StrokeEarly Phase 1NCT05277389
New Tool to Enhance Post-stroke Upper Extremity Disability
A Early Phase 1 study testing START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy in people with Stroke, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have a stroke, more disabled at 3 months, and less likely to be independently ambulatory. Individuals with low SES struggle to adhere to physician guidelines because of 1) increased disability leaves patients ineligible or unable to tolerate therapy… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2022to 15 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >18 years old
- Capacity to provide informed consent
- Cerebral stroke at least 6 months prior to testing
- Presence of upper extremity impairment associated with stroke
- Corrected pure tone threshold (octave frequencies 250- 4000 Hz) norms for their age and gender27,28 NOTE: Audiometry data will be collected for all participants by lab personnel trained by an audiologist in a sound-attenuated booth. We expect that ~30% of participants will use hearing aids; we will not exclude these individuals but rather include hearing aid use as a covariate in analyses.
Who cannot join
- Severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. uncontrolled cardiorespiratory impairment)
- Acute/painful condition/injury of upper extremity/spine that interfere with ability to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Post-stroke Upper-extremity Disability Through the Development of an Accessible, New Tool
Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have a stroke, more disabled at 3 months, and less likely to be independently ambulatory. Individuals with low SES struggle to adhere to physician guidelines because of 1) increased disability leaves patients ineligible or unable to tolerate therapy, and 2) poor access to quality care i.e., lack of transportation to therapy. To reduce post-stroke disparity in low SES groups, society must invest in development of novel tools that make therapy more accessible. For the past 5 years, the PI has been developing Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START), a tele-enabled, low-cost treatment to improve upper-extremity therapy outcomes in individuals with stroke - in particular individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus (via headphones) which increases the intensity of practice, particularly in severe patient populations. START is adjuvant, meaning it does not replace clinical practice but instead enhances current evidence-based treatments. Objective: the investigators seek to determine if START can be used to enhance functionally relevant movement of the upper extremity. Preliminary data: Individuals with severe-to-moderate disability from a stroke completed a remotely delivered, 3-day training of object manipulation with START. Box and Blocks, which was targeted during training, demonstrated a large increase under START (+47.1%) compared to Control (+3.3%). Modified functional reach was also increased under START (+8.9%) compared to Control (+1.1%). Impairment also decreased under START (Upper-Extremity-Fugl-Meyer: +8.6%) resulting in subject-reported increase in arm function both in quantity (Motor Activity Log: +26.2%) and quality (+20.2%). These results indicate that START can be deployed remotely and may prove a valuable, adjuvant tool to enhance functional upper extremity movement. The investigators propose to perform a Phase 1 clinical trial on a larger cohort of 58 subjects, with a longer, 5-day training with the goal of establishing that START can 1) enhance functional movement of the upper extremity and 2) generate sustainable changes that impact quality of life. Impact: This proposal is significant because it tests a tool that has the potential to directly target the causes leading to disparity of care for individuals with low SES. A third (34%) of 6.5 million people in the U.S. with stroke are on Medicaid or uninsured. Our best evidence-based therapies (e.g., high-intensity, CIMT) and our emerging rehabilitation technologies (e.g., TMS, robotics) are inaccessible to our minority and low SES populations. START addresses disparity because it 1) targets individuals with severe disability, which disproportionally affects low SES and minority groups, and 2) is tele-enabled eliminating transportation which 60% of individuals with low SES report as a barrier to care. If successful, this study will set the stage for larger trials to establish 1) the effectiveness of START to be incorporated into traditional therapy and as well as patient compliance, adherence, and tolerance - particularly in low SES groups.
Read the detailed description
Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have a stroke and more likely to have severe upper extremity dysfunction following that stroke. Patients from low SES backgrounds receive less out-patient care, are discharged more quickly, and are less likely to receive evidence-based, guideline recommended care. The mechanisms underlying disparity in treatment are multifaceted but a crucial contributor is individuals with low SES struggle to adhere to clinician guidelines because of 1) poor access to quality care - 60% of individuals with low SES report lack of transportation as a barrier to care, 2) increased severity requires high-intensity/ high-dose therapy which is not fully covered by traditional copay models or Medicaid/Medicare which have caps on therapy costs. To reduce post-stroke disparity in low SES groups, society needs to invest in the development of novel tools that make therapy more accessible or society runs the risk of furthering the inequities that leave our poor and minority populations unable to participate in daily life and return to work.
