AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerCLETURNCT05273593

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy During TransUrethral Resection for Improving BC Diagnosis and Treatment

A study testing Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) in people with Bladder Cancer and CLE, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective monocenter diagnostic accuracy study of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) for Bladder Cancer(BC) to assess two primary objectives: 1. The diagnostic accuracy of flexible probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) compared to histopathology of the resection specimen. 2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer, CLE
What is being tested?
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE)
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
6 Jan 2020to 12 Nov 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Display a papillary bladder tumor on cystoscopy.
  • >18 years of age.
  • Has given written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a known allergy to fluorescein.
  • Pregnancy or lactating women.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Academic Medical Center

    Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy During TransUrethral Resection for Improving Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

A prospective monocenter diagnostic accuracy study of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) for Bladder Cancer(BC) to assess two primary objectives:

  1. The diagnostic accuracy of flexible probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) compared to histopathology of the resection specimen.
  2. The diagnostic accuracy of CLE-based assessment of the surgical radicality of the resection bed (radical vs irradical) in comparison with histopathology of a biopsy of the resection bed.

All patients with a papillary bladder tumor on cystoscopy will be included in this trial.

Read the detailed description

Rationale:

Initial evaluation of gross hematuria consists of White Light Cystoscopy (WLC). Urine cytology combined with contrast imaging of the upper urothelial tract is performed when a bladder tumor is seen. Follow up of non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC) after initial treatment consists of similar steps. When a suspected lesion is visualized, a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) is performed for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. TURBT is considered to be the gold standard for diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). High recurrence rates of UCB after TURBT are reported, leading to repetitive surgery and high costs. In certain cases of high grade UCB a second look TURBT has proven to be beneficial after primary resection to ensure radical resection. Furthermore, recent research suggests that active surveillance for low-grade bladder tumors is safe. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), a high resolution optical imaging technique that can be used in combination with endo-urological procedures, seems promising to improve diagnosis of urothelial cancer, possibly without the need for immediate transurethral resection to obtain histological confirmation. CLE characteristics of UCB have been determined and validated using rigid probes, which are incompatible with flexible cystoscopes used for outpatient cystoscopies. With the present study, we aim to assess the diagnostic value of flexible probe based CLE for diagnosis and grading of UCB. Furthermore to possibly prevent second look TURBT in the future,an assessment of CLE features of the resection bed using a rigid CLE-probe will be performed.

Objective:

Primary objectives:

This study is two-fold and, therefore, has two primary objectives:

  1. Investigating the diagnostic accuracy of CLE (Cystoflex™F probe) during flexible cystoscopy for diagnosis and grading of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
  2. To investigate the diagnostic potential of CLE (Cystoflex™ UHD-R probe) for the assessment of the surgical radicality after transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (after TURBT)

Secondary objective:

  • To construct a convolutional neural network for computer aided assessment of CLE images for diagnosis and grading of UCB.

Study design:

This is a prospective monocenter, observational diagnostic accuracy study. Diagnostic accuracy study to compare the CLE-based diagnosis with the histopathologic findings.

Study population: All patients >18 years old with a papillary bladder tumor who are planned for TURBT are eligible for this study. We will include 60 patients in this pilot study.

Intervention: At the operation theatre, before performing a TURBT for the standard clinical care, we introduce a flexible cystoscope to map the bladder, then we record CLE images of the index lesion using the Cystoflex™F. Subsequently, we replace the flexible scope by the (rigid) resectoscope. We acquire additional images with the Cystoflex™ UHD-R rigid probe. We perform the TURBT. After completion of the TURBT, we introduce the Cystoflex™ UHD-R probe again for imaging of the resection bed. At a later stage correlation with a standard biopsy of the resection bed will be performed.

For CLE imaging, a fluorescent contrast agent (fluorescein) will be used intravesically and intravenously, respectively, to temporarily stain the extracellular matrix of the urothelium. We will introduce fluorescein for intravesical use through a bladder catheter and rinse the fluorescein out of the bladder after an indwelling time of 5-10 minutes. Before CLE measurement of the resection bed we will administer fluorescein intravenously.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

  1. Overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of flexible probe CLE-based diagnosis (benign vs malignant) and grading (low-grade versus high-grade) in comparison with the histopathology of the resection specimen.
  2. Overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of CLE-based assessment of the surgical radicality of the resection bed (radical versus irradical) in comparison with the histopathology of the biopsy of the resection bed.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participants will not benefit directly from this study. We hypothesize, however, that the results of this study will contribute to improvements in the diagnostic and surgical procedure for UCB. Outpatient-based cystoscopy with the potential diagnostic certainty of CLE-based grade assessment may enable active surveillance in low-risk UCB, and thus may even lead to a reduction in surgical procedures. We will introduce a CLE probe before TURBT via the working channel of the flexible cystoscope and hold it in direct contact with the bladder tumor to obtain CLE images. Before image acquisition of the bladder tumor we administer fluorescein intravesical, which is a fluorescent dye, used regularly intravenously in ophthalmatology. Before image acquisition of the resection bed we administer fluorescein intravenously. In patients not known with an allergy to this dye, this is a safe procedure. Patients with a known allergic reaction to fluorescein cannot participate in this study. Patients will be exposed to approximately 20 minutes of extra surgery time and the introduction of a flexible cystoscope compared to regular TURBT. As a result there is little burden to study participation for the patients. Adverse events are not expected based on previous experiences. The hospital's internal protocol for standard clinical care and histopathologic evaluation are not going to be affected by the study protocol.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer, CLE
Being tested
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE)
Keywords
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, CLE, Bladder cancer, Diagnosis, Imaging techniques
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE)Device

    Administration of fluorescein, intravesically and intravenously. CLE measurements with flexible and rigid probe of papillary bladder tumour and rigid probe-measurement of resection bed.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of flexible-probe based CLE(pCLE) for the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB)

    Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value) of flexible probe based CLE for the diagnosis (low-grade malignant, high-grade malignant) of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

    Measured: Consensus panel within 12 months of start of study.

  2. Diagnostic potential of probe based CLE for assessment of surgical radicality after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT).

    To investigate the diagnostic potential of CLE for the assessment of the surgical radicality (residual tumor/no residual tumor) after TURBT.

    Measured: Consensus panel within 12 months of start of study.

  3. Diagnostic potential of probe based CLE for assessment of depth of resection after transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT).

    To investigate the diagnostic potential of CLE for depth of resection (according to the tissue in the resection margin: urothelium, submucosa, m. detrusor or perivesical fatty tissue) after TURBT.

    Measured: Consensus panel within 12 months of start of study.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Computer aided assessment of pCLE images for diagnosis and grading of UCB

    To construct a convolutional neural network for computer aided assessment of pCLE images for diagnosis and grading of UCB.

    Measured: Within 24 months after starting study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2022
  2. Study start6 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion12 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion12 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Feasibility study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05273593
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL71360.018.19
Acronym
CLETUR
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
19 Mar 2020
Last updated
10 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (CLE) in people with Bladder Cancer and CLE, run by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic accuracy of flexible-probe based CLE(pCLE) for the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) (time frame: Consensus panel within 12 months of start of study.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in