Breastfeeding, ExclusivePROMPTNCT05262920
Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain With Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women Study
A study testing The BSM Intervention in people with Breastfeeding, Exclusive and Pain, Acute, run by University of Connecticut at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Every year, 1 million women cease breastfeeding (BF) before 6 months, the minimum time required for optimal maternal and infant health, development, and well-being. The highest rate of BF cessation occurs within 3 weeks after birth, with 30% of women ceasing BF due to acute breast and nipple pain (BNP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breastfeeding, Exclusive, Pain, Acute, Maternal Distress
- What is being tested?
- The BSM Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Mar 2022to 18 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- women
- 18 - 45 years of age
- Gave birth < 48 hours to a singleton infant > 37 weeks gestational age
- Intend to BF
- Received standardized BF basics during their antenatal care
- Access to the internet via own smartphone or study provided smartphone
- Able to read and write English
- Assessed by lactation consultant during BF
Who cannot join
- < 18 or > 45 years of age
- History of significant mental health disorder (e.g., major depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder) due to additional challenges in the capacity for self-management
- Skin conditions on nondominant forearm which could interfere with quantitative sensory testing
- Birth of an infant with medical complications or congenital anomalies
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
UConn Health
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102-5037
About this study
Every year, 1 million women cease breastfeeding (BF) before 6 months, the minimum time required for optimal maternal and infant health, development, and well-being. The highest rate of BF cessation occurs within 3 weeks after birth, with 30% of women ceasing BF due to acute breast and nipple pain (BNP). BNP is a complex and understudied biobehavioral phenomenon involving nociceptive signaling that stimulates multiple pain pathways. Women who experience BNP beyond BF initiation report lower BF self-efficacy, a key predictor of BF at 6 months and increased maternal distress symptoms contributing to differences in early BF cessation rates. The investigators developed and tested their 6-week nurse-led and participant-informed, Breastfeeding and Breast and Nipple Pain Self-Management (BSM) intervention guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. Aligned with the needs and preferences elicited from BF participants, the investigators used a cloud-based platform to deliver BF knowledge and skills and provided support through nurse-led text-based communication to decrease BNP, increase BF self-efficacy, decrease burdensome face-to-face visits, and increase adaptive coping behaviors. Participants in the BSM intervention group reported significantly reduced BNP intensity at 1 and 2 weeks which predicted increased BF self-efficacy and decreased anxiety at 6 weeks. Based on these promising results, the investigators propose to examine the efficacy of the BSM intervention in an R56NR020041 Randomized Control Trial (RCT), Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain Using Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women to decrease BNP intensity and interference and increase BF exclusivity. The study will reproduce and extend the pilot findings by exploring in a diverse population of BF participants how participants' pain sensitivity affects BNP. The study will explore the moderating role of BNP, and maternal well-being symptoms of fatigue, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep, pain, pain coping, and maternal self-efficacy, on BF exclusivity. Participants (N = 222) intending to breastfeed will be randomized to the BSM intervention or the attention control group with assessments performed at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Study results will advance knowledge on the BSM intervention, with direct implications for nurse-designed and lead self-management interventions in clinical settings or health care systems.
Read the detailed description
In response to the critical gap that exists in identifying effective biobehavioral self-management interventions for participants during BF initiation who experience breast and nipple pain (BNP), the investigators developed a patient-informed Breastfeeding and BNP Self-Management (BSM) intervention based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. The investigators propose to test the effectiveness of the BSM intervention on BNP severity, pain interference with daily life, and BF outcomes over time in this R56NR020041 Randomized Control Trial, Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain with Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women. Participants (N=222) intending to BF will be randomized either to receive the BSM intervention or be in the attention control group, with assessments performed after birth at the hospital (baseline). After screening and informed consent, participants will be asked to complete study measures, undergo quantitative sensory testing using a standardized protocol, and access a secure electronic survey site via participants' smartphone or study-provided smartphone text links or email before discharge home. During the first week home, all participants will receive bi-weekly texts with links to BSM intervention BF modules or for the attention control group, educational modules on postpartum recovery and infant care. All participants at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks will receive a text or email for ongoing assessments of BNP and BF measures of the exclusivity (breast, breast milk, or formula), the number of feedings each day, and how long (days/weeks/months) infants were breastfed (duration). In addition, the study occurs via mobile technology during an acute period of pain when the rate of BF cessation is the highest. At 6- and 24-weeks participants will repeat the study measures and quantitative sensory testing.
