Non Small Cell Lung CancerSALMONNCT05254132
Artificial Intelligence for Help Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Measure Cancer Biology and Treatment Response Via Imaging
An observational study of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by OncoRadiomics.
Trial summary
SALMON is a prospective, multi-center, multi-country, biomarker validation study that synergizes an extensive non-interventional biomarker discovery study on diagnostic images and tissue biopsies of non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC (rATLAS) with a smaller biomarker minimally interventional study on patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Liquid biopsy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2022to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The multi-racial population of rATLAS will be prospectively recruited from 35 different EU sites. No gender predilection will be applied, so that the final population could represent a real spectrum of the population affected by NSCLC. The aRECIST cohort will include stage IV NSCLC patients recruited from 10 different sites.
Who may be able to join
- Participant must be aged at least 18 years
- Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures.
- Willing and able to provide signed informed consent.
- Participant must be at first diagnosis of NSCLC and have the largest diameter of the primary tumor equal or greater than 2 cm.
- Participant must be treatment naïve (includes radiotherapy).
- Participant must have received a CT scan for the diagnosis of NSCLC according to "Imaging Protocol" document (Appendix 1).
Show all 14Show fewer
- Participant with confirmed availability of representative tumor specimens in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks or ≥25 unstained slides (at least 10 unstained slides). Participant without adequate archival tumor specimens cannot be included
- Additional inclusion criteria specific to aRECIST cohort:
- Participant must be diagnosed with NSCLC Stage IV.
- Participant must have a life expectancy ≥ 3 months.
- Participant must have at least one lesion that is suitable for accurate repeated assessment (according to RECIST criteria).
- Participant must be able to comply with standard of care visits for imaging purposes to follow-up on treatment response.
- Participant must need to agree to undergo a liquid biopsy at baseline and at follow-up visits.
- Participant must undergo either chemotherapy or immunotherapy after baseline visit, according to SoC.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast-feeding participants (to avoid radiation exposure)
- Participant is either an employee of Radiomics or the investigational center or an immediate relative of an employee of Radiomics or the investigational center.
- Participant with total body CT scan already performed at a different site with acquisition parameters different from those reported in the Imaging Protocol
- Additional inclusion criteria specific to aRECIST cohort:
- Participant who previously underwent or are planned for curable cancer surgery (lobectomy, wedge resection, pneumonectomy) or ablative radiotherapy on metastases.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Artificial Intelligence to Help Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Measure Lung Cancer Biology and Treatment Response Via Imaging
SALMON is a prospective, multi-center, multi-country, biomarker validation study that synergizes an extensive non-interventional biomarker discovery study on diagnostic images and tissue biopsies of non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC (rATLAS) with a smaller biomarker minimally interventional study on patients with metastases who undergo liquid biopsy and imaging follow-up for 2 years (aRECIST). A total of 1120 patients will be screened to get 1000 participants enrolled in rATLAS, and a subset of 250 participants will be screened to then recruit 150 participants also for aRECIST. The study will end after one visit for participants in rATLAS while there is a 2-years follow-up period for participants in aRECIST. Participants will not receive any treatment specific for this study, but might receive standard of care therapy or investigational products in the framework of another clinical study following the baseline visit.
The objectives of optimizing AI based tools for the assessment of EGFR status (rATLAS) and automated Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) (aRECIST) will be achieved using a trial design that combines a biomarker discovery study design (cross-sectional for rATLAS) with a reader study design (follow-up study in aRECIST). Medical treatments in the aRECIST cohort are not dictated by study protocol, rather determined by the clinicians in line with standard clinical practice.
Read the detailed description
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, accounting for an estimated 2.1 million deaths in 2018. About 80%-85% of lung cancers are NSCLC. The main subtypes of NSCLC are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. These subtypes, which start from different types of lung cells, are grouped together as NSCLC. For these reasons, the choice of NSCLC for this trial is the most relevant, as there is a clear societal burden / clinical need that will be addressed in SALMON.
