Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePREVAILNCT05306743
PRagmatic EVAluation of a Quality Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-risk COPD.
A study testing CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
A 3-year cluster randomized controlled trial of the impact of a quality improvement and clinical decision support package versus usual care for patients with modifiable high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with or without a current diagnosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 126 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2022to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Primary Care Teams (PCTs) must be able to function as a single randomization unit with low risk of contamination between participants and physicians due to the absence of blinding in the intervention (see section 8.8 for details on blinding).
- PCT must have a sufficient number of patients meeting modifiable high-risk patient criteria (see section 8.1 on sample size estimates).
- PCT must express willingness to be randomized to either receive the CONQUEST program initially, or usual care until program roll-out to the delayed intervention arm.
Who cannot join
- PCTs that are in the process of, or planning to change EHR software provider or practice ownership within the trial outcome evaluation period
- PCTs engaged in active research studies or COPD related Quality Improvement Programs which might impact the ability to implement CONQUEST program.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
MetroHealth
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Yasir Tarabichi, MD
- Recruiting
University of Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80309
Rodger Kessler, PhD
- Recruiting
Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Juan Wisnivesky, MD
About this study
Official title: Pragmatic Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-risk COPD (PREVAIL)
A 3-year cluster randomized controlled trial of the impact of a quality improvement and clinical decision support package versus usual care for patients with modifiable high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with or without a current diagnosis.
Read the detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequently underdiagnosed major health problem, responsible for over 250 million cases of disease and 3 million deaths (5% of all deaths) worldwide in 2015. Despite resulting in more than $30 billion in direct healthcare costs in the USA, and causing significant morbidity and lost days of work, COPD remains a globally under-recognised condition, with an estimated 60% of cases undetected at any one time, and frequently misdiagnosed in smokers and people with asthma.
Even once diagnosed, about two thirds of patients will have already experienced significant lung function decline or previous serious exacerbations, indicating that opportunities for earlier diagnosis may have been lost. The consequences of this have been summarized persuasively using data from large population-based studies of patients, demonstrating higher future risk of exacerbations, accelerated lung function decline, greater risk of cardiovascular events, higher mortality rates, and larger healthcare costs in late diagnosed patients with a symptomatic history.
Several proof of principle studies have demonstrated the feasibility of case finding in primary care, however, in practice it is patchily implemented if at all, with inconsistent evidence demonstrating significant positive impact. This is partially because post-case finding, patient follow-up and management can be poor and significant subgroups of COPD patients with frequent exacerbations or high symptom scores remain undertreated or under-monitored according to quality standards. Such patients represent a high-risk "phenotype" in whom risk may be reduced with dedicated measures taken for individualized, targeted management. This may be achieved by analyzing patient electronic medical records (EMR) data as a means to identify patients with modifiable, high-risk COPD in whom there remains options to further optimize their treatment according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations.
The CONQUEST intervention (Collaboration on a Quality Improvement Initiative to Achieve Excellence in Standards of COPD Care) will address areas for optimization of the management of patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, or potential COPD, through a targeted Quality Improvement Program (QIP) in primary care practices. The intervention will implement validated algorithms (appropriately adapted for CONQUEST) to identify patients with modifiable high-risk COPD or undiagnosed patients with potential modifiable high-risk COPD, and support their management through a multicomponent package incorporating Clinical Decision Support (CDS).
Parallel to this, the pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial - "PREVAIL" (PRagmatic EVAluation of a quality Improvement program for people Living with modifiable high-risk COPD) will be conducted evaluating the effectiveness of the CONQUEST intervention compared to usual care. Primary care teams will be the cluster unit of randomization.
Because of the established relationship between risk of major cardiac events and exacerbations, the effectiveness of the CONQUEST program will be evaluated in terms of COPD exacerbations and cardiovascular or respiratory events. The design of this trial presents a unique opportunity to compare major adverse cardiac or respiratory events (MACRE) outcomes in a naturally-occurring group of patients who are both frequent exacerbators and either treatment-naïve or undertreated at trial baseline, and to measure these outcomes over a period of time comparatively longer than the standard 52 weeks of many clinical trials of COPD medications.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, Quality Improvement Program
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CONQUEST Quality Improvement ProgramOther
CONQUEST supports primary healthcare professionals to diagnose, assess, and optimize the management of their patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, through the promotion of guideline-based care. CONQUEST will promote management according to four "Quality Standards" for the care of modifiable high-risk COPD patients. The Quality Standards can be summarized as the timely and appropriate: Identification of high-risk patient groups for assessment; Assessment of disease and quantification of future risk; Non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention; Follow-up. CONQUEST program will promote adherence to these standards through the use of electronic medical record -based algorithms for the identification of high-risk patients and clinical decision support resources. All decisions regarding patient management are made entirely at the discretion of the clinicians and patients who together negotiate the preferred course of action during consultations.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CONQUEST Intervention Arm | Experimental | Intervention arm clusters will receive the CONQUEST quality improvement program. Receives: Other: CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program |
| Delayed Intervention Arm | Other | The CONQUEST quality improvement program will be rolled-out to the delayed intervention practices at the end of the outcome evaluation period. Receives: Other: CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1a: COPD Exacerbations and 1b) major cardiac or respiratory events
To evaluate the effectiveness of the CONQUEST program on 1a) the annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations and on 2b) the annual rates of major adverse cardiac or respiratory events (during the outcome evaluation period).
