Disseminated Pancreatic CancerScanPan1NCT05271110
Surgery for Liver Metastases From PDAC
A study testing Liver resection (ablation) in people with Disseminated Pancreatic Cancer, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Dissemination from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in clinical practice either in the form of recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent resection (metachronous) or more frequently prevails already at the time of diagnosis (synchronous). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Disseminated Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Liver resection (ablation)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Mar 2022to Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed PDAC with synchronous or metachronous dissemination isolated in the liver (primary cohort) or other dissemination as described in chapter 7.1. where the local tumour board find indication for curative treatment attempt.
- The confirmation of PDAC before chemotherapy is not regulated by the protocol but EUS guided biopsies directed to the primary tumour or a site of recurrence/dissemination is recommended whereas a percutaneous approach towards liver lesion(s) can be an alternative diagnostic approach; radiology and elevated serum tumor markers may guide diagnosis in exceptional cases, for which, e.g., pathological sampling fails.
- Metastases are defined as synchronous when liver tumors are detected simultaneously with the primary tumor or within the first 6 months thereafter. All other tumors are regarded as metachronous metastases or locally recurrent disease (when applicable).
- The same definition applies to localized lesions detected intra- as well as extra-abdominally.
- Patients treated due to the radiological appearance and or elevated CA-19.9 levels despite negative biopsies are accepted for inclusion into the study
- To be included in "Limited liver desease":
- Up to 4 liver metastases treatable with liver resections (without volume expansion of the future liver remnant)/thermal ablations/RFA/IRE (largest diameter < 5 cm and for ablative techniques < 2 cm).
- Age 18 years or older ECOG 0-1 Any resectable (including borderline resectable, but without need for arterial reconstruction) (before or after neoadjuvant treatment) PDAC Patient can understand verbal and written information
Who cannot join
- Age less than 18 years ECOG >2 Patient is not able to understand the verbal and written information Progression of tumor (RECIST 1.1) during or after chemotherapy Distant metastases outside the liver (applies only to the primary cohort) Other malignancy within 2 years, the prognosis of which may affect the evaluation of the therapeutic outcome.
- Major non-pancreatic surgery within 4 weeks prior to study treatment start, or lack of complete recovery from the effects of major surgery Uncontrolled (bacterial or fungal) infections Significant concomitant diseases preventing the safe administration of study drugs or likely to interfere with study assessments Uncontrolled angina pectoris; cardiac failure or clinically significant arrhythmias Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents (Corticoids are allowed) Neuropathy >grade 1 (CTCAE, v 5.0) Pregnancy or breast feeding Patients (M/F) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptive measures Pre-defined need for arterial reconstruction to resect primary tumor
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: A Population-based Assessment of Curative Intended Multimodal Treatment in Patients With Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Responsive to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy - ScanPan 1 - A Scandinavian Prospective Multicenter Study
Dissemination from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in clinical practice either in the form of recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent resection (metachronous) or more frequently prevails already at the time of diagnosis (synchronous). Traditionally, metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC) is considered not to be eligible for meaningful aggressive therapies to be implemented. However, with the development of local as well as more effective systemic therapeutic regimens a variety of clinical situations have to be reevaluated. For instance, recent reports have indicated an option for maintained or even prolonged survival after resections and/or ablations of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (OMDPDAC), as represented by a single or few liver metastasis (es). These reports are burdened by methodological weaknesses such as being retrospective, single institution and reporting only from highly selected case series.
A common denominator of acceptable outcome is, however, that all metastatic lesions have been preoperatively treated and responded to chemotherapy, indicating an advantageous tumor biology.
Read more
Hence an unbiased approach, including neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before any aggressive local treatment must be explored to the updated management opportunities in terms of assessing the prevalence, safety, feasibility, tolerability and possible disease control options.
Primary objective (clinical): To prospectively investigate (on an intention to treat basis) the safety, feasibility, tolerability and clinical outcomes of all patients with PDAC presenting with limited metastatic disease, where a treatment option can be launched with the ambition of local disease control and eventually better survival.
The cohorts to be included are:
Primary cohort: Patients with liver limited (metachronous and synchronous) metastasis(es) due to PDAC. This cohort is further subdivided to:
Limited liver disease. Extended liver disease. Secondary cohort: Patients with OMDPDAC and at least one extrahepatic manifestation of PDAC.
Secondary objective (translational) is to improve the understanding of PDAC liver metastases biology by studying the mechanistic aspects of metastases invasion as well as intra- and peri-tumoral liver metastatic niche, and by charting the cellular composition of liver metastases on single cell level with a focus on the impact of cellular interactions on tumor cell growth and differentiation. Furthermore, the study aims to identify blood-based biomarkers of response to oncologic/surgical treatment.
