End of LifeNCT05297734
Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Two Supportive Cancer Care Delivery Models for Adults With Cancer
A study testing Receive technology-based supportive cancer care and Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care in people with End of Life and Cancer, run by Stanford University at 17 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial compares a technology-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach with a redesigned team-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End of Life, Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Receive technology-based supportive cancer care and Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,996 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Jun 2022to 28 Feb 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly diagnosed patients with solid tumor cancer diagnosis or recurrence of the disease.
- Patients must have the ability to understand and willingness to provide verbal consent.
- Participants must speak English, Spanish, Chinese, or Vietnamese.
Who cannot join
- Inability to consent to the study
- Plans to change oncologist within 12 months
- Employed by the practice site
- Patients who anticipate moving from the area within 12 months
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
17 sites in 1 country
United States17 sites, 12 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Gabrielle Rocque, MD
- Recruiting
Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010
Finly Zachariah, MD, 800-826-4673
- Recruiting
VA Medical Center, Fresno
Fresno, California, 93703
- Recruiting
Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
Fruitdale, California, 95128
Sangeeta Aggarwal, MD
- Recruiting
St Jude Heritage Medical Group
Fullerton, California, 92835
David Park, MD
- Recruiting
Spark M. Matsunaga VA Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819
- Active, not recruiting
North Las Vegas VA Medical Center
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89086
- Recruiting
Oncology Institute for Hope and Innovation
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Richy Agajanian, MD
- Active, not recruiting
Sacramento VA Medical Center - VA Northern California Health Care System
Mather, California, 95655
- Recruiting
University of South Alabama
Mobile, Alabama, 36688
Jennifer Y Pierce, MD
- Active, not recruiting
Pacific Cancer Care
Monterey, California, 93940
- Active, not recruiting
VA Palo Alto
Palo Alto, California, 94305
- Recruiting
George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148
- Recruiting
Zuckerberg San Francisco General
San Francisco, California, 94110
Niharika Dixit, MD
- Recruiting
Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
San Francisco, California, 94115
Raymond Liu, MD
- Recruiting
University of San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94117
Kim Rhoads, MD
- Active, not recruiting
San Francisco VA Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94121
About this study
This cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial compares a technology-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach with a redesigned team-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Greater intervention effects on health-related quality of life
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Greater intervention effects on patient activation II. Greater satisfaction with care and decision-making III. Greater documentation of goals of care and symptoms IV. To lower acute care V. Greater palliative care and hospice
OUTLINE: Sites are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive educational materials to assist with advance care planning and symptom management through a technology-based supportive cancer care weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.
ARM B: Patients are paired with a lay health worker who will discuss the same educational materials from ARM A either in person or by telephone discussions weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.
All participants complete a baseline interview upon enrollment during the initial consent phone contact and then a survey at 3-, 6-and 12-months post enrollment.
- Conditions
- End of Life, Cancer
- Being tested
- Receive technology-based supportive cancer care, Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care
- Keywords
- Carcinoma, Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Melanoma, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Sarcoma, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Stomach Neoplasms, Glioblastoma, Rectal Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Esophageal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Skin Neoplasms, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, Osteosarcoma, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Disease Progression
- Medical subject headings
- Death, Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Melanoma, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Sarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Receive technology-based supportive cancer careOther
Also called Technology-based SCC approach
All participants will receive an electronic health record message or email with standardized information provided regarding advance care planning and symptom management.
Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer careBehavioural
Also called Patients Activated in Cancer care through Teams (PACT), Redesigned SCC team-based approach
Lay Health Workers will meet with 1:1 with participants over 12 months to discuss advance care planning, surrogate decision-makers, advance directives and physician orders for life sustaining treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Technology-based supportive cancer care | Active comparator | Patients receive educational materials to assist with advance care planning and symptom management through a technology-based supportive cancer care weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12. Receives: Other: Receive technology-based supportive cancer care |
| Redesigned team-based supportive cancer care | Experimental | Patients are paired with a health educator who will discuss the same educational materials from ARM A either in person or by telephone discussions weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12. Receives: Behavioral: Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G).
Each patient will receive a health-related quality of life survey (FACT-G) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Measured: Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 3 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G).
Each patient will receive a health-related quality of life survey (FACT-G) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Measured: Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 6, and 12 months
Change in patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13).
