AzTrials
AzTrials

Patellar DislocationNCT05243134

The Influence of Anatomic Deformities on the Clinical Efficacy in the Patients With Patellar Dislocation

An observational study of Patellar Dislocation and Anatomic Abnormality, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

All the data of patients with patellar dislocation will be collected to evaluate the anatomic deformities. The data includes X-ray, CT, MRI examinations, medical records, and physical examination information. Finally, we correlate the anatomic deformities with clinical efficacy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 40 years
What is being tested?
Collect the clinical data
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
30 Sep 2021to 30 Dec 2025
How long will I take part?
5 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Patients with patellar dislocation

Who may be able to join

  • -Patients with patellar dislocation.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with significant ligamentous knee injury.
  • Previous fracture or surgery of the lower limb.
  • Patellar dislocation caused by car accidents or other high-energy force directly on the patella.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jia_kuo Yu contact

01082267392

yujiakuo@126.com

Lin Lin contact

01082267392

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191

    Jia-kuo Yu, MD, 86-10-82267392, yujiakuo@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

All the data of patients with patellar dislocation will be collected to evaluate the anatomic deformities. The data includes X-ray, CT, MRI examinations, medical records, and physical examination information. Finally, we correlate the anatomic deformities with clinical efficacy. To search for the risk factors that lead to patellar dislocation and influence the therapeutic effect.

Being tested
Collect the clinical data
Keywords
Patellar dislocation, Anatomic deformity, trochlear dysplasia, treatment
Medical subject headings
Patellar Dislocation, Congenital Abnormalities

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Collect the clinical dataOther

    We analyze the influence of the anatomic deformity on the clinical efficacy at the follow-up.

Study groups in NCT05243134
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study GroupPatients with at least one type of anatomic deformity
Receives: Other: Collect the clinical data
Control groupPatients without anatomic deformity
Receives: Other: Collect the clinical data

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with redislocation of their patella after surgery as confirmed by clinical physical examination

    We can determine patellar redislocation by physical examination. In participants with redislocation of their patella, the patella (kneecap) slips out of its normal position. Often the knee is partly bent, painful and swollen.The patella is also often felt and seen out of place. We recored the number of participants with redislocation of their patella after surgery.

    Measured: Three years after surgery

  2. International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) score

    The entire IKDC form, which includes a demographic form, current health assessment form, subjective knee evaluation form, knee history form, surgical documentation form, and knee examination form, may be used as separate forms. The knee history form and surgical documentation form are provided for convenience. All researchers are required to complete the subjective knee evaluation and knee examination form. Instructions for scoring the subjective knee evaluation form and the knee examination form are provided on the back of the forms. Total score 100, ≥75 being considered excellent.

    Measured: Three years after surgery

  3. Magnatic Resonance Imaging evaluation

    All patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction underwent MRI imaging evaluation of both knees. Use International Cartilage Repair Society(ICRS) score to evaluate, total score is 12, classified into four grades,grade Ⅰ: normal (12), grade Ⅱ: nearly normal (8-11), grade Ⅲ: abnormal (4-7), grade Ⅳ: severely abnormal (1-3).

    Measured: Three years after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Skeletal force line and various angles by X-ray evaluation

    X-ray was used to evaluate the skeletal force line and various angles of patients. Use Qvadriceps Angle to evaluate quadriceps force line and patellar ligament force line. The normal Angle is 18-22° for the adult standing position.Above or below this range is considered abnormal.

    Measured: Preoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2022
  2. Study start30 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Target duration
5 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05243134
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00006761-M2021423
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
23 Nov 2021
Last updated
16 Feb 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Xu Z, Song Y, Deng R, Ye J, Wang X, Wang H, Yu JK. CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle lateralization in patients with patellar dislocation were not equivalent but could be interchangeable. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jan;31(1):349-357. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07119-8. Epub 2022 Sep 11.

    PubMed 36088618

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patellar Dislocation and Anatomic Abnormality, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jia_kuo Yu (01082267392, yujiakuo@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with redislocation of their patella after surgery as confirmed by clinical physical examination (time frame: Three years after surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05243134, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in