Read the detailed description
Dissemination from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in clinical practice either in the form of recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent or more frequently is manifested already at the time of diagnosis. Traditionally corresponding disease states are considered not to be eligible for meaningful aggressive therapies to be implemented. Instead, palliative therapies are instituted with a very limited survival. However, with the development of local as well as more effective systemic therapeutic regimens, a variety of clinical situations must be reevaluated.
In PDAC, disseminated to the liver, the traditional view as that the corresponding lesions are non-treatable by aggressive chemotherapy followed by surgical interventions and generally, surgery has been considered obsolete in this patient cohort5. Despite these early discouraging results there are some reports, from selected cohorts, indicating more promising survival rates after resection of metastasis(es) than ever earlier described6. Moreover, during recent years there has been significant improvement in the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens available for patients with localized as well as disseminated PDAC that may enhance the effect of surgical removal of macroscopic tumor manifestations.
The same may be true for alternative limited manifestations of metastatic PDAC disease. Hence an unbiased approach must be explored to the updated management opportunities in terms of assessing the incidence, safety, feasibility, tolerability and possible disease control options.
According to the Swedish and Danish pancreatic cancer registry the overall median survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic cancer is about 6-7 months while studies demonstrate 9-15 months median survival when palliative chemotherapy is used7, 8.
Hitherto, no prospective, population-based study, with intention to treat design, has been presented to define the role of aggressive oncological regimens with successive macroscopic eradication of tumor lesions as exemplified by surgery in disseminated PDAC. The evidence at hand comes from retrospectively collected and selected cohorts where comparison is often made to surgical palliation alone (intestinal bypass surgery) or best supportive care. The reported median survival after surgery varies widely from 7.6 months to as long as 56 months9. A recent case matched study suggested that in selected cases, surgery may improve median survival from about 1 to 2 years10. Corresponding data just reflect the large impact of selection on either the intervention and/or the control group. The main drawback of the available literature is the general lack of population based, intention to treat data and lack of clear definition of disease stages that severely limit the usefulness of these results in clinical decision making.
The evidence for applying invasive treatment for extrahepatic dissemination of PDAC is even more limited although dissemination to the lungs may be associated with somewhat longer overall survival than other locations 11.
Despite increasing evidence for some role of updated multimodal treatment options in disseminated PDAC there is a strong need for an intention to treat designed prospective, population-based study to investigate the value of corresponding regimens in PDAC.
Eligible for enrolment are all patients presenting with the following characteristics:
Primary cohort; Synchronous or metachronous liver metastasis(es) from PDAC without signs of extra hepatic disease. This cohort is subdivided:
- Limited liver disease: Synchronous or metachronous uni- or bilobar liver metastasis(es) from PDAC. The number of metastases shall be < 4 and the largest < 5 cm (2 cm if ablative treatment is planned) and no signs of extrahepatic dissemination. This cohort forms the basis for sample size calculation and primary outcome.
- Extended liver disease: Liver limited metastasis that do not fit into the limited liver disease cohort but are still evaluated at a multidisciplinary conference and judged as amendable for treatment with curative intent Secondary cohort; PDAC patients with limited (unilocular) dissemination to intra- or extra-abdominal locations rendering the lesion(s) amenable to either; SBRT, alternative external radiation options, surgery, thermal ablation or a combination of these. Patients with loco-regional recurrences of PDCA as defined as those detected in the remaining part of the resected organs (e.g. the gastric or pancreatic remnant), in the anastomotic area, the anatomic area representing the original resection bed, regional remaining lymph nodes. Patients with isolated loco-regional recurrences as defined as those emerging and detected in the above-mentioned sites, and with no signs of distant metastases.
All these patients are identified at multidisciplinary tumor boards in each participating center.
Patients deemed fit for oncological treatment are enrolled and chemotherapy started. After at least 2 months of chemotherapy patient status is reevaluated with CT scan/MRI and PET-CT and in case of response (stable disease or regression according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria) and also evaluating tumour markers (CA19.9), local treatment is given.
For inclusion in the Primary "Limited liver disease" cohort" a minimum of 4 months chemotherapy treatment is given.
If response is not achieved on initial oncological treatment, further treatment may be given and disease status re-evaluated every other month as long as considered clinically relevant-meaningful. Patients that do not achieve stable disease/regression will continue palliative treatment as clinically indicated.
