BronchiectasisNCT05293314
Assessment of an Exhaled Breath Test to Detect Bronchiectasis
An observational study of Bronchiectasis, run by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To investigate whether the breath test is able to detect bronchiectasis using breathomics. This study was conducted with a prospective specimen collection, evaluator-blinded, case-controlled clinical study designed to evaluate the accuracy of breathomics to diagnosis of bronchiectasis in adults. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Bronchiectasis
- What is being tested?
- An exhaled breath test
- How many people
- 544 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2022to 20 May 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The age of all subjects were all older than 18 . The study population was recruited from Shanghai pulmonary hospital. Diagnosis of bronchiectasis was performed using chest HRCT scans in suspected patients with coughing and expectoration, or long durations of haemoptysis. Idiopathic bronchiectasis patients with acute exacerbation were included in the study. Healthy participants (HC) and unhealthy participants(UHC) were as control.
Who may be able to join
- BE Patients were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Age>18 years; (2) the diagnosis of BE was according to European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis; (3) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.
- Healthy control subjects were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria:(1) Age>18 years; (2) No history of any lung disease (according to pulmonary imaging and physical examinations); (3) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.
- Unhealthy control subjects were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Age>18 years; (2) The diagnosis of ILD was according to HRCT and clinical symptoms by two experts' consensus; (3) The diagnosis of Sarcoidosis (SA) was according to American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline;(4) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Patients combined with serious comorbidities (chronic renal failure, hepatic disease, etc.); (2) Patients who are diagnosed with asthma, pneumonia, malignant tumor, and COPD; (3) Women who are pregnant or preparing for pregnancy or breastfeeding; (4) Participated in other clinical trials within three months; (5) Refused to join in and sign the informed consent form.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessment of an Exhaled Breath Test Using High-Pressure Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry to Detect Bronchiectasis
To investigate whether the breath test is able to detect bronchiectasis using breathomics. This study was conducted with a prospective specimen collection, evaluator-blinded, case-controlled clinical study designed to evaluate the accuracy of breathomics to diagnosis of bronchiectasis in adults.
Read the detailed description
Bronchiectasis is a chronic airway inflammation with irreversible expansion of bronchial walls, which is characteristic by chronic cough, mucinous sputum, dyspnea and wheezing. High resolution CT (HRCT) combined with clinical manifestations is the main diagnostic method of bronchiectasis, but HRCT is expensive and radioactive. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a new technology to diagnose bronchiectasis. Exhaled breath may be a better tool for bronchiectasis detection because of its noninvasive nature. Many efforts have been made to develop breath tests for lung cancer, asthma and Helicobacter pylori infection. However, little studies pay attention to bronchiectasis. High-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS) is a promising tool for breath testing, because it is highly sensitive, does not require pretreatment of exhaled breath, and holds great tolerance for humidity. In our case-control diagnostic study, we investigated whether a breath test combining HPPI-TOFMS and a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was able to distinguish patients with bronchiectasis from control individuals.
- Conditions
- Bronchiectasis
- Being tested
- An exhaled breath test
- Keywords
- bronchiectasis, breathomics, exhaled breath
- Medical subject headings
- Bronchiectasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
An exhaled breath testDiagnostic test
All exhaled breath samples were collected by trained investigators following the same protocol. All participants fasted for at least 6 hours before breath collection. To reduce potential confounding factors, all participants were asked to not ingest spicy food, alcohol, or coffee the night before exhaled breath collection. Exhaled breath was collected in Tedlar air bags (DuPont de Nemours). The night before breath collection, the Tedlar bags were baked at 60 °C for 3 hours to fully release possible contaminants and continuously purged with high-purity nitrogen 4 times. Participants first gargled with pure water and then performed a single deep nasal inhalation followed by complete exhalation via their mouth into Tedlar bags. A total of 1000 mL of exhaled breath was collected from each participant. Breath sample detection was based on the HPPI-TOFMS platform.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients with bronchiectasis (BE) | Diagnosis of bronchiectasis was performed using chest HRCT scans in suspected patients with coughing and expectoration, or long durations of haemoptysis. High-resolution images were obtained during full inspiration at 1-mm collimation and 10-mm intervals from the apex to the base of the lungs. The presence of bronchiectasis was confirmed based on the following criteria: 1) lack of tapering in the bronchi; 2) dilation of the bronchi where the internal diameter was larger than that of the adjacent pulmonary artery; or 3) visualisation of the peripheral bronchi within 1 cm of the costal pleural surface or the adjacent mediastinal pleural surface. Receives: Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath test | |
| Healthy control group (HC) | Control group is healthy participants. Receives: Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath test | |
| Unhealthy control group (UHC) | Patients with interstitial lung disease or patients with Sarcoidosis. Interstitial lung disease is a heterogeneous pulmonary disease characterized with lung fibrosis and manifest with breathlessness. Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of granulomas in various organs, mostly involved is the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes . Receives: Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Ability of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People
Evaluate the ability of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy individuals by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The maximum value in the area below the receiver is 1. The closer the value is to 1, the higher the prediction accuracy of the model.
Measured: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.
Secondary outcomes (1)
The Sensitivity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People
Sensitivity=number of true positives/(number of true positives+number of false negatives) * 100% Sensitivity is the rate of correctly judging patients.We calculated the sensitivity of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy people.The maximum percentage of the sensitivity is 100%. The higher the percentage is , the more sensitive of the model.
