Injury;SportsDPL2NCT05256186
Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players
A study testing Basketball Pre-injury Attack program in people with Injury;Sports and Biomechanical Lesions, run by University Rovira i Virgili at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Injury;Sports, Biomechanical Lesions, Musculoskeletal Injury
- What is being tested?
- Basketball Pre-injury Attack program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 212 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2019to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 17 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Be between 10 and 17 years old
- Be an active player at the time of selection
- Sign the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Being diagnosed with a psychological and/or psychiatric illness.
- Being diagnosed with an oncological disease.
- Be injured at the time of selection.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this sport requires. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to establish an evaluation protocol that allows the detection of functional deficiencies, to guide and conduct in a specific and early way every moment of players' health and growth.
The purpose of this study is to design, apply and analyze the effectiveness of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Pre-injury Attack) based on the approach of the functional deficiencies detected by the Basketball Injury Defense, to reduce the susceptibility to injury of youth basketball players (U14 - U17).
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study is to design, apply and analyze the effectiveness of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Pre-injury Attack) based on the approach of functional deficiencies detected by the Basketball Injury Defense, to reduce the susceptibility to injury of training federated basketball players.
The specific objectives are:
To improve the deficiencies detected in mobility, stability, symmetry and jumping/landing technique of basketball players in training categories (U14, U16 and U17).
To structure and determine the contents of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Preinjury Attack) designed to improve the functional deficiencies of mobility, stability, symmetry and jumping/landing technique of training basketball players based on current scientific evidence.
To analyze whether adherence to the program is achieved by raising players' awareness of the importance and benefits of performing the exercises with correct technique.
To assess whether a decrease in the susceptibility to injury of training federated basketball players is achieved.
For this purpose, an experimental study was conducted as a single-blind, randomized, cluster-controlled clinical trial during the months of June 2019 to February 2020 (9 months). For the development of the methodology of this study, the guidelines of the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement were followed.
- Being tested
- Basketball Pre-injury Attack program
- Keywords
- Basketball, Prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Athletic Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Basketball Pre-injury Attack programOther
The intervention had a total duration of 24 weeks, with 3 sessions per week (before starting training) with a total duration of 12 to 15 minutes per session. Each session consisted of 8 exercises with a load of 2 to 3 series between 6 and 12 repetitions; and with a rest at the end of each series of <60 seconds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Basketball pre-injury attack program | Experimental | The intervention group carried out a program for 24 weeks. The participant had to perform the program 3 days per week for 12-15' each day (training days with the team, prior to group activation). Receives: Other: Basketball Pre-injury Attack program |
| Control | No intervention | The control group performed only the initial, follow-up (12 weeks) and final (24 weeks) evaluations. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ankle dorsiflexion under load
The Weight-bearing Lunge Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. Ankle dorsiflexion was recorded in centimeters.
Measured: 1 year
Active hip, knee and ankle dorsiflexion
The Hurdle Step Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. A frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices so that the results could be analyzed later. Impairment was considered in those cases in which the subject was not able to step the foot over the rope during the hurdle step or if he/she performed adduction, internal or external rotation of the hip, and lost alignment between the hip, knee and ankle.
Measured: 1 year
Ankle stability in monopodal loading
The Single Leg Squat Test was used and the criteria established by Perrot were used: it was considered stable if the foot remained in neutral position during the movement; and unstable if excessive pronation of the foot was evident during the movement or external rotation of the leg. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices.
Measured: 1 year
Monopodal dynamic knee valgus
The Single Leg Squat Test was used. The evaluator recorded a frontal and sagittal view with two filming devices. The knee was considered to be aligned if the patella was over the second toe.
Measured: 1 year
Lumbo-pelvic stability
It was evaluated qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test and the Hurdle Step Test. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices and the criteria established by Perrot were used. It was considered stable if there was minimal movement in all three planes, the pelvic girdle was aligned and there was no evidence of excessive anteroposterior tilt and/or trunk rotation. It was considered unstable if these criteria were not met.