The PI has been developing Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START), a tele-enabled, low-cost treatment to improve therapy outcomes in individuals with stroke - in particular individuals with severe stroke. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus (via headphones) administered in conjunction with traditional therapy. Distinct from other auditory treatments (e.g. metronome), START represents endogenous activation of the cortico-reticular system that increases the intensity of practice leading to faster therapy outcomes, particularly in severe stroke. START increases the intensity of muscle activity i.e., more frequent activity onset, larger amplitude (2-3-fold higher than maximum voluntary capacity), and faster onsets. START is adjuvant, meaning it does not replace clinical practice but instead enhances current evidence-based treatments. As START can be administered safely with a cellphone and headphones (often already available to patients), patients can continue to practice at home safely without therapist supervision.
OBJECTIVE: Determine if START can be used to enhance functionally relevant movement of the upper extremity. In our preliminary data, individuals with severe-to-moderate disability from a stroke completed a remotely delivered, 3-day training with START. Box and Blocks had a large increase under START (+47.1%) compared to Control (+3.3%). The Modified Functional Reach Test also increased under START (+8.9%) compared to Control (+1.1%). Impairment decreased under START (Upper-Extremity-Fugl-Meyer: +8.6%) resulting in subject-reported increase in arm function both in quantity (Motor Activity Log: +26.2%) and quality (+20.2%).
These results indicate that START can be deployed remotely and may prove a valuable, adjuvant tool to enhance functional upper extremity movement. The investigators propose to perform a Phase 1 clinical trial on a larger cohort of 58 subjects, with a longer, 5-day training, and more rigorous assessment of function with the goal of establishing that START can 1) enhance functional movement of the upper extremity and 2) generate sustainable changes that impact quality of life.
The investigation team is uniquely positioned to pursue these objective. The team made up experts in START, upper-extremity post-stroke disability, engineering including app development (Claire Honeycutt, PhD, PI), physical therapy, high-intensity training, focus in severe stroke (Pamela Bosch, DPT, PhD, Co-I), occupational therapy, remote delivery/telehealth, rater fidelity, randomized controlled trials (Veronica Rowe, PhD, OTR/L, Co-I). Finally, a data analytics/statistics consultant (Venn Ravichandran, PhD). Together, the investigators will explore the following aims.
Aim 1: To establish that START can increase functional paretic limb usage, the investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of START on therapy outcomes. The investigators will perform a stratified, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with individuals with severe-moderate stroke (UEFM 0-42/66; MAS 0-4/4) - with recruitment focused on individuals with low SES. Following baseline assessment, subjects will receive training consisting of 5 consecutive days of training focusing on object manipulation. Subjects will either receive therapy with START or without (Control). Outcome measures will be: % change in paretic arm impairment (Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer: FMA-UE), spasticity (modified Ashworth: MA \& modified Tradieu Scales: MTS), function (Action Research Arm Test: ARAT), patient reported Quality of life (stroke impact scale: SIS), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale: mRS), and arm function (Motor Activity Log: MAL). H1: Training with START will increase paretic arm function (ARAT) and self-reported arm function (MAL) compared to training without START.
Aim 2: To establish that START generates sustainable functional changes that impact quality of life, the investigators will re-assess upper-extremity function and self-reported quality of life at one-month. All outcome measures (FMA-UE, MA, MTS, ARAT, SIS, mRS, MAL) will be re-administered one-month post training. H2: START gains will be retained more than Control and retention will be associated with higher quality of life measures (e.g., SIS, MAL) one-month post-START training.
IMPACT: This proposal is significant because it tests a tool that has the potential to directly target the causes leading to disparity of care for individuals with low SES. A third (34%) of 6.5 million people in the U.S. with stroke are on Medicaid or uninsured. Our best evidence-based therapies (e.g., high-intensity, CIMT) and our emerging rehabilitation technologies (e.g., TMS, robotics) are inaccessible to our minority and low SES populations. START addresses disparity because it 1) targets individuals with severe disability, which disproportionally affects low SES and minority groups, and 2) is tele-enabled eliminating transportation. If successful, this study will set the stage for larger trials to establish 1) the effectiveness of START to be incorporated into traditional therapy and as well as patient compliance, adherence, and tolerance - particularly in low SES groups.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy, Sham Control
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation TherapyOther
Application of startling acoustic stimuli during practice of movement task
Sham ControlOther
Practice of Movement task without START
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Sham comparator | Individuals in this group will practice object manipulation tasks without the START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) intervention Receives: Other: Sham Control |
| START | Experimental | Individuals in this group with practice object manipulation tasks with the START condition (startling acoustic stimuli applied during 33% of trials) Receives: Other: START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Total Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.