Measured: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2022
- Study start1 Jul 2022
- Primary completion1 May 2023
- Study completion20 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for BronchiectasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 544 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jin-Fu Xu, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China
- Investigators
- Jin-fu Xu, MD, Study director, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05293314
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20220303
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of an Exhaled Breath Test Using High-Pressure Photon Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry to Detect Bronchiectasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05293314
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20220303
- Conditions
- Bronchiectasis
- Keywords
- bronchiectasis, breathomics, exhaled breath
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 544 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Nov 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate whether the breath test is able to detect bronchiectasis using breathomics. This study was conducted with a prospective specimen collection, evaluator-blinded, case-controlled clinical study designed to evaluate the accuracy of breathomics to diagnosis of bronchiectasis in adults.
Detailed description
Bronchiectasis is a chronic airway inflammation with irreversible expansion of bronchial walls, which is characteristic by chronic cough, mucinous sputum, dyspnea and wheezing. High resolution CT (HRCT) combined with clinical manifestations is the main diagnostic method of bronchiectasis, but HRCT is expensive and radioactive. Therefore, it is urgent to develop a new technology to diagnose bronchiectasis. Exhaled breath may be a better tool for bronchiectasis detection because of its noninvasive nature. Many efforts have been made to develop breath tests for lung cancer, asthma and Helicobacter pylori infection. However, little studies pay attention to bronchiectasis. High-pressure photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPPI-TOFMS) is a promising tool for breath testing, because it is highly sensitive, does not require pretreatment of exhaled breath, and holds great tolerance for humidity. In our case-control diagnostic study, we investigated whether a breath test combining HPPI-TOFMS and a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was able to distinguish patients with bronchiectasis from control individuals.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients with bronchiectasis (BE) | – | Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath testDiagnosis of bronchiectasis was performed using chest HRCT scans in suspected patients with coughing and expectoration, or long durations of haemoptysis. High-resolution images were obtained during full inspiration at 1-mm collimation and 10-mm intervals from the apex to the base of the lungs. The presence of bronchiectasis was confirmed based on the following criteria: 1) lack of tapering in the bronchi; 2) dilation of the bronchi where the internal diameter was larger than that of the adjacent pulmonary artery; or 3) visualisation of the peripheral bronchi within 1 cm of the costal pleural surface or the adjacent mediastinal pleural surface. |
| Healthy control group (HC) | – | Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath testControl group is healthy participants. |
| Unhealthy control group (UHC) | – | Diagnostic Test: An exhaled breath testPatients with interstitial lung disease or patients with Sarcoidosis. Interstitial lung disease is a heterogeneous pulmonary disease characterized with lung fibrosis and manifest with breathlessness. Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of granulomas in various organs, mostly involved is the lungs and intrathoracic lymph nodes . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The age of all subjects were all older than 18 . The study population was recruited from Shanghai pulmonary hospital. Diagnosis of bronchiectasis was performed using chest HRCT scans in suspected patients with coughing and expectoration, or long durations of haemoptysis. Idiopathic bronchiectasis patients with acute exacerbation were included in the study. Healthy participants (HC) and unhealthy participants(UHC) were as control.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- BE Patients were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Age>18 years; (2) the diagnosis of BE was according to European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis; (3) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.
- Healthy control subjects were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria:(1) Age>18 years; (2) No history of any lung disease (according to pulmonary imaging and physical examinations); (3) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.
- Unhealthy control subjects were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Age>18 years; (2) The diagnosis of ILD was according to HRCT and clinical symptoms by two experts' consensus; (3) The diagnosis of Sarcoidosis (SA) was according to American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline;(4) Willing to join in and sign the informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients combined with serious comorbidities (chronic renal failure, hepatic disease, etc.); (2) Patients who are diagnosed with asthma, pneumonia, malignant tumor, and COPD; (3) Women who are pregnant or preparing for pregnancy or breastfeeding; (4) Participated in other clinical trials within three months; (5) Refused to join in and sign the informed consent form.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| An exhaled breath testAll exhaled breath samples were collected by trained investigators following the same protocol. All participants fasted for at least 6 hours before breath collection. To reduce potential confounding factors, all participants were asked to not ingest spicy food, alcohol, or coffee the night before exhaled breath collection. Exhaled breath was collected in Tedlar air bags (DuPont de Nemours). The night before breath collection, the Tedlar bags were baked at 60 °C for 3 hours to fully release possible contaminants and continuously purged with high-purity nitrogen 4 times. Participants first gargled with pure water and then performed a single deep nasal inhalation followed by complete exhalation via their mouth into Tedlar bags. A total of 1000 mL of exhaled breath was collected from each participant. Breath sample detection was based on the HPPI-TOFMS platform. | Diagnostic test | Adult patients with bronchiectasis (BE), Healthy control group (HC), Unhealthy control group (UHC) |
Primary outcome
The Ability of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People
Time frame: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.
Evaluate the ability of the breath test model to distinguish bronchiectasis from healthy individuals by measuring the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The maximum value in the area below the receiver is 1. The closer the value is to 1, the higher the prediction accuracy of the model.
1 secondary outcome
The Sensitivity of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People
Time frame: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bronchiectasis
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of 24 to 52 Weeks Treatment to Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Galvokimig in Adult Study Participants With Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
Recruiting
THERMotherapy Against Persistent Bacterial LUNG Infections
Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Bronchiectasis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Bronchiectasis
Bronchiectasis, Cystic Fibrosis
RecruitingPhase 1
Investigation of Pharmacokinetics, Safety of HSK31858 in Subjects With Renal Impairment
Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFBE)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn How Well People With Bronchiectasis Tolerate Continued Treatment With Verducatib After Earlier Studies (AIRTIVITY®-ON)
Bronchiectasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jin-fu Xu, MD study director
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bronchiectasis, run by Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Ability of the Breath Test Model to Distinguish Bronchiectasis From Healthy People (time frame: One week.Exhaled breath samples were collected on the first day of patients' hospitalization and sent to detect VOCs.The entire process will take one week.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2024.