- Conditions
- Disseminated Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Liver resection (ablation)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liver resection (ablation)Procedure or surgery
Treatment of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer by surgery or ablation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment cohort | Experimental | Adult patients (ECOG 0-1) with a resectable (or previously resected) PDAC and either synchronous or metachronous liver metastases are the target population of this study. Receives: Procedure: Liver resection (ablation) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety of surgery
Safety of liver metastases treatment with surgery or ablation as measured by the proportion of patients experiencing severe complications (defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification)
Measured: Up to 90 days after surgery
Feasibility of treatment
Measured as the proportion of patients starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy that finally get invasive treatment for their liver metastases
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (12)
Chemotherapy associated morbidity
Measured as the number of adverse events occuring during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Measured: 3 years
Surgical morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and reported as the most severe complication
Measured: 90 days after surgery
Surgical morbidity according to the CCI (comprehensive complication index)
All complications occuring up to 90 days after surgery are combined in a CCI for each patient
Measured: 90 days post operatively
Pos operative pancreatic fistula (POPF)
Defined according to established criteria, proportion of patients experiencing POPF will be reported
Measured: 90 days post operatively
Post pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)
Defined according to established criteria, proportion of patients experiencing PPH will be reported
Measured: 90 days post operatively
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE)
Defined according to established criteria, proportion of patients experiencing DGE will be reported
Measured: 90 days post operatively
R0 resection rate of liver metastasis
Defined as <1mm margin on pathology assessment
Measured: 3 yeras
Histological tumor response
Graded on pathology assessment as the proportion of viable tumour cells in the specimen
Measured: 3 years
Overall survival
Calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method 2 years after last surgery
Measured: 5 years
Progression free survival
Calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method 2 years after last surgery
Measured: 5 years
Disease free survival
Calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method 2 years after last surgery
Measured: 5 years
Quality of life after surgery
Measured with EQ5D before and up to 2 years after surgery
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Mar 2022
- Study startMar 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Disseminated Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- A prospective cohort study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Linkoeping University
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Lund University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Uppsala University Hospital, University Hospital, Umeå, University of Southern Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Oslo University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bergthor Björnsson, Linkoeping University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05271110
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ScanPan 1
- Acronym
- ScanPan1
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hasselgren K, Williamsson C, Wennerblom J, Ghorbani P, Liljefors MG, Huhta H, Heby M, Mansson C, Johansson MI, Elander NO, Nortunen M, Kallio R, Halimi A, Ohlund D, Sandstrom P, Sparrelid E, Bjornsson B. Prospective evaluation of surgical treatment of liver metastasizing pancreatic cancer - ScanPan study protocol. BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02983-w.
PubMed 40682051
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Population-based Assessment of Curative Intended Multimodal Treatment in Patients With Oligometastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Responsive to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy - ScanPan 1 - A Scandinavian Prospective Multicenter Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05271110
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ScanPan1 / ScanPan 1
- Conditions
- Disseminated Pancreatic Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Linkoeping UniversityOther government
- Collaborators
- Lund University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Uppsala University Hospital, University Hospital, Umeå, University of Southern Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Oslo University Hospital
- Study start
- Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dissemination from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in clinical practice either in the form of recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent resection (metachronous) or more frequently prevails already at the time of diagnosis (synchronous). Traditionally, metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPDAC) is considered not to be eligible for meaningful aggressive therapies to be implemented. However, with the development of local as well as more effective systemic therapeutic regimens a variety of clinical situations have to be reevaluated. For instance, recent reports have indicated an option for maintained or even prolonged survival after resections and/or ablations of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer (OMDPDAC), as represented by a single or few liver metastasis (es). These reports are burdened by methodological weaknesses such as being retrospective, single institution and reporting only from highly selected case series.
A common denominator of acceptable outcome is, however, that all metastatic lesions have been preoperatively treated and responded to chemotherapy, indicating an advantageous tumor biology.
Hence an unbiased approach, including neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before any aggressive local treatment must be explored to the updated management opportunities in terms of assessing the prevalence, safety, feasibility, tolerability and possible disease control options.
Primary objective (clinical): To prospectively investigate (on an intention to treat basis) the safety, feasibility, tolerability and clinical outcomes of all patients with PDAC presenting with limited metastatic disease, where a treatment option can be launched with the ambition of local disease control and eventually better survival.
The cohorts to be included are:
Primary cohort: Patients with liver limited (metachronous and synchronous) metastasis(es) due to PDAC. This cohort is further subdivided to:
Limited liver disease. Extended liver disease. Secondary cohort: Patients with OMDPDAC and at least one extrahepatic manifestation of PDAC.
