Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT05279417
ATI-450 Plus Methotrexate (MTX) Versus Placebo Plus MTX in Participants With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
A Phase 2 study testing ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID, Methotrexate and ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc. at 50 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This study evaluates ATI-450 plus MTX versus placebo plus MTX in participants with moderate to severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to MTX alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID, Methotrexate and ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 251 participants
- Where
- 50 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2022to 11 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Able to comprehend and be willing to sign the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved participant ICF prior to administration of any study-related procedures.
- Diagnosis of adult-onset RA as defined by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria.
- Have active moderate to severe RA at Screening.
- A minimum of 12 weeks on MTX with a stable MTX dose.
Who cannot join
- Current acute or chronic immunoinflammatory disease other than RA which may impact the course or assessment of RA.
- Uncontrolled non-immunoinflammatory disease that may place the participant at increased risk during the study or impact the interpretation of results (eg, previous malignancy, recurrent infection, previous venous thromboembolism).
- Participant has experience with > 2 biologics, > 1 JAK inhibitor, or a combination of 1 biologic experience and 1 JAK inhibitor.
- Currently receiving corticosteroids at doses > 10 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) or have been receiving an unstable dosing regimen of corticosteroids within 2 weeks of screening.
Trial locations and contacts
50 sites in 4 countries.
50 sites in 4 countries
Poland23 sites
Aclaris Investigational Site
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-351
Aclaris Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-297
Aclaris Investigational Site
Bialystok, 15-879
Aclaris Investigational Site
Dąbrówka, 62-069
Aclaris Investigational Site
Elblag, Warm.Maz., 82-300
Aclaris Investigational Site
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Mzowieckie, 05-825
Aclaris Investigational Site
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-282
Aclaris Investigational Site
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-002
Aclaris Investigational Site
Krakow, 30-363
Aclaris Investigational Site
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-362
Aclaris Investigational Site
Lublin, 20-607
Aclaris Investigational Site
Nadarzyn, Masovian Voivodeship, 05-830
Aclaris Investigational Site
Nowa Sól, 67-100
Aclaris Investigational Site
Olsztyn, Warmińsko-Mazurskien, 10-117
Aclaris Investigational Site
Poznan, Wielkopolska, 61-113
Aclaris Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-218
Aclaris Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-446
Aclaris Investigational Site
Poznan, 61-397
Aclaris Investigational Site
Sochaczew, 96-500
Aclaris Investigational Site
Tomaszów Lubelski, Lubelski, 22-600
Aclaris Investigational Site
Torun, 87-100
Aclaris Investigational Site
Warsaw, 04-141
Aclaris Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 52-442
United States11 sites
Aclaris Investigational Site
Cypress, Texas, 77429
Aclaris Investigational Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Aclaris Investigational Site
El Cajon, California, 92020
Aclaris Investigational Site
Encino, California, 91436
Aclaris Investigational Site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Aclaris Investigational Site
La Jolla, California, 92093
Aclaris Investigational Site
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Aclaris Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
Aclaris Investigational Site
Palm Desert, California, 92260
Aclaris Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Aclaris Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Bulgaria9 sites
Aclaris Investigational Site
Pleven, 5800
Aclaris Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4000
Aclaris Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4001
Aclaris Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4002
Aclaris Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4004
Aclaris Investigational Site
Sofia, 1336
Aclaris Investigational Site
Sofia, 1431
Aclaris Investigational Site
Sofia, 1606
Aclaris Investigational Site
Varna, 9000
Czechia7 sites
Aclaris Investigational Site
Brno, 615 00
Aclaris Investigational Site
Hlučín, 748 01
Aclaris Investigational Site
Ostrava, 702 00
Aclaris Investigational Site
Pardubice, 530 02
Aclaris Investigational Site
Prague, 128 50
Aclaris Investigational Site
Prague, 140 00
Aclaris Investigational Site
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
About this study
Official title: Phase 2b, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Doses of ATI-450 Plus Methotrexate (MTX) Versus Placebo Plus MTX in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to MTX Alone
This study evaluates ATI-450 plus MTX versus placebo plus MTX in participants with moderate to severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to MTX alone.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 2b, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, dose ranging study to investigate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple doses of ATI-450 plus MTX versus placebo plus MTX in participants with moderate to severe active RA who have had an inadequate response to MTX alone.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID, Placebo oral tablet, Methotrexate, ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid, Arthritis, RA
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BIDDrug
Also called zunsemetinib
Oral, small molecule MK2 inhibitor
Placebo oral tabletDrug
Placebo tablet manufactured to match ATI-450 in appearance
MethotrexateDrug
15 mg to 25 mg weekly
ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BIDDrug
Also called zunsemetinib
Oral, small molecule MK2 inhibitor
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ATI-450 20 mg BID plus Methotrexate | Experimental | ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet twice daily (BID) with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Methotrexate; Drug: ATI-450 20 mg oral tablet BID |
| ATI-450 50 mg BID plus Methotrexate | Experimental | ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: ATI-450 50 mg oral tablet BID; Drug: Methotrexate |
| Placebo plus Methotrexate | Placebo comparator | Placebo oral tablet BID with a stable weekly dose of methotrexate for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Placebo oral tablet; Drug: Methotrexate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 at Week 12
Participants achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 (responders) were defined as having ≥20% improvement in both the number of swollen and tender joints (66/68 joint counts) and ≥20% improvement in ≥3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), and acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP.
