AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Convulsive Status EpilepticusPhase 3FASTNCT05263674

Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-dose i.v. Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus (FAST-trial)

A Phase 3 study testing Rapid sedation in people with Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus, run by University of Southern Denmark at 5 sites in Denmark.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This open-label, randomized multicenter trial aims at clarifying the standard of care of patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus not responding to treatment with benzodiazepines and at least one high-dose intra venous anti-seizure medication. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 120 years
Conditions the study is for
Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus
What is being tested?
Rapid sedation
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
5 sitesDenmark
Study dates
7 Feb 2022to 31 Dec 2028
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 120 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (older than 18 years) with EEG-verified NCSE, according to the Salzburg criteria, who have not responded to appropriate treatment with benzodiazepines and at least one 2nd line i.v. anti-seizure medication according to the current Danish national neurological treatment guidelines (Levetiracetam, Fosfenytoin or Valproate).

Who cannot join

  • patients with epilepticus status due to acute neuroinfection (e.g. bacterial meningitis or viral encephalitis)
  • acute traumatic or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage
  • suspicion of cerebral anoxia / hypoxia / hypoglycemia / epileptic encephalopathy
  • contraindications to anti-seizure medication defined in the protocol
  • contraindications to anesthesia treatment in intensive care
  • focal motor status epilepticus without relevant conscious influence (Glasgow Coma Scale> 13)
  • known epileptic encephalopathy
  • Clinical need for acute intubation

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Christoph P. Beier, M.D. contact

+4565411943

cbeier@health.sdu.dk

5 sites in 1 country

Denmark5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital

    Aarhus, 8200

    Jakob Christensen, M.D., Ph.d.

    Recruiting
  • Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, 2100

    Anette S. Sidaros, M.D., Ph.d.

    Recruiting
  • Department of Neurology

    Herlev, 2730

    Anders Hougaard, M.D., +45 38 68 38 68, anders.hougaard@regionh.dk

    Recruiting
  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense, 5000

    Christoph Beier, M.D., cbeier@health.sdu.dk

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital of Zealand

    Roskilde, 4000

    Henning P. Hansen, M.D. Ph.D.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

This open-label, randomized multicenter trial aims at clarifying the standard of care of patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus not responding to treatment with benzodiazepines and at least one high-dose intra venous anti-seizure medication.

Read the detailed description

Persistent epileptic seizures, aka. status epilepticus (SE), are the second most common neurological cause of acute admissions. Around halv of the patients suffers from SE without prominent visible seizures ("convulsions"), which is referred to as non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and is afflicted with a long-term mortality of >50% also in patients without concomittant acute brain disease. There are no evidence-based treatment guidelines for NCSE but patients usually receive treatment with benzodiazepines followed by i.v. anti-seizure medication. If seizures continues, further treatment is controversial. The participating centers have long-standing experience in treating NCSE but use different, internationally accepted treatment strategies. Some initiate aggressive treatment with fast sedation at intensive care aiming at immediate seizure control, other estimate that the side effects of sediation does not outweigh the potential benefit and try high-dose i.v. anti-seizure medication that only slightly impair conciousness - often with success.

This randomized, open label, multicenter trial (Eudract 2021-003392-34) aims at clarifying the treatment of patients with NSCE not responding to standard therapy. Patients with verified NCSE based on clinical parameter or using electroencephalography (EEG) are randomized into a fast acute sedation group and a group that receives at least one additional, high-dose anti-seizure mediciation.

Primary objective endpoint is treatment failure 24 h after randomization as determined by EEG. Secondary endpoints are e.g. seizure-induced neurological damage, treatment-related complications and neurological long-term outcome.

The statistical planing aims at showing superiority of aggressive treatment, 140 patients shall be included in a three years period at the University Hospitals in Aarhus, Odense, Roskilde and Copenhagen.

Being tested
Rapid sedation
Medical subject headings
Status Epilepticus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rapid sedationDrug

    High-dose Propofol (bolus 3-5 g / kg, maintenance dose 5-10 mg / kg / hour) to - 5 on the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) for 20 hours, and a single anti-epileptic drug should be added as adjunctive therapy. Addition of low-dose Midazolam (max. 0.1 mg / kg / h) is permitted if deep sedation (defined clinically by RASS -5) is not possible with Propofol alone.

Study groups in NCT05263674
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
"Non-sedative medical treatment"No interventionThe patient is treated with an additional high-dose intravenous antiepileptic drug, which is selected by the treating neurologist. If NCSE continues to be detected at cEEG or clinically> 3 hours after starting treatment, the patient should receive standard treatment (i.e. sedation in the intensive care unit or addition of additional intravenous antiepileptic drugs) in accordance with local guidelines and the assessment of the treating neurologist. The following preparations are permitted as additional treatment: Levetiracetam (60 mg / kg as saturation dose followed by maintenance dose of 2-4 g / day), valproate (60 mg / kg as saturation dose followed by maintenance dose of 20 mg / kg / day), phosphenytoin (20 PE as saturation dose followed by maintenance dose 5 mg PE / kg / day), lacosamide (400 mg as a saturation dose followed by a maintenance dose of 200-400 mg / day), topiramate (200-400 mg per probe as a saturation dose followed by a maintenance dose of 200-400 mg / day).
Fast sedationExperimentalWithin a maximum of 60 minutes after the diagnosis of NCSE (EEG or clinical), the patient must be sedated with high-dose Propofol (bolus 3-5 g / kg, maintenance dose 5-10 mg / kg / hour) to - 5 on the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) for 20 hours, and a single anti-epileptic drug should be added as adjunctive therapy. Addition of low-dose Midazolam (max. 0.1 mg / kg / h) is permitted if deep sedation (defined clinically by RASS -5) is not possible with Propofol alone. After 20 hours, the sedation should be completely phased out within 3 hours.
Receives: Drug: Rapid sedation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients with continued NCSE on EEG after 24 h ("treatment failure")

    NCSE diagnosed using EEG and defined by the "Salzburg criteria" for NCSE (e.g. Leitinger et al. Lancet Neurology, 2016)

    Measured: 24 hours after randomisation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of treatment related complications

    e.g. tracheostoma, infections

    Measured: at discharge, on average after 7 days

  2. New neurological deficit

    Neurological deficits are quantified using National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, maximum possible score is 42, the minimum score - indicating no deficits - is 0) at admission and discharge. New neurological deficit is defined as increase of NIHSS >5 at discharge

    Measured: at discharge, on average after 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2022
  2. Study start7 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Comparison of two treatment strategies
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
140 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05263674
Sponsor's protocol ID
21/34684
Other IDs
2021-003392-34
Acronym
FAST
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
17 Jan 2022
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Anonymized IPD will be shared upon reasonable request within the limits of Danish legislation for data security.

Publications

  • Cornwall CD, Piilgaard H, Engedal TS, Olsen HT, Moller K, Kroigard T, Uslu B, Christensen J, Sidaros A, Beier CP. Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial. Crit Care Explor. 2025 Sep 15;7(9):e1311. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001311. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.

    PubMed 40953286

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Rapid sedation in people with Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus, run by University of Southern Denmark at 5 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Christoph P. Beier, M.D. (+4565411943, cbeier@health.sdu.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients with continued NCSE on EEG after 24 h ("treatment failure") (time frame: 24 hours after randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05263674, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in