Secondary objective (translational) is to improve the understanding of PDAC liver metastases biology by studying the mechanistic aspects of metastases invasion as well as intra- and peri-tumoral liver metastatic niche, and by charting the cellular composition of liver metastases on single cell level with a focus on the impact of cellular interactions on tumor cell growth and differentiation. Furthermore, the study aims to identify blood-based biomarkers of response to oncologic/surgical treatment.
Detailed description
Dissemination from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) occurs in clinical practice either in the form of recurrence after initial treatment with curative intent or more frequently is manifested already at the time of diagnosis. Traditionally corresponding disease states are considered not to be eligible for meaningful aggressive therapies to be implemented. Instead, palliative therapies are instituted with a very limited survival. However, with the development of local as well as more effective systemic therapeutic regimens, a variety of clinical situations must be reevaluated.
In PDAC, disseminated to the liver, the traditional view as that the corresponding lesions are non-treatable by aggressive chemotherapy followed by surgical interventions and generally, surgery has been considered obsolete in this patient cohort5. Despite these early discouraging results there are some reports, from selected cohorts, indicating more promising survival rates after resection of metastasis(es) than ever earlier described6. Moreover, during recent years there has been significant improvement in the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens available for patients with localized as well as disseminated PDAC that may enhance the effect of surgical removal of macroscopic tumor manifestations.
The same may be true for alternative limited manifestations of metastatic PDAC disease. Hence an unbiased approach must be explored to the updated management opportunities in terms of assessing the incidence, safety, feasibility, tolerability and possible disease control options.
According to the Swedish and Danish pancreatic cancer registry the overall median survival (OS) of patients with pancreatic cancer is about 6-7 months while studies demonstrate 9-15 months median survival when palliative chemotherapy is used7, 8.
Hitherto, no prospective, population-based study, with intention to treat design, has been presented to define the role of aggressive oncological regimens with successive macroscopic eradication of tumor lesions as exemplified by surgery in disseminated PDAC. The evidence at hand comes from retrospectively collected and selected cohorts where comparison is often made to surgical palliation alone (intestinal bypass surgery) or best supportive care. The reported median survival after surgery varies widely from 7.6 months to as long as 56 months9. A recent case matched study suggested that in selected cases, surgery may improve median survival from about 1 to 2 years10. Corresponding data just reflect the large impact of selection on either the intervention and/or the control group. The main drawback of the available literature is the general lack of population based, intention to treat data and lack of clear definition of disease stages that severely limit the usefulness of these results in clinical decision making.
The evidence for applying invasive treatment for extrahepatic dissemination of PDAC is even more limited although dissemination to the lungs may be associated with somewhat longer overall survival than other locations 11.
Despite increasing evidence for some role of updated multimodal treatment options in disseminated PDAC there is a strong need for an intention to treat designed prospective, population-based study to investigate the value of corresponding regimens in PDAC.
Eligible for enrolment are all patients presenting with the following characteristics:
Primary cohort; Synchronous or metachronous liver metastasis(es) from PDAC without signs of extra hepatic disease. This cohort is subdivided:
- Limited liver disease: Synchronous or metachronous uni- or bilobar liver metastasis(es) from PDAC. The number of metastases shall be < 4 and the largest < 5 cm (2 cm if ablative treatment is planned) and no signs of extrahepatic dissemination. This cohort forms the basis for sample size calculation and primary outcome.
- Extended liver disease: Liver limited metastasis that do not fit into the limited liver disease cohort but are still evaluated at a multidisciplinary conference and judged as amendable for treatment with curative intent Secondary cohort; PDAC patients with limited (unilocular) dissemination to intra- or extra-abdominal locations rendering the lesion(s) amenable to either; SBRT, alternative external radiation options, surgery, thermal ablation or a combination of these. Patients with loco-regional recurrences of PDCA as defined as those detected in the remaining part of the resected organs (e.g. the gastric or pancreatic remnant), in the anastomotic area, the anatomic area representing the original resection bed, regional remaining lymph nodes. Patients with isolated loco-regional recurrences as defined as those emerging and detected in the above-mentioned sites, and with no signs of distant metastases.
All these patients are identified at multidisciplinary tumor boards in each participating center.
Patients deemed fit for oncological treatment are enrolled and chemotherapy started. After at least 2 months of chemotherapy patient status is reevaluated with CT scan/MRI and PET-CT and in case of response (stable disease or regression according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria) and also evaluating tumour markers (CA19.9), local treatment is given.
