AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung DiseasesNCT05270616

Robotic Versus Video-assisted Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Lung Surgery

A study testing robotic surgery, uniport surgery and multiple- port surgery in people with Lung Diseases and Surgery, run by The Second Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the safety/efficacy of the robotic-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (RAL/S) with the video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection. Video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection is divided into uniport group and multiple- port group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Diseases, Surgery
What is being tested?
robotic surgery, uniport surgery and multiple- port surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
800 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jun 2020to 1 Jun 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • good cardio- pulmonary function to tolerate surgery;
  • minimaly invasive surgery for lobectomy or segmentectomy or sleeve lobectomy;

Who cannot join

  • cardio- pulmonary function is not good enough to tolerate surgery;
  • huge tumor or extensive adhesion in thoracic cavity.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The Second Hospital of Shandong University

    Jinan, Shandong, 250033

    Yunpeng Zhao, doctor, +8618766188692

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

To compare the safety/efficacy of the robotic-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (RAL/S) with the video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection.

Video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection is divided into uniport group and multiple- port group.

Being tested
robotic surgery, uniport surgery, multiple- port surgery
Keywords
robotic surgery, VATS, uniport, multiport
Medical subject headings
Lung Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • robotic surgeryProcedure or surgery

    minimally invasive surgery using the Davinci robotic system

  • uniport surgeryProcedure or surgery

    VATS minimally invasive surgery under the uniportal status

  • multiple- port surgeryProcedure or surgery

    VATS minimally invasive surgery under the multiple- port status

Study groups in NCT05270616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
robotic surgery groupExperimentalminimally invasive lung surgery using the Davinci robotic system to assist.
Receives: Procedure: robotic surgery
uniport surgery groupActive comparatorVATS minimally invasive lung surgery under the uniportal status.
Receives: Procedure: uniport surgery
multiple- port surgery groupActive comparatorVATS minimally invasive lung surgery under the multiple- port status.
Receives: Procedure: multiple- port surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. mortality

    incidence rate

    Measured: 30 days after surgery

  2. conversion rate to open surgery

    incidence rate

    Measured: during surgery

  3. postoperative complications

    incidence rate

    Measured: within 7 days after surgery

  4. operation time

    minutes

    Measured: within 180 minutes

  5. duration of hospitalization

    days

    Measured: within 7 days after surgery

  6. days to tube removal

    days

    Measured: within 7 days after surgery

  7. retrieved lymph node

    amount

    Measured: within 1 days after surgery

  8. retrieved lymph node station

    amount

    Measured: within 1 days after surgery

  9. short- term PFS

    proportion

    Measured: 3 years

  10. short- term overall survival

    proportion

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Mar 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
800 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05270616
Sponsor's protocol ID
Robotic lung ZYP
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
27 Feb 2022
Last updated
8 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing robotic surgery, uniport surgery and multiple- port surgery in people with Lung Diseases and Surgery, run by The Second Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xiaogang Zhao (+8617660080007, zhaoxiaogang@sdu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

mortality (time frame: 30 days after surgery). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT05270616 | AzTrials