Chronic PainNCT05259865
Pharmacogenetic Testing and Chronic Pain
An observational study of Chronic Pain, run by Canadian Forces Health Services Centre Ottawa at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Understanding the impact of genetics could aid rational, precision drug choices. In the current study, investigators will focus on whether genetic analysis of drug processing using the Inagene platform could predict efficacy and side effect profile in patients prescribed medication for pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Genetic test for drug response prediction
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 21 Sep 2025to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Adult
Study population: The study population will be Canadian Forces members between the ages of 18-60 years old, suffering from chronic pain, seen within the Canadian Forces Ottawa Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic (CFO-P).
Who may be able to join
- male and female between 18 and 60 years old
- seen within the CFO-P
- diagnosed by a physician with one or more chronic pain condition.
Who cannot join
- adults who are unable to give their own consent
- contraindications to a buccal swab
- uncontrolled mental health issues determined by clinical judgement without mental health treatment and/or presence of active suicidal ideation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Utility of Genetic Testing in Predicting Drug Response in Chronic Pain
Understanding the impact of genetics could aid rational, precision drug choices. In the current study, investigators will focus on whether genetic analysis of drug processing using the Inagene platform could predict efficacy and side effect profile in patients prescribed medication for pain.
Read the detailed description
Understanding the impact of genetics could aid rational, precision drug choices. In the current study, investigators will focus on whether genetic analysis of drug processing using the Inagene platform could predict efficacy and side effect profile in patients prescribed medication for pain. In the investigator's clinic commonly employed medications included nortriptyline, duloxetine, topiramate, gabapentin, pregabalin, opioids (morphine derivatives, tramadol, tapentadol, buprenorphine patch), cesamet (a synthetic cannabinoid). To the investigator's knowledge this type of study has not been completed in this environment and/or patient population.
Research Objectives:
The main goal of this study is to determine whether genetic analysis of drug processing could help predict efficacy and side effect profiles of medications in a cohort of patients suffering from chronic pain.
In order to control for various clinical factors, patient reported outcomes will also be collected. As a standard part of any patient intake, pain diagrams, measures of pain, function, mental health status and exercise describe the conditions and relative impact will be included. Investigators will include various standardized and/or adapted versions of other questionnaires which will allow investigators to control for known confounders.
The following information will be collected at baseline
- Demographics - age, gender, rank, working status, medical category
- Patient Reported Outcomes at baseline (Appendix A)
- Body Pain Diagram
- Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity Scale (PEG)
- Pain Disability Index
- Hospital Anxiety and Depressions Scale (HADS)
- Adapted Deployment Risk \& Resilience Inventory 2 Section J: Unit Support Exercise Questionnaire
- Brief Trauma Questionnaire (BTQ)
- Litigation Status
The following information will be collected at follow up, defined by discontinuation of medication or continuation on medication associated with predefined measure of clinical efficacy
- Medication Efficacy and Side effect Form - for each prescribed medication noted perceived efficacy, severity of side effects and general comments. This will be completed at either the time of medication discontinuation, or when no further changes to dosing is made.
- Previous medication taken (Appendix B) - investigators will look specifically at commonly prescribed pain medications, including: nortriptyline, duloxetine, topiramate, gabapentin, pregabalin, opioids (ie morphine derivatives, tramadol, tapentadol, buprenorphine patch), Cesamet and plant based cannabis. If necessary, the patient's health record will be accessed to complete this record
- Current medications
- Smoking status and total starting/current dose
Clinical efficacy will be defined by achieving 5-8 on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC). Medication selection will be done in accordance with current standard of care, patient informed consent and clinical experience. Prescription of medication will not be directed by the results of the genetics analytics. Doses will be adjusted if side effects permit and until clinical efficacy is achieved
Classification of inferred phenotypes (i.e. ultrarapid, normal, intermediate and poor metabolizer) will be consistent with the recently published guidance for allele function status. As noted, there are four possible scores for each tested medication, ranging from 1-4, which includes; 1) do not use 2) caution 3) use as directed 4) preferred. For the main analysis, the phenotypes will be grouped 1\&2 (do not prescribe) and 3\&4 (prescribe) and compared against whether patient responded or not to determine sensitivity and specificity of the genetic testing. Sub-analysis will determine for those that did not respond and whether this was a result of side effects or a lack of efficacy. From a functional standpoint for each recommendation the pharmacogenetics testing will classified into green (prescribe), yellow (caution), red (do no prescribe). All yellow outcomes will be reviewed to determine if the clinical information (ie dosing, smoking, and/or current medications), could allow for re-classification to a green or red recommendation for the purpose of the analysis.
