Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 4SEMANCT05303857
Analyse the Effect of Semaglutide on Vascular Structure and Function in Patients With Early Type 2 Diabetes
A Phase 4 study testing Semaglutide Pen Injector in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
This is a phase IV, randomized (1:1), prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group, single center study at the Clinical Research Unit (CRC) of the Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, with its two separate locations: Nürnberg, Kreuzburger Str. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Semaglutide Pen Injector
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2022to 17 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age of 18 - 75 years
- Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: defined by fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or HbA1c ≥ 6,5 % or on oral single or dual blood glucose lowering medication (held constant for the last 3 months)
- HbA1c ≥ 7.0%
- Male and Female patients (females of child bearing potential must be using adequate contraceptive precautions)
- Females of childbearing potential or within two years of the menopause must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening visit
- Informed consent (§ 40 Abs. 1 Satz 3 Punkt 3 AMG) has to be given in written form
Who cannot join
- Any other form of diabetes mellitus than type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Use of insulin, sulfonylurea or GLP-1 analogue within the past 3 months
- Patients with more than two oral blood glucose lowering medication
- HbA1c ≥ 10.5%
- Body mass index > 40 kg/m²
- Fasting plasma glucose > 240 mg/dl
Show all 27Show fewer
- Any form of diabetic retinopathy, macular oedema
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73m²
- Acute or chronic pancreatitis
- Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (BP ≥ 180/110 mmHg)
- Any history of stroke, transient ischemic attack, instable angina pectoris, or myocardial infarction within the last 3 months prior to study inclusion
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) NYHA stage III and IV
- Drug or alcohol abuses
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
- Subset of patients receiving ASL-MRI, exclusion criteria-
- Patients with contraindications to MRI, including:
- Brain aneurysm clip
- Implanted neural stimulator
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, or presence of intracardiac wires
- Prosthetic heart valves
- Cochlear implant
- Ocular foreign bodies that might be ferromagnetic (e.g., metal shavings)
- Other implanted medical devices (e.g., insulin pumps)
- Metal shrapnel or bullets still in the body
- Severe claustrophobia
- Tattoos (as determined by the Investigator and Imager)
- Weight in excess of MRI machine capacity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Clinical Research Center, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen
Erlangen, 91054
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Prospective Clinical Study to Analyse the Effect of Semaglutide on Vascular Structure and Function in Patients With Early Type 2 Diabetes
This is a phase IV, randomized (1:1), prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group, single center study at the Clinical Research Unit (CRC) of the Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, with its two separate locations:
- Nürnberg, Kreuzburger Str. 2, 90471 Nürnberg, and
- Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen The main goal of the study is to demonstrate the effect of semaglutide on different vascular parameters of the macro- and microcirculation. The primary objective is to analyze the effect of semaglutide, compared to placebo on central (aortic) pulse pressure.
Read more
At least 90 patients will be randomized (1:1) and included (informed consent, intention to treat population) in order to obtain 80 fully evaluable subjects (per protocol population).
Patients will be simultaneously recruited from investigator's outpatient clinics, referring physicians, and advertisement in local newspapers, and social media. Those patients that appear to potentially fulfill the inclusion criteria will be invited to a screening visit (visit 1). After providing informed consent, patients will be tested for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients will provide a blood sample for laboratory testing. If the patient then fulfills inclusion criteria and in the absence of exclusion criteria, the patient will be enrolled into the trial, and the study visits will be scheduled. Randomization will take place at the latest one day prior to the study visit 2 (e.g. at the latest at visit 2a).
At visit 2 (2a and 2b), baseline vascular function parameters will be obtained and the patient will be given a SC injection of the study drug (either SC 0.25 mg semaglutide or SC placebo). After giving detailed instructions to the patient how to apply the injections, the patient will be advised to apply the injection once weekly. A safety visit will be conducted 1 week after first administration of study drug (visit 3). At visit 4 and 5, semaglutide will be up-titrated to 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg respectively. At visit 6, a safety visit will be conducted and the dose of semaglutide will be kept at 1.0 mg. After 16 weeks of treatment (visits 7a and 7b), testing of vascular function will be repeated. At visit 7b, a final close out visit will be performed to gather additional safety information.