A pressing need exists to uncover the genetic and molecular composition of tumors, as this information would accelerate the development of more effective cancer therapies. Since tumors differ in their biological makeup, treatments can now often be tailored towards individual patients, in a strategy termed personalized medicine. NSCLC perfectly illustrates this paradigm, with treatments either targeted at well-defined oncogenic pathways (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) \& receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (ROS1) gene rearrangements, B-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma gene (BRAF) mutations), and for so-called "wild-type" NSCLC, immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). The recent development of different types of immunotherapy has led to promising advances in the treatment of patients with NSCLC in advanced or metastatic disease.
Medical imaging plays a pivotal role in the assessment of tumors, including lung cancer, as it provides non-invasively the features to identify, characterize and stage the local tumor and its overall metastatic burden. The information provided by imaging can be still improved with a thorough post-processing analysis of the images, with "radiomics" being the most sophisticated tool for quantitative imaging. Through radiomics the imaging data obtained can be linked to specific biological properties of the tumor, acquired either from tissue or liquid biopsies. However, the knowledge on this is fragmented to date.
The first objective of this trial is to generate a radiomics atlas (rATLAS) that provides a broader link between biological descriptors and medical imaging features in NSCLC, to eventually identify oncologic pathways through medical images and quantify the overall burden of specific markers for targeted therapies. In particular, imaging biomarkers that can predict immunosensitivity and more accurately predict the prognosis than the existing ones will be assessed on the medical images and compared to tissue and liquid biopsies.
Apart from NSCLC diagnosis and staging, imaging plays a key role also in the evaluation of patient's follow-up, representing the gold standard for the assessment of response to therapy. However, the evaluation of medical images is amenable to radiologist's interpretation and many attempts have been made to face this issue in the last decades. The RECIST is a one-dimensional measure (shortest/longest diameter in the plane of measurement) created in 2000, updated in 2009 (RECIST 1.1), with a branch for immunotherapy finalized in 2017 (iRECIST). RECIST, in all its different declination, is used to assess whether a tumor in cancer patients is progressing, regressing or did not change before and after some event, such as therapy. RECIST criteria are recognized both in the EU and in US. Although representing an international attempt to overcome the subjective evaluation of tumor response to cancer treatment, biases of measurements remain as it relies on human assessments. In 1976 Moertel and Hanley acknowledged that "the culmination of most experimental therapeutic trials for solid tumors occurs when a [physician] places a ruler or caliper over a lump and attempts to estimate its size," and with this measurement comes the inevitable component of human error. In 2021 this issue is still present in clinical practice, but in the last years Artificial Intelligence (AI) has demonstrated remarkable progress in image-recognition tasks in research.
Thus, the investigators propose to eliminate the shortcomings of measurement biases with the second objective of our trial that is focused on the validation of a new automated RECIST (aRECIST) workflow for the assessment of therapy response.
A signed and dated informed consent form will be obtained from each patient before any screening procedures are conducted. The participants will be prospectively enrolled to rATLAS only, to both rATLAS and aRECIST, or considered as screen failure. If enrolled then a unique study-specific subject number shall be assigned, Informed consent form will be signed and the following evaluations will be included:
The following data will be obtained for each participant from medical files and records:
- Demographic data (Age, Gender, Race, country);
- Anthropometric data (Weight in kg, Height in cm, body mass index (BMI) in kg/m^2);
- Medical history (comorbidities, oncology-related history, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Interstitial lung disease (ILD), Pulmonary vascular disease, history related to NSCLC);
- Substance use (cigarettes/e-cigarettes/alcohol), duration and dose/frequency [smoking required, others optional];
- Concomitant treatment only linked to immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy (subtype, drug name, line of treatment (first/second/third line), reason for discontinuation (completed regimen/completed response/progression disease/toxicity/other);
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 to 5);
- Histological diagnosis (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma, other);
- Laboratoristic data: Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets) and Chemistry (sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, calcium, albumin, magnesium, phosphate, blood urea nitrogen, protein, urea, potassium, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)).
From clinical examination and imaging (and multidisciplinary discussion report if available) the following data will be recorded per participant: Clinical Tumor Staging (cTNM) upon initial diagnosis.
From Radiology department the following data will be recorded per participant: The staging computed tomography (CT) scan data already performed at the site per standard of care (SoC) will be pseudo-anonymized and sent to the central reader, along with Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans obtained per patient staging, when available.
