Medical Student Firearm Epidemiology KnowledgeNCT05242627
Firearm-Safety Counseling: Medical Student Training
A study testing Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling Module in people with Medical Student Firearm Epidemiology Knowledge and Medical Student Firearm Safety Knowledge, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In the United States, nearly one in every three households contains at least one firearm, and roughly 20-25% of American adults personally own a firearm. Such easy access to firearms is a major contributor to the uniquely high levels of firearm-related violent death in the United States compared with other high-income… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Medical Student Firearm Epidemiology Knowledge, Medical Student Firearm Safety Knowledge, Medical Student Initiated Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling
- What is being tested?
- Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling Module
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Oct 2020to 1 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligibility Criteria is limited to being a member of the DGSOM Classes of 2023 or 2024.
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-7000
About this study
Official title: Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Firearm-Safety Counseling Educational Module for Medical Students
In the United States, nearly one in every three households contains at least one firearm, and roughly 20-25% of American adults personally own a firearm. Such easy access to firearms is a major contributor to the uniquely high levels of firearm-related violent death in the United States compared with other high-income nations. American physicians are intimately aware of this burden and are positioned to help modify the risks that firearms pose to the health and safety of their patients. Accordingly, it is imperative that physicians learn both how to screen their patients for exposure to firearms and how they can effectively counsel those who are at an increased risk for firearm-related injury on how they might reduce that risk.
Until the 2021-2022 academic year, the David Geffen School of Medicine (DGSOM) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) did not include in its medical school curriculum a firearm-safety counseling module; the only information pertaining to firearms had been a narrow-in-scope "Clinical Pearl," which gave statistics on the increased risk for fatal injury that firearms pose in the setting of domestic violence. Beginning with the incoming Class of 2025, DGSOM will implement a new curriculum, and the Curriculum Re-design Committee has incorporated a module offering instruction on how to screen for exposure to firearms and counsel patients on firearm-safety. This inclusion follows a pilot module on firearm safety counseling that was presented to the Class of 2023. The current trial will take advantage of these unique circumstances to evaluate the effects of introducing such a module on medical students' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to firearm-safety counseling in the clinical setting. The performance of students in the Class of 2023, who did not receive training, will be compared to that of students in the Class of 2024, who did receive training, during a standardized patient encounter.
Read more
The high prevalence of firearms in the US demands that physicians have a working knowledge of how to screen patients for exposure to firearms, and an ability to counsel those who have such exposure on firearm-safety. While physicians believe they should have an active role in screening for risk factors of firearm violence and counsel on firearm safety, experience indicates that they fail to do either routinely. Importantly, physicians cite a lack of training and self-confidence as the major factors preventing them from screening for, and counseling on, firearm safety. A recent study of third-year medical students showed that those who completed a brief (20 minute) module on firearm injury prevention (compared with those who did not) were more likely to report increased self-perceived ability to counsel patients on firearm injury prevention, both immediately and 6 months post intervention; however, the study failed to demonstrate a difference in long-term clinical behavior, suggesting more rigorous training methods are warranted. The investigators hope that educational modules supplemented with simulated patient interactions designed to allow students the opportunity to practice firearm-safety counseling will increase their propensity for engaging in these conversations in the future.
The first innovative aspect of our proposal is that it is introducing an educational module which combines didactic lectures, interactive case-based discussions, and interviews with standardized patients. On a computerized literature search, the investigators found no evidence that such a comprehensive module has been studied. Furthermore, unlike previous studies which have either focused on immediate self-reported confidence or self-reported clinical encounters, the investigators' proposal intends to assess long-term retention of the module content by observing students' clinical practices in an OSCE 6 months after the module is taught. The investigators hypothesize that an educational module will significantly increase both the proportion of second-year medical year students who screen for firearms and the quality of firearm safety counseling.
- Conditions
- Medical Student Firearm Epidemiology Knowledge, Medical Student Firearm Safety Knowledge, Medical Student Initiated Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling
- Being tested
- Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling Module
- Keywords
- Firearm, Firearm Safety Counseling, Suicide Prevention, Medical Education
- Medical subject headings
- Suicide Prevention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling ModuleBehavioural
The DGSOM class of 2024 will participate in a mandatory 1-hour module covering four main domains: (1) firearm epidemiology; (2) suicide epidemiology and introduction to "means matter"; (3) firearm counseling; and (4) an example of standardized patient encounter that includes a discussion of firearm safety with the patient. The module will be taught in combination by the study team, subject matter experts, and the DGSOM Standardized Patient Program.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DGSOM Class of 2023 | No intervention | Not described |
| DGSOM Class of 2024 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling Module |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of firearm screening and counseling in a modified clinical setting.
The prevalence of medical students screening for the presence of firearms and counseling on firearm safety will be assessed during a standardized Observed Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE). The proportion of students who counsel will be reported by the standardized patients and by students who consent to having their OSCE included in the study.
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (1)
Medical Student's Attitudes and Beliefs on Firearms
Students will complete a survey several months prior to the OSCE on their baseline attitudes and beliefs regarding firearms. Students in the DGSOM Class of 2024 will complete the same survey following the training module.
