AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaPhase 2NCT05240976

Combination of NMDA-enhancing and Anti-inflammatory Treatments for Ultra-resistant Schizophrenia

A Phase 2 study testing NMDAE plus AIFA in people with Schizophrenia, run by China Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Previous study found that some NMDA-enhancing agent was able to augment efficacy of clozapine for clinical symptoms but not cognitive function in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
NMDAE plus AIFA
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
23 Feb 2022to Mar 2027
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have a DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association) diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Are treatment-resistant to standard treatments of at least two specific antipsychotics before clozapine treatment
  • Are receiving adequate trials of clozapine for more than 12 weeks but without satisfactory response
  • PANSS total score ≥ 70; SANS total score ≥ 40
  • Have sufficient education to communicate effectively and are capable of completing the assessments of the study
  • Agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • DSM-5 diagnosis of intellectual disability or substance (including alcohol) use disorder
  • History of epilepsy, head trauma, or serious medical or central nervous system diseases (other than schizophrenia) which may interfere with the study
  • Clinically significant laboratory screening tests (including blood routine, biochemical tests)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to follow protocol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D contact

886 4 22052121 ext. 1855

hylane@gmail.com

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital

    Taichung

    Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D, 886 4 22052121 ext. 1855, hylane@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Previous study found that some NMDA-enhancing agent was able to augment efficacy of clozapine for clinical symptoms but not cognitive function in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with anti-inflammatory properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. Whether a drug with anti-inflammatory property can strengthen the efficacy of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia remains unknown.

Read the detailed description

Several lines of evidence suggest that both NMDA and inflammatory hypotheses have been implicated in schizophrenia. Previous study found that some NMDA-enhancing agent was able to augment efficacy of clozapine for clinical symptoms but not cognitive function in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with anti-inflammatory properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. Whether a drug with anti-inflammatory property can strengthen the efficacy of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia remains unknown.

Therefore, this study aims to compare NMDAE plus a drug with anti-inflammatory property and NMDAE plus placebo in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia. The subjects are the patients with ultra-resistant schizophrenia who have responded poorly to clozapine treatment. They keep their original clozapine treatment and are randomly, double-blindly assigned into two treatment groups for 12 weeks: (1) NMDAE plus Anti-inflammatory Agent (AIFA), or (2) NMDAE plus placebo. Cognitive functions are assessed at baseline and at endpoint of treatment by a battery of tests. Clinical performances and side effects are measured at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12. The efficacies of NMDAE plus AIFA and NMDAE plus placebo will be compared.

Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) for both primary and secondary outcomes . All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Conditions
Schizophrenia
Being tested
NMDAE plus AIFA, NMDAE plus Placebo Cap
Keywords
Ultra-resistant schizophrenia, NMDA, Inflammation
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NMDAE plus AIFADrug

    Use of an NMDA enhancer plus a drug with anti-inflammatory property for the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia.

  • NMDAE plus Placebo CapDrug

    Use of an NMDA enhancer plus placebo as a comparator

Study groups in NCT05240976
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NMDAE plus Anti-inflammatory Agent (AIFA)ExperimentalAn NMDA enhancer plus a drug with anti-inflammatory property
Receives: Drug: NMDAE plus AIFA
NMDAE plus PlaceboPlacebo comparatorAn NMDA enhancer plus Placebo
Receives: Drug: NMDAE plus Placebo Cap

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change of cognitive function

    The measure is the composite from multiple measures. All tests have no unit. For the domain (a. and c.) with more than one test, a composite T score will be calculated by standardizing the average of each T score. Furthermore, a global composite score (for all seven domains) and a neurocognitive composite score (for the first 6 domains) will be also calculated by standardizing the average of the T score of each domain (Lane HY et al, JAMA Psychiatry 2013).

    Ten tests for assessing 7 cognitive domains:

    1. speed of processing (assessed by Category Fluency, Trail Marking A, WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding);
    2. sustained attention (Continuous Performance Test);
    3. working memory: verbal (digit span) and nonverbal (spatial span);
    4. verbal learning and memory (WMS-III, word listing);
    5. visual learning and memory (WMS-III, visual reproduction);
    6. reasoning and problem solving (WISC-III, Maze);
    7. social cognition (MSCEIT Version 2)

    Measured: Week 0, 12

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    Assessment of overall symptoms. Minimum value: 30, maximum value:210, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    As shown in "Detailed Description", "mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) for both primary and secondary outcomes. That is, GEE is used for analyzing the changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments by a single analysis (but not multiple analyses).

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  2. Change of scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score

    Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  3. Chang of positive subscale of PANSS

    Assessment of positive symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  4. Change of negative subscale of PANSS

    Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  5. Change of general Psychopathology subscale of PANSS

    Assessment of general psychopathology. Minimum value: 16, maximum value:112, the higher scores mean a worse outcome

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  6. Change of clinical Global Impression

    Assessment of general impression. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:7, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  7. Change of global Assessment of Functioning

    Assessment of social, occupational, and psychological function. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean better function.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  8. Change of hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

    Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

  9. Change of quality of Life Scale

    Assessment of life quality. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:126, the higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2022
  2. Study start23 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05240976
Sponsor's protocol ID
CMUH109-REC3-043
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
24 Jan 2022
Last updated
24 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing NMDAE plus AIFA in people with Schizophrenia, run by China Medical University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D (886 4 22052121 ext. 1855, hylane@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change of cognitive function (time frame: Week 0, 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in