The PROMPT study is the first to target self-management for BNP using cloud-based educational modules and user-preferred text-based smartphone intervention during the critical weeks of BF initiation, when support for BF is most desired, face-to-face visits are most burdensome, and places the mother-infant dyads at risk for illness, such as COVID-19. The study will describe how many participants experience BNP from BF initiation to 24 weeks as participants return to work and who may be at risk for chronic pain, which has not been examined. The study also replicates and expands on how the presence of pain sensitivity affects BNP and BF outcomes. The results from this study hold great promise to 1) support a diverse population of BF participants by identifying the risk factors of BNP; 2) target personal interventions for participants experiencing BNP based on unique moderating factors of pain sensitivity, nonpharmacological interventions, BF self-efficacy, pain coping, maternal self-efficacy and maternal well-being (anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue); and 3) to develop easily accessible strategies for participants BF within clinical settings that allow for large-scale translation in health care systems or public health settings.
Participant Recruitment will begin by active and passive methods successfully used in the pilot study with the addition of prenatal recruitment in the clinical site. Passive methods include (1) advertisements via Facebook pages (Connecticut Breastfeeding Coalition and the School of Nursing Center for the Advancement of Management of Pain (CAMP)) and Instagram ads, targeting participants in Connecticut who intend to BF, (2) flyers posted at clinical partners offices, (3) flyers given by the clinical partners to participants expressing interest in BF during routine prenatal care and referring participants to the peer counselors, research assistants, or lactation consultants team members on the inpatient hospital units, (4) flyers included in discharge educational packets at both recruitment sites, (5) flyers posted in hospital (HH, University of Connecticut Medical Center (UConn Health) common areas.
Active methods include screening the inpatient unit census two to three times per week by the clinical partners for participants who meet inclusion or exclusion criteria. Participants who agree to speak with a member of the research team about the study will be approached. A HIPAA consent will be obtained for the research team to ask initial screening questions via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). REDCap is a secure web application and database storage for creating and managing online data collection with highly customizable data types (including 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 Part 11, Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA), and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant environments). If eligible, informed consent will be obtained by a member of the research team trained in obtaining informed consent and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
The investigators will recruit participants after birth, with data collection to occur before discharge from the hospital and take approximately 60 minutes. To decrease participant burden, recruitment will begin during the antenatal care so participants may anticipate participating in data collection after delivery. In BSM pilot study, the retention rate was 94% of participants at 6 weeks, and as the primary aim is the effectiveness of the intervention during the first 3 weeks, the sample size calculations account for the possibility of loss-to-follow-up as high as 5% at 3 weeks. Additionally, the investigators anticipate the possibility of a 25% attrition rate at 24 weeks, a level somewhat larger than the 15-20% rate observed in many longitudinal intervention trials.
After informed consent and prior to the start of data collection, participants will be randomized to the BSM intervention or the attention control group and be assigned a unique participant identification number. Participants will be shown how to access the REDCap modules on participants' or a study-provided smartphone. An alternative contact person's information will be requested to reduce the likelihood of attrition. A randomization schedule created in REDCap will ensure that the two groups remain balanced with respect to age, race, BF experience, antenatal plan for BF duration, route of delivery, and intent to return to work. The randomization assignment will be known to data management graduate assistant with experience in clinical trials, intervention monitoring, IRB compliance. The PI will be blinded to the randomization assignment of participants. The graduate assistant will not be involved in data collection but will administer and monitor the interventions and missing data.
After discharge, both groups will receive an encrypted text via REDCap with embedded links from Twilio, a cloud communications platform, and a backup archive feature to secure participant's privacy and confidentiality, from the nurse on the research team. The follow-up measures at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks (Figure 4, see research plan) include the participants weekly BNP, pain coping, BF exclusivity, ongoing BF assessment, BF algorithm, and maternal assessment of infant BF behaviors, self-efficacy scales (pain, BF, and maternal), maternal well-being assessments, and perceived well-being scales. The completion of the measures will take about 30 minutes. Weekly meetings will identify any missing data and contact participants to complete the surveys. At 6 and 24 weeks, participants will complete the above measures and quantitative sensory testing at the clinical locations. The completion of the measures will take about 60 minutes.
Intervention Administration. Each group will receive a link to the eight video modules that address a different topic within a 15-minute interval. During the first week, the appropriate link to the first video to the BSM intervention and attention control group will be sent. Intervention fidelity will be addressed using continual assessment of design, training, delivery, receipt, enactment throughout the study duration. Design fidelity is applied through a standardized intervention with scheduled interactive texts, text-based daily BF journals and links to modules. Dr. Lucas will routinely assess the training of the interventionist(s) through simulated scenarios and practice sessions using texting and phone scripts. Evidence of treatment will include participant's response to bi-weekly texts and targeted lactation support based on galactogenesis and lactation milestones. The investigation team will monitor intervention fidelity by using the REDCap feature that allows the study team to view the date, time, length, and the number of times the participant accesses each module and completes the daily BF journal. The Project Manager will coordinate the study team to send participants text and follow-up phone calls at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks at a prescheduled time to encourage completion of the modules and for BSM intervention, address any BF concerns. After the first week, phone calls and encrypted text messages, depending on the participant preference, will be made by the research team to encourage BF data completion.
