AzTrials
AzTrials

Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaNCT05240001

Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) vs Holmium MOSES for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

A study testing Thulium Fibre Laser and MOSES Holmium Laser in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate, places pressure on the urethra and causes urination and bladder problems. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard treatment in most centres for BPH. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
What is being tested?
Thulium Fibre Laser and MOSES Holmium Laser
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
104 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
20 Apr 2022to Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males over 50 years of age at the time of enrollment
  • Referred to urology for refractory LUTS or urinary retention secondary to BPH
  • Failed medical (non-surgical) treatment
  • Prostate size on preoperative TRUS of≥80 ml
  • IPSS >15 and QOL score ≥3 and Qmax <15 ml/sec
  • Written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Ability to comply with the requirements of the study procedures

Who cannot join

  • Previous surgical treatment for BPH
  • History of prostate cancer
  • Prostate size < 80 mL
  • History of urethral stenosis or its management
  • Known or suspected neurogenic bladder
  • Participants with active urinary tract infection until appropriately treated
  • Participants with preexisting conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the conduct of the study
  • Participants who lack the capacity, or cannot speak English, in order to provide free and informed written consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Rabail Siddiqui, MPH, MHSc contact

(807) 684-6608

siddiqur@tbh.net

Hazem Elmansy, MD contact

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre

    Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 6V4

    Rabail Siddiqui, MPH, MHSc, siddiqur@tbh.net

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) Versus Holmium MOSES Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate, places pressure on the urethra and causes urination and bladder problems. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard treatment in most centres for BPH. However, morbidity after TURP is high, especially bleeding requiring blood transfusion and late postoperative bleeding.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a safe and effective procedure which has demonstrated comparable results to TURP. HOLEP also offers patients the alternative of being treated endoscopically with minimal blood loss, short catheterization time, and decreased hospital stay. The main reason HoLEP has yet to become the new standard for treatment of symptomatic BPH is due the complexity of this procedure as compared to TURP. Furthermore, the HoLEP can be used with the MOSESTM system, a system that allows for more efficiency and ease of use of the HoLEP.

Read more

Thulium fiber laser (TFL) enucleation of the prostate is an emerging technology for endoscopic prostate enucleation that is notable for its high wavelength and pulsed mode of action. Recent studies have shown TFL enucleation of the prostate to be a safe and highly efficacious treatment modality for the management of large volume (> 80 cm3) glands in BPH. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden the investigators' understanding of the TFL and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations.

The aim of this study is to whether Thulium Fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation using MOSES™ (M-HoLEP) have comparable length of hospital stay, as well as intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Being tested
Thulium Fibre Laser, MOSES Holmium Laser
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Hyperplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Thulium Fibre LaserDevice

    Participants will undergo treatment using the TFL

  • MOSES Holmium LaserDevice

    Participants will undergo treatment using the MOSES Holmium laser.

Study groups in NCT05240001
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Thulium Fibre Laser (TFL)ExperimentalPatients randomized to this arm will undergo treatment using the TFL.
Receives: Device: Thulium Fibre Laser
MOSES Holmium LaserExperimentalPatients randomized to this arm will undergo treatment using the MOSES Holmium laser.
Receives: Device: MOSES Holmium Laser

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Length of stay in the hospital

    Measured: within 6 hours

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Incidence of bleeding

    Measured: Intra-Op

  2. Incidence of blood transfusion

    Measured: Intra-Op

  3. Operative time

    Including laser use time

    Measured: Intra-Op

  4. International Prostate Symptom Score

    Eight questions (seven concerning urinary symptoms and one concerning quality of life), responses range from 0 (better outcome) to 5 (worse outcome), with total score ranging from 0 to 35.

    Measured: 1,3,6,12 months post-op

  5. Quality of Life (QOL) as scored on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    Response to the last question on the IPSS:

    "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?" Response ranging from 'Delighted' to 'Terrible'.

    Measured: 1,3,6,12 months post-op

  6. Peak flow rate

    Qmax

    Measured: 1,3,6,12 months post-op

  7. Post-void residual

    PVR

    Measured: 1,3,6,12 months post-op

  8. Prostate specific antigen

    PSA

    Measured: 1,3,6,12 months post-op

  9. Change in size

    Assessed by TRUS

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Time to Catheter Removal

    Measured: within 4 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2022
  2. Study start20 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completionApr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
104 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05240001
Sponsor's protocol ID
RP-775
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
7 Jan 2022
Last updated
16 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Thulium Fibre Laser and MOSES Holmium Laser in people with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by Thunder Bay Regional Health Research Institute at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rabail Siddiqui, MPH, MHSc ((807) 684-6608, siddiqur@tbh.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Length of stay in the hospital (time frame: within 6 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in