AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasal PolypsPhase 3ANCHOR-1NCT05274750

Efficacy and Safety of Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

A Phase 3 study testing Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in people with Nasal Polyps, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 105 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab (GSK3511294) in participants with Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nasal Polyps
What is being tested?
Depemokimab (GSK3511294)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
276 participants
Where
105 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
22 Apr 2022to 27 Aug 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with 18 years of age and older inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Endoscopic bilateral NP score of at least 5 out of a maximum score of 8 (with a minimum score of 2 in each nasal cavity) assessed by the investigator.
  • Participants who have had at least one of the following at Visit 1: Previous nasal surgery for the removal of NP; have used at least three consecutive days of systemic corticosteroids in the previous 2 years for the treatment of NP; medically unsuitable or intolerant to systemic corticosteroid.
  • Participants (except for those in Japan) must be on daily treatment with intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) (including intranasal liquid steroid wash/douching) for at least the 8 weeks immediately prior to screening.
  • Participants presenting with severe NP symptoms defined as symptoms of nasal congestion/blockade/obstruction with moderate or severe severity and loss of smell or rhinorrhea (runny nose) based on clinical assessment by the investigator.
  • Presence of symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis as described by at least 2 different symptoms for at least 12 weeks prior to Visit 1, one of which should be either nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip), plus facial pain/pressure and/or reduction or loss of smell.
  • Male or eligible female participants.

Who cannot join

  • As a result of medical interview, physical examination, or screening investigation the physician responsible considers the participant unfit for the study.
  • Cystic fibrosis.
  • Antrochoanal polyps.
  • Nasal cavity tumor (malignant or benign).
  • Fungal rhinosinusitis.
  • Severe nasal septal deviation occluding one nostril preventing full assessment of nasal polyps in both nostrils
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Participants who had a sino-nasal or sinus surgery changing the lateral wall structure of the nose making impossible the evaluation of nasal polyp score.
  • Acute sinusitis or upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) at screening or in 2 weeks prior to screening.
  • Ongoing rhinitis medicamentosa (rebound or chemical induced rhinitis).
  • Participants who have had an asthma exacerbation requiring admission to hospital within 4 weeks of screening.
  • Participants who have undergone any intranasal and/or sinus surgery (for example [e.g.], polypectomy, balloon dilatation or nasal stent insertion) within 6 months prior to Visit 1; nasal biopsy prior to Visit 1 for diagnostic purposes only is excepted.
  • Participants where NP surgery is contraindicated in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Participants with other conditions that could lead to elevated eosinophils such as hyper-eosinophilic syndromes including (but not limited to) Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) (formerly known as Churg-Strauss Syndrome) or Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
  • Participants with a known, pre-existing parasitic infestation within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  • A known immunodeficiency (e.g. human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]), other than that explained by the use of corticosteroids (CSs) taken as therapy for asthma.
  • A current malignancy or previous history of cancer in remission for less than 12 months prior to screening.
  • Liver Disease: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 times Upper limit of normal (ULN); Total bilirubin >1.5 times ULN (isolated bilirubin >1.5 times ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin less than [<]35 percent [%]); Cirrhosis or current unstable liver or biliary disease per investigator assessment defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice.
  • Participants who have known, pre-existing, clinically significant cardiac, endocrine, autoimmune, metabolic, neurological, renal, gastrointestinal, hepatic, hematological or any other system abnormalities that are uncontrolled with standard treatment.
  • Participants with current diagnosis of vasculitis. Participants with high clinical suspicion of vasculitis at screening will be evaluated and current vasculitis must be excluded prior to enrollment.
  • Hypersensitivity: Participants with allergy/intolerance to the excipients of depemokimab (GSK3511294) in a monoclonal antibody, or biologic.
  • Participants that, according to the investigator's medical judgment, are likely to have active Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection must be excluded. Participants with known COVID-19 positive contacts within the past 14 days must be excluded for at least 14 days following the exposure during which the participant should remain symptom-free. Reported smell/ taste complications from COVID-19 must be used as exclusion.
  • Participants that have been exposed to ionizing radiation in excess of 10 millisievert (mSv) above background over the previous 3-year period as a result of occupational exposure or previous participation in research studies.
  • Previously participated in any study with mepolizumab, reslizumab, or benralizumab and received study intervention (including placebo) within 12 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating or are planning on becoming pregnant during the study.