Participant Retention At enrollment, participants will be informed that payment will occur after each data collection point completion and if all data points are completed will receive a study completion bonus. To maintain contact and trust, the participants in both groups will receive monthly text links at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks, to modules highlighting normal infant development and age-appropriate play.
The sample size objective for the study is to recruit N = 222 participants who will be randomly assigned to the BSM or attention control study groups at a 1:1 ratio (111 per group). This objective provides 80 percent power (α =0.05, two-sided) to detect a standardized mean difference (Cohens d) of 0.39 or more between the BSM and attention control groups. It also provides 80 percent power to detect an odds ratio of 2.5 or more in exclusive BF between the two groups, assuming that the exclusive BF rate of the control group will be 10 percent higher than the national population rate in 2017 at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. These calculations account for "loss to follow-up" as high as 5% at 3 weeks and 25% at 24 weeks. The calculations reflect a conservative approach relative to the attrition rate of 6% that occurred at the 6-week time point in the pilot study and the 15-20% rate observed in many longitudinal intervention trials. In the pilot study, repeated measures ANCOVAs (with the baseline value of a measure as the covariate) revealed standardized mean differences larger than d = 0.39 for the main effect of the intervention on BNP intensity (d = 0.45), pain severity (d = 0.60), cumulative pain (d = 0.64), and BF self-efficacy (d = 0.48) cross the 1, 2, and 6 week time points. For BNP interference, the value of d was 0.39 at week 1, but smaller at weeks 2 and 6. Furthermore, the odds of exclusive BF in the intervention group is 2.9 times higher than the control group at 6 weeks, which is also higher than the hypothesized OR = 2.5. Therefore, the investigators are confident that the sample size goal will be sufficiently powered to detect intervention effects on key variables for study aims 1 and 2.
Finally, the sample size estimate does not reflect the investigators' plans to conduct analyses based on repeated measurement of outcome variables at the 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 week time points (due to the dearth of information regarding 24-week outcomes). Generally, the inclusion of data for an outcome variable across additional time points marginally enhances statistical power, especially for testing main and interaction effects of intervention and time.
- Conditions
- Breastfeeding, Exclusive, Pain, Acute, Maternal Distress, Parent-Child Relations, Self Efficacy
- Being tested
- The BSM Intervention, Attention Control
- Keywords
- Breastfeeding, Pain, Self-efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Feeding, Acute Pain, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The BSM InterventionBehavioural
The BSM intervention entailed a daily electronic journal for monitoring BF and BNP with feedings, bi-weekly texting for 6 weeks from a research nurse for informational support and to promote personalized goal-setting and problem-solving, and hyperlinks to eight uniform BNP educational modules (knowledge and skills) and online resources. 1. Fundamentals of BF (FBF), 2. Deep breathing (DB), 3. BNP non-pharmacological strategies (BNPS), 4. Guided imagery (GI), 5. Pain neurophysiology specifically related to BF (PN-BF), 6. Catastrophizing, 7. Stress reactivity, and 8. Common pumping issues and interventions (CPI).
Attention ControlBehavioural
The Attention Control and Intervention groups both receive fourth-trimester care videos. The educational modules are the following: Urgent maternal warning signs, caring for the maternal body after birth; infant care; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and infant health prevention; maternal and infant immunization; infant safety in the home; maternal and infant dietary recommendations; and national and health resources to support BF in the workplace
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The BSM Intervention | Experimental | Guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory, the Lucas team developed the Breastfeeding and BNP Self-Management (BSM) intervention. The BSM intervention uses a cloud-based platform, links to educational modules, and daily journaling, to provide women uniform best practice knowledge and skills for BF and BNP self-management.
Strategies include guided imagery, therapeutic breathing, mindfulness, relaxation, non-pharmacological interventions that are integrated within the self-management process such as goal-setting, self-monitoring, problem-solving, and social support through texting. Receives: Behavioral: The BSM Intervention |
| Attention Control | Active comparator | Attention control participants will receive equivalent attention as the BSM group. The fourth-trimester care based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HEAR HER campaign and infant health information modules will be provided through the REDCap link. Receives: Behavioral: Attention Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analogue Scale for Breast and Nipple Pain Severity
Visual analogue scale (0-100) uses an unlabeled line with scores further to the right indicating higher scores and increased pain
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity sum score of 4 items (3, 4, 5, and 6). Each item is scored 0-10, the pain intensity sum score ranges from 0-40. The higher the score the worse the pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 for the four pain intensity items.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference score is the average sum score of 7 items 9a - 9g. Each item is scored 0-5, with a total score of 0-35. Higher scores mean worse pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 for the seven interference item.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks.