Then, depending on group (aRECIST or rATLAS), the following steps will also be considered:
rATLAS: Diagnostic samples of tissue biopsy (ideally 1 block or 25 slides - minimum required: 10 slides) performed at the participating site per standard of care will be shipped to the central laboratory for testing on oncogenic biomarkers. After this baseline visit all participants in rATLAS may start their treatment as per SoC. rATLAS study ends after this baseline and enrolment visit.
aRECIST: A liquid biopsy will be obtained (blood sample, 1 tube of 10 ml) and shipped within 2 days to the central laboratory for oncogenic biomarker testing. In order not to influence therapeutic decision making, biomarker results will be shared with the sites only after the decision concerning NSCLC therapy has been made. Diagnostic samples of tissue biopsy which have been obtained for ATLAS (ideally 1 block or 25 slides - minimum required: 10 slides) performed at the participating site per standard of care will be shipped to the central laboratory for oncogenetic biomarker testing. In those cases where standard tissue biopsy is not obtained, fine needle biopsy and cells obtained per SoC by fine needle aspiration could be analyzed and send to the central laboratory following specific procedures. Enough material should be available to be analyzed, otherwise the genetic testing would not be possible.
After baseline all participants of the aRECIST group will undergo standard chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and will be followed up for a maximum of 2 years to investigate a possible treatment response (manual local \& central and automated RECIST) by imaging parameters and liquid biopsy. These participants will need to return to the clinic for liquid biopsies (2 tubes of 10 mL) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months within 5 days (before or after) of their imaging follow-up as per SoC. It is the site staff that will be responsible for providing a copy of all relevant post-treatment CT-scans (and PET/CT scan if available) as taken per SoC together with local RECIST scoring, NSCLC treatment(s) information (class, dose, duration) and NSCLC-related events. The data will be collected at time-points as per standard of care (at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months approximately). The participant's participation to aRECIST will end 2 years after baseline or earlier in case of death or any event that in the opinion of the investigator requires an early termination.
In particular, the site staff will be responsible to provide a liquid biopsy (2 tubes of 10ml each) and to share the following data at 3 (visit1), 6 (visit 2), 12 (visit 3), and 24 (visit 4) months):
- A copy of all relevant post-treatment CT scans - and PET/CT scans if available - as taken per SoC
- Detailed description of CT acquisition for each participant, including contrast media injection characteristics
- Local reading of treatment response by using RECIST 1.1 criteria (manual local reading), along with the time needed for evaluating each participant,
- A liquid biopsy (2 tubes of 10 ml each) within 5 days of the CT scan performed for participant follow up
- NSCLC treatment(s) information (class, dose, duration, specific timeframes)
- NSCLC-related events.
Any rATLAS participant are considered as having completed the study after performing the initial baseline visit (Day 0), except for those also participating to aRECIST. Participants of aRECIST are considered as having completed the study after the 2-year follow-up period, or earlier, in case of death or any event that in the opinion of the investigator requires an early termination.
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Liquid biopsy
- Keywords
- AI, Radiomics, Oncology, RECIST, Lung cancer, Medical imaging, Imaging biomarkers, Immunotherapy, iRECIST
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liquid biopsyProcedure or surgery
Participants in the aRECIST group will undergo a blood draw for liquid biopsy analysis at baseline and follow up visits
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| aRECIST | Treatment naive patients with metastatic NSCLC (stage four) with life expectancy of more than three months. Receives: Procedure: Liquid biopsy | |
| rATLAS | Treatment naive patients diagnosed with NSCLC. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at time of study enrolment
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Measured: At time of study enrolment
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 3
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Measured: Month 3
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 6
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Measured: Month 6
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 12
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Measured: Month 12
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 24
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Measured: Month 24
Identification of imaging biomarkers that discriminate EGFR status in patients with NSCLC with a minimum area under the curve of 0.65
A radiomics-based EGFR mutation prediction model will be trained and tested. The EGFR mutation prediction model is considered successful if its AUC of ROC is ≥ 0.65 in the independent test set of 200 patients.
Measured: At time of study enrolment
Secondary outcomes (2)
Reduction in diagnostic time and inter-reader variability compared to manual RECIST (local reading) in determining therapeutic response on target lesions.