Each patient will receive a validated patient activation survey (PAM-13) to assess their activation at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Measured: Change in patient activation from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in satisfaction with care using the Consumer Assessment of Health Care (Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Cancer Care Survey Questions #39 and #42.
Each patient will receive a validated satisfaction with care survey at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Measured: Change in satisfaction with care from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in satisfaction with decision using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD)
Each patient will receive a validated satisfaction with decision survey at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
Measured: Change in satisfaction with decision from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months
Palliative Care Use (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Palliative care use will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6 and 12 months after patient enrollment.
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Hospice Care Use (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Hospice care use will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment.
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Emergency Department Visits (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Emergency Department use will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Hospitalization Visits (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Hospital use for each patient will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Documentation of goals of care discussions (Chart Review)
Documentation of goals of care discussions will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Documentation of symptom discussions (Chart Review)
Documentation of symptom discussions will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2022
- Study start24 Jun 2022
- Primary completion31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for End of LifeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial among 26 clinics
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,996 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Manali Indravadan Patel, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05297734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 63646
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Two Supportive Cancer Care Delivery Models for Adults With Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05297734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 63646
- Conditions
- End of Life, Cancer
- Keywords
- Carcinoma, Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Melanoma, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Sarcoma, Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,996 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Study start
- 24 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial compares a technology-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach with a redesigned team-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Greater intervention effects on health-related quality of life
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- Greater intervention effects on patient activation II. Greater satisfaction with care and decision-making III. Greater documentation of goals of care and symptoms IV. To lower acute care V. Greater palliative care and hospice
OUTLINE: Sites are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive educational materials to assist with advance care planning and symptom management through a technology-based supportive cancer care weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.
ARM B: Patients are paired with a lay health worker who will discuss the same educational materials from ARM A either in person or by telephone discussions weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.
All participants complete a baseline interview upon enrollment during the initial consent phone contact and then a survey at 3-, 6-and 12-months post enrollment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial among 26 clinics
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Technology-based supportive cancer care | Active comparator | Other: Receive technology-based supportive cancer carePatients receive educational materials to assist with advance care planning and symptom management through a technology-based supportive cancer care weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12. |
| Redesigned team-based supportive cancer care | Experimental | Behavioral: Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer carePatients are paired with a health educator who will discuss the same educational materials from ARM A either in person or by telephone discussions weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Newly diagnosed patients with solid tumor cancer diagnosis or recurrence of the disease.
- Patients must have the ability to understand and willingness to provide verbal consent.
- Participants must speak English, Spanish, Chinese, or Vietnamese.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inability to consent to the study
- Plans to change oncologist within 12 months
- Employed by the practice site
- Patients who anticipate moving from the area within 12 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Receive technology-based supportive cancer careAlso: Technology-based SCC approachAll participants will receive an electronic health record message or email with standardized information provided regarding advance care planning and symptom management. | Other | Technology-based supportive cancer care |
| Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer careAlso: Patients Activated in Cancer care through Teams (PACT), Redesigned SCC team-based approachLay Health Workers will meet with 1:1 with participants over 12 months to discuss advance care planning, surrogate decision-makers, advance directives and physician orders for life sustaining treatment. | Behavioural | Redesigned team-based supportive cancer care |
Primary outcome
Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G).
Time frame: Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 3 months
Each patient will receive a health-related quality of life survey (FACT-G) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G).
Time frame: Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 6, and 12 months
Change in patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13).
Time frame: Change in patient activation from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in satisfaction with care using the Consumer Assessment of Health Care (Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Cancer Care Survey Questions #39 and #42.
Time frame: Change in satisfaction with care from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months
Change in satisfaction with decision using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD)
Time frame: Change in satisfaction with decision from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months
Palliative Care Use (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Hospice Care Use (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Emergency Department Visits (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Hospitalization Visits (Self-reported and Chart Review)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Documentation of goals of care discussions (Chart Review)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Documentation of symptom discussions (Chart Review)
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2026.
Related trials for End of Life
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Receive technology-based supportive cancer care and Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care in people with End of Life and Cancer, run by Stanford University at 17 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Manali I Patel, MD MPH MS (6507234000, manalip@stanford.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G). (time frame: Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2026.