Cumulative Breast and Nipple Pain Scores
Each weekly score uses the visual analogue score of 0-100. Cumulative Breast and Nipple Pain (BNP) is calculated each week as a summed additive score. Participants' cumulative BNP (baseline +1 week, + 2 weeks, + 3 weeks, + 6 weeks, + 9 weeks, + 12 weeks, +18 weeks, 24 weeks, 0 - 900). Higher cumulative scores represent greater BNP severity.
Only individuals who remain in the study scores are reported.
Measured: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Breastfeeding Exclusivity Participation Rate
The number of participants who self-reported breastfeeding exclusivity (providing only breast milk and no formula) their infant.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale is a 14 item scale with 5-point Likert scale (1-5). Score Range: 14-70, with higher scores (>50) indicate greater breastfeeding self-efficacy.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Anxiety Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 6a
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score range from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of sub-clinical or elevated levels of anxiety. PROMIS Anxiety shows moderate to strong correlations with Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a 10-item questionnaire with a 0-3 Likert scale and a total score range from 0 to 30. A score of 10 or more may indicate possible depression and a score of 13 or higher may be used to identify women with higher depression levels.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Fatigue Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 6a
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score ranges from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of elevated levels of fatigue.
Measured: Baseline to 24 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale10 Form V.09/16/13
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is a 10-item questionnaire is a 10-item Likert Scale from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Very Often"). The total scores range from 0-40. To calculate a total PSS score, responses to the four positively stated items (items 4, 5, 7 and 8) first need to be reversed (i.e. 0 => 4; 1 => 3; 2 => 2; 3 => 1; 4 => 0). Higher scores indicate higher levels of perceived stress.
Measured: Baseline and 24 weeks
Sleep Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 6a
The PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 6a is a 6-item Likert Scale (1-5, never - always). Total raw score ranges from 6-30. Raw scores are converted to a T-score. The T-score of 50 is the population mean and the average for the US population with a standard deviation of 10. The T-score of 60 is indicative of increase sleep disturbances.
Measured: Baseline and 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2022
- Study start16 Mar 2022
- Primary completion18 Dec 2023
- Study completion18 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breastfeeding, ExclusiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The proposed Randomized Control Trial (RCT),will be conducted to test the effect of the BSM intervention vs. an attention control group on BNP, BF exclusivity and duration, BF self-efficacy, and maternal well-being to 24 weeks
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Connecticut
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hartford HealthCare, UConn Health, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ruth Lucas, University of Connecticut
- Investigators
- Ruth F Lucas, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Connecticut
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05262920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E21-0205
- Other IDs
- R56NR020041
- Acronym
- PROMPT
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The final research data will be a computerized dataset consisting of participant data, BF exclusivity, BNP, and pain sensitivity. All data will be shared and published in a de-identified manner and free of identifiers that would permit linkages or variables that may lead to deductive disclosure of the identity of the individual participants. Data generated from the proposed study will be shared with and available to the participating study investigators. We also intend to make results available upon request to the community of scientists interested in BF and BNP.
Publications
Lucas RF, McGrath JM. Clinical assessment and management of breastfeeding pain. Top Pain Manag. 2016;32(3):1-12.
Lucas R, Bernier K, Perry M, Evans H, Ramesh D, Young E, Walsh S, Starkweather A. Promoting self-management of breast and nipple pain in breastfeeding women: Protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Nurs Health. 2019 Jun;42(3):176-188. doi: 10.1002/nur.21938. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
PubMed 30835887Lucas R, Zhang Y, Walsh SJ, Evans H, Young E, Starkweather A. Efficacy of a Breastfeeding Pain Self-Management Intervention: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Nurs Res. 2019 Mar/Apr;68(2):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000336.
PubMed 30829925Gallegos D, Russell-Bennett R, Previte J, Parkinson J. Can a text message a week improve breastfeeding? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Nov 6;14:374. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0374-2.
PubMed 25369808Ryan P, Sawin KJ. The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):217-225.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004.
