Congenital Heart Disease in ChildrenCOMPASSNCT05268094
Comparison of Methods of Pulmonary Blood Flow Augmentation in Neonates: Shunt Versus Stent (The COMPASS Trial)
A study testing Ductal Arterial Stent and Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt in people with Congenital Heart Disease in Children, run by Carelon Research at 24 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
COMPASS is a prospective multicenter randomized interventional trial. Participants with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow will be randomized to receive either a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt or ductal artery stent. Block randomization will be performed by center and by single vs. two ventricle status. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 30 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Congenital Heart Disease in Children
- What is being tested?
- Ductal Arterial Stent and Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2022to 29 Feb 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 30 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) and ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow requiring only a stable source of pulmonary blood flow as the initial palliation, for whom the clinical decision is made at the enrolling center that this is best achieved by either DAS or SPS.
- Age ≤ 30 days at time of index procedure (DAS or SPS).
Who cannot join
- 1. Any patient for whom the clinical decision at the enrolling center is that an initial intervention other than DAS or SPS is indicated (e.g., Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Artery (RV-PA) conduit, Right Ventricular Outflow Tract (RVOT) stent, primary complete anatomic repair, etc.).
- 2. Pulmonary Atresia with Intact Ventricular Septum (PA/IVS) where Right Ventricle (RV) decompression is planned.
- 3. Presence of MAPCAs: defined as an aortopulmonary collateral that is expected to require unifocalization.
- 4. Non-confluent Pulmonary Arteries (i.e., isolated Pulmonary Artery (PA) of ductal origin).
- 5. Acutely jeopardized branch Pulmonary Arteries (>75% narrowing of proximal PA based on screening cross sectional imaging [Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) or cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (cMR)]).
- 6. Bilateral Patent Ductus Arteriosis (PDA). 7. Patient who, at the time of enrollment, is deemed not to be a candidate for eventual Glenn or Complete Surgical Repair (CSR) for any reason.
Show all 10Show fewer
- 8. Birth weight <2.0 kg. 9. Gestational age <34 weeks at birth. 10. Patient for whom additional intervention is expected concomitant with, or prior to, DAS or SPS (e.g., atrial septostomy, aortic arch intervention, or RV outflow tract intervention) - except for branch PA arterioplasty or stent/balloon angioplasty.
- 11. Major co-morbidities which, in the opinion of the investigator, would negatively alter expected 1-year survival (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage, renal failure, etc.).
- 12. Specific known genetic anomaly which, in the opinion of the investigator, would be expected to significantly alter clinical course in the first year of life (e.g., Trisomy 13/18, CHARGE, VACTERL).
- 13. Patient who does not plan to return to the enrolling center or another participating center for Glenn/CSR.
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 2 countries.
24 sites in 2 countries
United States23 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Children's Hospital of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Levine Children's Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Joe DiMaggio Children's Hospital
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Le Bonheur Children's Hospital
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals
Oakland, California, 94609
Stanford Children's Health
Palo Alto, California, 94304
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadephia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Primary Children's Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Children's Wisconsin
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226
About this study
COMPASS is a prospective multicenter randomized interventional trial. Participants with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow will be randomized to receive either a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt or ductal artery stent. Block randomization will be performed by center and by single vs. two ventricle status. Participants will be followed through the first year of life.
Read the detailed description
In neonates with ductal-dependent blood flow there remains valid uncertainty regarding the comparative benefits of ductal artery stent (DAS) with the traditional systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt (SPS) palliation due to the lack of previous multicenter studies. COMPASS is a prospective multicenter randomized interventional trial where participants will be randomized to receive either an SPS or DAS to compare rates of a composite major morbidity/mortality endpoint in the first year of life. The study objectives are to perform an intention-to-treat analysis of participants' outcomes, and to describe the failure rate for neonatal candidates for DAS and the impact of this failure on the post-SPS course. Participants will be followed through the first year of life.
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart Disease in Children
- Being tested
- Ductal Arterial Stent, Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt
- Keywords
- Congenital Heart Disease, Ductal Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow, Ductal Artery Shunt, Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Defects, Congenital
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ductal Arterial StentDevice
Also called Medtronic Resolute Onyx, Boston Scientific Promus Elite/Premier, Boston Scientific Synergy, Cordis Elunir
Drug-eluting ductal arterial stents will be placed by transcatheter method.
Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery ShuntProcedure or surgery
A surgical connection will be made between a systemic artery and the pulmonary artery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ductal Artery Stent | Experimental | Transcatheter ductal artery shunt will be placed by the interventional team. Drug-eluting coronary stent brand, length, and diameter are determined by the interventional team. Receives: Device: Ductal Arterial Stent |
| Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt | Experimental | Surgical systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt performed by the interventional team. SPS diameter, length, and material will be determined by the surgeon performing the intervention. Receives: Procedure: Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Morbidity and/or Mortality Endpoint
Rates of a composite major morbidity and/or mortality endpoint in the first year of life will be compared between neonates with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow randomized to receive either DAS or SPS as the initial palliation.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Global Rank Score
All participants will be assigned a Global Rank Score, which is a rank based on a pre-specified hierarchical ranking of outcomes. This combines various endpoints into a single quantifiable endpoint with weighting of the severity of the component endpoints, and allows for the inclusion of endpoints of different forms. Global rank scores will range from 1-7.
Measured: 1 year
Freedom from Adverse Events
Safety, defined as freedom from procedural adverse events and complications, will be tracked and evaluated.
Measured: 1 year
Days Alive out of Hospital
Days alive out of the hospital represents a patient-centered outcome, and functions as a composite endpoint.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2022
- Study start2 Jun 2022
- Primary completion1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion29 Feb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Congenital Heart Disease in ChildrenStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to receive either an SPS or DAS. Overall randomization will be 1:1 to each treatment arm, with block randomization will be performed by center and by single vs. two ventricle status
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carelon Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pediatric Heart Network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christopher Petit, MD, Study chair, Columbia UniversityAndrew Glatz, MD, Study chair, Washington University School of MedicineSara Pasquali, MD, Study chair, University of MichiganJenna Romano, MD, Study chair, University of MichiganJeffrey Zampi, MD, Study chair, University of Michigan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05268094
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PHNCOMPASS
- Acronym
- COMPASS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All individual participant data collected by the Data Coordinating Center will be shared after posting of results and main study results publication.
Publications
Reddy D, Kleinloog R, Kinsley R. Pulmonary Atresia, Ventricular Septal Defect, and Major Aortopulmonary Collateral Arteries: The Natural History and Late Presentation. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2025 Mar;16(2):203-207. doi: 10.1177/21501351241311882. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
PubMed 39905870Petit CJ, Romano JC, Zampi JD, Pasquali SK, McCracken CE, Chanani NK, Les AS, Burns KM, Crosby-Thompson A, Stylianou M, Kato B, Glatz AC; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Rationale and design of the randomized COmparison of Methods for Pulmonary blood flow Augmentation: Shunt versus Stent (COMPASS) trial: A Pediatric Heart Network study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):637-647. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31109. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
PubMed 39311092Petit CJ, Romano JC, Zampi JD, Pasquali SK, McCracken CE, Chanani NK, Les AS, Burns KM, Crosby-Thompson A, Stylianou M, Kato B, Glatz AC; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Rationale and Design of the Randomized COmparison of Methods for Pulmonary Blood Flow Augmentation: Shunt Versus Stent (COMPASS) Trial: A Pediatric Heart Network Study. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2024 Nov;15(6):693-702. doi: 10.1177/21501351241266110. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
PubMed 39308140
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Methods of Pulmonary Blood Flow Augmentation in Neonates: Shunt Versus Stent (The COMPASS Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05268094
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMPASS / PHNCOMPASS
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart Disease in Children
- Keywords
- Congenital Heart Disease, Ductal Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow, Ductal Artery Shunt, Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Carelon ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pediatric Heart Network
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 29 Feb 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
COMPASS is a prospective multicenter randomized interventional trial. Participants with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow will be randomized to receive either a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt or ductal artery stent. Block randomization will be performed by center and by single vs. two ventricle status. Participants will be followed through the first year of life.
Detailed description
In neonates with ductal-dependent blood flow there remains valid uncertainty regarding the comparative benefits of ductal artery stent (DAS) with the traditional systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt (SPS) palliation due to the lack of previous multicenter studies. COMPASS is a prospective multicenter randomized interventional trial where participants will be randomized to receive either an SPS or DAS to compare rates of a composite major morbidity/mortality endpoint in the first year of life. The study objectives are to perform an intention-to-treat analysis of participants' outcomes, and to describe the failure rate for neonatal candidates for DAS and the impact of this failure on the post-SPS course. Participants will be followed through the first year of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized to receive either an SPS or DAS. Overall randomization will be 1:1 to each treatment arm, with block randomization will be performed by center and by single vs. two ventricle status
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ductal Artery Stent | Experimental | Device: Ductal Arterial StentTranscatheter ductal artery shunt will be placed by the interventional team. Drug-eluting coronary stent brand, length, and diameter are determined by the interventional team. |
| Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt | Experimental | Procedure: Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery ShuntSurgical systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt performed by the interventional team. SPS diameter, length, and material will be determined by the surgeon performing the intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 30 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) and ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow requiring only a stable source of pulmonary blood flow as the initial palliation, for whom the clinical decision is made at the enrolling center that this is best achieved by either DAS or SPS.
