AzTrials
AzTrials

Papillary Thyroid CarcinomaNCT05263141

Retro-Auricular Single-Site Endoscopic to Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

A study testing retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy and traditional open surgery thyroidectomy in people with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this non randomized control clinical research study is to compare the cosmetic outcomes and efficiacy of retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroid lobectomy and central lymph node dissection against conventional resection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
What is being tested?
retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy and traditional open surgery thyroidectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Mar 2022to 30 Nov 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-70 years old, no gender restrictions.
  • Fine-needle aspiration cytology(FNA) confirmed papillary thyroid carcinoma(PTC).
  • Early stage PTC (stage T1N0M0).
  • Preoperative ultrasonography showed unilateral glandular lobe malignant tumor and the largest diameter was not more than 2cm, without cervical lymph node metastasis and extensive metastasis.
  • Patients undergoing thyroid lobectomy and central lymph node dissection.
  • Patients who have signed an approved Informed Consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who do not accept case data collection for various reasons.
  • The clinical data unfit this study (at the discretion of the investigator).
  • Patients who have undergone neck surgery or radiotherapy before this trail.
  • Patients who have uncontrolled hyperthyroidism.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Single-center, Prospective, Non-Randomized Control Clinical Trial of Retro-Auricular Single-Site Endoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Patients With Early Stage Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

The goal of this non randomized control clinical research study is to compare the cosmetic outcomes and efficiacy of retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroid lobectomy and central lymph node dissection against conventional resection.

Being tested
retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy, traditional open surgery thyroidectomy
Keywords
Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, Thyroidectomy, Laparoscopy, Retroauricular approach, Single-site
Medical subject headings
Thyroid Cancer, Papillary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called RASSET

    The strap muscles and the sternocleidomastoid muscle were separated. Upper parathyroid and lower parathyroid glands were identified and preserved. The recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) was identified,A lobe of thyroid specimen and central lymph nodes were dissected.

  • traditional open surgery thyroidectomyProcedure or surgery

    The strap muscles were separated in the midline to expose the thyroid gland. Upper parathyroid and lower parathyroid glands were identified and preserved. The recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) was identified, a lobe of thyroid specimen and central lymph nodes were dissected.

Study groups in NCT05263141
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RASSET groupExperimentalPatients in the retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy (RASSET) group will receive endoscopic thyroid lobectomy and central lymph node dissection.
Receives: Procedure: retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy
traditional open thyroid lobectomy groupActive comparatorPatients in the traditional open thyroid lobectomy group will receive thyroid lobectomy and central lymph node dissection.
Receives: Procedure: traditional open surgery thyroidectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. postoperative cosmetic satisfaction scores

    The cosmetic satisfaction score(CSS) was defined as the sum of the scores on questions about the scar. Q1 and Q2 was using a verbal response scale from 1 to 5 (corresponding to decreasing satisfaction). The other four questions, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (again of decreasing satisfaction).

    Measured: 3 months from surgery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. postoperative Vancouver Scar Scale

    The Vancouver Scar Scale(VSS) is used for scar assessment. It has six domains: vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, height, pain and itchiness. The maximum score for the sum of the domain scores is 18, which corresponds to the worst scar, while 0 indicates normal skin.

    Measured: 3 months from surgery

  2. postoperative Vancouver Scar Scale

    The Vancouver Scar Scale(VSS) is used for scar assessment. It has six domains: vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, height, pain and itchiness. The maximum score for the sum of the domain scores is 18, which corresponds to the worst scar, while 0 indicates normal skin.

    Measured: 1 month from surgery

  3. Intra-operative, peri-operative, post-operative clinicopathologic characteristics

    Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics of patients

    Measured: 1 week from surgery

  4. postoperative cosmetic satisfaction scores

    The cosmetic satisfaction score(CSS) was defined as the sum of the scores on questions about the scar. Q1 and Q2 was using a verbal response scale from 1 to 5 (corresponding to decreasing satisfaction). The other four questions, each on a scale of 0 to 3 (again of decreasing satisfaction).

    Measured: 1 month from surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2022
  2. Study start1 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05263141
Sponsor's protocol ID
B2022-012-02
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
20 Feb 2022
Last updated
3 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Anuwong A, Ketwong K, Jitpratoom P, Sasanakietkul T, Duh QY. Safety and Outcomes of the Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach. JAMA Surg. 2018 Jan 1;153(1):21-27. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3366.

    PubMed 28877292
  • Lee DW, Ko SH, Song CM, Ji YB, Kim JK, Tae K. Comparison of postoperative cosmesis in transaxillary, postauricular facelift, and conventional transcervical thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3388-3397. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07113-1. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

    PubMed 31515625
  • Dong F, Ao Y, Li MT, Zhan ZR, Lin YQ, Tan QJ, Li H, Yang AK, Ouyang D. [A comparative study between retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach: a single-center retrospective analysis]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Nov 1;59(11):891-896. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210903-00420. Chinese.

    PubMed 34743449
  • Schardey HM, Schopf S, Kammal M, Barone M, Rudert W, Hernandez-Richter T, Portl S. Invisible scar endoscopic thyroidectomy by the dorsal approach: experimental development of a new technique with human cadavers and preliminary clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):813-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9761-y. Epub 2008 Feb 23.

    PubMed 18297357
  • Berber E, Bernet V, Fahey TJ 3rd, Kebebew E, Shaha A, Stack BC Jr, Stang M, Steward DL, Terris DJ; American Thyroid Association Surgical Affairs Committee. American Thyroid Association Statement on Remote-Access Thyroid Surgery. Thyroid. 2016 Mar;26(3):331-7. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0407.

    PubMed 26858014
  • Russell JO, Razavi CR, Al Khadem MG, Lopez M, Saraf S, Prescott JD, Starmer HM, Richmon JD, Tufano RP. Anterior cervical incision-sparing thyroidectomy: Comparing retroauricular and transoral approaches. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2018 Sep 24;3(5):409-414. doi: 10.1002/lio2.200. eCollection 2018 Oct.

    PubMed 30410996
  • Nguyen HX, Nguyen HX, Nguyen HV, Nguyen LT, Nguyen TTP, Le QV. Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy by Vestibular Approach with Central Lymph Node Dissection for Thyroid Microcarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Apr;31(4):410-415. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0411. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

    PubMed 32706603
  • Nakajo A, Arima H, Hirata M, Mizoguchi T, Kijima Y, Mori S, Ishigami S, Ueno S, Yoshinaka H, Natsugoe S. Trans-Oral Video-Assisted Neck Surgery (TOVANS). A new transoral technique of endoscopic thyroidectomy with gasless premandible approach. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1105-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2588-6. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

    PubMed 23179070
  • Duek I, Duek OS, Fliss DM. Minimally Invasive Approaches for Thyroid Surgery-Pitfalls and Promises. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Jun 29;22(8):77. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00939-2.

    PubMed 32601931
  • Chung EJ, Park MW, Cho JG, Baek SK, Kwon SY, Woo JS, Jung KY. A prospective 1-year comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy via a retroauricular approach versus conventional open thyroidectomy at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):3014-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4361-7. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

    PubMed 25605517
  • Schardey HM, Barone M, Portl S, von Ahnen M, von Ahnen T, Schopf S. Invisible scar endoscopic dorsal approach thyroidectomy: a clinical feasibility study. World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2997-3006. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0769-9.

    PubMed 20835708

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing retro-auricular single-site endoscopic thyroidectomy and traditional open surgery thyroidectomy in people with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

postoperative cosmetic satisfaction scores (time frame: 3 months from surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05263141, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in