T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)NCT05279911
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After Dental Implant Insertion
A study testing low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in people with T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) and Low-level Laser Therapy, run by Sinai University at 5 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study aimed therefore to evaluate bone density (BD) and OPG levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients. 40 T2DM patients were included in this study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), Low-level Laser Therapy, Bone Density Increased
- What is being tested?
- low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2021to 22 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- None of the participants had other major illnesses or severe diabetic complications.
- A detailed medical history of each subject was obtained according to the detailed questionnaire of the modified Cornell Medical Index [22].
- Diabetic control was measured by glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of blood samples, patients had relatively stable glycemic control, as demonstrated by a difference not exceeding 1% in at least two HbA1c assays over the previous 6 months.
- Participants with partial edentulous posterior mandibular region with bone density ranging between D2 and D3, also having adjacent tooth with healthy periodontium were selected.
Who cannot join
- Any uncontrolled systemic diseases that prevent surgery for dental implant placement; (b) Need for guided bone regeneration or sinus lift for implant placement, and (c) History of radiation therapy in head and neck.
- Pregnant women, smokers and patients with para-functional habits, psychological problems or in-cooperated patients were also excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Egypt5 sites
Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University
Cairo
Misr International University
Cairo
Misr University for Science and Technology (MUST)
Cairo
Sinai University
El Arish
Delta University of Science and Technology
Gamasa
About this study
Official title: Influence of Low-level Laser Therapy on Radiographic and Biochemical Profiles in Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After Dental Implant Insertion: A Randomized Case Control Study
This study aimed therefore to evaluate bone density (BD) and OPG levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients. 40 T2DM patients were included in this study. Implants were randomly inserted in 20 non-lased T2DM patients (Control) and 20 lased T2DM patients (Intervention). BD and OPG levels in the PICF were assessed in both groups at the follow up points.
Read the detailed description
Background and objectives: Use of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with dental implants has been suggested to improve bone quality during osseointegration. However, there is a lack of evidence about its influence on dental implants in diabetic patients. Osteoprotegrin (OPG) levels was reported as a biomarker for bone turnover to distinguish implant prognosis. This study aimed therefore to evaluate bone density (BD) and OPG levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients. Methods: 40 T2DM patients were included in this study. Implants were randomly inserted in 20 non-lased T2DM patients (Control) and 20 lased T2DM patients (Intervention). BD and OPG levels in the PICF were assessed in both groups at the follow up points.
- Being tested
- low-level laser therapy (LLLT)
- Keywords
- T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), Dental Implant insertion, Osteoprotegrin (OPG), Bone Density, Low-level laser therapy, LLLT
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Osteosclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
low-level laser therapy (LLLT)Radiation
low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with dental implants has been suggested to improve bone quality during osseointegration. Low-level laser (Gallium Aluminum Arsenide Diode [Ga-Al-As]) (wavelength: 808 nm, average power density: 50 mW, circular spot diameter:0.71 cm, spot area: 0.4cm2) in continuous mode was applied in six points in contact with peri-implant soft tissue (1.23 minutes in each point of application; dose per point 11 J) before and immediately after suturing. The application points were divided into two points in the labial region where the implant would be placed (apical and cervical); two points in the lingual region (apical and cervical); and two points in the occlusal direction. After suturing the laser protocol was repeated in the same points following the same protocol, resulting in a total dose of 66 J for each application moment (before and after implant placement).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Implants were randomly inserted in 20 non-lased T2DM patients (Control) |
| Low level laser therapy | Experimental | Implant were randomly inserted in 20 lased T2DM patients (Intervention) Receives: Radiation: low-level laser therapy (LLLT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bone density
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Week 1
Bone density
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Month 1
Bone density
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Month 3
Bone density
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Month 4
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Week 1
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Month 1
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Month 3
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Measured: Month 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2022
- Study start3 Mar 2021
- Primary completion5 Jan 2022
- Study completion22 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Study design: A randomized case control study. A total of 40 adult participants of both genders of at least 21 years old were included in the study. All participants were controlled T2DM patients for more than 2 years (diagnosed according to the American Diabetes Association criteria) \[21\]. Patients were able and willing to participate in the study. Patients were recruited from out-patient clinic of Oral Diagnosis at Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sinai University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Misr International University, Al-Azhar University, Delta University for Science and Technology
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Moawed Ibrahim Ghoneim, PhD, Sinai University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05279911
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FWA00025577
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Attia MS, Elewa GM, Abdelgawad N, Ismail RM, Hassan Eid M, Ghoneim MM. The Influence of Low-Level Laser Therapy on CBCT Radiographic and Biochemical Profiles of Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After Dental Implant Insertion: A Randomized Case-Control Study. Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36559. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36559. eCollection 2023 Mar.