Measured: 1 year
Dynamic postural stability
It was analyzed qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test. The test was recorded with two filming devices (frontal and sagittal) and the criteria established by Perrot and Crossley were used. For this purpose, the deviation of the trunk with respect to the center of gravity was observed. It was considered stable if there was minimal translation of the center of mass, i.e., no lateral flexion/tilt, rotation or trunk flexion/extension.
Measured: 1 year
Jumping/landing technique
It was analyzed with de Single Hop for distance Test. Ankle stability at landing, dynamic knee valgus, lumbopelvic stability and dynamic postural stability were analyzed.
Measured: 1 year
Symmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limb
From the distance obtained in the Single Hop for distance Test, the Symmetry Index was calculated using the formula: (Distance dominant limb/Distance non-dominant limb)*100.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (7)
Age
Recorded in years.
Measured: 1 year
Category
According to the age of the participant could compete in 3 categories: U14, U16 or U17.
Measured: 1 year
Gender
Female or male.
Measured: 1 year
Weight
Weight was recorded in kg.
Measured: 1 year
Height
Height was recorded in cm.
Measured: 1 year
Body Mass Index (BMI)
It was calculated from the following formula [weight (kg) / height2 (m)].
Measured: 1 year
Wingspan
The horizontal wingspan was recorded in cm.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2022
- Study start1 Jun 2019
- Primary completion28 Feb 2020
- Study completion30 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Injury;SportsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 212 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Rovira i Virgili
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, CRISTINA ADILLÓN, University Rovira i Virgili
- Investigators
- Cristina Adillón, MsC, Principal investigator, University Rovira i Virgili
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05256186
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 123/2018 (phase 2)
- Acronym
- DPL2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 25 Feb 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Romero Morales C, Calvo Lobo C, Rodriguez Sanz D, Sanz Corbalan I, Ruiz Ruiz B, Lopez Lopez D. The concurrent validity and reliability of the Leg Motion system for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in older adults. PeerJ. 2017 Jan 3;5:e2820. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2820. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28070457Aerts I, Cumps E, Verhagen E, Wuyts B, Van De Gucht S, Meeusen R. The effect of a 3-month prevention program on the jump-landing technique in basketball: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):21-30. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0099. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
PubMed 24911356Myer GD, Ford KR, McLean SG, Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):445-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281241. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
PubMed 16282579Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Mar;13(2):71-8. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00002.
PubMed 12629423Moody JA, Naclerio F, Green P, Lloyd RS. Motor skill development in youths. En: Lloyd R, Oliver JL. Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 1ª edición. New York:Routledge;2014
Dill KE, Begalle RL, Frank BS, Zinder SM, Padua DA. Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing-lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):723-32. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.29.
PubMed 25144599Baumbach SF, Braunstein M, Seeliger F, Borgmann L, Bocker W, Polzer H. Ankle dorsiflexion: what is normal? Development of a decision pathway for diagnosing impaired ankle dorsiflexion and M. gastrocnemius tightness. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2513-x. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
PubMed 27418341Gonzalo-Skok O, Serna J, Rhea MR, Marin PJ. AGE DIFFERENCES IN MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT AND PERFORMANCE IN HIGHLY YOUTH BASKETBALL PLAYERS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Oct;12(5):812-821.
PubMed 29181258Branta C, Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V. Age changes in motor skills during childhood and adolescence. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1984;12:467-520.
PubMed 6734680Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Gual G, Romero-Rodriguez D, Unnitha V. Lower Limb Neuromuscular Asymmetry in Volleyball and Basketball Players. J Hum Kinet. 2016 Apr 13;50:135-143. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0150. eCollection 2016 Apr 1.
PubMed 28149351Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):123-40. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.
PubMed 24105612McKeon PO, Hertel J. Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part I: can deficits be detected with instrumented testing. J Athl Train. 2008 May-Jun;43(3):293-304. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.3.293.
PubMed 18523566Perrott MA, Pizzari T, Opar M, Cook J. Development of clinical rating criteria for tests of lumbopelvic stability. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:803637. doi: 10.1155/2012/803637. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
PubMed 22263111Teyhen D, Bergeron MF, Deuster P, Baumgartner N, Beutler AI, de la Motte SJ, Jones BH, Lisman P, Padua DA, Pendergrass TL, Pyne SW, Schoomaker E, Sell TC, O'Connor F. Consortium for health and military performance and American College of Sports Medicine Summit: utility of functional movement assessment in identifying musculoskeletal injury risk. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;13(1):52-63. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000023.
