Penile ImplantationNCT05287438
Next Generation Sequencing Versus Traditional Cultures for Clinically Infected Penile Implants: Impact of Culture Identification on Outcomes
A study testing Next-Generation DNA Sequencing and Standard Culture in people with Penile Implantation and Infections, run by MicroGenDX at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Randomized prospective study to evaluate next generation sequencing (NGS) and standard-of-care culture for clinically infected penile implants and to compare outcomes with identification of microbes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Penile Implantation, Infections
- What is being tested?
- Next-Generation DNA Sequencing and Standard Culture
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Oct 2021to 31 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male penile prosthesis patients
- Age range: 18-80
- Within 6 months of penile prosthesis surgery
- At least 1 of the following: Device part stuck to thinning skin, any drainage from the wound site, massive red and swollen genitalia parts, exposed penile prosthesis parts, draining open tract, draining hematoma
Who cannot join
- Transgender / neophallus
- Not able to communicate or follow up well, or non-compliant
- Less than 18 or more than 80 years old
- Active addiction
- Main issue is implant pain
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
WK Advanced Urology
Bossier City, Louisiana, 71111
Ryan Griggs, MD, 318-212-7335, rpgriggsuro@gmail.com
Gerard Henry, MD
- Recruiting
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Paul Chung, MD, 215-955-1000, paul.chung@jefferson.edu
Paul Chung, MD
- Recruiting
Duke University
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
Adi Molvin, RN, BSN, 919-681-4990, adi.molvin@dule.edu
Aaron Lentz, MD
About this study
Randomized prospective study to evaluate next generation sequencing (NGS) and standard-of-care culture for clinically infected penile implants and to compare outcomes with identification of microbes.
Read the detailed description
Randomized prospective study to evaluate next generation sequencing (NGS) and standard-of-care culture for clinically infected penile implants and to compare outcomes with identification of microbes. Eligible subjects will undergo a baseline/screening visit at which time the following will be collected: demographics/history/known allergies to antibiotics, symptom scoring questionnaire. Drainage swabs OR needle aspiration will be collected for standard culture and PCR/NGS and empiric antibiotics will start.
Subjects will be randomized into the culture arm or the NGS arm. If randomized to NGS: central ID reviews result according to arm and offers recommendations. Physician will treat based on antibiotic recommendations (based on positive PCR/NGS or positive culture, if negative then empiric treatment will be continued) adjusted for patients contraindications and co-morbidities If randomized to the traditional culture arm: Physician will follow routine local standard of care.
A follow-up visit will occur within 10 days of starting empiric antibiotic therapy to collect symptoms scoring questionnaire. A 2nd and final visit will occur 6 months after baseline to collect similar data to the 1st follow up visit.
- Conditions
- Penile Implantation, Infections
- Being tested
- Next-Generation DNA Sequencing, Standard Culture
- Keywords
- next generation sequencing, penile prosthesis, infections
- Medical subject headings
- Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Next-Generation DNA SequencingDiagnostic test
Also called NGS
NGS is a technique of microbiological sequencing, using 16s ribosomal RNA molecular identification has been implemented to detect bacteria and fungi present in the sample
Standard CultureDiagnostic test
Standard of care culture and sensitivity
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Culture | Active comparator | Following local standard of care, treatment will be based on standard culture Receives: Diagnostic Test: Standard Culture |
| Group B - NGS | Experimental | Treatment will be based on NGS results reviewed by an infectious disease doctor Receives: Diagnostic Test: Next-Generation DNA Sequencing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Device survival rates by calculating by incidence of implant freely mobile and working without tenderness
To determine if device survival rates outcomes are improved using NGS versus traditional culture
Measured: 2 years
Patient satisfaction of penile prosthesis
Satisfaction is a 5-point descriptive scale in which subjects self-report that degree of satisfaction: high, mostly, fair, minimum, and none
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2022
- Study start27 Oct 2021
- Primary completion31 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Penile ImplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Group A will receive results based on standard culture and Group B will receive results based on NGS
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MicroGenDX
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05287438
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MDX-002
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to share data with other researchers
Publications
Carrasquillo RJ, Munarriz RM, Gross MS. Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients. Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Feb 1;20(3):12. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0875-7.
PubMed 30707308Krzastek SC, Smith R. An update on the best approaches to prevent complications in penile prosthesis recipients. Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Jan 8;11:1756287218818076. doi: 10.1177/1756287218818076. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 30671142Carvajal A, Benavides J, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Henry GD. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Nov;32(6):587-597. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0232-x. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
PubMed 32015525Mahon J, Dornbier R, Wegrzyn G, Faraday MM, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Hakim L, McVary KT. Infectious Adverse Events Following the Placement of a Penile Prosthesis: A Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev. 2020 Apr;8(2):348-354. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
PubMed 31519461Carrasquillo RJ, Gross MS. Infection Prevention Strategies Prior to Penile Implant Surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Apr;4(3):317-320. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
PubMed 30017899Levy PY, Fenollar F. The role of molecular diagnostics in implant-associated bone and joint infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18(12):1168-75. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12020.
PubMed 23148447Salimnia H, Fairfax MR, Lephart PR, Schreckenberger P, DesJarlais SM, Johnson JK, Robinson G, Carroll KC, Greer A, Morgan M, Chan R, Loeffelholz M, Valencia-Shelton F, Jenkins S, Schuetz AN, Daly JA, Barney T, Hemmert A, Kanack KJ. Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel: Results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):687-98. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01679-15. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PubMed 26739158Tzeng A, Tzeng TH, Vasdev S, Korth K, Healey T, Parvizi J, Saleh KJ. Treating periprosthetic joint infections as biofilms: key diagnosis and management strategies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;81(3):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
PubMed 25586931
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Next Generation Sequencing Versus Traditional Cultures for Clinically Infected Penile Implants: Impact of Culture Identification on Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05287438
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MDX-002
- Conditions
- Penile Implantation, Infections
- Keywords
- next generation sequencing, penile prosthesis, infections
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- MicroGenDXIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Randomized prospective study to evaluate next generation sequencing (NGS) and standard-of-care culture for clinically infected penile implants and to compare outcomes with identification of microbes.