Read the detailed description
Diabetes mellitus type 2, considered at the beginning as a metabolic disorder, converts into a predominantly vascular disease, once its duration extends over several years or/and when additional cardiovascular risk factors like arterial hypertension coexist. Moreover, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Recently, it has been demonstrated in a large longitudinal study that arterial stiffness is associated with higher risk of incident diabetes, independent of traditional risk factors. Increase in arterial stiffness appeared to even precede increase in fasting blood glucose. Moreover, we showed a reduced retinal capillary density in patients with prediabetes compared to patients with normal glucose metabolism (unpublished data). As a consequence, treatment of type 2 diabetes should focus not only on metabolic control but also on improving vascular structure and function, including endothelial function, the first stage of the atherosclerotic cascade.
In the last decade many studies have shown improved cardiovascular outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with recently developed antidiabetic medication. The EMPA-REG Outcome trial evaluated the effect of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (empagliflozin) and have shown improved cardiovascular outcomes and lower rate of death from any cause in patients with type 2 diabetes who were at high risk for cardiovascular events. Similarly, in the LEADER trial first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was lower with a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue (liraglutide) than with placebo.
Semaglutide is another glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week compared to liraglutide (efficacy and safety). Without any doubts, the large-scale prospective trial (SUSTAIN-6) demonstrating improved cardiovascular prognosis along with significant blood glucose reduction after treatment with semaglutide are very impressive and convincing, and this study fulfilled the regulatory guidance to establish cardiovascular safety of new therapies for type 2 diabetes. However this was primarily a non-inferior trial, although it demonstrated superiority with respect to the combined cardiovascular endpoint (p=0.02 for superiority). In the PIONEER-6 study conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes at least above 50 years with cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease or above 60 years and with cardiovascular risk factors, oral semaglutide proved cardiovascular safety. Other benefits of semaglutide in patient cohorts other than patients with type 2 diabetes has been described recently.
Several prospective studies reported a closer relation of organ damage with central (aortic) as opposed to peripheral (brachial) systolic blood pressure (BP), and central systolic BP was found to be independently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In accordance, central pulse pressure has been repeatedly found to independently predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in various study cohorts. Further-more, prospective data have now been published showing that the forward and backward (reflected) wave amplitude predict independently cardiovascular complications. New advanced technology allows us to assess vascular parameters also under ambulatory conditions over 24 hours. Previously, we could demonstrate that the SGLT-2 inhibitors empagliflozin and dapagliflozin as well as the DPP-4 inhibitor saxagliptin improved parameters of vascular function and arterial stiffness and decreased central (aortic) pulse and systolic pressures (i.e. afterload of the left ventricle). Our results provided evidence for the concept that the better cardiovascular and renal outcomes observed with empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG Outcome Study are related to improved vascular function.
So far, there are no clinical data or an in-depth analysis of the effects on vascular function and stiffness after treatment with GLP-1 analogues, neither with liraglutide nor with semaglutide. In mice, semaglutide reduced the development of atherosclerosis by preventing the development of aortic plaques. Data supporting the concept that semaglutide improves vascular structure and function, including endothelial function are lacking, and our study aims at closing this knowledge gap by measuring various parameters of vascular remodeling and function at the same time thereby allowing us to delineate a complete profile of the vascular effects of semaglutide in the maco- and microcirculation. Such an approach is now in particular of relevance, since the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has already approved semaglutide s.c. (Ozempic) and semaglutide in an oral formula (Rybelsus) within the EU.
Our hypothesis is that in face of its impressive anti-diabetic effect semaglutide exerts beneficial effects on vascular structure and function, including endothelial function. Since the arterial pulse wave along the arterial tree is reflected at each bifurcation and thereby in particular at the ones of small arterioles, improvement in the vascular structure and function in microcirculation will also have profound consequences for the macrocirculation, as previously demonstrated, by lowering central pulse pressure and central systolic pressure both considered as valid and reliably measurable vascular parameters in the macrocirculation.
The main goal of the study is to demonstrate the effect of semaglutide on different vascular parameters of the macro- and microcirculation. The primary objective is to analyze the effect of semaglutide, compared to placebo on central (aortic) pulse pressure. Flow mediated vasodilation (FMD), an indicator of the integrity of endothelial function, is another parameter of the macrocirculation assessed in this study. Another parameter of the macrocirculation, assessed both in resting condition and 24-hours ambulatory conditions, in this study is pulse wave velocity (PWV), which is well known as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. To analyze vascular remodeling processes in the microcirculation, we are measuring wall to lumen ratio of small retinal arterioles non-invasively in-vivo that reflects vascular remodeling of small arteries. Finally, only for a subgroup of up to 40 paitents parameters of the renal circulation including total renal perfusion, separate cortical and medullary renal perfusion and renal vascular resistance are measured using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI).