PubMed 19631064Subnis UB, Starkweather A, Menzies V. A current review of distraction-based interventions for chronic pain management. Eur J Integr Med. 2016;8(5):715-722. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2016.08.162
Litt MD, Tennen H. What are the most effective coping strategies for managing chronic pain? Pain Manag. 2015;5(6):403-6. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.45. Epub 2015 Sep 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 26399377Aderibigbe T, Kelleher SL, Henderson WA, Prescott S, Young EE, Lucas RF. COMT Variants are Associated With Breast and Nipple Pain. J Pain. 2024 Sep;25(9):104568. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104568. Epub 2024 May 18.
PubMed 38763257
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain With Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05262920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROMPT / E21-0205
- Conditions
- Breastfeeding, Exclusive, Pain, Acute, Maternal Distress, Parent-Child Relations, Self Efficacy
- Keywords
- Breastfeeding, Pain, Self-efficacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ConnecticutUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hartford HealthCare, UConn Health, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Study start
- 16 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 28 Jan 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Every year, 1 million women cease breastfeeding (BF) before 6 months, the minimum time required for optimal maternal and infant health, development, and well-being. The highest rate of BF cessation occurs within 3 weeks after birth, with 30% of women ceasing BF due to acute breast and nipple pain (BNP). BNP is a complex and understudied biobehavioral phenomenon involving nociceptive signaling that stimulates multiple pain pathways. Women who experience BNP beyond BF initiation report lower BF self-efficacy, a key predictor of BF at 6 months and increased maternal distress symptoms contributing to differences in early BF cessation rates. The investigators developed and tested their 6-week nurse-led and participant-informed, Breastfeeding and Breast and Nipple Pain Self-Management (BSM) intervention guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. Aligned with the needs and preferences elicited from BF participants, the investigators used a cloud-based platform to deliver BF knowledge and skills and provided support through nurse-led text-based communication to decrease BNP, increase BF self-efficacy, decrease burdensome face-to-face visits, and increase adaptive coping behaviors. Participants in the BSM intervention group reported significantly reduced BNP intensity at 1 and 2 weeks which predicted increased BF self-efficacy and decreased anxiety at 6 weeks. Based on these promising results, the investigators propose to examine the efficacy of the BSM intervention in an R56NR020041 Randomized Control Trial (RCT), Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain Using Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women to decrease BNP intensity and interference and increase BF exclusivity. The study will reproduce and extend the pilot findings by exploring in a diverse population of BF participants how participants' pain sensitivity affects BNP. The study will explore the moderating role of BNP, and maternal well-being symptoms of fatigue, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and sleep, pain, pain coping, and maternal self-efficacy, on BF exclusivity. Participants (N = 222) intending to breastfeed will be randomized to the BSM intervention or the attention control group with assessments performed at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. Study results will advance knowledge on the BSM intervention, with direct implications for nurse-designed and lead self-management interventions in clinical settings or health care systems.
Detailed description
In response to the critical gap that exists in identifying effective biobehavioral self-management interventions for participants during BF initiation who experience breast and nipple pain (BNP), the investigators developed a patient-informed Breastfeeding and BNP Self-Management (BSM) intervention based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. The investigators propose to test the effectiveness of the BSM intervention on BNP severity, pain interference with daily life, and BF outcomes over time in this R56NR020041 Randomized Control Trial, Promoting Self-Management of Breast and Nipple Pain with Technology (PROMPT) for Breastfeeding Women. Participants (N=222) intending to BF will be randomized either to receive the BSM intervention or be in the attention control group, with assessments performed after birth at the hospital (baseline). After screening and informed consent, participants will be asked to complete study measures, undergo quantitative sensory testing using a standardized protocol, and access a secure electronic survey site via participants' smartphone or study-provided smartphone text links or email before discharge home. During the first week home, all participants will receive bi-weekly texts with links to BSM intervention BF modules or for the attention control group, educational modules on postpartum recovery and infant care. All participants at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks will receive a text or email for ongoing assessments of BNP and BF measures of the exclusivity (breast, breast milk, or formula), the number of feedings each day, and how long (days/weeks/months) infants were breastfed (duration). In addition, the study occurs via mobile technology during an acute period of pain when the rate of BF cessation is the highest. At 6- and 24-weeks participants will repeat the study measures and quantitative sensory testing.
The PROMPT study is the first to target self-management for BNP using cloud-based educational modules and user-preferred text-based smartphone intervention during the critical weeks of BF initiation, when support for BF is most desired, face-to-face visits are most burdensome, and places the mother-infant dyads at risk for illness, such as COVID-19. The study will describe how many participants experience BNP from BF initiation to 24 weeks as participants return to work and who may be at risk for chronic pain, which has not been examined. The study also replicates and expands on how the presence of pain sensitivity affects BNP and BF outcomes. The results from this study hold great promise to 1) support a diverse population of BF participants by identifying the risk factors of BNP; 2) target personal interventions for participants experiencing BNP based on unique moderating factors of pain sensitivity, nonpharmacological interventions, BF self-efficacy, pain coping, maternal self-efficacy and maternal well-being (anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue); and 3) to develop easily accessible strategies for participants BF within clinical settings that allow for large-scale translation in health care systems or public health settings.