Statistical testing on the performance difference between models predicting survival at 24 months will be performed to compare the prognostic value of aRECIST to that of RECIST. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and local RECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. Inter-reader agreement within the central panel will be computed trough the kappa coefficient.
Measured: Month 24
Identification of imaging biomarkers that correlate with major oncogenic biomarkers to help guide drug development and therapy choice in NSCLC, with a minimum AUC of 0.65
This is assessed by comparing biomarker results from solid biopsies with CT-scan imaging features collected at the baseline visit. A customized radiomics approach to identify statistically significant differences in radiomics features between numerous genomic/biological statuses will be used to map the rATLAS.
Measured: At time of study enrolment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2022
- Study start1 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- OncoRadiomics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Antwerp
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jan P Van Meerbeeck, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Antwerp
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05254132
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0060RDX
- Acronym
- SALMON
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Gridelli C, Rossi A, Carbone DP, Guarize J, Karachaliou N, Mok T, Petrella F, Spaggiari L, Rosell R. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 May 21;1:15009. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.9.
PubMed 27188576Goldstraw P, Ball D, Jett JR, Le Chevalier T, Lim E, Nicholson AG, Shepherd FA. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1727-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62101-0. Epub 2011 May 10.
PubMed 21565398Dempke WC, Suto T, Reck M. Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2010 Mar;67(3):257-74. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
PubMed 19914732El-Deiry WS, Goldberg RM, Lenz HJ, Shields AF, Gibney GT, Tan AR, Brown J, Eisenberg B, Heath EI, Phuphanich S, Kim E, Brenner AJ, Marshall JL. The current state of molecular testing in the treatment of patients with solid tumors, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jul;69(4):305-343. doi: 10.3322/caac.21560. Epub 2019 May 22.
PubMed 31116423Aerts HJ. The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Dec 1;2(12):1636-1642. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631.
PubMed 27541161Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
PubMed 26579733Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
PubMed 19097774Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, Ford R, Schwartz LH, Mandrekar S, Lin NU, Litiere S, Dancey J, Chen A, Hodi FS, Therasse P, Hoekstra OS, Shankar LK, Wolchok JD, Ballinger M, Caramella C, de Vries EGE; RECIST working group. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):e143-e152. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
PubMed 28271869Moertel CG, Hanley JA. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer. Cancer. 1976 Jul;38(1):388-94. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197607)38:13.0.co;2-a.
PubMed 947531
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Artificial Intelligence to Help Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Measure Lung Cancer Biology and Treatment Response Via Imaging
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05254132
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SALMON / 0060RDX
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- AI, Radiomics, Oncology, RECIST, Lung cancer, Medical imaging, Imaging biomarkers, Immunotherapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- OncoRadiomicsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Antwerp
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
SALMON is a prospective, multi-center, multi-country, biomarker validation study that synergizes an extensive non-interventional biomarker discovery study on diagnostic images and tissue biopsies of non-small cell lung cancer NSCLC (rATLAS) with a smaller biomarker minimally interventional study on patients with metastases who undergo liquid biopsy and imaging follow-up for 2 years (aRECIST). A total of 1120 patients will be screened to get 1000 participants enrolled in rATLAS, and a subset of 250 participants will be screened to then recruit 150 participants also for aRECIST. The study will end after one visit for participants in rATLAS while there is a 2-years follow-up period for participants in aRECIST. Participants will not receive any treatment specific for this study, but might receive standard of care therapy or investigational products in the framework of another clinical study following the baseline visit.
The objectives of optimizing AI based tools for the assessment of EGFR status (rATLAS) and automated Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) (aRECIST) will be achieved using a trial design that combines a biomarker discovery study design (cross-sectional for rATLAS) with a reader study design (follow-up study in aRECIST). Medical treatments in the aRECIST cohort are not dictated by study protocol, rather determined by the clinicians in line with standard clinical practice.
Detailed description
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, accounting for an estimated 2.1 million deaths in 2018. About 80%-85% of lung cancers are NSCLC. The main subtypes of NSCLC are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. These subtypes, which start from different types of lung cells, are grouped together as NSCLC. For these reasons, the choice of NSCLC for this trial is the most relevant, as there is a clear societal burden / clinical need that will be addressed in SALMON.