Measured: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
Retention in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.
Measured: Comparing baseline to one-month post (1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
Change in Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores mean more use. Total score averages task scores (0-5). Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale. MAL was taken at baseline and then at one-month post intervention.
Measured: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
Retention in Motor Activity Log (MAL)
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use (AOU) subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores indicate more use. The total score sums the 30 AOU task scores, ranging from 0 to 150. Units on a scale.
Measured: Retention of measure comparing baseline to one-month
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) Baseline to Post-intervention
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) evaluates motor function post-stroke via 33 tasks. Total score (0-66) sums subscales: shoulder/arm (0-36), wrist/hand (0-24), coordination (0-6). Higher scores indicate better function. Units on a scale. FMA-UE was taken at baseline and then at one-month post intervention.
Measured: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
Retention of Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer From End Training to One-month Post
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) evaluates motor function post-stroke via 33 tasks. Total score (0-66) sums subscales: shoulder/arm (0-36), wrist/hand (0-24), coordination (0-6). Higher scores indicate better function. Units on a scale.
Measured: Retention of measure comparing baseline to one-month post training
Change in Stroke Impact Scale From Baseline to Post-intervention
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) measures quality of life and functional recovery post-stroke across 8 subscales: strength (0-100), hand function (0-100), mobility (0-100), ADL (0-100), emotion (0-100), memory (0-100), communication (0-100), participation (0-100). Each subscale score is scaled to 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total score (0-100) averages the subscale scores. Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale.
Measured: Change from baseline to post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
Retention of Stroke Impact Scale - Post-training to One-month Post
The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) measures quality of life and functional recovery post-stroke across 8 subscales: strength (0-100), hand function (0-100), mobility (0-100), ADL (0-100), emotion (0-100), memory (0-100), communication (0-100), participation (0-100). Each subscale score is scaled to 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total score (0-100) averages the subscale scores. Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale.
Measured: Change from baseline to one-month post training
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2022
- Study start20 Dec 2022
- Primary completion15 Dec 2023
- Study completion15 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Claire Honeycutt, Arizona State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05277389
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00002440
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Addressing Socioeconomic Disparities in Post-stroke Upper-extremity Disability Through the Development of an Accessible, New Tool
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05277389
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00002440
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Arizona State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have a stroke, more disabled at 3 months, and less likely to be independently ambulatory. Individuals with low SES struggle to adhere to physician guidelines because of 1) increased disability leaves patients ineligible or unable to tolerate therapy, and 2) poor access to quality care i.e., lack of transportation to therapy. To reduce post-stroke disparity in low SES groups, society must invest in development of novel tools that make therapy more accessible. For the past 5 years, the PI has been developing Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START), a tele-enabled, low-cost treatment to improve upper-extremity therapy outcomes in individuals with stroke - in particular individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus (via headphones) which increases the intensity of practice, particularly in severe patient populations. START is adjuvant, meaning it does not replace clinical practice but instead enhances current evidence-based treatments. Objective: the investigators seek to determine if START can be used to enhance functionally relevant movement of the upper extremity. Preliminary data: Individuals with severe-to-moderate disability from a stroke completed a remotely delivered, 3-day training of object manipulation with START. Box and Blocks, which was targeted during training, demonstrated a large increase under START (+47.1%) compared to Control (+3.3%). Modified functional reach was also increased under START (+8.9%) compared to Control (+1.1%). Impairment also decreased under START (Upper-Extremity-Fugl-Meyer: +8.6%) resulting in subject-reported increase in arm function both in quantity (Motor Activity Log: +26.2%) and quality (+20.2%). These results indicate that START can be deployed remotely and may prove a valuable, adjuvant tool to enhance functional upper extremity movement. The investigators propose to perform a Phase 1 clinical trial on a larger cohort of 58 subjects, with a longer, 5-day training with the goal of establishing that START can 1) enhance functional movement of the upper extremity and 2) generate sustainable changes that impact quality of life. Impact: This proposal is significant because it tests a tool that has the potential to directly target the causes leading to disparity of care for individuals with low SES. A third (34%) of 6.5 million people in the U.S. with stroke are on Medicaid or uninsured. Our best evidence-based therapies (e.g., high-intensity, CIMT) and our emerging rehabilitation technologies (e.g., TMS, robotics) are inaccessible to our minority and low SES populations. START addresses disparity because it 1) targets individuals with severe disability, which disproportionally affects low SES and minority groups, and 2) is tele-enabled eliminating transportation which 60% of individuals with low SES report as a barrier to care. If successful, this study will set the stage for larger trials to establish 1) the effectiveness of START to be incorporated into traditional therapy and as well as patient compliance, adherence, and tolerance - particularly in low SES groups.