Participant Recruitment will begin by active and passive methods successfully used in the pilot study with the addition of prenatal recruitment in the clinical site. Passive methods include (1) advertisements via Facebook pages (Connecticut Breastfeeding Coalition and the School of Nursing Center for the Advancement of Management of Pain (CAMP)) and Instagram ads, targeting participants in Connecticut who intend to BF, (2) flyers posted at clinical partners offices, (3) flyers given by the clinical partners to participants expressing interest in BF during routine prenatal care and referring participants to the peer counselors, research assistants, or lactation consultants team members on the inpatient hospital units, (4) flyers included in discharge educational packets at both recruitment sites, (5) flyers posted in hospital (HH, University of Connecticut Medical Center (UConn Health) common areas.
Active methods include screening the inpatient unit census two to three times per week by the clinical partners for participants who meet inclusion or exclusion criteria. Participants who agree to speak with a member of the research team about the study will be approached. A HIPAA consent will be obtained for the research team to ask initial screening questions via REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). REDCap is a secure web application and database storage for creating and managing online data collection with highly customizable data types (including 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 Part 11, Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA), and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant environments). If eligible, informed consent will be obtained by a member of the research team trained in obtaining informed consent and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
The investigators will recruit participants after birth, with data collection to occur before discharge from the hospital and take approximately 60 minutes. To decrease participant burden, recruitment will begin during the antenatal care so participants may anticipate participating in data collection after delivery. In BSM pilot study, the retention rate was 94% of participants at 6 weeks, and as the primary aim is the effectiveness of the intervention during the first 3 weeks, the sample size calculations account for the possibility of loss-to-follow-up as high as 5% at 3 weeks. Additionally, the investigators anticipate the possibility of a 25% attrition rate at 24 weeks, a level somewhat larger than the 15-20% rate observed in many longitudinal intervention trials.
After informed consent and prior to the start of data collection, participants will be randomized to the BSM intervention or the attention control group and be assigned a unique participant identification number. Participants will be shown how to access the REDCap modules on participants' or a study-provided smartphone. An alternative contact person's information will be requested to reduce the likelihood of attrition. A randomization schedule created in REDCap will ensure that the two groups remain balanced with respect to age, race, BF experience, antenatal plan for BF duration, route of delivery, and intent to return to work. The randomization assignment will be known to data management graduate assistant with experience in clinical trials, intervention monitoring, IRB compliance. The PI will be blinded to the randomization assignment of participants. The graduate assistant will not be involved in data collection but will administer and monitor the interventions and missing data.
After discharge, both groups will receive an encrypted text via REDCap with embedded links from Twilio, a cloud communications platform, and a backup archive feature to secure participant's privacy and confidentiality, from the nurse on the research team. The follow-up measures at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks (Figure 4, see research plan) include the participants weekly BNP, pain coping, BF exclusivity, ongoing BF assessment, BF algorithm, and maternal assessment of infant BF behaviors, self-efficacy scales (pain, BF, and maternal), maternal well-being assessments, and perceived well-being scales. The completion of the measures will take about 30 minutes. Weekly meetings will identify any missing data and contact participants to complete the surveys. At 6 and 24 weeks, participants will complete the above measures and quantitative sensory testing at the clinical locations. The completion of the measures will take about 60 minutes.
Intervention Administration. Each group will receive a link to the eight video modules that address a different topic within a 15-minute interval. During the first week, the appropriate link to the first video to the BSM intervention and attention control group will be sent. Intervention fidelity will be addressed using continual assessment of design, training, delivery, receipt, enactment throughout the study duration. Design fidelity is applied through a standardized intervention with scheduled interactive texts, text-based daily BF journals and links to modules. Dr. Lucas will routinely assess the training of the interventionist(s) through simulated scenarios and practice sessions using texting and phone scripts. Evidence of treatment will include participant's response to bi-weekly texts and targeted lactation support based on galactogenesis and lactation milestones. The investigation team will monitor intervention fidelity by using the REDCap feature that allows the study team to view the date, time, length, and the number of times the participant accesses each module and completes the daily BF journal. The Project Manager will coordinate the study team to send participants text and follow-up phone calls at 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 18 weeks at a prescheduled time to encourage completion of the modules and for BSM intervention, address any BF concerns. After the first week, phone calls and encrypted text messages, depending on the participant preference, will be made by the research team to encourage BF data completion.