A pressing need exists to uncover the genetic and molecular composition of tumors, as this information would accelerate the development of more effective cancer therapies. Since tumors differ in their biological makeup, treatments can now often be tailored towards individual patients, in a strategy termed personalized medicine. NSCLC perfectly illustrates this paradigm, with treatments either targeted at well-defined oncogenic pathways (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) \& receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (ROS1) gene rearrangements, B-Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma gene (BRAF) mutations), and for so-called "wild-type" NSCLC, immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). The recent development of different types of immunotherapy has led to promising advances in the treatment of patients with NSCLC in advanced or metastatic disease.
Medical imaging plays a pivotal role in the assessment of tumors, including lung cancer, as it provides non-invasively the features to identify, characterize and stage the local tumor and its overall metastatic burden. The information provided by imaging can be still improved with a thorough post-processing analysis of the images, with "radiomics" being the most sophisticated tool for quantitative imaging. Through radiomics the imaging data obtained can be linked to specific biological properties of the tumor, acquired either from tissue or liquid biopsies. However, the knowledge on this is fragmented to date.
The first objective of this trial is to generate a radiomics atlas (rATLAS) that provides a broader link between biological descriptors and medical imaging features in NSCLC, to eventually identify oncologic pathways through medical images and quantify the overall burden of specific markers for targeted therapies. In particular, imaging biomarkers that can predict immunosensitivity and more accurately predict the prognosis than the existing ones will be assessed on the medical images and compared to tissue and liquid biopsies.
Apart from NSCLC diagnosis and staging, imaging plays a key role also in the evaluation of patient's follow-up, representing the gold standard for the assessment of response to therapy. However, the evaluation of medical images is amenable to radiologist's interpretation and many attempts have been made to face this issue in the last decades. The RECIST is a one-dimensional measure (shortest/longest diameter in the plane of measurement) created in 2000, updated in 2009 (RECIST 1.1), with a branch for immunotherapy finalized in 2017 (iRECIST). RECIST, in all its different declination, is used to assess whether a tumor in cancer patients is progressing, regressing or did not change before and after some event, such as therapy. RECIST criteria are recognized both in the EU and in US. Although representing an international attempt to overcome the subjective evaluation of tumor response to cancer treatment, biases of measurements remain as it relies on human assessments. In 1976 Moertel and Hanley acknowledged that "the culmination of most experimental therapeutic trials for solid tumors occurs when a [physician] places a ruler or caliper over a lump and attempts to estimate its size," and with this measurement comes the inevitable component of human error. In 2021 this issue is still present in clinical practice, but in the last years Artificial Intelligence (AI) has demonstrated remarkable progress in image-recognition tasks in research.
Thus, the investigators propose to eliminate the shortcomings of measurement biases with the second objective of our trial that is focused on the validation of a new automated RECIST (aRECIST) workflow for the assessment of therapy response.
A signed and dated informed consent form will be obtained from each patient before any screening procedures are conducted. The participants will be prospectively enrolled to rATLAS only, to both rATLAS and aRECIST, or considered as screen failure. If enrolled then a unique study-specific subject number shall be assigned, Informed consent form will be signed and the following evaluations will be included:
The following data will be obtained for each participant from medical files and records:
- Demographic data (Age, Gender, Race, country);
- Anthropometric data (Weight in kg, Height in cm, body mass index (BMI) in kg/m^2);
- Medical history (comorbidities, oncology-related history, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Interstitial lung disease (ILD), Pulmonary vascular disease, history related to NSCLC);
- Substance use (cigarettes/e-cigarettes/alcohol), duration and dose/frequency [smoking required, others optional];
- Concomitant treatment only linked to immunotherapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy (subtype, drug name, line of treatment (first/second/third line), reason for discontinuation (completed regimen/completed response/progression disease/toxicity/other);
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 to 5);
- Histological diagnosis (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma, other);
- Laboratoristic data: Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets) and Chemistry (sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, calcium, albumin, magnesium, phosphate, blood urea nitrogen, protein, urea, potassium, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, bilirubin, direct bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)).