Detailed description
Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to have a stroke and more likely to have severe upper extremity dysfunction following that stroke. Patients from low SES backgrounds receive less out-patient care, are discharged more quickly, and are less likely to receive evidence-based, guideline recommended care. The mechanisms underlying disparity in treatment are multifaceted but a crucial contributor is individuals with low SES struggle to adhere to clinician guidelines because of 1) poor access to quality care - 60% of individuals with low SES report lack of transportation as a barrier to care, 2) increased severity requires high-intensity/ high-dose therapy which is not fully covered by traditional copay models or Medicaid/Medicare which have caps on therapy costs. To reduce post-stroke disparity in low SES groups, society needs to invest in the development of novel tools that make therapy more accessible or society runs the risk of furthering the inequities that leave our poor and minority populations unable to participate in daily life and return to work.
The PI has been developing Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START), a tele-enabled, low-cost treatment to improve therapy outcomes in individuals with stroke - in particular individuals with severe stroke. START is the application of a startling, acoustic stimulus (via headphones) administered in conjunction with traditional therapy. Distinct from other auditory treatments (e.g. metronome), START represents endogenous activation of the cortico-reticular system that increases the intensity of practice leading to faster therapy outcomes, particularly in severe stroke. START increases the intensity of muscle activity i.e., more frequent activity onset, larger amplitude (2-3-fold higher than maximum voluntary capacity), and faster onsets. START is adjuvant, meaning it does not replace clinical practice but instead enhances current evidence-based treatments. As START can be administered safely with a cellphone and headphones (often already available to patients), patients can continue to practice at home safely without therapist supervision.
OBJECTIVE: Determine if START can be used to enhance functionally relevant movement of the upper extremity. In our preliminary data, individuals with severe-to-moderate disability from a stroke completed a remotely delivered, 3-day training with START. Box and Blocks had a large increase under START (+47.1%) compared to Control (+3.3%). The Modified Functional Reach Test also increased under START (+8.9%) compared to Control (+1.1%). Impairment decreased under START (Upper-Extremity-Fugl-Meyer: +8.6%) resulting in subject-reported increase in arm function both in quantity (Motor Activity Log: +26.2%) and quality (+20.2%).
These results indicate that START can be deployed remotely and may prove a valuable, adjuvant tool to enhance functional upper extremity movement. The investigators propose to perform a Phase 1 clinical trial on a larger cohort of 58 subjects, with a longer, 5-day training, and more rigorous assessment of function with the goal of establishing that START can 1) enhance functional movement of the upper extremity and 2) generate sustainable changes that impact quality of life.
The investigation team is uniquely positioned to pursue these objective. The team made up experts in START, upper-extremity post-stroke disability, engineering including app development (Claire Honeycutt, PhD, PI), physical therapy, high-intensity training, focus in severe stroke (Pamela Bosch, DPT, PhD, Co-I), occupational therapy, remote delivery/telehealth, rater fidelity, randomized controlled trials (Veronica Rowe, PhD, OTR/L, Co-I). Finally, a data analytics/statistics consultant (Venn Ravichandran, PhD). Together, the investigators will explore the following aims.
Aim 1: To establish that START can increase functional paretic limb usage, the investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of START on therapy outcomes. The investigators will perform a stratified, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial with individuals with severe-moderate stroke (UEFM 0-42/66; MAS 0-4/4) - with recruitment focused on individuals with low SES. Following baseline assessment, subjects will receive training consisting of 5 consecutive days of training focusing on object manipulation. Subjects will either receive therapy with START or without (Control). Outcome measures will be: % change in paretic arm impairment (Upper-Extremity Fugl-Meyer: FMA-UE), spasticity (modified Ashworth: MA \& modified Tradieu Scales: MTS), function (Action Research Arm Test: ARAT), patient reported Quality of life (stroke impact scale: SIS), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale: mRS), and arm function (Motor Activity Log: MAL). H1: Training with START will increase paretic arm function (ARAT) and self-reported arm function (MAL) compared to training without START.