PubMed 24412892Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):492-501. doi: 10.1177/0363546504269591. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
PubMed 15722287
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Feb 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05256186
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DPL2 / 123/2018 (phase 2)
- Keywords
- Basketball, Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 212 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Rovira i VirgiliUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this sport requires. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to establish an evaluation protocol that allows the detection of functional deficiencies, to guide and conduct in a specific and early way every moment of players' health and growth.
The purpose of this study is to design, apply and analyze the effectiveness of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Pre-injury Attack) based on the approach of the functional deficiencies detected by the Basketball Injury Defense, to reduce the susceptibility to injury of youth basketball players (U14 - U17).
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to design, apply and analyze the effectiveness of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Pre-injury Attack) based on the approach of functional deficiencies detected by the Basketball Injury Defense, to reduce the susceptibility to injury of training federated basketball players.
The specific objectives are:
To improve the deficiencies detected in mobility, stability, symmetry and jumping/landing technique of basketball players in training categories (U14, U16 and U17).
To structure and determine the contents of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Preinjury Attack) designed to improve the functional deficiencies of mobility, stability, symmetry and jumping/landing technique of training basketball players based on current scientific evidence.
To analyze whether adherence to the program is achieved by raising players' awareness of the importance and benefits of performing the exercises with correct technique.
To assess whether a decrease in the susceptibility to injury of training federated basketball players is achieved.
For this purpose, an experimental study was conducted as a single-blind, randomized, cluster-controlled clinical trial during the months of June 2019 to February 2020 (9 months). For the development of the methodology of this study, the guidelines of the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement were followed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Basketball pre-injury attack program | Experimental | Other: Basketball Pre-injury Attack programThe intervention group carried out a program for 24 weeks. The participant had to perform the program 3 days per week for 12-15' each day (training days with the team, prior to group activation). |
| Control | No intervention | –The control group performed only the initial, follow-up (12 weeks) and final (24 weeks) evaluations. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Be between 10 and 17 years old
- Be an active player at the time of selection
- Sign the informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Being diagnosed with a psychological and/or psychiatric illness.
- Being diagnosed with an oncological disease.
- Be injured at the time of selection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Basketball Pre-injury Attack programThe intervention had a total duration of 24 weeks, with 3 sessions per week (before starting training) with a total duration of 12 to 15 minutes per session. Each session consisted of 8 exercises with a load of 2 to 3 series between 6 and 12 repetitions; and with a rest at the end of each series of <60 seconds. | Other | Basketball pre-injury attack program |
Primary outcome
Ankle dorsiflexion under load
Time frame: 1 year
The Weight-bearing Lunge Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. Ankle dorsiflexion was recorded in centimeters.
Active hip, knee and ankle dorsiflexion
Time frame: 1 year
The Hurdle Step Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. A frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices so that the results could be analyzed later. Impairment was considered in those cases in which the subject was not able to step the foot over the rope during the hurdle step or if he/she performed adduction, internal or external rotation of the hip, and lost alignment between the hip, knee and ankle.
Ankle stability in monopodal loading
Time frame: 1 year
The Single Leg Squat Test was used and the criteria established by Perrot were used: it was considered stable if the foot remained in neutral position during the movement; and unstable if excessive pronation of the foot was evident during the movement or external rotation of the leg. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices.
Monopodal dynamic knee valgus
Time frame: 1 year
The Single Leg Squat Test was used. The evaluator recorded a frontal and sagittal view with two filming devices. The knee was considered to be aligned if the patella was over the second toe.
Lumbo-pelvic stability
Time frame: 1 year
It was evaluated qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test and the Hurdle Step Test. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices and the criteria established by Perrot were used. It was considered stable if there was minimal movement in all three planes, the pelvic girdle was aligned and there was no evidence of excessive anteroposterior tilt and/or trunk rotation. It was considered unstable if these criteria were not met.
