AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic GastroparesisTNM-DGpNCT05273788

Thoracic Neuromodulation for Diabetic Gastroparesis

A study testing 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 1Hz and 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 10Hz in people with Diabetic Gastroparesis, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The global incidence of diabetes is rising. Gastroparesis is a significant complication of diabetes that results in debilitating symptoms and affects quality of life. Current treatment options for diabetic gastroparesis are limited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Gastroparesis
What is being tested?
2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 1Hz and 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 10Hz
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Jul 2022to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Outpatient DGp patients with refractory symptoms and total ANMS GCSI-DD score ≥ 2.0 (moderate-severe severity) during screening period;
  • Men or women age less than 85;
  • No known mucosal disease;
  • Speak, write, and understand English (by self-report);
  • On stable doses of any medication for 30 days prior to entering the study (exceptions are psychotropic, opioids, and/or illicit drugs) and agrees not to change medications or dosages during the study period.

Who cannot join

  • Postsurgical gastroparesis;
  • Gastrointestinal obstruction;
  • Prior gastric surgery (fundoplication, gastric resection or pyloroplasty);
  • Achalasia, Chronic Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction, Colonic Inertia with one complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) less than every 2 weeks;
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease;
  • Use of opioids greater than 3 times a week and marijuana more than 5 times a week;
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Change in neuromodulator dosage in last 3 months (tricyclic antidepressants, gabapentin, olanzapine, etc.);
  • Use of sympathomimetics;
  • Seizure history or disorder;
  • Active serious psychiatric illness that would warrant independent attention;
  • Severe, unstable cardiac disease and arrhythmias;
  • Metal implants that are not MR safe, gastric electrical stimulators (GES), deep brain stimulators (DBS), sacral nerve stimulators (SNS), or pacemakers;
  • Pregnant women or nursing mothers;
  • Enteral or parenteral feeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Augusta University

    Augusta, Georgia, 30912

Other trials in United States

About this study

The global incidence of diabetes is rising. Gastroparesis is a significant complication of diabetes that results in debilitating symptoms and affects quality of life. Current treatment options for diabetic gastroparesis are limited. Significant visceral afferent neuropathy is associated with diabetic gastroparesis and sympathetic overactivity is seen in nausea, both type 1 and 2 diabetes, and diabetic complications. These dysfunctions can result from neuropathy affecting the thoracic spinal nerves that carry both general visceral afferents and preganglionic sympathetic efferents in the greater splanchnic nerve, innervating the foregut. Neuromodulation of the thoracic spinal nerves should improve diabetic gastroparesis symptoms and restore quality of life by improving neuropathy and gastric sensori-motor function. The investigators has developed and refined a novel, noninvasive, neuromodulation treatment, Thoracic Spinal Nerve Magnetic Neuromodulation Therapy (ThorS-MagNT). In an uncontrolled trial of adults with diabetic gastroparesis, ThorS-MagNT the investigators demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and improvement of DGp symptoms. Whether active neuromodulation is better than sham therapy and the optimal frequency of treatment are not known. The investigators propose to conduct a dose-ranging, sham-controlled trial (pilot NIH Stage 1b) to assess the effect of ThorS-MagNT on symptom severity and quality of life in diabetic gastroparesis (TNM-DGp Trial). The investigators will test the hypothesis that ThorS-MagNT will improve visceral afferent neuropathy, autonomic and gastric dysfunction, compared to sham. The investigators will also test whether any improvements are due to neuromodulation of (a) peripheral spino-gut axis or (b) central structures of the limbic system and autonomic network, or both. Successful completion of this pilot study will provide insights into gastroparesis disease processes and inform mechanisms of action of neuromodulation therapy in addressing disruption of the brain-gut axis. Expected outcomes include development of a novel, non-invasive, safe and efficacious therapy for diabetic gastroparesis. These efforts will inform future true efficacy testing in an NIH Stage 2 trial using multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) design.

