Nasal Septum; Deviation, CongenitalNCT05243147
Design and Application of Nasal Stents
A study testing nasal stents and merocel in people with Nasal Septum; Deviation, Congenital, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Comparative study of nasal stents and nasal packing in patients undergoing septoplasty Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasal Septum; Deviation, Congenital
- What is being tested?
- nasal stents and merocel
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 22 Oct 2020to 30 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subjects voluntarily participate in the experiment and sign the informed consent;
- Age range from 18 to 70 years old, gender unlimited;
- With nasal congestion as the chief complaint, CT of sinus suggested deviation of nasal septum with indications of surgery (deviation of nasal septum affects breathing and nasal congestion is serious; High nasal septum deviation affects sinus drainage or causes reflex headache; Nasal septum spine often causes nasal bleeding; Nasal septum deviation affects eustachian tube function);
- No history of respiratory tract infection and nasal decongestant use within 1 month before the visit;
- No other treatment was used;
- ASA grade 1~2;
- Able to communicate well with researchers and follow the requirements of the experiment.
Who cannot join
- There are acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, benign and malignant tumors and other nasal diseases;
- History of craniocerebral and nasal surgery;
- The results of preoperative coagulation function test exceeded 20% of the upper limit of normal value;
- Patients known to be allergic to test instrument materials;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Other organoplastic or functional diseases complicated by the subjects limited their participation in the study and could not comply with the follow-up or affect the scientific integrity of the study;
- Participants who have participated in other clinical trials within the last 1 month;
- Participants considered unsuitable for this clinical trial for other reasons.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100191
About this study
Official title: Clinical Control Study of Application of Nasal Stent and Merocel Sponge After Nasal Septoplasty
Comparative study of nasal stents and nasal packing in patients undergoing septoplasty
Read the detailed description
To investigate the safety and effectiveness of nasal stent in clinical application by comparing and observing the clinical effect and comfort of nasal stent and merocel sponge applied in nasal septoplasty. Methods: patients with nasal septal deviation were selected and randomly divided into nasal stent group (experimental group) and merocel sponge group (control group) according to the packing method. The hemostasis effect, comfort and complications of the two groups were compared during the packing period.
- Conditions
- Nasal Septum; Deviation, Congenital
- Being tested
- nasal stents, merocel
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nasal stentsDevice
using nasal stents after septoplasty
merocelDevice
using merocel after septoplasty
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| nasal stents | Experimental | using nasal stents after septoplasty Receives: Device: nasal stents |
| merocel | Other | using merocel as nasal packing after septoplasty Receives: Device: merocel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Effective rate of packing
(1) In the period of nasal tamponade and after the removal of the tamponade instrument (48 h ± 1 h after surgery), the nasal bleeding score was ≤ 2 points; (2) 48 h ± 1 h after the completion of nasal tamponade, the overall discomfort score ≤ 7 points; (3) No septal hematoma and nasal adhesions were confirmed by nasal endoscopy at 30 days ± 5 days after the operation. Nasal tamponade is considered effective when the above 3 criteria are met.
Measured: 2days after operation
Secondary outcomes (2)
visual analog scale(VAS)of comfort
including nasal congestion, nasal pain, headache, itchy nose sneezing, watery tears, runny nose, nasal reflux, facial swelling, difficulty swallowing, sleep disturbance, dry mouth, and general discomfort. The severity of each symptom was graded using the visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 (none) to10 (unbearable)
Measured: 2days after operation
security
The incidence of complications and adverse events were used as safety evaluation indexes
Measured: 30days after operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2022
- Study start22 Oct 2020
- Primary completion30 Aug 2022
- Study completion30 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nasal Septum; Deviation, CongenitalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Third HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Junxiu Liu, Principal investigator, Peking University Third Hosptial
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05243147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PUTH-NS
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 31 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Control Study of Application of Nasal Stent and Merocel Sponge After Nasal Septoplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05243147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PUTH-NS
- Conditions
- Nasal Septum; Deviation, Congenital
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Third HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparative study of nasal stents and nasal packing in patients undergoing septoplasty
Detailed description
To investigate the safety and effectiveness of nasal stent in clinical application by comparing and observing the clinical effect and comfort of nasal stent and merocel sponge applied in nasal septoplasty. Methods: patients with nasal septal deviation were selected and randomly divided into nasal stent group (experimental group) and merocel sponge group (control group) according to the packing method. The hemostasis effect, comfort and complications of the two groups were compared during the packing period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| nasal stents | Experimental | Device: nasal stentsusing nasal stents after septoplasty |
| merocel | Other | Device: merocelusing merocel as nasal packing after septoplasty |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The subjects voluntarily participate in the experiment and sign the informed consent;
- Age range from 18 to 70 years old, gender unlimited;
- With nasal congestion as the chief complaint, CT of sinus suggested deviation of nasal septum with indications of surgery (deviation of nasal septum affects breathing and nasal congestion is serious; High nasal septum deviation affects sinus drainage or causes reflex headache; Nasal septum spine often causes nasal bleeding; Nasal septum deviation affects eustachian tube function);
- No history of respiratory tract infection and nasal decongestant use within 1 month before the visit;
- No other treatment was used;
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- There are acute and chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, benign and malignant tumors and other nasal diseases;
- History of craniocerebral and nasal surgery;
- The results of preoperative coagulation function test exceeded 20% of the upper limit of normal value;
- Patients known to be allergic to test instrument materials;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nasal stentsusing nasal stents after septoplasty | Device | nasal stents |
| merocelusing merocel after septoplasty | Device | merocel |
Primary outcome
Effective rate of packing
Time frame: 2days after operation
(1) In the period of nasal tamponade and after the removal of the tamponade instrument (48 h ± 1 h after surgery), the nasal bleeding score was ≤ 2 points; (2) 48 h ± 1 h after the completion of nasal tamponade, the overall discomfort score ≤ 7 points; (3) No septal hematoma and nasal adhesions were confirmed by nasal endoscopy at 30 days ± 5 days after the operation. Nasal tamponade is considered effective when the above 3 criteria are met.
2 secondary outcomes
visual analog scale(VAS)of comfort
Time frame: 2days after operation
security
Time frame: 30days after operation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Junxiu Liu principal investigator
Peking University Third Hosptial
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing nasal stents and merocel in people with Nasal Septum; Deviation, Congenital, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Effective rate of packing (time frame: 2days after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2023.