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Semaglutide Pen Injector, Placebo
- Keywords
- vascular structure, vascular function, GLP-1 analogue
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Semaglutide Pen InjectorDrug
Injection of the semaglutide once weekly
PlaceboDrug
Injection of placebo once weekly
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Active comparator | Baseline vascular function parameters will be obtained and the patient will be given semaglutide 1.34 mg/ml (SC, administered by personal injector, once weekly) Receives: Drug: Semaglutide Pen Injector |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Baseline vascular function parameters will be obtained and the patient will be given placebo (SC, administered by personal injector, once weekly) Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Central (aortic) pulse pressure assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
The primary objective of the study is to analyze the effect of semaglutide, compared to placebo, on:
central (aortic) pulse pressure after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (14)
Central (aortic) systolic pressure assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
change of central (aortic) systolic pressure after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Augmentation pressure assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
change of augmentation pressure after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Augmentation index (cAIX@75) assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
change of augmentation index (cAIX@75) after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Forward wave amplitude assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
change of forward wave amplitude after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Backward wave amplitude assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
change of backward wave amplitude after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Outer diameter of small retinal arterioles assessed by Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
change of outer diameter of small retinal arterioles after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Inner diameter of small retinal arterioles assessed by Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
change of inner diameter of small retinal arterioles after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Wall to lumen ratio of small retinal arterioles assessed by Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
change of wall to lumen ratio of small retinal arterioles after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Flow-mediated Vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery assessed by UNEX EF
change of FMD of the brachial artery after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Pulse wave velocity assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
change of pulse wave velocity after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
24-h ambulatory BP (brachial and central) assessed by Mobil-O-Graph®
change of 24-h ambulatory BP (brachial and central) after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
24-h ambulatory vascular parameter assessed by Mobil-O-Graph®
change of 24-h ambulatory vascular parameter (pulse wave velocity) from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
24-h ambulatory vascular parameter assessed by Mobil-O-Graph®
change of 24-h ambulatory vascular parameter (central pulse pressure, central systolic pressure) from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Renal perfusion of both kidneys assessed by Arterial Spin Labeling MRI
change of renal perfusion (total, cortical, medullary) from baseline
Measured: 16 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2022
- Study start3 Mar 2022
- Primary completion15 Dec 2023
- Study completion17 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group, prospective
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Roland E. Schmieder, University Hospital Erlangen
- Investigators
- Roalnd E Schmieder, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital Erlangen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05303857
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CRC2020SEMA
- Acronym
- SEMA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 11 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Prospective Clinical Study to Analyse the Effect of Semaglutide on Vascular Structure and Function in Patients With Early Type 2 Diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05303857
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SEMA / CRC2020SEMA
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- vascular structure, vascular function, GLP-1 analogue
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase IV, randomized (1:1), prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group, single center study at the Clinical Research Unit (CRC) of the Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, with its two separate locations:
- Nürnberg, Kreuzburger Str. 2, 90471 Nürnberg, and
- Erlangen, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen The main goal of the study is to demonstrate the effect of semaglutide on different vascular parameters of the macro- and microcirculation. The primary objective is to analyze the effect of semaglutide, compared to placebo on central (aortic) pulse pressure.
At least 90 patients will be randomized (1:1) and included (informed consent, intention to treat population) in order to obtain 80 fully evaluable subjects (per protocol population).
Patients will be simultaneously recruited from investigator's outpatient clinics, referring physicians, and advertisement in local newspapers, and social media. Those patients that appear to potentially fulfill the inclusion criteria will be invited to a screening visit (visit 1). After providing informed consent, patients will be tested for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients will provide a blood sample for laboratory testing. If the patient then fulfills inclusion criteria and in the absence of exclusion criteria, the patient will be enrolled into the trial, and the study visits will be scheduled. Randomization will take place at the latest one day prior to the study visit 2 (e.g. at the latest at visit 2a).