For inclusion in the Primary "Limited liver disease" cohort" a minimum of 4 months chemotherapy treatment is given.
If response is not achieved on initial oncological treatment, further treatment may be given and disease status re-evaluated every other month as long as considered clinically relevant-meaningful. Patients that do not achieve stable disease/regression will continue palliative treatment as clinically indicated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- A prospective cohort study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment cohort | Experimental | Procedure: Liver resection (ablation)Adult patients (ECOG 0-1) with a resectable (or previously resected) PDAC and either synchronous or metachronous liver metastases are the target population of this study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Confirmed PDAC with synchronous or metachronous dissemination isolated in the liver (primary cohort) or other dissemination as described in chapter 7.1. where the local tumour board find indication for curative treatment attempt.
- The confirmation of PDAC before chemotherapy is not regulated by the protocol but EUS guided biopsies directed to the primary tumour or a site of recurrence/dissemination is recommended whereas a percutaneous approach towards liver lesion(s) can be an alternative diagnostic approach; radiology and elevated serum tumor markers may guide diagnosis in exceptional cases, for which, e.g., pathological sampling fails.
- Metastases are defined as synchronous when liver tumors are detected simultaneously with the primary tumor or within the first 6 months thereafter. All other tumors are regarded as metachronous metastases or locally recurrent disease (when applicable).
- The same definition applies to localized lesions detected intra- as well as extra-abdominally.
- Patients treated due to the radiological appearance and or elevated CA-19.9 levels despite negative biopsies are accepted for inclusion into the study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age less than 18 years ECOG >2 Patient is not able to understand the verbal and written information Progression of tumor (RECIST 1.1) during or after chemotherapy Distant metastases outside the liver (applies only to the primary cohort) Other malignancy within 2 years, the prognosis of which may affect the evaluation of the therapeutic outcome.
- Major non-pancreatic surgery within 4 weeks prior to study treatment start, or lack of complete recovery from the effects of major surgery Uncontrolled (bacterial or fungal) infections Significant concomitant diseases preventing the safe administration of study drugs or likely to interfere with study assessments Uncontrolled angina pectoris; cardiac failure or clinically significant arrhythmias Continuous use of immunosuppressive agents (Corticoids are allowed) Neuropathy >grade 1 (CTCAE, v 5.0) Pregnancy or breast feeding Patients (M/F) with reproductive potential not implementing adequate contraceptive measures Pre-defined need for arterial reconstruction to resect primary tumor
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liver resection (ablation)Treatment of liver metastases from pancreatic cancer by surgery or ablation | Procedure or surgery | Treatment cohort |
Primary outcome
Safety of surgery
Time frame: Up to 90 days after surgery
Safety of liver metastases treatment with surgery or ablation as measured by the proportion of patients experiencing severe complications (defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification)
Feasibility of treatment
Time frame: 3 years
Measured as the proportion of patients starting neoadjuvant chemotherapy that finally get invasive treatment for their liver metastases
12 secondary outcomes
Chemotherapy associated morbidity
Time frame: 3 years
Surgical morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification
Time frame: 90 days after surgery
Surgical morbidity according to the CCI (comprehensive complication index)
Time frame: 90 days post operatively
Pos operative pancreatic fistula (POPF)
Time frame: 90 days post operatively
Post pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)
Time frame: 90 days post operatively
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE)
Time frame: 90 days post operatively
R0 resection rate of liver metastasis
Time frame: 3 yeras
Histological tumor response
Time frame: 3 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Progression free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Disease free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Quality of life after surgery
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40682051Hasselgren K, Williamsson C, Wennerblom J, Ghorbani P, Liljefors MG, Huhta H, Heby M, Mansson C, Johansson MI, Elander NO, Nortunen M, Kallio R, Halimi A, Ohlund D, Sandstrom P, Sparrelid E, Bjornsson B. Prospective evaluation of surgical treatment of liver metastasizing pancreatic cancer - ScanPan study protocol. BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02983-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Disseminated Pancreatic Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prediction of Peritoneal Dissemination of Digestive Tumors Through the Study of Circulating Tumor DNA
Gastric Cancer (GC), Pancreatic Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Tumor Cell and DNA Detection in the Blood, Urine and Bone Marrow of Patients With Solid Cancers
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Esophageal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Liver resection (ablation) in people with Disseminated Pancreatic Cancer, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bergthor Björnsson (+46703766890, bergthor.bjornsson@liu.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety of surgery (time frame: Up to 90 days after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05271110, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2022.