The distribution of the prediction score will also be separately evaluated for medications actively taken by participants and for medications that had been discontinued. The distribution of prediction scores will be compared using ANOVA. Genetic prediction scores will be separately compared against participants reported efficacy and side effects profile using Spearman's correlation coefficient, and the respective p values will be calculated, and corrected for multiple comparison
Patient Care:
Participation in the current study will not impact patient care or impact decision making regarding medication. Each patient is simply evaluating the effects of the medications so that we can compare their experiences with the predictive abilities of genetic prediction score.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Genetic test for drug response prediction
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Genetic test for drug response predictionDiagnostic test
There is interest in whether genetic analysis of how a given drug is processed for a patient can help with rational drug choices (i.e. most efficacious, with least side effects/interactions, in the fastest time). This appears to have some early support in cardiac, psychiatric and acute pain studies.
All participants enrolled in the study will provide consent and a buccal cell sample for genotyping and standard patient reported outcomes questionnaires at the beginning of the study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with chronic pain | Patients seen in clinic agreeing to participate in trial by completing clinical questionnaires and genetic testing Receives: Diagnostic Test: Genetic test for drug response prediction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity and Specificity of PGx testing for pain response
For the main analysis, the phenotypes will be grouped 1\&2 (do not prescribe) and 3\&4 (prescribe) and compared against whether patient responded or not to determine sensitivity and specificity of the genetic testing. Sub-analysis will determine for those that did not respond and whether this was a result of side effects or a lack of efficacy
Measured: up to 8 weeks post initial medication prescription
Secondary outcomes (1)
Sensitivity and Specificity of PGx testing for side effects
For the main analysis, the phenotypes will be grouped 1\&2 (do not prescribe) and 3\&4 (prescribe) and compared against whether patient responded or not to determine sensitivity and specificity of the genetic testing. Sub-analysis will determine for those that did not respond and whether this was a result of side effects or a lack of efficacy
Measured: up to 8 weeks post initial medication prescription
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2022
- Study start21 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Working on obtaining approvals
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Canadian Forces Health Services Centre Ottawa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gaurav Gupta, Canadian Forces Health Services Centre Ottawa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05259865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-043
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Utility of Genetic Testing in Predicting Drug Response in Chronic Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05259865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-043
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- SuspendedReason stopped: Working on obtaining approvals
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Canadian Forces Health Services Centre OttawaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Understanding the impact of genetics could aid rational, precision drug choices. In the current study, investigators will focus on whether genetic analysis of drug processing using the Inagene platform could predict efficacy and side effect profile in patients prescribed medication for pain.
Detailed description
Understanding the impact of genetics could aid rational, precision drug choices. In the current study, investigators will focus on whether genetic analysis of drug processing using the Inagene platform could predict efficacy and side effect profile in patients prescribed medication for pain. In the investigator's clinic commonly employed medications included nortriptyline, duloxetine, topiramate, gabapentin, pregabalin, opioids (morphine derivatives, tramadol, tapentadol, buprenorphine patch), cesamet (a synthetic cannabinoid). To the investigator's knowledge this type of study has not been completed in this environment and/or patient population.
Research Objectives:
The main goal of this study is to determine whether genetic analysis of drug processing could help predict efficacy and side effect profiles of medications in a cohort of patients suffering from chronic pain.
In order to control for various clinical factors, patient reported outcomes will also be collected. As a standard part of any patient intake, pain diagrams, measures of pain, function, mental health status and exercise describe the conditions and relative impact will be included. Investigators will include various standardized and/or adapted versions of other questionnaires which will allow investigators to control for known confounders.
The following information will be collected at baseline
- Demographics - age, gender, rank, working status, medical category
- Patient Reported Outcomes at baseline (Appendix A)
- Body Pain Diagram
- Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity Scale (PEG)
- Pain Disability Index
- Hospital Anxiety and Depressions Scale (HADS)
- Adapted Deployment Risk \& Resilience Inventory 2 Section J: Unit Support Exercise Questionnaire
- Brief Trauma Questionnaire (BTQ)
- Litigation Status
The following information will be collected at follow up, defined by discontinuation of medication or continuation on medication associated with predefined measure of clinical efficacy
- Medication Efficacy and Side effect Form - for each prescribed medication noted perceived efficacy, severity of side effects and general comments. This will be completed at either the time of medication discontinuation, or when no further changes to dosing is made.