At visit 2 (2a and 2b), baseline vascular function parameters will be obtained and the patient will be given a SC injection of the study drug (either SC 0.25 mg semaglutide or SC placebo). After giving detailed instructions to the patient how to apply the injections, the patient will be advised to apply the injection once weekly. A safety visit will be conducted 1 week after first administration of study drug (visit 3). At visit 4 and 5, semaglutide will be up-titrated to 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg respectively. At visit 6, a safety visit will be conducted and the dose of semaglutide will be kept at 1.0 mg. After 16 weeks of treatment (visits 7a and 7b), testing of vascular function will be repeated. At visit 7b, a final close out visit will be performed to gather additional safety information.
Detailed description
Diabetes mellitus type 2, considered at the beginning as a metabolic disorder, converts into a predominantly vascular disease, once its duration extends over several years or/and when additional cardiovascular risk factors like arterial hypertension coexist. Moreover, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Recently, it has been demonstrated in a large longitudinal study that arterial stiffness is associated with higher risk of incident diabetes, independent of traditional risk factors. Increase in arterial stiffness appeared to even precede increase in fasting blood glucose. Moreover, we showed a reduced retinal capillary density in patients with prediabetes compared to patients with normal glucose metabolism (unpublished data). As a consequence, treatment of type 2 diabetes should focus not only on metabolic control but also on improving vascular structure and function, including endothelial function, the first stage of the atherosclerotic cascade.
In the last decade many studies have shown improved cardiovascular outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with recently developed antidiabetic medication. The EMPA-REG Outcome trial evaluated the effect of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (empagliflozin) and have shown improved cardiovascular outcomes and lower rate of death from any cause in patients with type 2 diabetes who were at high risk for cardiovascular events. Similarly, in the LEADER trial first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was lower with a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue (liraglutide) than with placebo.
Semaglutide is another glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue with an extended half-life of approximately 1 week compared to liraglutide (efficacy and safety). Without any doubts, the large-scale prospective trial (SUSTAIN-6) demonstrating improved cardiovascular prognosis along with significant blood glucose reduction after treatment with semaglutide are very impressive and convincing, and this study fulfilled the regulatory guidance to establish cardiovascular safety of new therapies for type 2 diabetes. However this was primarily a non-inferior trial, although it demonstrated superiority with respect to the combined cardiovascular endpoint (p=0.02 for superiority). In the PIONEER-6 study conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes at least above 50 years with cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease or above 60 years and with cardiovascular risk factors, oral semaglutide proved cardiovascular safety. Other benefits of semaglutide in patient cohorts other than patients with type 2 diabetes has been described recently.
Several prospective studies reported a closer relation of organ damage with central (aortic) as opposed to peripheral (brachial) systolic blood pressure (BP), and central systolic BP was found to be independently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In accordance, central pulse pressure has been repeatedly found to independently predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in various study cohorts. Further-more, prospective data have now been published showing that the forward and backward (reflected) wave amplitude predict independently cardiovascular complications. New advanced technology allows us to assess vascular parameters also under ambulatory conditions over 24 hours. Previously, we could demonstrate that the SGLT-2 inhibitors empagliflozin and dapagliflozin as well as the DPP-4 inhibitor saxagliptin improved parameters of vascular function and arterial stiffness and decreased central (aortic) pulse and systolic pressures (i.e. afterload of the left ventricle). Our results provided evidence for the concept that the better cardiovascular and renal outcomes observed with empagliflozin in the EMPA-REG Outcome Study are related to improved vascular function.
So far, there are no clinical data or an in-depth analysis of the effects on vascular function and stiffness after treatment with GLP-1 analogues, neither with liraglutide nor with semaglutide. In mice, semaglutide reduced the development of atherosclerosis by preventing the development of aortic plaques. Data supporting the concept that semaglutide improves vascular structure and function, including endothelial function are lacking, and our study aims at closing this knowledge gap by measuring various parameters of vascular remodeling and function at the same time thereby allowing us to delineate a complete profile of the vascular effects of semaglutide in the maco- and microcirculation. Such an approach is now in particular of relevance, since the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has already approved semaglutide s.c. (Ozempic) and semaglutide in an oral formula (Rybelsus) within the EU.
Our hypothesis is that in face of its impressive anti-diabetic effect semaglutide exerts beneficial effects on vascular structure and function, including endothelial function. Since the arterial pulse wave along the arterial tree is reflected at each bifurcation and thereby in particular at the ones of small arterioles, improvement in the vascular structure and function in microcirculation will also have profound consequences for the macrocirculation, as previously demonstrated, by lowering central pulse pressure and central systolic pressure both considered as valid and reliably measurable vascular parameters in the macrocirculation.