Trial locations and contacts

105 sites in 11 countries.

105 sites in 11 countries

United States26 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18017

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02135

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buena Park, California, 90621

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75390-9035

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gainesville, Florida, 32605

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40509

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90006

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40205

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Meridian, Idaho, 83642

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Meridian, Idaho, 83706

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02914

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Richmond, Virginia, 23235

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Diego, California, 91942

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Stanford, California, 94304

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tamarac, Florida, 33321

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Temecula, California, 92592

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85704

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137

Other trials in United States

Japan15 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ehime, 790-0024

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ehime, 798-8510

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukui, 910-1193

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukuoka, 806-8501

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ishikawa, 920-0293

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 231-8682

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 250-8558

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kumamoto, 860-0814

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kyoto, 600-8216

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mie, 514-8507

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nagano, 392-8510

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 560-0082

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 570-8507

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 160-0023

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 173-0026

Other trials in Japan

China11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100191

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100730

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dongguan, 523326

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jingzhou, 434020

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nanchang, 330006

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Qingdao, 266061

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shanghai, 200065

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Taiyuan, 300201

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wenzhou, 325000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wuhan, 430022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yantai, 264000

Other trials in China

France11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Créteil, 94010

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Grenoble, 38043

  • GSK Investigational Site

    La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925

  • GSK Investigational Site

    La Rochelle, 17019

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Marseille, 13005

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Montpellier, 34295

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nantes, 44093

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pontoise, 95300

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toulouse, 31059

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Valenciennes, 59322

Other trials in France

Argentina10 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buenos Aires, 1023

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buenos Aires, C1425BEN

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buenos Aires, C1426ABP

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ciudad Autonoma de Bueno, C1121ABE

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Florida, B1602DOH

  • GSK Investigational Site

    La Plata, 1900

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mar del Plata, 7600

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mendoza, 5500

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mendoza, M5500CCG

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rosario, S2000DBS

Other trials in Argentina

Germany10 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bonn, 53127

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dortmund, 44137

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dresden, 01139

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dresden, 01307

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Düsseldorf, 40549

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Marburg, 35043

  • GSK Investigational Site

    München, 81377

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Münster, 48149

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wiesbaden, 65183

Other trials in Germany

Spain9 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Barcelona, 08022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jerez de la Frontera, 11407

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madrid, 28034

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madrid, 28040

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pamplona, 31008

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seville, 41009

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Valladolid, 47005

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zaragoza, 50009

Other trials in Spain

Canada7 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2

  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4V2

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2V 2K1

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1E4

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4W2

Other trials in Canada

United Kingdom3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Great Yarmouth, NR31 6LA

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Stevenage, SG1 4AB

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wigan, WN1 2NN

Other trials in United Kingdom

Netherlands2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leiden, 2353 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

Belgium1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Phase III Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 100 mg SC Depemokimab in Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) - ANCHOR-1 (depemokimAb iN CHrOnic Rhinosinusitis)

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab (GSK3511294) in participants with Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

Conditions
Nasal Polyps
Being tested
Depemokimab (GSK3511294), Placebo
Keywords
Depemokimab, GSK3511294, Chronic rhinosinusitis, Verbal response scale, Asthma Control Questionnaire, Lund Mackay computed tomography, Nasal polyps score, Nasal endoscopy
Medical subject headings
Nasal Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Depemokimab (GSK3511294)Biological

    Depemokimab (GSK3511294) was administered using a pre- filled syringe.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo was administered as normal saline using a pre-filled syringe.

