Spinal Stenosis LumbarPhase 4NCT05297513
Efficacy of ActiveMatrix on Spinal SSI Rate
A Phase 4 study testing ActiveMatrix in people with Spinal Stenosis Lumbar and Surgical Site Infection, run by Baylor College of Medicine.
Trial summary
This clinical trial seeks to provide high level of evidence on the efficacy of ActiveMatrix primarily on spinal surgical site infection rate. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Stenosis Lumbar, Surgical Site Infection, Back Pain Lower Back Chronic
- What is being tested?
- ActiveMatrix
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 275 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2022to Jul 2026
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Male or female, ≥ 18 years of age to 100 years of age
- Have a clinical diagnosis of thoracic and or lumbosacral spinal disease indicated for decompression and/or fusion
- Have no contraindications or allergies to the treatment administered
Who cannot join
- Subject is involved with a worker's compensation, personal injury, or other legal matters related to their health
- Subject does not provide full consent
- Known history of allergy to allografts
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Minimally invasive spinal surgery
- Non-fusion instrumented cases requiring drains
- There is no intended distribution or restriction of subjects by racial and ethnic origin. No vulnerable subjects are included in this protocol.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of ActiveMatrix on Spinal Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Reduction: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
This clinical trial seeks to provide high level of evidence on the efficacy of ActiveMatrix primarily on spinal surgical site infection rate.
Read the detailed description
Postoperative spinal surgical site infections (SSI) have a significant effect on patient morbidity and mortality.1 Spinal SSI as well as other complications including pseudoarthrosis occur at a higher rate in patients with comorbidities including obesity, smoking history, diabetes, steroid use, older age, and higher modified frailty index.2 Patients of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers have higher number of comorbidities than non-VA patients, and are therefore at higher risk for postoperative spinal SSI and complications.3,4 Spinal SSI has been reported to be anywhere from <1% in decompressions to >10% after instrumented fusion.5 Anecdotal evidence has suggested SSI to be as high as 20% among our population. As spine surgeons for the largest VA in the country, our team sought a product that could reduce the rate of spinal SSI, and ideally result in improved patient outcomes, in our at-risk patient population.
Skye Biologics offers placental tissue-based matrices in the form of both flowable and solid mediums. The flowable matrix has been shown in-vitro to contain significant amounts of collagen and growth factors, as well as molecules known to modulate immune response. The results of this have been in-vitro inhibition of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus proliferation, increase in migration of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), adherence to the ASCs in cultures.6 In translation of these results clinical application has been well received, with various subspecialties including ENT and orthopedics using the products. Based on both the positive in vitro and in vivo results, out team began using the flowable product with good initial subjective results, including improved wound healing and excellent patient satisfaction. The true clinical efficacy remains to be assessed, however. Our team sought to provide level 1 evidence on this product in thoracolumbosacaral posterior spinal decompression and/or fusion in our at-risk population via a single-blinded randomized control trial at high-volume institution (s).
- Being tested
- ActiveMatrix
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ActiveMatrixDrug
All patients will receive weight based prophylactic antibiotics i.e. Ancef, vancomycin, or clindamycin. Drains will be used in fusion cases only. Intrawound vancomycin will be used for all instrumented cases.No negative pressure devices will be used. Anatomic layers will be closed in similar, standard fashion for all cases. For those randomized to the treatment group, the ActiveMatrix product will be administered on top of the dura mater and again on the closed fascia. Those in the control group, will forgo this step.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard treatment, no intervention | No intervention | Not described |
| Standard treatment, plus ActiveMatrix | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: ActiveMatrix |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
90-day surgical site infection
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Fascial defects at 3-6 months for fusion cases
Measured: 6 months
Improvement in back and leg pain
Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire/Index (0-100, higher scores indicate greater disability)
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2022
- Study startJul 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spinal Stenosis LumbarStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor College of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 275 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Skye Biologics Holdings, LLC
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alfonso Fuentes, MD, Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05297513
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-51093
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Casper DS, Zmistowski B, Hollern DA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK. The Effect of Postoperative Spinal Infections on Patient Mortality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Feb 1;43(3):223-227. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002277.
PubMed 28604484Badiee RK, Mayer R, Pennicooke B, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Tan LA. Complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion: a review of incidence, risk factors, and prevention strategies. J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):323-333. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.01.
PubMed 32309669Melzer AC, Pinsker EA, Clothier B, Noorbaloochi S, Burgess DJ, Danan ER, Fu SS. Validating the use of veterans affairs tobacco health factors for assessing change in smoking status: accuracy, availability, and approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 11;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0501-2.
PubMed 29751746Agha Z, Lofgren RP, VanRuiswyk JV, Layde PM. Are patients at Veterans Affairs medical centers sicker? A comparative analysis of health status and medical resource use. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Nov 27;160(21):3252-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3252.
PubMed 11088086O'Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG. Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Oct;11(4):471-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08633.
