AzTrials
AzTrials

Leadership in Early Care and Education CentersExCELSNCT05258994

Early Care and Education Leadership Study: Descriptive Study

An observational study of Leadership in Early Care and Education Centers, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mathematica and the Institute for Early Education Leadership and Innovation at the University of Massachusetts Boston, conducted a descriptive study within the Early Care and Education Leadership Study (ExCELS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
How many people
1,164 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 Mar 2022to 15 Sep 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Center-based early care and education settings that receive at least 20 percent of its funding from Head Start or the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) and serve children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (not yet in kindergarten). Data collection included interviews with each center's primary site leader (the person in the building who is responsible for oversight of all that happens in the center on a daily basis) and surveys for select center managers and all teaching staff.

Who may be able to join

  • Early care and education (ECE) centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5, not yet in kindergarten, who are supported by Head Start or Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) subsidies. A center is defined as a specific physical location where ECE is delivered to children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (not yet in kindergarten) with at least two classrooms.

Who cannot join

  • Classrooms operated by public schools
  • Centers offering less than four hours of early childcare education each day
  • Drop-in child care settings

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Mathematica

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20002

Other trials in United States

About this study

Mathematica and the Institute for Early Education Leadership and Innovation at the University of Massachusetts Boston, conducted a descriptive study within the Early Care and Education Leadership Study (ExCELS). ExCELS is funded by the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation within the Administration for Children and Families in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The goal of the descriptive study is to develop a new measure of early care and education (ECE) leadership that has strong psychometric properties and examines associations among key constructs and outcomes on how ECE leadership could support quality improvements. In early 2022, the study team recruited 132 ECE centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (but who are not yet in kindergarten) and supported by Head Start grants or Child Care Development Fund subsidies. In spring 2022, the study team conducted phone interviews to collect center characteristics and learn about the center's staffing structure and leadership positions, and distributed surveys to center managers and teaching staff in recruited centers.

Read the detailed description

Leadership is widely recognized as an essential driver of organizational performance and improvement, but little is known about its role in driving the quality of care and education centers provide and outcomes for staff, children, and families. ExCELS seeks to fill the definitional and measurement gaps to help the early childhood field understand how effective leaders can improve quality experiences for children in early care and education (ECE) settings.

The ExCELS descriptive study includes a purposive sample of 132 ECE centers from four states. These selected four states vary on administrator qualifications; quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) participation levels; licensing requirements to reflect the regulatory environment; funding sources (e.g., Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) or Head Start funding) to support access and quality; and geographic diversity. Within each selected state, centers were selected to achieve variability in funding sources, center size, and geography. The study includes ECE centers serving children whose ages range from birth to age 5 (but who are not yet in kindergarten) who receive at least 20 percent of their funding from Head Start grants or CCDF subsidies.

The study team conducted the following activities with the recruited centers:

  1. An engagement interview with the primary site leader (the person in the building who is responsible for oversight of all that happens in the center on a daily basis) to collect center characteristics and confirm center eligibility for the study
  2. A staffing structure and leadership positions interview with the primary site leader to understand the staffing structure and formal leadership positions at the center, and
  3. Surveys of center managers and teaching staff to understand key leadership elements related to the care and education of young children (on who participates in decision-making, their values and beliefs, and what they do to support high quality practices, coordination among staff and with families, having a shared vision, along with efficient operations), the center's culture, climate, and communication (such as collaboration among staff or whether there is a culture of respect, shared growth, and learning), and outcomes for the center and staff (job satisfaction, staff well-being and mental health, and staff retention).
Keywords
Leadership, Infant-toddler care, Early child development, Early childhood education, Head Start, Child care, Day care, Preschool, Child care and early education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Job Satisfaction

    Study-developed survey on job commitment (intention to continue to work at center); and satisfaction (enjoy job, make a difference, choose career again)

    Measured: 5 months

  2. Staff well-being and mental health

    Job stress; four-item scale with response options from strongly disagree to strongly agree with the stronger agreement indicating more job stress (Institute of Behavioral Research. (2005). TCU Survey of Organizational Functioning (TCU SOF). Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research. Available at ibr.tcu.edu.)

    Measured: 5 months

  3. Staff retention

    Study-developed survey on teaching staff turnover over past 12 months

    Measured: 5 months

  4. Teaching staff report of family involvement

    Parent involvement measure from Essential 0-5 Survey (Ehrlich, Stacy B., Debra M. Pacchiano, Amanda G. Stein, Maureen R. Wagner, Stuart Luppescu, Sangyoon Park, Elizabeth Frank, Holly Lewandowski, and Christopher Young. "Organizing Early Education for Improvement: Testing a New Survey Tool." Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research and the Ounce of Prevention Fund, 2018.)

    Measured: 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Feb 2022
  2. Study start4 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022
  4. Study completion15 Sep 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
1,164 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05258994
Sponsor's protocol ID
50708
Acronym
ExCELS
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
17 Feb 2022
Last updated
18 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The study team plans to archive a restricted-use data file at the Child and Family Data Archive for secondary analysis by qualified researchers. The study team will implement procedures to ensure that data are prepared in accordance with archive requirements, removing all linkable identifiers and geographic details as well as all open-ended text and verbatim responses from all data files.

Publications

  • G. Kirby, A. Douglass, J. Lyskawa, C. Jones, and L. Malone. (2021). Understanding Leadership in Early Care and Education: A literature review. OPRE Report 2021-02. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Leadership in Early Care and Education Centers, run by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Job Satisfaction (time frame: 5 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05258994, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in