- Previous medication taken (Appendix B) - investigators will look specifically at commonly prescribed pain medications, including: nortriptyline, duloxetine, topiramate, gabapentin, pregabalin, opioids (ie morphine derivatives, tramadol, tapentadol, buprenorphine patch), Cesamet and plant based cannabis. If necessary, the patient's health record will be accessed to complete this record
- Current medications
- Smoking status and total starting/current dose
Clinical efficacy will be defined by achieving 5-8 on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC). Medication selection will be done in accordance with current standard of care, patient informed consent and clinical experience. Prescription of medication will not be directed by the results of the genetics analytics. Doses will be adjusted if side effects permit and until clinical efficacy is achieved
Classification of inferred phenotypes (i.e. ultrarapid, normal, intermediate and poor metabolizer) will be consistent with the recently published guidance for allele function status. As noted, there are four possible scores for each tested medication, ranging from 1-4, which includes; 1) do not use 2) caution 3) use as directed 4) preferred. For the main analysis, the phenotypes will be grouped 1\&2 (do not prescribe) and 3\&4 (prescribe) and compared against whether patient responded or not to determine sensitivity and specificity of the genetic testing. Sub-analysis will determine for those that did not respond and whether this was a result of side effects or a lack of efficacy. From a functional standpoint for each recommendation the pharmacogenetics testing will classified into green (prescribe), yellow (caution), red (do no prescribe). All yellow outcomes will be reviewed to determine if the clinical information (ie dosing, smoking, and/or current medications), could allow for re-classification to a green or red recommendation for the purpose of the analysis.
The distribution of the prediction score will also be separately evaluated for medications actively taken by participants and for medications that had been discontinued. The distribution of prediction scores will be compared using ANOVA. Genetic prediction scores will be separately compared against participants reported efficacy and side effects profile using Spearman's correlation coefficient, and the respective p values will be calculated, and corrected for multiple comparison
Patient Care:
Participation in the current study will not impact patient care or impact decision making regarding medication. Each patient is simply evaluating the effects of the medications so that we can compare their experiences with the predictive abilities of genetic prediction score.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with chronic pain | – | Diagnostic Test: Genetic test for drug response predictionPatients seen in clinic agreeing to participate in trial by completing clinical questionnaires and genetic testing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- The study population will be Canadian Forces members between the ages of 18-60 years old, suffering from chronic pain, seen within the Canadian Forces Ottawa Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic (CFO-P).
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- male and female between 18 and 60 years old
- seen within the CFO-P
- diagnosed by a physician with one or more chronic pain condition.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- adults who are unable to give their own consent
- contraindications to a buccal swab
- uncontrolled mental health issues determined by clinical judgement without mental health treatment and/or presence of active suicidal ideation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Genetic test for drug response predictionThere is interest in whether genetic analysis of how a given drug is processed for a patient can help with rational drug choices (i.e. most efficacious, with least side effects/interactions, in the fastest time). This appears to have some early support in cardiac, psychiatric and acute pain studies. All participants enrolled in the study will provide consent and a buccal cell sample for genotyping and standard patient reported outcomes questionnaires at the beginning of the study. | Diagnostic test | Patients with chronic pain |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity and Specificity of PGx testing for pain response
Time frame: up to 8 weeks post initial medication prescription
For the main analysis, the phenotypes will be grouped 1\&2 (do not prescribe) and 3\&4 (prescribe) and compared against whether patient responded or not to determine sensitivity and specificity of the genetic testing. Sub-analysis will determine for those that did not respond and whether this was a result of side effects or a lack of efficacy
1 secondary outcome
Sensitivity and Specificity of PGx testing for side effects
Time frame: up to 8 weeks post initial medication prescription
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Healing Track Clinical Trial
Chronic Back Pain
Recruiting
Sana Device for Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome Chronic Pain
Post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome, Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Reducing Chronic Pain Following Cesarean Delivery
Chronic Pain, Cesarean Section Complications
Recruiting
The Intervention Effect of Exercise on Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injuries
Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain, Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Pain, run by Canadian Forces Health Services Centre Ottawa at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity and Specificity of PGx testing for pain response (time frame: up to 8 weeks post initial medication prescription). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.