Study groups in NCT05274750
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DepemokimabExperimentalParticipants received a 100 milligram (mg) dose of depemokimab SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52 weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) standard of care (SOC) treatment throughout the study.
Receives: Biological: Depemokimab (GSK3511294)
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants received placebo SC injection once every 26 weeks (week 0 and week 26) over a treatment period of 52 weeks. Participants were to be maintained on their existing baseline maintenance for CRSwNP SOC treatment throughout the study.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps (NP) Score at Week 52 (Centrally Read)

    Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores [0 to 4] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score Using Verbal Response Scale From Week 49 Through to Week 52

    This endpoint evaluated the change from baseline in the mean nasal obstruction score using a Verbal Response Scale (VRS) from Week 49 through to Week 52. Participants used a VRS to rate nasal obstruction severity, with scores averaged over the specified period to assess treatment impact on nasal obstruction symptoms. Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating worse status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of electronic diary (eDiary) data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Rhinorrhea (Runny Nose) Using Verbal Response Scale From Week 49 Through to Week 52

    Participants were asked to indicate the severity of rhinorrhea (runny nose) at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicate the worse status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean Symptom Score for Loss of Smell Using Verbal Response Scale From Week 49 Through to Week 52

    Participants were asked to indicate the severity of loss of smell at their worst over the last 24 hours using a 4-point VRS, with options of no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms. This was scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicates worse status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data are presented for Weeks 49-52. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 49 to Week 52

  3. Change From Baseline in Lund Mackay Computerized Tomography (CT) Score at Week 52

    The LMK CT scoring system is based on CT imaging of the sinuses with points given for degree of opacification: 0 =normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. These points were applied to the maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, frontal sinus on each side (right and left). The osteomeatal complex (OC) is graded as 0 = not occluded, or 2 = occluded. The range for the total LMK CT score is therefore 0 (normal) to 24 (total opacification) when summed across both sides with higher scores indicating more severe disease. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  4. Change From Baseline in Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 Total Score at Week 52

    Sino-nasal outcome test-22 is a 22-item measure of disease specific health related quality of life (HRQoL). Participants were asked to rate the severity of their condition on each of the 22 items over the previous 2 weeks using a 6-point rating scale of 0-5 including: 0 = Not present/no problem; 1 = Very mild problem; 2 = Mild or slight problem; 3 = Moderate problem; 4 = Severe problem; 5 = Problem as "bad as it can be". The scores for each question were summed up to derive the total score range for the SNOT-22 was from 0 (high quality of life) to 110 (worst quality of life), where higher scores indicate worse quality of life. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  5. Change From Baseline in Mean Nasal Obstruction Score (Verbal Response Scale) From Week 21 Through to Week 24

    Participants were asked to indicate the severity of nasal obstruction at its worst over the previous 24 hours using a 4-point VRS. The response options were no symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, and severe symptoms, scored on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). Higher scores indicate more severe status. The average of daily scores in 4-weekly intervals were calculated and data are presented for Weeks 21-24. Baseline was defined as the average score from 28 days of eDiary data collected prior to Day 1. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and from Week 21 to Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps Score at Week 26

    Total endoscopic nasal polyps (NP) score evaluated the size and extent of nasal polyps via endoscopy. The assessments were performed by central video image recordings of nasal endoscopy. The right and left nostrils were scored from 0 to 4 (0 = No polyps; 1 = Small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha; 2 = Polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = Large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha; and 4 = Large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior meatus). The scores were graded based on NP size, recorded as sum of the right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), calculated by summing the scores [0 to 4] in each nostril; with higher scores indicating worse status. Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 26

  7. Percentage of Participants Requiring First Nasal Surgery (Actual or Entry on Waiting List) or Disease-Modulating Medication for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) Up to Week 52