PubMed 37102010
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Influence of Low-level Laser Therapy on Radiographic and Biochemical Profiles in Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After Dental Implant Insertion: A Randomized Case Control Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05279911
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FWA00025577
- Keywords
- T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), Dental Implant insertion, Osteoprotegrin (OPG), Bone Density, Low-level laser therapy, LLLT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sinai UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Misr International University, Al-Azhar University, Delta University for Science and Technology
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed therefore to evaluate bone density (BD) and OPG levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients. 40 T2DM patients were included in this study. Implants were randomly inserted in 20 non-lased T2DM patients (Control) and 20 lased T2DM patients (Intervention). BD and OPG levels in the PICF were assessed in both groups at the follow up points.
Detailed description
Background and objectives: Use of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with dental implants has been suggested to improve bone quality during osseointegration. However, there is a lack of evidence about its influence on dental implants in diabetic patients. Osteoprotegrin (OPG) levels was reported as a biomarker for bone turnover to distinguish implant prognosis. This study aimed therefore to evaluate bone density (BD) and OPG levels in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients. Methods: 40 T2DM patients were included in this study. Implants were randomly inserted in 20 non-lased T2DM patients (Control) and 20 lased T2DM patients (Intervention). BD and OPG levels in the PICF were assessed in both groups at the follow up points.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Study design: A randomized case control study. A total of 40 adult participants of both genders of at least 21 years old were included in the study. All participants were controlled T2DM patients for more than 2 years (diagnosed according to the American Diabetes Association criteria) [21]. Patients were able and willing to participate in the study. Patients were recruited from out-patient clinic of Oral Diagnosis at Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Implants were randomly inserted in 20 non-lased T2DM patients (Control) |
| Low level laser therapy | Experimental | Radiation: low-level laser therapy (LLLT)Implant were randomly inserted in 20 lased T2DM patients (Intervention) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- None of the participants had other major illnesses or severe diabetic complications.
- A detailed medical history of each subject was obtained according to the detailed questionnaire of the modified Cornell Medical Index [22].
- Diabetic control was measured by glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of blood samples, patients had relatively stable glycemic control, as demonstrated by a difference not exceeding 1% in at least two HbA1c assays over the previous 6 months.
- Participants with partial edentulous posterior mandibular region with bone density ranging between D2 and D3, also having adjacent tooth with healthy periodontium were selected.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any uncontrolled systemic diseases that prevent surgery for dental implant placement; (b) Need for guided bone regeneration or sinus lift for implant placement, and (c) History of radiation therapy in head and neck.
- Pregnant women, smokers and patients with para-functional habits, psychological problems or in-cooperated patients were also excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| low-level laser therapy (LLLT)low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with dental implants has been suggested to improve bone quality during osseointegration. Low-level laser (Gallium Aluminum Arsenide Diode [Ga-Al-As]) (wavelength: 808 nm, average power density: 50 mW, circular spot diameter:0.71 cm, spot area: 0.4cm2) in continuous mode was applied in six points in contact with peri-implant soft tissue (1.23 minutes in each point of application; dose per point 11 J) before and immediately after suturing. The application points were divided into two points in the labial region where the implant would be placed (apical and cervical); two points in the lingual region (apical and cervical); and two points in the occlusal direction. After suturing the laser protocol was repeated in the same points following the same protocol, resulting in a total dose of 66 J for each application moment (before and after implant placement). | Radiation | Low level laser therapy |
Primary outcome
Bone density
Time frame: Week 1
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Bone density
Time frame: Month 1
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Bone density
Time frame: Month 3
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Bone density
Time frame: Month 4
Bone density was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Time frame: Week 1
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Time frame: Month 1
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Time frame: Month 3
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level
Time frame: Month 4
Osteoprotegrin (OPG) level was evaluated in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) in lased controlled type II Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients versus non-lased T2DM patients.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37102010Attia MS, Elewa GM, Abdelgawad N, Ismail RM, Hassan Eid M, Ghoneim MM. The Influence of Low-Level Laser Therapy on CBCT Radiographic and Biochemical Profiles of Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After Dental Implant Insertion: A Randomized Case-Control Study. Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36559. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36559. eCollection 2023 Mar.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Active, not recruiting
Pilot of Continuous Glucose Monitor-Augmented Food Is Medicine
Nutrition, Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
Physiologic Insulin Resensitization (PIR) Treatment in Patients With a Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Role of Endothelial Dysfunction on Exercise Pressor Reflex in Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM), Endothelial Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
Community-Empowerment and Environmental Enrichment-based Co-management (CEEEC) Model and Mechanisms for Improving Health of Older Stroke Patients With Multimorbidity
Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Satisfaction of Once-Weekly Tirzepatide in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in people with T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) and Low-level Laser Therapy, run by Sinai University at 5 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bone density (time frame: Week 1). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05279911, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2022.