Dynamic postural stability
Time frame: 1 year
It was analyzed qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test. The test was recorded with two filming devices (frontal and sagittal) and the criteria established by Perrot and Crossley were used. For this purpose, the deviation of the trunk with respect to the center of gravity was observed. It was considered stable if there was minimal translation of the center of mass, i.e., no lateral flexion/tilt, rotation or trunk flexion/extension.
Jumping/landing technique
Time frame: 1 year
It was analyzed with de Single Hop for distance Test. Ankle stability at landing, dynamic knee valgus, lumbopelvic stability and dynamic postural stability were analyzed.
Symmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limb
Time frame: 1 year
From the distance obtained in the Single Hop for distance Test, the Symmetry Index was calculated using the formula: (Distance dominant limb/Distance non-dominant limb)*100.
7 secondary outcomes
Age
Time frame: 1 year
Category
Time frame: 1 year
Gender
Time frame: 1 year
Weight
Time frame: 1 year
Height
Time frame: 1 year
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: 1 year
Wingspan
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Feb 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28070457Romero Morales C, Calvo Lobo C, Rodriguez Sanz D, Sanz Corbalan I, Ruiz Ruiz B, Lopez Lopez D. The concurrent validity and reliability of the Leg Motion system for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in older adults. PeerJ. 2017 Jan 3;5:e2820. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2820. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24911356Aerts I, Cumps E, Verhagen E, Wuyts B, Van De Gucht S, Meeusen R. The effect of a 3-month prevention program on the jump-landing technique in basketball: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):21-30. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0099. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 16282579Myer GD, Ford KR, McLean SG, Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):445-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281241. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 12629423Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Mar;13(2):71-8. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00002.
- BackgroundMoody JA, Naclerio F, Green P, Lloyd RS. Motor skill development in youths. En: Lloyd R, Oliver JL. Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 1ª edición. New York:Routledge;2014
- Background: PubMed 25144599Dill KE, Begalle RL, Frank BS, Zinder SM, Padua DA. Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing-lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):723-32. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.29.
- Background: PubMed 27418341Baumbach SF, Braunstein M, Seeliger F, Borgmann L, Bocker W, Polzer H. Ankle dorsiflexion: what is normal? Development of a decision pathway for diagnosing impaired ankle dorsiflexion and M. gastrocnemius tightness. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2513-x. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
- Background: PubMed 29181258Gonzalo-Skok O, Serna J, Rhea MR, Marin PJ. AGE DIFFERENCES IN MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT AND PERFORMANCE IN HIGHLY YOUTH BASKETBALL PLAYERS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Oct;12(5):812-821.
- Background: PubMed 6734680Branta C, Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V. Age changes in motor skills during childhood and adolescence. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1984;12:467-520.
- Background: PubMed 28149351Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Gual G, Romero-Rodriguez D, Unnitha V. Lower Limb Neuromuscular Asymmetry in Volleyball and Basketball Players. J Hum Kinet. 2016 Apr 13;50:135-143. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0150. eCollection 2016 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 24105612Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):123-40. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.
- Background: PubMed 18523566McKeon PO, Hertel J. Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part I: can deficits be detected with instrumented testing. J Athl Train. 2008 May-Jun;43(3):293-304. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.3.293.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Injury;Sports
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Functional Recovery After a Recent Lateral Ankle Sprain With Early Initiation of Rehabilitation: Changes in the Ankle-GO Score and Its Association With Return to Sport and Recurrent Sprains.
Ankle Sprain
Recruiting
Enovis High Ankle Sprain Brace Testing
Athletes in Cutting Sports
Not yet recruiting
Integrating Sport-Specific Comprehensive Training to Upscale Performance in Women and Girls
Sport Injuries, Performance in Sport
Not yet recruiting
PNF Effects on Volleyball Performance
Sport Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cristina Adillón, MsC principal investigator
University Rovira i Virgili
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Basketball Pre-injury Attack program in people with Injury;Sports and Biomechanical Lesions, run by University Rovira i Virgili at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ankle dorsiflexion under load (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05256186, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2022.