    Nasal polyp surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue from the nasal cavity (for example polypectomy). Time to first nasal polyp surgery (actual or entry on waiting list) or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP up to Week 52 was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). The percentage of participants with nasal surgery or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  8. Percentage of Participants Requiring First Nasal Surgery (Actual) or Disease-Modulating Medication for CRSwNP up to Week 52

    Nasal polyp surgery is defined as any procedure involving instruments resulting in incision and removal of tissue from the nasal cavity (for example polypectomy).Time to first nasal polyp surgery (actual) or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP up to week 52 was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). The percentage of participants with nasal surgery or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP and corresponding 95% CI have been presented, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  9. Percentage of Participants Requiring at Least One Course of Systemic Corticosteroids or Disease-Modulating Medication for CRSwNP or Nasal Surgery (Actual) During the Week 52 Treatment Period

    The percentage of participants requiring at least 1 course of systemic corticosteroids (CS) or disease-modulating medication for CRSwNP or nasal surgery (actual) during the Week 52 treatment period was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). Percentage of participants with nasal surgery or course of systemic CS for CRSwNP have been presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 52

  10. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) Score at Week 52

    The ACQ-5 is a five-item questionnaire designed to be self-completed by the participants to assess the most common asthma symptoms. The 5 questions enquired to recall how their asthma had been during the previous week and to respond about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms (nocturnal awakening, waking in the morning, activity limitation, shortness of breath and wheezing). The overall ACQ-5 response option is the mean score of all 5 questions representing 0 with no impairment/limitation and 6 as total impairment/ limitation. Higher scores indicated more limitations and lower scores with better asthma control. Impact on asthma control in the subgroup of participants with an ACQ-5 score greater than 0.75 (indicating partially or not well-controlled) at baseline was assessed in a pre-specified pooled analysis across replicate studies 217095 (NCT05274750) and 218079 (NCT05281523). Baseline was defined as Day 1 value. Change from Baseline = Post-baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2022
  2. Study start22 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion27 Aug 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will receive either depemokimab (GSK3511294) or placebo during the study.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
276 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05274750
Sponsor's protocol ID
217095
Other IDs
2021-005037-16
Acronym
ANCHOR-1
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
2 Mar 2022
Last updated
3 Dec 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to anonymized individual patient-level data (IPD) and related study documents of the eligible studies via the Data Sharing Portal. Details on GSK's data sharing criteria can be found at: https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/innovation/trials/data-transparency

Publications

  • Gevaert P, Cornet M, Mullol J, De Corso E, Keles Turel N, Desrosiers M, et al. . ANCHOR-1/-2 primary data including pooled analysis ms. Lancet. PMID: 40037388 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00197-7

  • Jackson DJ, Bourdin A, Blackorby A, Leslie A, Vichiendilokkul A, Howarth P, Karkoszka N, Fujieda S, Cornet M. Safety and Tolerability of Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Patients with Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Pooled Results from SWIFT-1/-2 and ANCHOR-1/-2. Adv Ther. 2026 Feb;43(2):880-897. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03457-4. Epub 2025 Dec 29.

    PubMed 41461999
  • Gevaert P, Desrosiers M, Cornet M, Mullol J, De Corso E, Keles Turel N, Maspero J, Fujieda S, Zhang L, Sousa AR, Woods SJ, Davis AM, Schalkwijk S, Edwards D, Ranganathan P, Follows R, Marshall C, Han JK; ANCHOR-1 and ANCHOR-2 trial investigators. Efficacy and safety of twice per year depemokimab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (ANCHOR-1 and ANCHOR-2): phase 3, randomised, double-blind, parallel trials. Lancet. 2025 Mar 15;405(10482):911-926. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00197-7. Epub 2025 Mar 1.

    PubMed 40037388

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Depemokimab (GSK3511294) in people with Nasal Polyps, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 105 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 105 sites in United States, Japan, China, France, Argentina and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Nasal Polyps (NP) Score at Week 52 (Centrally Read) (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05274750, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in