine infusion. According to available data lidocaine is superior to placebo in attenuating systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure changes in children. Our study will focus on assessing hemodynamic stability preserving properties during induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation. Blood pressure will be recorded and analyzed. The secondary aim is to examine intravenous lidocaine infusion in terms of reducing systemic response to surgical stress. Cortisol and glucose levels will be measured before skin incision, and immediately after the end of surgery. Side effects and serum lidocaine levels will be recorded to determine safety of the examined intervention. Similar pattern of infusion was investigated in RCT concerning children population - the toxic plasma level of 5 mcg/ml was not reached. Studies on children population have promising results but high quality randomized controlled trials are still missing. The proposed study has been planned to evaluate the efficacy of continuous infusion of lidocaine as an adjunct to standard general anesthesia (involving intravenous induction and opioid with sevoflurane maintenance) in attenuating hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation, as well as metabolic and hormonal response to surgical procedure in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine | Experimental | Drug: Intravenous lidocaine1% lidocaine intravenous bolus of 0.15 ml/kg over 5 min before induction of anesthesia followed by lidocaine infusion at 0.15 ml/kg/h intraoperatively will be administered. The infusion will be discontinued before the patients' transfer to the postanesthesia care unit. |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal saline infusion0.9% NaCl intravenous bolus of 0.15 ml/kg over 5 min before induction of anesthesia followed by 0.9% NaCl infusion at 0.15 ml/kg/h intraoperatively will be administered. The infusion will be discontinued before the patients' transfer to the postanesthesia care unit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 months to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ASA physical status class 1E, 2E, 3E;
- Patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Allergy to local anesthetics or contraindications for the use of lidocaine;
- ASA physical status class 4E or higher;
- Severe cardiovascular disease;
- Preoperative bradycardia;
- Preoperative atrioventricular block;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous lidocaineAlso: IVLIntraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion. | Drug | Lidocaine |
| Normal saline infusionAlso: PlaceboIntraoperative intravenous normal saline infusion. | Drug | Control |
Primary outcome
Hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation
Time frame: Before intubation - immediately after intubation.
A change in arterial blood pressure more than 20% from baseline. The fractions of patients in each group will be compared.
4 secondary outcomes
Metabolic response to laparoscopic procedure
Time frame: First blood sample will be taken 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Second blood sample will be taken just before extubation.
Lidocaine blood level
Time frame: First blood sample will be taken 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Second blood sample will be taken just before extubation.
Side effects of lidocaine
Time frame: From the beginning of drug infusion until transfer to the postanesthesia care unit (10 minutes after extubation).
Hormonal response to laparoscopic procedure
Time frame: First blood sample will be taken 5 minutes after tracheal intubation. Second blood sample will be taken just before extubation.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 23839320Qi DY, Wang K, Zhang H, Du BX, Xu FY, Wang L, Zou Z, Shi XY. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine versus placebo on attenuating cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Dec;79(12):1423-35. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
- BackgroundEl-Deeb A, El-Morsy GZ, Ghanem AAA, Elsharkawy AA, Elmetwally AS. The effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion on hospital stay after major abdominal pediatric surgery. A randomized double-blinded study. Egypt J Anaesth. 2013;29(3):225-230, doi: 10.1016/j.egja.2013.02.005.
- Background: PubMed 33397287Kaszynski M, Lewandowska D, Sawicki P, Wojcieszak P, Pagowska-Klimek I. Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusions for pain relief in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01218-0.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41226876Kaszynski M, Stankiewicz B, Kalicka A, Mikolap K, Olszanecka M, Rybka Z, Witt P, Darowski M, Pagowska-Klimek I. Comparison of Opioid Consumption During Paediatric Anaesthesia with and Without a Mandatory Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2025 Oct 22;14(21):7481. doi: 10.3390/jcm14217481.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39794723Kaszynski M, Kuczerowska A, Pietrzyk J, Sawicki P, Witt P, Stankiewicz B, Darowski M, Pagowska-Klimek I. Influence of intravenous lidocaine infusion on haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and metabolic-hormonal responses during laparoscopic procedures in children: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 10;25(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02885-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The datasets used and/or analysed during the study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Related trials for Hemodynamic Response
Not yet recruiting
Boyle-Davis Mouth Gag Timing in Pediatric Tonsil Surgery
Tonsillectomy and Adenotonsillectomy in Children
Recruiting
A Study Of Exercise In Patients With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection And Fibromuscular Dysplasia
Fibromuscular Dysplasia, Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection
Not yet recruiting
Pre-induction Norepinephrine in Septic Patients Undergoing Surgery
Sepsis, Hypotension
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Core-to-Big-Toe Temperature Gradient as a Marker of Peripheral Perfusion in Adult Patients With Septic Shock
Septic Shock, Sepsis
Recruiting
Changes in Hemodynamic Response Following Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Sroke Individuals
Hemorrhagic Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maciej Kaszyński principal investigator
Medical University of Warsaw
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Intravenous lidocaine and Normal saline infusion in people with Hemodynamic Response and Acute Appendicitis, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hemodynamic reaction to tracheal intubation (time frame: Before intubation - immediately after intubation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05238506, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2023.