Aim 2: To establish that START generates sustainable functional changes that impact quality of life, the investigators will re-assess upper-extremity function and self-reported quality of life at one-month. All outcome measures (FMA-UE, MA, MTS, ARAT, SIS, mRS, MAL) will be re-administered one-month post training. H2: START gains will be retained more than Control and retention will be associated with higher quality of life measures (e.g., SIS, MAL) one-month post-START training.
IMPACT: This proposal is significant because it tests a tool that has the potential to directly target the causes leading to disparity of care for individuals with low SES. A third (34%) of 6.5 million people in the U.S. with stroke are on Medicaid or uninsured. Our best evidence-based therapies (e.g., high-intensity, CIMT) and our emerging rehabilitation technologies (e.g., TMS, robotics) are inaccessible to our minority and low SES populations. START addresses disparity because it 1) targets individuals with severe disability, which disproportionally affects low SES and minority groups, and 2) is tele-enabled eliminating transportation. If successful, this study will set the stage for larger trials to establish 1) the effectiveness of START to be incorporated into traditional therapy and as well as patient compliance, adherence, and tolerance - particularly in low SES groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Sham comparator | Other: Sham ControlIndividuals in this group will practice object manipulation tasks without the START (Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy) intervention |
| START | Experimental | Other: START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation TherapyIndividuals in this group with practice object manipulation tasks with the START condition (startling acoustic stimuli applied during 33% of trials) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- >18 years old
- Capacity to provide informed consent
- Cerebral stroke at least 6 months prior to testing
- Presence of upper extremity impairment associated with stroke
- Corrected pure tone threshold (octave frequencies 250- 4000 Hz) norms for their age and gender27,28 NOTE: Audiometry data will be collected for all participants by lab personnel trained by an audiologist in a sound-attenuated booth. We expect that ~30% of participants will use hearing aids; we will not exclude these individuals but rather include hearing aid use as a covariate in analyses.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Severe concurrent medical problems (e.g. uncontrolled cardiorespiratory impairment)
- Acute/painful condition/injury of upper extremity/spine that interfere with ability to participate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation TherapyApplication of startling acoustic stimuli during practice of movement task | Other | START |
| Sham ControlPractice of Movement task without START | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Total Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention
Time frame: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.
Retention in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time frame: Comparing baseline to one-month post (1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) assesses upper extremity function, specifically arm and hand motor abilities, in individuals with neurological conditions. The test evaluates grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement through 19 standardized tasks. Each task is scored from 0 (no movement) to 3 (normal movement), yielding four subscale scores (Grasp, Grip, Pinch, Gross Movement) that are summed to compute a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity function. Subscale ranges are: Grasp (0-18), Grip (0-12), Pinch (0-18), and Gross Movement (0-9). The outcome measure reports the change in the total ARAT score from baseline to post-intervention, with positive values reflecting improved function. Scores are reported as units on a scale.
Change in Motor Activity Log (MAL) Amount of Use Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention
Time frame: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores mean more use. Total score averages task scores (0-5). Change in total score is reported. Units on a scale. MAL was taken at baseline and then at one-month post intervention.
Retention in Motor Activity Log (MAL)
Time frame: Retention of measure comparing baseline to one-month
The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses arm use in daily activities post-stroke. The Amount of Use (AOU) subscale (0-5) rates 30 tasks; higher scores indicate more use. The total score sums the 30 AOU task scores, ranging from 0 to 150. Units on a scale.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (UEFM) Baseline to Post-intervention
Time frame: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
Retention of Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer From End Training to One-month Post
Time frame: Retention of measure comparing baseline to one-month post training
Change in Stroke Impact Scale From Baseline to Post-intervention
Time frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)
Retention of Stroke Impact Scale - Post-training to One-month Post
Time frame: Change from baseline to one-month post training
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
Delay AvoIding Primary Evaluation for ThRombectomy of Acute StrokE Patients With Large Vessel OCclusion in the Angiography SuiTe
Stroke, Acute
RecruitingPhase 4
Xeomin® and Gait Related Mobility After Stroke
Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
EEG Feedback-Based Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia
Ischemic Stroke, Post-stroke Dysphagia
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment in Moyamoya Disease and Moyamoya Syndrome
Moyamoya Disease, Moyamoya Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing START - Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy in people with Stroke, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Total Score From Baseline to Post-Intervention (time frame: Time from Baseline to Post-intervention (1 week intervention, 1 month post intervention - total 5 weeks time frame)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2025.