Detailed description
Randomized prospective study to evaluate next generation sequencing (NGS) and standard-of-care culture for clinically infected penile implants and to compare outcomes with identification of microbes. Eligible subjects will undergo a baseline/screening visit at which time the following will be collected: demographics/history/known allergies to antibiotics, symptom scoring questionnaire. Drainage swabs OR needle aspiration will be collected for standard culture and PCR/NGS and empiric antibiotics will start.
Subjects will be randomized into the culture arm or the NGS arm. If randomized to NGS: central ID reviews result according to arm and offers recommendations. Physician will treat based on antibiotic recommendations (based on positive PCR/NGS or positive culture, if negative then empiric treatment will be continued) adjusted for patients contraindications and co-morbidities If randomized to the traditional culture arm: Physician will follow routine local standard of care.
A follow-up visit will occur within 10 days of starting empiric antibiotic therapy to collect symptoms scoring questionnaire. A 2nd and final visit will occur 6 months after baseline to collect similar data to the 1st follow up visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Group A will receive results based on standard culture and Group B will receive results based on NGS
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A - Culture | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Standard CultureFollowing local standard of care, treatment will be based on standard culture |
| Group B - NGS | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Next-Generation DNA SequencingTreatment will be based on NGS results reviewed by an infectious disease doctor |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male penile prosthesis patients
- Age range: 18-80
- Within 6 months of penile prosthesis surgery
- At least 1 of the following: Device part stuck to thinning skin, any drainage from the wound site, massive red and swollen genitalia parts, exposed penile prosthesis parts, draining open tract, draining hematoma
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Transgender / neophallus
- Not able to communicate or follow up well, or non-compliant
- Less than 18 or more than 80 years old
- Active addiction
- Main issue is implant pain
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Next-Generation DNA SequencingAlso: NGSNGS is a technique of microbiological sequencing, using 16s ribosomal RNA molecular identification has been implemented to detect bacteria and fungi present in the sample | Diagnostic test | Group B - NGS |
| Standard CultureStandard of care culture and sensitivity | Diagnostic test | Group A - Culture |
Primary outcome
Device survival rates by calculating by incidence of implant freely mobile and working without tenderness
Time frame: 2 years
To determine if device survival rates outcomes are improved using NGS versus traditional culture
Patient satisfaction of penile prosthesis
Time frame: 2 years
Satisfaction is a 5-point descriptive scale in which subjects self-report that degree of satisfaction: high, mostly, fair, minimum, and none
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2022.
- Background: PubMed 30707308Carrasquillo RJ, Munarriz RM, Gross MS. Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients. Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Feb 1;20(3):12. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0875-7.
- Background: PubMed 30671142Krzastek SC, Smith R. An update on the best approaches to prevent complications in penile prosthesis recipients. Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Jan 8;11:1756287218818076. doi: 10.1177/1756287218818076. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
- Background: PubMed 32015525Carvajal A, Benavides J, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Henry GD. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Nov;32(6):587-597. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0232-x. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
- Background: PubMed 31519461Mahon J, Dornbier R, Wegrzyn G, Faraday MM, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Hakim L, McVary KT. Infectious Adverse Events Following the Placement of a Penile Prosthesis: A Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev. 2020 Apr;8(2):348-354. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
- Background: PubMed 30017899Carrasquillo RJ, Gross MS. Infection Prevention Strategies Prior to Penile Implant Surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Apr;4(3):317-320. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 23148447Levy PY, Fenollar F. The role of molecular diagnostics in implant-associated bone and joint infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Dec;18(12):1168-75. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12020.
- Background: PubMed 26739158Salimnia H, Fairfax MR, Lephart PR, Schreckenberger P, DesJarlais SM, Johnson JK, Robinson G, Carroll KC, Greer A, Morgan M, Chan R, Loeffelholz M, Valencia-Shelton F, Jenkins S, Schuetz AN, Daly JA, Barney T, Hemmert A, Kanack KJ. Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel: Results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):687-98. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01679-15. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
- Background: PubMed 25586931Tzeng A, Tzeng TH, Vasdev S, Korth K, Healey T, Parvizi J, Saleh KJ. Treating periprosthetic joint infections as biofilms: key diagnosis and management strategies. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;81(3):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to share data with other researchers
Related trials for Penile Implantation
Recruiting
Penile Lengthening Pre-Penile Prosthesis Implantation
Erectile Dysfunction
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Registry for Patients Undergoing Penile Prosthesis Implantation for Male Erectile Dysfunction
Erectile Dysfunction
Recruiting
Risks and Benefits of Scrotal Drainage in Penile Prosthesis Implant
Erectile Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
ZEPHYR: A Study Evaluating Surgical Outcome After Implantation of the Zephyr ZSI 475 FTM Inflatable Penile Implant in the Neophallus After Female-to-male Sex Reassignment Surgery
Erectile Dysfunction, Gender Dysphoria
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Next-Generation DNA Sequencing and Standard Culture in people with Penile Implantation and Infections, run by MicroGenDX at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Device survival rates by calculating by incidence of implant freely mobile and working without tenderness (time frame: 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05287438, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2022.