Measured: Up to 16 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2022
- Study start11 Oct 2020
- Primary completion2 Mar 2022
- Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Medical Student Firearm Epidemiology KnowledgeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Students in the DGSOM Classes of 2023 and 2024 will participate in the same Observed Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) scenario during their second year of medical school, in which they virtually interview a standardized patient presenting with postpartum depression. The Class of 2023 received no specific training on firearm screening and counseling, while the Class of 2024 participated in an educational module on firearm safety counseling 6-months prior to the OSCE.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Davis
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gary Holland, MD, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05242627
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-000968
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Firearm-Safety Counseling Educational Module for Medical Students
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05242627
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20-000968
- Conditions
- Medical Student Firearm Epidemiology Knowledge, Medical Student Firearm Safety Knowledge, Medical Student Initiated Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling
- Keywords
- Firearm, Firearm Safety Counseling, Suicide Prevention, Medical Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, Davis
- Study start
- 11 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the United States, nearly one in every three households contains at least one firearm, and roughly 20-25% of American adults personally own a firearm. Such easy access to firearms is a major contributor to the uniquely high levels of firearm-related violent death in the United States compared with other high-income nations. American physicians are intimately aware of this burden and are positioned to help modify the risks that firearms pose to the health and safety of their patients. Accordingly, it is imperative that physicians learn both how to screen their patients for exposure to firearms and how they can effectively counsel those who are at an increased risk for firearm-related injury on how they might reduce that risk.
Until the 2021-2022 academic year, the David Geffen School of Medicine (DGSOM) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) did not include in its medical school curriculum a firearm-safety counseling module; the only information pertaining to firearms had been a narrow-in-scope "Clinical Pearl," which gave statistics on the increased risk for fatal injury that firearms pose in the setting of domestic violence. Beginning with the incoming Class of 2025, DGSOM will implement a new curriculum, and the Curriculum Re-design Committee has incorporated a module offering instruction on how to screen for exposure to firearms and counsel patients on firearm-safety. This inclusion follows a pilot module on firearm safety counseling that was presented to the Class of 2023. The current trial will take advantage of these unique circumstances to evaluate the effects of introducing such a module on medical students' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to firearm-safety counseling in the clinical setting. The performance of students in the Class of 2023, who did not receive training, will be compared to that of students in the Class of 2024, who did receive training, during a standardized patient encounter.
The high prevalence of firearms in the US demands that physicians have a working knowledge of how to screen patients for exposure to firearms, and an ability to counsel those who have such exposure on firearm-safety. While physicians believe they should have an active role in screening for risk factors of firearm violence and counsel on firearm safety, experience indicates that they fail to do either routinely. Importantly, physicians cite a lack of training and self-confidence as the major factors preventing them from screening for, and counseling on, firearm safety. A recent study of third-year medical students showed that those who completed a brief (20 minute) module on firearm injury prevention (compared with those who did not) were more likely to report increased self-perceived ability to counsel patients on firearm injury prevention, both immediately and 6 months post intervention; however, the study failed to demonstrate a difference in long-term clinical behavior, suggesting more rigorous training methods are warranted. The investigators hope that educational modules supplemented with simulated patient interactions designed to allow students the opportunity to practice firearm-safety counseling will increase their propensity for engaging in these conversations in the future.
The first innovative aspect of our proposal is that it is introducing an educational module which combines didactic lectures, interactive case-based discussions, and interviews with standardized patients. On a computerized literature search, the investigators found no evidence that such a comprehensive module has been studied. Furthermore, unlike previous studies which have either focused on immediate self-reported confidence or self-reported clinical encounters, the investigators' proposal intends to assess long-term retention of the module content by observing students' clinical practices in an OSCE 6 months after the module is taught. The investigators hypothesize that an educational module will significantly increase both the proportion of second-year medical year students who screen for firearms and the quality of firearm safety counseling.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Students in the DGSOM Classes of 2023 and 2024 will participate in the same Observed Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) scenario during their second year of medical school, in which they virtually interview a standardized patient presenting with postpartum depression. The Class of 2023 received no specific training on firearm screening and counseling, while the Class of 2024 participated in an educational module on firearm safety counseling 6-months prior to the OSCE.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DGSOM Class of 2023 | No intervention | – |
| DGSOM Class of 2024 | Experimental | Behavioral: Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling Module |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Eligibility Criteria is limited to being a member of the DGSOM Classes of 2023 or 2024.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling ModuleThe DGSOM class of 2024 will participate in a mandatory 1-hour module covering four main domains: (1) firearm epidemiology; (2) suicide epidemiology and introduction to "means matter"; (3) firearm counseling; and (4) an example of standardized patient encounter that includes a discussion of firearm safety with the patient. The module will be taught in combination by the study team, subject matter experts, and the DGSOM Standardized Patient Program. | Behavioural | DGSOM Class of 2024 |
Primary outcome
Prevalence of firearm screening and counseling in a modified clinical setting.
Time frame: 1 day
The prevalence of medical students screening for the presence of firearms and counseling on firearm safety will be assessed during a standardized Observed Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE). The proportion of students who counsel will be reported by the standardized patients and by students who consent to having their OSCE included in the study.
1 secondary outcome
Medical Student's Attitudes and Beliefs on Firearms
Time frame: Up to 16 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Clinical Firearm Safety Counseling Module in people with Medical Student Firearm Epidemiology Knowledge and Medical Student Firearm Safety Knowledge, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of firearm screening and counseling in a modified clinical setting. (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.