From clinical examination and imaging (and multidisciplinary discussion report if available) the following data will be recorded per participant: Clinical Tumor Staging (cTNM) upon initial diagnosis.
From Radiology department the following data will be recorded per participant: The staging computed tomography (CT) scan data already performed at the site per standard of care (SoC) will be pseudo-anonymized and sent to the central reader, along with Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans obtained per patient staging, when available.
Then, depending on group (aRECIST or rATLAS), the following steps will also be considered:
rATLAS: Diagnostic samples of tissue biopsy (ideally 1 block or 25 slides - minimum required: 10 slides) performed at the participating site per standard of care will be shipped to the central laboratory for testing on oncogenic biomarkers. After this baseline visit all participants in rATLAS may start their treatment as per SoC. rATLAS study ends after this baseline and enrolment visit.
aRECIST: A liquid biopsy will be obtained (blood sample, 1 tube of 10 ml) and shipped within 2 days to the central laboratory for oncogenic biomarker testing. In order not to influence therapeutic decision making, biomarker results will be shared with the sites only after the decision concerning NSCLC therapy has been made. Diagnostic samples of tissue biopsy which have been obtained for ATLAS (ideally 1 block or 25 slides - minimum required: 10 slides) performed at the participating site per standard of care will be shipped to the central laboratory for oncogenetic biomarker testing. In those cases where standard tissue biopsy is not obtained, fine needle biopsy and cells obtained per SoC by fine needle aspiration could be analyzed and send to the central laboratory following specific procedures. Enough material should be available to be analyzed, otherwise the genetic testing would not be possible.
After baseline all participants of the aRECIST group will undergo standard chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and will be followed up for a maximum of 2 years to investigate a possible treatment response (manual local \& central and automated RECIST) by imaging parameters and liquid biopsy. These participants will need to return to the clinic for liquid biopsies (2 tubes of 10 mL) at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months within 5 days (before or after) of their imaging follow-up as per SoC. It is the site staff that will be responsible for providing a copy of all relevant post-treatment CT-scans (and PET/CT scan if available) as taken per SoC together with local RECIST scoring, NSCLC treatment(s) information (class, dose, duration) and NSCLC-related events. The data will be collected at time-points as per standard of care (at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months approximately). The participant's participation to aRECIST will end 2 years after baseline or earlier in case of death or any event that in the opinion of the investigator requires an early termination.
In particular, the site staff will be responsible to provide a liquid biopsy (2 tubes of 10ml each) and to share the following data at 3 (visit1), 6 (visit 2), 12 (visit 3), and 24 (visit 4) months):
- A copy of all relevant post-treatment CT scans - and PET/CT scans if available - as taken per SoC
- Detailed description of CT acquisition for each participant, including contrast media injection characteristics
- Local reading of treatment response by using RECIST 1.1 criteria (manual local reading), along with the time needed for evaluating each participant,
- A liquid biopsy (2 tubes of 10 ml each) within 5 days of the CT scan performed for participant follow up
- NSCLC treatment(s) information (class, dose, duration, specific timeframes)
- NSCLC-related events.
Any rATLAS participant are considered as having completed the study after performing the initial baseline visit (Day 0), except for those also participating to aRECIST. Participants of aRECIST are considered as having completed the study after the 2-year follow-up period, or earlier, in case of death or any event that in the opinion of the investigator requires an early termination.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| aRECIST | – | Procedure: Liquid biopsyTreatment naive patients with metastatic NSCLC (stage four) with life expectancy of more than three months. |
| rATLAS | – | –Treatment naive patients diagnosed with NSCLC. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The multi-racial population of rATLAS will be prospectively recruited from 35 different EU sites. No gender predilection will be applied, so that the final population could represent a real spectrum of the population affected by NSCLC. The aRECIST cohort will include stage IV NSCLC patients recruited from 10 different sites.
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Participant must be aged at least 18 years
- Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures.
- Willing and able to provide signed informed consent.
- Participant must be at first diagnosis of NSCLC and have the largest diameter of the primary tumor equal or greater than 2 cm.
- Participant must be treatment naïve (includes radiotherapy).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding participants (to avoid radiation exposure)
- Participant is either an employee of Radiomics or the investigational center or an immediate relative of an employee of Radiomics or the investigational center.