Participant Retention At enrollment, participants will be informed that payment will occur after each data collection point completion and if all data points are completed will receive a study completion bonus. To maintain contact and trust, the participants in both groups will receive monthly text links at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks, to modules highlighting normal infant development and age-appropriate play.
The sample size objective for the study is to recruit N = 222 participants who will be randomly assigned to the BSM or attention control study groups at a 1:1 ratio (111 per group). This objective provides 80 percent power (α =0.05, two-sided) to detect a standardized mean difference (Cohens d) of 0.39 or more between the BSM and attention control groups. It also provides 80 percent power to detect an odds ratio of 2.5 or more in exclusive BF between the two groups, assuming that the exclusive BF rate of the control group will be 10 percent higher than the national population rate in 2017 at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. These calculations account for "loss to follow-up" as high as 5% at 3 weeks and 25% at 24 weeks. The calculations reflect a conservative approach relative to the attrition rate of 6% that occurred at the 6-week time point in the pilot study and the 15-20% rate observed in many longitudinal intervention trials. In the pilot study, repeated measures ANCOVAs (with the baseline value of a measure as the covariate) revealed standardized mean differences larger than d = 0.39 for the main effect of the intervention on BNP intensity (d = 0.45), pain severity (d = 0.60), cumulative pain (d = 0.64), and BF self-efficacy (d = 0.48) cross the 1, 2, and 6 week time points. For BNP interference, the value of d was 0.39 at week 1, but smaller at weeks 2 and 6. Furthermore, the odds of exclusive BF in the intervention group is 2.9 times higher than the control group at 6 weeks, which is also higher than the hypothesized OR = 2.5. Therefore, the investigators are confident that the sample size goal will be sufficiently powered to detect intervention effects on key variables for study aims 1 and 2.
Finally, the sample size estimate does not reflect the investigators' plans to conduct analyses based on repeated measurement of outcome variables at the 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 week time points (due to the dearth of information regarding 24-week outcomes). Generally, the inclusion of data for an outcome variable across additional time points marginally enhances statistical power, especially for testing main and interaction effects of intervention and time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The proposed Randomized Control Trial (RCT),will be conducted to test the effect of the BSM intervention vs. an attention control group on BNP, BF exclusivity and duration, BF self-efficacy, and maternal well-being to 24 weeks
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The BSM Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: The BSM InterventionGuided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory, the Lucas team developed the Breastfeeding and BNP Self-Management (BSM) intervention. The BSM intervention uses a cloud-based platform, links to educational modules, and daily journaling, to provide women uniform best practice knowledge and skills for BF and BNP self-management. Strategies include guided imagery, therapeutic breathing, mindfulness, relaxation, non-pharmacological interventions that are integrated within the self-management process such as goal-setting, self-monitoring, problem-solving, and social support through texting. |
| Attention Control | Active comparator | Behavioral: Attention ControlAttention control participants will receive equivalent attention as the BSM group. The fourth-trimester care based on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) HEAR HER campaign and infant health information modules will be provided through the REDCap link. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- women
- 18 - 45 years of age
- Gave birth < 48 hours to a singleton infant > 37 weeks gestational age
- Intend to BF
- Received standardized BF basics during their antenatal care
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- < 18 or > 45 years of age
- History of significant mental health disorder (e.g., major depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder) due to additional challenges in the capacity for self-management
- Skin conditions on nondominant forearm which could interfere with quantitative sensory testing
- Birth of an infant with medical complications or congenital anomalies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The BSM InterventionThe BSM intervention entailed a daily electronic journal for monitoring BF and BNP with feedings, bi-weekly texting for 6 weeks from a research nurse for informational support and to promote personalized goal-setting and problem-solving, and hyperlinks to eight uniform BNP educational modules (knowledge and skills) and online resources. 1. Fundamentals of BF (FBF), 2. Deep breathing (DB), 3. BNP non-pharmacological strategies (BNPS), 4. Guided imagery (GI), 5. Pain neurophysiology specifically related to BF (PN-BF), 6. Catastrophizing, 7. Stress reactivity, and 8. Common pumping issues and interventions (CPI). | Behavioural | The BSM Intervention |
| Attention ControlThe Attention Control and Intervention groups both receive fourth-trimester care videos. The educational modules are the following: Urgent maternal warning signs, caring for the maternal body after birth; infant care; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and infant health prevention; maternal and infant immunization; infant safety in the home; maternal and infant dietary recommendations; and national and health resources to support BF in the workplace | Behavioural | Attention Control |
Primary outcome
Visual Analogue Scale for Breast and Nipple Pain Severity
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Visual analogue scale (0-100) uses an unlabeled line with scores further to the right indicating higher scores and increased pain
Brief Pain Inventory Pain Intensity Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
The Brief Pain Inventory pain intensity sum score of 4 items (3, 4, 5, and 6). Each item is scored 0-10, the pain intensity sum score ranges from 0-40. The higher the score the worse the pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 for the four pain intensity items.
Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks.
The Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference score is the average sum score of 7 items 9a - 9g. Each item is scored 0-5, with a total score of 0-35. Higher scores mean worse pain. A composite score of the average is sometimes reported. Factor analysis verified the two separate factors, pain intensity and interference, found in the previous study. Internal stability (Cronbach alpha) was also examined in this study. Alphas showed good internal consistency, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 for the seven interference item.
Cumulative Breast and Nipple Pain Scores
Time frame: Baseline to 24 Weeks
Each weekly score uses the visual analogue score of 0-100. Cumulative Breast and Nipple Pain (BNP) is calculated each week as a summed additive score. Participants' cumulative BNP (baseline +1 week, + 2 weeks, + 3 weeks, + 6 weeks, + 9 weeks, + 12 weeks, +18 weeks, 24 weeks, 0 - 900). Higher cumulative scores represent greater BNP severity. Only individuals who remain in the study scores are reported.
7 secondary outcomes
Breastfeeding Exclusivity Participation Rate
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Anxiety Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 6a
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Fatigue Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form 6a
Time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks
Perceived Stress Scale10 Form V.09/16/13
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Sleep Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 6a
Time frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BackgroundLucas RF, McGrath JM. Clinical assessment and management of breastfeeding pain. Top Pain Manag. 2016;32(3):1-12.
- Background: PubMed 30835887Lucas R, Bernier K, Perry M, Evans H, Ramesh D, Young E, Walsh S, Starkweather A. Promoting self-management of breast and nipple pain in breastfeeding women: Protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Res Nurs Health. 2019 Jun;42(3):176-188. doi: 10.1002/nur.21938. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 30829925Lucas R, Zhang Y, Walsh SJ, Evans H, Young E, Starkweather A. Efficacy of a Breastfeeding Pain Self-Management Intervention: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Nurs Res. 2019 Mar/Apr;68(2):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000336.
- Background: PubMed 25369808Gallegos D, Russell-Bennett R, Previte J, Parkinson J. Can a text message a week improve breastfeeding? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Nov 6;14:374. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0374-2.
- Background: PubMed 19631064Ryan P, Sawin KJ. The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):217-225.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004.
- BackgroundSubnis UB, Starkweather A, Menzies V. A current review of distraction-based interventions for chronic pain management. Eur J Integr Med. 2016;8(5):715-722. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2016.08.162
- Background: PubMed 26399377Litt MD, Tennen H. What are the most effective coping strategies for managing chronic pain? Pain Manag. 2015;5(6):403-6. doi: 10.2217/pmt.15.45. Epub 2015 Sep 24. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38763257Aderibigbe T, Kelleher SL, Henderson WA, Prescott S, Young EE, Lucas RF. COMT Variants are Associated With Breast and Nipple Pain. J Pain. 2024 Sep;25(9):104568. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104568. Epub 2024 May 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The final research data will be a computerized dataset consisting of participant data, BF exclusivity, BNP, and pain sensitivity. All data will be shared and published in a de-identified manner and free of identifiers that would permit linkages or variables that may lead to deductive disclosure of the identity of the individual participants. Data generated from the proposed study will be shared with and available to the participating study investigators. We also intend to make results available upon request to the community of scientists interested in BF and BNP.
Related trials for Breastfeeding, Exclusive
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Breastfeeding Chatbot on Mothers' Breastfeeding Attitudes, Behaviors, and Self-Efficacy
Breastfeeding, Breastfeeding Attitudes
Not yet recruiting
Healthy Habits During and After Gestational Diabetes
GDM
Recruiting
Effectiveness of a Counseling Program on Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates in a Primary Care Center
Growth & Development, Breastfeeding Satisfaction
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of a Health Mediation Program in the Maternity Ward.
Breast Feeding, Exclusive
Recruiting
Hybrid Breastfeeding Education in Late Pregnancy: Effects on Antenatal Attachment and Breastfeeding
Breast Feeding, Exclusive Breast Feeding
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ruth F Lucas, PhD principal investigator
University of Connecticut
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The BSM Intervention in people with Breastfeeding, Exclusive and Pain, Acute, run by University of Connecticut at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jan 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analogue Scale for Breast and Nipple Pain Severity (time frame: Baseline to 24 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05262920, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2026.