Read the detailed description

The proposed TNM-DGp trial is a pilot sham-controlled RCT to test the preliminary efficacy of ThorS-MagNT to improve DGp symptom severity and related quality of life. The investigators will also explore mechanisms of change and potential moderators of treatment outcome after ThorS-MagNT. The trial will be conducted over the 3-year pilot RO1.

Randomization: Using the magnitude of change in DGp symptom severity in the initial pilot trial, the investigators will randomize 48 patients in a 1:1:1 ratio to either receive sham, 1 Hz, or 10 Hz ThorS-MagNT over a 5-day period. The investigators will use blocked randomization with a block size ranging from 3 to 6 and known only to the biostatistician. The biostatistician will create the randomization sequence for all participants prior to any pre-treatment assessments. Treatment allocation will be made available to the interventionists only after baseline assessments, determination of eligibility, and informed consent.

Participants (N = 48): The investigators will recruit TNM-DGp trial participants at Augusta University. Approximately 2-3 DGp patients are seen per week at our center. To further facilitate recruitment, advertisements will be put into newsletters of both hospitals, local newspaper, and radio. Flyers will be placed in GI, family medicine, internal medicine, and endocrine clinics, and locoregional colleagues will be emailed. Forty-eight adult, DGp outpatients with refractory symptoms of greater than 6 months and moderate-severe disease (total American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptoms Index (ANMS GCSI) score greater than or equal to 2.0) will be recruited. Participants will be screened by phone to assess eligibility and interest in the study. Those who are eligible and interested in the study will complete informed consent.

Sample size justification: Assuming a responder rate of 30% for the sham arm, we consider a 1:1:1 balanced design for the sham, 1 Hz, and 10 Hz treatment arms, respectively. For the primary clinical outcome, the difference is assessed between sham and the combined treatment arm (1 Hz and 10 Hz), giving a 1:2 allocation. A sample size of 14 per treatment arm is required to observe a responder rate of 65% for the combined treatment arm with 80% power at 5% significance level. This sample size is sufficient to observe a 1-point improvement in the PAGI-QOL score (secondary clinical outcome) with 85% power. Accounting for a 15% dropout in the study, the investigators will need 16 subjects per treatment arm. For the proposed interim analysis at 33% and 66% recruitment, the investigators will have enough sample size (5 and 10 per treatment arm respectively) to achieve 80% power if the responder rate in the treatment arms is 90% and 77% respectively.

Clinical outcome (Aim 1) measures: The primary clinical outcome will be responder rate with responder defined as ≥30% improvement in gastroparesis symptom severity by the Week 4 ANMS total GCSI-DD compared to baseline. The total ANMS GCSI-DD score includes a 7-day average of 5 gastroparesis-specific items. A greater than 30% reduction in total symptom score is defined as a responder by the FDA User Manual for the ANMS GSCI-DD. Secondary clinical outcome will be improvement in quality of life, defined by a 1-point improvement in Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL). ANMS GCSI-DD will be collected monthly for one year after treatment. Duration of response will be defined as time to loss of response (<30% improvement over baseline total ANMS GCSI-DD score).

Exploratory mechanisms of change (Aim 2) assessments: The investigators will evaluate potential mechanisms of change pre- to post-treatment including change in activity levels and functional connectivity to surrounding brain regions of the insula by dipolar source localization and fMRI; sensation by quantitative sensory testing (QST) and satiety test; autonomic function testing; and and gastric emptying breath tests. Exploratory moderators of outcome measures. The investigators will characterize patients at pre-treatment by various clinical variables including: age, gender, type of diabetes (type 1 vs type 2), glycemic control (Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)), hip/waist circumference, Body Mass Index (BMI), Gastrointestinal-specific anxiety (Visceral Sensitivity Index; (VSI)), interoceptive awareness (Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, (MAIA)), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and presence of depression or anxiety (by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; (HADS)). The investigators will explore these characteristics as potential moderators of treatment outcome (associated with change in total ANMS GSCI-DD and outcome questionnaire scores).

