AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Biliary CholangitisHEROES PBCNCT05292872

Real-World Data Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of OCA on Hepatic Outcomes in PBC Patients

An observational study of Primary Biliary Cholangitis, run by Intercept Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an observational, retrospective cohort study of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who failed ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment, using a real-world data source, the Komodo Health United States (US) claims database. The study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of obeticholic acid (OCA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Primary Biliary Cholangitis
How many people
4,577 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2015to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients who meet diagnostic criteria in each database between 01 Jun 2015 and 31 Dec 2021 and who meet the eligibility criteria were considered for these studies.

Who may be able to join

  • Definite or probable PBC diagnosis
  • Inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA
  • Age ≥18 years at the index date
  • Continuous enrollment and evaluable data for at least 12 months before the index date (inclusive)

Who cannot join

  • History or presence of other concomitant liver diseases
  • History of non-skin malignancy or melanoma
  • History of HIV
  • Medical conditions that may cause non-hepatic increases in ALP
  • Patients with laboratory values indicative of hepatic decompensation or significant hepatobiliary injury
  • History of liver transplant
  • Evidence of fenofibrate, or bezafibrate use
  • History or presence of hepatic decompensating events

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc

    San Diego, California, 92121

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Replicate Studies Evaluating the Effectiveness of Obeticholic Acid on Hepatic Real-World Outcomes in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

This is an observational, retrospective cohort study of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who failed ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment, using a real-world data source, the Komodo Health United States (US) claims database. The study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of obeticholic acid (OCA). All patients who meet diagnostic criteria for PBC in the database between 01 Jun 2015 and 31 Dec 2021 and who meet all eligibility criteria were considered for this study.

Keywords
Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Primary Biliary Cirrhosis, PBC, Hepatic Impairment, Liver
Medical subject headings
Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT05292872
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OCA-treatedPBC participants with a history of UDCA failure (inadequate response, intolerance, or discontinuation) who initiated Obeticholic acid (OCA) in the study window.
Non-OCA TreatedPBC participants with a history of UDCA failure who were eligible but not treated with OCA (or off-label fibrates) in the study window.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Risk of the First Event of the Composite Events

    The primary analysis outcome was assessed with hazard ratio (HR) comparing hazard of first event of the composite endpoint among OCA-treated participants and SMR-weighted non-OCA-treated PBC participants indexes. It included all-cause death, liver transplant, hospitalization for hepatic decompensation based on first occurrence of: variceal bleed, ascites (including hepatic hydrothorax and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis) and hepatic encephalopathy. OCA-treated indexes were censored 90 days after OCA discontinuation, or if fibrates were initiated. Control indexes were censored if a participant-initiated OCA therapy, initiated fibrate therapy, reinitiated UDCA for participants who had discontinued UDCA for >6 months, or end of study period (31 Dec 2021), whichever came first. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentile of nonparametric bootstrap samples were used to estimate 95% CI for HR and to perform a test of hypothesis. Risk is presented using the number of composite event and components.

    Measured: Up to 67 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Risk of Death

    The primary source for death was the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) along with obituary search, which was compared to Komodo Health claims and LabCorp/Quest laboratory data. The secondary objectives were to estimate the effect of OCA treatment versus non-OCA treatment on each component of the composite endpoint, with the same censoring rule applied as in the primary composite endpoint. Risk is presented using the the number of all-cause death within the risk period (prior to censoring).

    Measured: Up to 67 months

  2. Risk of Liver Transplantation

    The primary source for liver transplant was the Organ Transplant Network (OPTN) transplant registry. Risk is presented using the number of liver transplantation.

    Measured: Up to 67 months

  3. Risk of Hospitalization for Hepatic Decompensation

    The primary source for hospitalization for hepatic decompensation were Komodo Health claims. Risk is presented using the number of hospitalization for hepatic decompensation.

    Measured: Up to 67 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
4,577 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05292872
Sponsor's protocol ID
747-405
Acronym
HEROES PBC
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
4 Mar 2022
Last updated
24 Jan 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Brookhart MA, Mayne TJ, Coombs C, Breskin A, Ness E, Bessonova L, Chu YJ, Li J, Fried MW, Hansen BE, Kowdley KV, Jones D, Mells G, Trivedi PJ, Hiu S, Kareithi DN, Wason J, Smith R, Seeger JD, Hirschfield GM. Hepatic real-world outcomes with obeticholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis (HEROES): A trial emulation study design. Hepatology. 2025 Jun 1;81(6):1647-1659. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001174. Epub 2025 Jan 3.

    PubMed 39630028

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Primary Biliary Cholangitis, run by Intercept Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jan 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Risk of the First Event of the Composite Events (time frame: Up to 67 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05292872, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in