The main goal of the study is to demonstrate the effect of semaglutide on different vascular parameters of the macro- and microcirculation. The primary objective is to analyze the effect of semaglutide, compared to placebo on central (aortic) pulse pressure. Flow mediated vasodilation (FMD), an indicator of the integrity of endothelial function, is another parameter of the macrocirculation assessed in this study. Another parameter of the macrocirculation, assessed both in resting condition and 24-hours ambulatory conditions, in this study is pulse wave velocity (PWV), which is well known as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. To analyze vascular remodeling processes in the microcirculation, we are measuring wall to lumen ratio of small retinal arterioles non-invasively in-vivo that reflects vascular remodeling of small arteries. Finally, only for a subgroup of up to 40 paitents parameters of the renal circulation including total renal perfusion, separate cortical and medullary renal perfusion and renal vascular resistance are measured using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group, prospective
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Semaglutide Pen InjectorBaseline vascular function parameters will be obtained and the patient will be given semaglutide 1.34 mg/ml (SC, administered by personal injector, once weekly) |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboBaseline vascular function parameters will be obtained and the patient will be given placebo (SC, administered by personal injector, once weekly) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age of 18 - 75 years
- Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus: defined by fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or HbA1c ≥ 6,5 % or on oral single or dual blood glucose lowering medication (held constant for the last 3 months)
- HbA1c ≥ 7.0%
- Male and Female patients (females of child bearing potential must be using adequate contraceptive precautions)
- Females of childbearing potential or within two years of the menopause must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening visit
Key exclusion criteria (27 listed)
- Any other form of diabetes mellitus than type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Use of insulin, sulfonylurea or GLP-1 analogue within the past 3 months
- Patients with more than two oral blood glucose lowering medication
- HbA1c ≥ 10.5%
- Body mass index > 40 kg/m²
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide Pen InjectorInjection of the semaglutide once weekly | Drug | Treatment |
| PlaceboInjection of placebo once weekly | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Central (aortic) pulse pressure assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
Time frame: 16 weeks
The primary objective of the study is to analyze the effect of semaglutide, compared to placebo, on: central (aortic) pulse pressure after 16 weeks of treatment from baseline
14 secondary outcomes
Central (aortic) systolic pressure assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
Time frame: 16 weeks
Augmentation pressure assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
Time frame: 16 weeks
Augmentation index (cAIX@75) assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
Time frame: 16 weeks
Forward wave amplitude assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
Time frame: 16 weeks
Backward wave amplitude assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
Time frame: 16 weeks
Outer diameter of small retinal arterioles assessed by Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
Time frame: 16 weeks
Inner diameter of small retinal arterioles assessed by Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
Time frame: 16 weeks
Wall to lumen ratio of small retinal arterioles assessed by Scanning laser Doppler flowmetry
Time frame: 16 weeks
Flow-mediated Vasodilation (FMD) of the brachial artery assessed by UNEX EF
Time frame: 16 weeks
Pulse wave velocity assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL
Time frame: 16 weeks
24-h ambulatory BP (brachial and central) assessed by Mobil-O-Graph®
Time frame: 16 weeks
24-h ambulatory vascular parameter assessed by Mobil-O-Graph®
Time frame: 16 weeks
24-h ambulatory vascular parameter assessed by Mobil-O-Graph®
Time frame: 16 weeks
Renal perfusion of both kidneys assessed by Arterial Spin Labeling MRI
Time frame: 16 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jun 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
RecruitingObservational study
Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes in West Africans
Hypertension, Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study Comparing SHR-3167 With Insulin Degludec in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Currently Treated With Basal Insulin
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Active, not recruiting
Chrono Nutrition and Insulin Resistance in Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Research Trial to Study Insulin Sensitivity Using Automated Glucose Clamp Technology
Obesity Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Obese Adults
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Eloralintide (LY3841136) in Participants With Obesity or Overweight, Type 2 Diabetes, and Increased Cardiovascular Risk
Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roalnd E Schmieder, MD principal investigator
University Hospital Erlangen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Semaglutide Pen Injector in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 27 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Central (aortic) pulse pressure assessed by Sphygmocor XCEL (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2025.