Being tested
2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 1Hz, 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 10Hz, Sham Stimulations

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 1HzDevice

    The inferior angles of the scapula will serve as landmarks for the T7 level. A mapping procedure is performed with subject in the seated position using a single-pulse stimulation circular 90- mm coil to determine the location and minimum intensity of stimulation left and right of the T7 spinous process required to achieve a motor evoked response (MEP) of 50 μV with 50% of trials (resting motor threshold) in the upper rectus abdominis or external oblique muscles. The intensity for ThorS-MagNT is set at 150% above motor threshold. 1 Hz ThorS-MagNT, one of 4 total trains is delivered over 5 minutes with 3-min rest intervals on both right and left sides (total 1200 pulses/side).

  • 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 10HzDevice

    The inferior angles of the scapula will serve as landmarks for the T7 level. A mapping procedure is performed with subject in the seated position using a single-pulse stimulation circular 90- mm coil to determine the location and minimum intensity of stimulation left and right of the T7 spinous process required to achieve a motor evoked response (MEP) of 50 μV with 50% of trials (resting motor threshold) in the upper rectus abdominis or external oblique muscles. The intensity for ThorS-MagNT is set at 150% above motor threshold. 10Hz ThorS-MagNT involves delivering one train of 100 pulses per minute with 50-second rest intervals over twelve minutes on both right and left sides (total 1200 pulses/side).

  • Sham StimulationsDevice

    The inferior angles of the scapula will serve as landmarks for the T7 level. A mapping procedure is performed with subject in the seated position using a single-pulse stimulation circular 90- mm coil to determine the location and minimum intensity of stimulation left and right of the T7 spinous process required to achieve a motor evoked response (MEP) of 50 μV with 50% of trials (resting motor threshold) in the upper rectus abdominis or external oblique muscles. The intensity for ThorS-MagNT is set at 150% above motor threshold. Sham stimulations, one of 4 total trains is delivered over 5 minutes with 3-min rest intervals on both right and left sides (total 1200 pulses/side).

Study groups in NCT05273788
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Hz ArmActive comparatorThorS-MagNT treatment intervention with 2400 total stimulations at 1Hz with the magnetic coil.
Receives: Device: 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 1Hz
10Hz ArmActive comparatorThorS-MagNT treatment intervention with 2400 total stimulations at 10Hz with the magnetic coil.
Receives: Device: 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 10Hz
Sham ArmSham comparatorSham intervention with 2400 total sham stimulations with the magnetic coil.
Receives: Device: Sham Stimulations

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference in ANMS GCSI-DD Score

    Change in American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary (ANMS GCSI-DD) total score from Baseline to Week 4. The ANMS GCSI-DD is a patient-reported measure of gastroparesis symptom severity based on 5 gastroparesis-specific symptom items averaged over a 7-day period. Total scores range from 0 to 5, where higher scores indicate more severe gastroparesis symptoms and lower scores indicate less severe symptoms. Difference was calculated as Baseline score minus Week 4 score, such that larger positive values indicate greater improvement in symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in PAGI-QOL Score

    Change in Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders Quality of Life (PAGI-QOL) total score from Baseline to Week 4. PAGI-QOL is a patient-reported measure of quality of life related to upper gastrointestinal disorders. Scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating better quality of life and lower scores indicating worse quality of life. Change was calculated as Week 4 score minus Baseline score, such that positive values indicate improvement in quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2022
  2. Study start27 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05273788
Sponsor's protocol ID
1870454
Other IDs
Pro00146242
Acronym
TNM-DGp
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
2 Mar 2022
Last updated
14 Sep 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 1Hz and 2400 ThorS-MagNT Stimulations at 10Hz in people with Diabetic Gastroparesis, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Sep 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Difference in ANMS GCSI-DD Score (time frame: Baseline and Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in