- Participant with total body CT scan already performed at a different site with acquisition parameters different from those reported in the Imaging Protocol
- Participant who previously underwent or are planned for curable cancer surgery (lobectomy, wedge resection, pneumonectomy) or ablative radiotherapy on metastases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid biopsyParticipants in the aRECIST group will undergo a blood draw for liquid biopsy analysis at baseline and follow up visits | Procedure or surgery | aRECIST |
Primary outcome
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at time of study enrolment
Time frame: At time of study enrolment
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 3
Time frame: Month 3
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 12
Time frame: Month 12
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at month 24
Time frame: Month 24
Equivalence will be assessed by comparing manual RECIST target response (central readings) with the target response as generated by the automated Radiomics aRECIST workflow. Categorical similarity measures between central panel RECIST and aRECIST will be computed through Cohen's kappa coefficient. aRECIST is considered successful if kappa is at least 0.7 (lower bound), in the full dataset of 150 patients.
Identification of imaging biomarkers that discriminate EGFR status in patients with NSCLC with a minimum area under the curve of 0.65
Time frame: At time of study enrolment
A radiomics-based EGFR mutation prediction model will be trained and tested. The EGFR mutation prediction model is considered successful if its AUC of ROC is ≥ 0.65 in the independent test set of 200 patients.
2 secondary outcomes
Reduction in diagnostic time and inter-reader variability compared to manual RECIST (local reading) in determining therapeutic response on target lesions.
Time frame: Month 24
Identification of imaging biomarkers that correlate with major oncogenic biomarkers to help guide drug development and therapy choice in NSCLC, with a minimum AUC of 0.65
Time frame: At time of study enrolment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2022.
- Background: PubMed 27188576Gridelli C, Rossi A, Carbone DP, Guarize J, Karachaliou N, Mok T, Petrella F, Spaggiari L, Rosell R. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015 May 21;1:15009. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.9.
- Background: PubMed 21565398Goldstraw P, Ball D, Jett JR, Le Chevalier T, Lim E, Nicholson AG, Shepherd FA. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011 Nov 12;378(9804):1727-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62101-0. Epub 2011 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 19914732Dempke WC, Suto T, Reck M. Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2010 Mar;67(3):257-74. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
- Background: PubMed 31116423El-Deiry WS, Goldberg RM, Lenz HJ, Shields AF, Gibney GT, Tan AR, Brown J, Eisenberg B, Heath EI, Phuphanich S, Kim E, Brenner AJ, Marshall JL. The current state of molecular testing in the treatment of patients with solid tumors, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jul;69(4):305-343. doi: 10.3322/caac.21560. Epub 2019 May 22.
- Background: PubMed 27541161Aerts HJ. The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Dec 1;2(12):1636-1642. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2631.
- Background: PubMed 26579733Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 19097774Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
- Background: PubMed 28271869Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, Ford R, Schwartz LH, Mandrekar S, Lin NU, Litiere S, Dancey J, Chen A, Hodi FS, Therasse P, Hoekstra OS, Shankar LK, Wolchok JD, Ballinger M, Caramella C, de Vries EGE; RECIST working group. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):e143-e152. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30074-8. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
- Background: PubMed 947531Moertel CG, Hanley JA. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer. Cancer. 1976 Jul;38(1):388-94. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197607)38:13.0.co;2-a.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Phase 2 Trial of Adagrasib Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab and a Phase 3 Trial of Adagrasib in Combination in Patients With a KRAS G12C Mutation KRYSTAL-7
Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Adjuvant Intismeran (V940) With or Without Pembrolizumab Coformulated With Berahyaluronidase Alfa (MK-3475A) in High-Risk Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (V940-014)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Understanding the Feasibility of a Co-designed Pre-radiotherapy Exercise Programme - A Single-arm Study
Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Adjuvant ctDNA-Adapted Personalized Treatment in Early Stage NSCLC (ADAPT-E)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jan P Van Meerbeeck, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Antwerp
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by OncoRadiomics.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lise Barbeaux (+3242292280, lise.barbeaux@radiomics.bio), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Equivalence between aRECIST and manual RECIST in the evaluation of target lesions at time of study enrolment (time frame: At time of study enrolment). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05254132, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2022.