- Age ≤ 30 days at time of index procedure (DAS or SPS).
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- 1. Any patient for whom the clinical decision at the enrolling center is that an initial intervention other than DAS or SPS is indicated (e.g., Right Ventricle-Pulmonary Artery (RV-PA) conduit, Right Ventricular Outflow Tract (RVOT) stent, primary complete anatomic repair, etc.).
- 2. Pulmonary Atresia with Intact Ventricular Septum (PA/IVS) where Right Ventricle (RV) decompression is planned.
- 3. Presence of MAPCAs: defined as an aortopulmonary collateral that is expected to require unifocalization.
- 4. Non-confluent Pulmonary Arteries (i.e., isolated Pulmonary Artery (PA) of ductal origin).
- 5. Acutely jeopardized branch Pulmonary Arteries (>75% narrowing of proximal PA based on screening cross sectional imaging [Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) or cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (cMR)]).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ductal Arterial StentAlso: Medtronic Resolute Onyx, Boston Scientific Promus Elite/Premier, Boston Scientific Synergy, Cordis ElunirDrug-eluting ductal arterial stents will be placed by transcatheter method. | Device | Ductal Artery Stent |
| Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery ShuntA surgical connection will be made between a systemic artery and the pulmonary artery. | Procedure or surgery | Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt |
Primary outcome
Morbidity and/or Mortality Endpoint
Time frame: 1 year
Rates of a composite major morbidity and/or mortality endpoint in the first year of life will be compared between neonates with ductal-dependent pulmonary blood flow randomized to receive either DAS or SPS as the initial palliation.
3 secondary outcomes
Global Rank Score
Time frame: 1 year
Freedom from Adverse Events
Time frame: 1 year
Days Alive out of Hospital
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39905870Reddy D, Kleinloog R, Kinsley R. Pulmonary Atresia, Ventricular Septal Defect, and Major Aortopulmonary Collateral Arteries: The Natural History and Late Presentation. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2025 Mar;16(2):203-207. doi: 10.1177/21501351241311882. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39311092Petit CJ, Romano JC, Zampi JD, Pasquali SK, McCracken CE, Chanani NK, Les AS, Burns KM, Crosby-Thompson A, Stylianou M, Kato B, Glatz AC; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Rationale and design of the randomized COmparison of Methods for Pulmonary blood flow Augmentation: Shunt versus Stent (COMPASS) trial: A Pediatric Heart Network study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Oct;104(4):637-647. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31109. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39308140Petit CJ, Romano JC, Zampi JD, Pasquali SK, McCracken CE, Chanani NK, Les AS, Burns KM, Crosby-Thompson A, Stylianou M, Kato B, Glatz AC; Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Rationale and Design of the Randomized COmparison of Methods for Pulmonary Blood Flow Augmentation: Shunt Versus Stent (COMPASS) Trial: A Pediatric Heart Network Study. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2024 Nov;15(6):693-702. doi: 10.1177/21501351241266110. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
- Pediatric Heart Network Current StudiesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All individual participant data collected by the Data Coordinating Center will be shared after posting of results and main study results publication.
Related trials for Congenital Heart Disease in Children
Not yet recruiting
Autologous Thymus Transplant in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Butyric Acid Supplementation for Gut Improvement After Cardiac Surgery in Kids
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
Not yet recruiting
Starry-Sky Projection and Maternal Voice for Sleep After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD), Postoperative Sleep
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Brain Phenotype of Children With Williams Syndrome
Williams Syndrome, Duplication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christopher Petit, MD study chair
Columbia University
Andrew Glatz, MD study chair
Washington University School of Medicine
Sara Pasquali, MD study chair
University of Michigan
24 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ductal Arterial Stent and Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt in people with Congenital Heart Disease in Children, run by Carelon Research at 24 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Morbidity and/or Mortality Endpoint (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05268094, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2026.