Model-based estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were produced.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (12)
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 at Week 12
Participant achieving ACR50 (responders) were defined as having ≥50% improvement in both the number of swollen and tender joints (66/68 joint counts) and ≥50% improvement in ≥3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), HAQ-DI, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP.
Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 at Week 12
Participants achieving ACR70 (responders) were defined as having ≥70% improvement in both the number of swollen and tender joints (66/68 joint counts) and ≥70% improvement in ≥3 of the following 5 measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), HAQ-DI, Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (VAS), Acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP.
Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12
The DAS28-CRP consists of a composite score of the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, CRP (hsCRP was used for the purposes of this study), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Interpretation of the DAS28-CRP is on a scale of 0 to 9.4, where <2.6 is considered remission, ≥2.6 to <3.2 is considered low/minimal disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1 is considered moderate disease activity, and >5.1 is considered high/severe disease activity.
The least square (LS) mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 12 was estimated from the Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Remission (Score <2.6) at Week 12
The Disease Activity Score using 28 Joint Count-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) consists of a composite score of the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, CRP (hsCRP is used for the purposes of this study), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Interpretation of the DAS28-CRP is on a scale of 0 to 9.4, where <2.6 is considered remission, ≥2.6 to <3.2 is considered low/minimal disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1 is considered moderate disease activity, and >5.1 is considered high/severe disease activity.
Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Low Disease Activity (Score ≤ 3.2) at Week 12
The DAS28-CRP consists of a composite score of the following variables: TJC28, SJC28, CRP (hsCRP is used for the purposes of this study), and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity. Interpretation of the DAS28-CRP is on a scale of 0 to 9.4, where <2.6 is considered remission, ≥2.6 to <3.2 is considered low/minimal disease activity, ≥3.2 to ≤5.1 is considered moderate disease activity, and >5.1 is considered high/severe disease activity.
Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Week12
The HAQ-DI (standard disability method calculation) was utilized to assess the participant's physical function or disability according to the participant. The HAQ-DI is a 20-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities [errands and chores]). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (inability to perform a ask in that area). Overall score was computed as the sum of category scores and divided by the number of categories answered, ranging from 0 to 3. A lower score demonstrated less disability.
LS mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was the sum of 4 outcome parameters:
- Tender joint count out of 28 joints (TJC28)
- Swollen joint count out of 28 joints (SJC28)
- Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; and
- Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity.
Interpretation of the CDAI disease activity was measured on a scale of 0 to 76, where ≤2.8 was considered remission, >2.8 to ≤10 was considered low/minimal disease activity, >10 to ≤22 was considered moderate disease activity, and >22.0 was considered high/severe disease activity.
LS mean change from baseline in CDAI score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Remission (Score ≤ 2.8)
The CDAI was the sum of 4 outcome parameters:
- Tender joint count out of 28 joints (TJC28)
- Swollen joint count out of 28 joints (SJC28)
- Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity; and
- Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity.
Interpretation of the CDAI disease activity was measured on a scale of 0 to 76, where ≤2.8 was considered remission, >2.8 to ≤10 was considered low/minimal disease activity, >10 to ≤22 was considered moderate disease activity, and >22.0 was considered high/severe disease activity.
Model-based estimates and 95% CIs were produced.
Measured: Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in hsCRP Level at Week 12
Blood samples were evaluated to measure levels of hsCRP.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12
The PCS is composed of 4 scales of the Short Form-36 Health Status Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) version 2 assessing physical function, role limitations caused by physical problems, bodily pain, and general health. The range of the SF-36 PCS is between 0 and 100, where higher scores represent better physical functioning.
A 2.5 to 5-point change from baseline is established as the minimum clinically-important difference for the PCS in RA participants.
LS mean change from baseline in SF-36 PCS score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 12
The FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire that measures an individual's level of fatigue during their usual daily activities over the past week. The level of fatigue is measured on a 4 point Likert scale (4 = not at all fatigued to 0 = very much fatigued). The total score range is from 0 to 52. The higher the score, the lower the fatigue level.
LS mean change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score at Week 12 was estimated from the MMRM model.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
ATI-450 and Metabolite (CDD-2164) Concentrations
Measured: 2 hours postdose on Days 1, 8, and 85
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2022
- Study start1 Feb 2022
- Primary completion5 Sep 2023
- Study completion11 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 251 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ajay Aggarwal, Study director, Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05279417
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ATI-450-RA-202
- Other IDs
- 2021-002860-31
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No