PubMed 19929344Irvin J, Danchik C, Rall J, Babcock A, Pine M, Barnaby D, Pathakamuri J, Kuebler D. Bioactivity and composition of a preserved connective tissue matrix derived from human placental tissue. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 Nov;106(8):2731-2740. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34054. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
PubMed 29437272
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of ActiveMatrix on Spinal Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Reduction: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05297513
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-51093
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 275 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Skye Biologics Holdings, LLC
- Study start
- Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial seeks to provide high level of evidence on the efficacy of ActiveMatrix primarily on spinal surgical site infection rate.
Detailed description
Postoperative spinal surgical site infections (SSI) have a significant effect on patient morbidity and mortality.1 Spinal SSI as well as other complications including pseudoarthrosis occur at a higher rate in patients with comorbidities including obesity, smoking history, diabetes, steroid use, older age, and higher modified frailty index.2 Patients of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers have higher number of comorbidities than non-VA patients, and are therefore at higher risk for postoperative spinal SSI and complications.3,4 Spinal SSI has been reported to be anywhere from <1% in decompressions to >10% after instrumented fusion.5 Anecdotal evidence has suggested SSI to be as high as 20% among our population. As spine surgeons for the largest VA in the country, our team sought a product that could reduce the rate of spinal SSI, and ideally result in improved patient outcomes, in our at-risk patient population.
Skye Biologics offers placental tissue-based matrices in the form of both flowable and solid mediums. The flowable matrix has been shown in-vitro to contain significant amounts of collagen and growth factors, as well as molecules known to modulate immune response. The results of this have been in-vitro inhibition of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus proliferation, increase in migration of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), adherence to the ASCs in cultures.6 In translation of these results clinical application has been well received, with various subspecialties including ENT and orthopedics using the products. Based on both the positive in vitro and in vivo results, out team began using the flowable product with good initial subjective results, including improved wound healing and excellent patient satisfaction. The true clinical efficacy remains to be assessed, however. Our team sought to provide level 1 evidence on this product in thoracolumbosacaral posterior spinal decompression and/or fusion in our at-risk population via a single-blinded randomized control trial at high-volume institution (s).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard treatment, no intervention | No intervention | – |
| Standard treatment, plus ActiveMatrix | Experimental | Drug: ActiveMatrix |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
- Male or female, ≥ 18 years of age to 100 years of age
- Have a clinical diagnosis of thoracic and or lumbosacral spinal disease indicated for decompression and/or fusion
- Have no contraindications or allergies to the treatment administered
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject is involved with a worker's compensation, personal injury, or other legal matters related to their health
- Subject does not provide full consent
- Known history of allergy to allografts
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Minimally invasive spinal surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ActiveMatrixAll patients will receive weight based prophylactic antibiotics i.e. Ancef, vancomycin, or clindamycin. Drains will be used in fusion cases only. Intrawound vancomycin will be used for all instrumented cases.No negative pressure devices will be used. Anatomic layers will be closed in similar, standard fashion for all cases. For those randomized to the treatment group, the ActiveMatrix product will be administered on top of the dura mater and again on the closed fascia. Those in the control group, will forgo this step. | Drug | Standard treatment, plus ActiveMatrix |
Primary outcome
90-day surgical site infection
Time frame: 90 days
2 secondary outcomes
Fascial defects at 3-6 months for fusion cases
Time frame: 6 months
Improvement in back and leg pain
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28604484Casper DS, Zmistowski B, Hollern DA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK. The Effect of Postoperative Spinal Infections on Patient Mortality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Feb 1;43(3):223-227. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002277.
- Background: PubMed 32309669Badiee RK, Mayer R, Pennicooke B, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Tan LA. Complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion: a review of incidence, risk factors, and prevention strategies. J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):323-333. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.01.
- Background: PubMed 29751746Melzer AC, Pinsker EA, Clothier B, Noorbaloochi S, Burgess DJ, Danan ER, Fu SS. Validating the use of veterans affairs tobacco health factors for assessing change in smoking status: accuracy, availability, and approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 11;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0501-2.
- Background: PubMed 11088086Agha Z, Lofgren RP, VanRuiswyk JV, Layde PM. Are patients at Veterans Affairs medical centers sicker? A comparative analysis of health status and medical resource use. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Nov 27;160(21):3252-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3252.
- Background: PubMed 19929344O'Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG. Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Oct;11(4):471-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08633.
- Background: PubMed 29437272Irvin J, Danchik C, Rall J, Babcock A, Pine M, Barnaby D, Pathakamuri J, Kuebler D. Bioactivity and composition of a preserved connective tissue matrix derived from human placental tissue. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 Nov;106(8):2731-2740. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34054. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Stenosis Lumbar
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Foraminal Imaging and Symptoms in Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis
Recruiting
Post-Market Clinical Study of Functional Motion Outcomes in Subjects Treated With the Minuteman Device
Degenerative Conditions of the Lumbar Spine, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
MILD® Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression: A Medicare Claims Study
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
RecruitingObservational study
Thoracic-Lumbar Arthrodesis- Implanet Jazz
Spondylolisthesis, Spinal Stenosis
Recruiting
Surgical Treatment of Adjacent Segment Stenosis
Adjacent Segment Disease, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing ActiveMatrix in people with Spinal Stenosis Lumbar and Surgical Site Infection, run by Baylor College of Medicine.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
90-day surgical site infection (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05297513, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2022.