Measured: During the 2-year outcome evaluation period
Secondary outcomes (1)
Systemic corticosteroid use (SCS)
To evaluate the impact of the CONQUEST program on systemic corticosteroid (SCS) use to treat COPD exacerbations during the outcome evaluation period.
Measured: During the 2 year outcome evaluation period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2022
- Study start23 Sep 2022
- Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A total of 126 primary care teams (PCT) will be enrolled in the trial; 63 PCTs will be randomized to the intervention arm and receive the CONQUEST QIP, and 63 to the control arm where they will receive care as usual.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The DARTNet Institute (DI), AstraZeneca, Optimum Patient Care Global Limited
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05306743
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OPRI-2003
- Acronym
- PREVAIL
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hickman K, Tarabichi Y, Dickens AP, Pullen R, Kerr M, Couper A, Evans A, Gatenby J, Alves L, Ariti C, Bafadhel M, Carter V, Chalmers J, Chen R, Devereux G, Drummond MB, Gibson JM, Halpin DMG, Han M, Hanania NA, Hurst JR, Kaplan A, Kostikas K, Make B, Mapel D, Marshall J, Martinez F, Meldrum C, van Melle M, Miravitlles M, Morris T, Mullerova H, Murray R, Muro S, Nordon C, Ohar J, Pace W, Pollack M, Quint JK, Sharma A, Singh D, Singh M, Trudo F, Williams D, Wilkinson T, Winders T, Price D. Pragmatic Evaluation of an Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-Risk COPD Versus Usual Care: Protocols for the Cluster Randomized PREVAIL Trial. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025 May 27;12(3):223-239. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0564.
PubMed 40300198
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pragmatic Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-risk COPD (PREVAIL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05306743
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREVAIL / OPRI-2003
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease, Quality Improvement Program
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 126 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Observational and Pragmatic Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The DARTNet Institute (DI), AstraZeneca, Optimum Patient Care Global Limited
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A 3-year cluster randomized controlled trial of the impact of a quality improvement and clinical decision support package versus usual care for patients with modifiable high-risk chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with or without a current diagnosis.
Detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequently underdiagnosed major health problem, responsible for over 250 million cases of disease and 3 million deaths (5% of all deaths) worldwide in 2015. Despite resulting in more than $30 billion in direct healthcare costs in the USA, and causing significant morbidity and lost days of work, COPD remains a globally under-recognised condition, with an estimated 60% of cases undetected at any one time, and frequently misdiagnosed in smokers and people with asthma.
Even once diagnosed, about two thirds of patients will have already experienced significant lung function decline or previous serious exacerbations, indicating that opportunities for earlier diagnosis may have been lost. The consequences of this have been summarized persuasively using data from large population-based studies of patients, demonstrating higher future risk of exacerbations, accelerated lung function decline, greater risk of cardiovascular events, higher mortality rates, and larger healthcare costs in late diagnosed patients with a symptomatic history.
Several proof of principle studies have demonstrated the feasibility of case finding in primary care, however, in practice it is patchily implemented if at all, with inconsistent evidence demonstrating significant positive impact. This is partially because post-case finding, patient follow-up and management can be poor and significant subgroups of COPD patients with frequent exacerbations or high symptom scores remain undertreated or under-monitored according to quality standards. Such patients represent a high-risk "phenotype" in whom risk may be reduced with dedicated measures taken for individualized, targeted management. This may be achieved by analyzing patient electronic medical records (EMR) data as a means to identify patients with modifiable, high-risk COPD in whom there remains options to further optimize their treatment according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations.
The CONQUEST intervention (Collaboration on a Quality Improvement Initiative to Achieve Excellence in Standards of COPD Care) will address areas for optimization of the management of patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, or potential COPD, through a targeted Quality Improvement Program (QIP) in primary care practices. The intervention will implement validated algorithms (appropriately adapted for CONQUEST) to identify patients with modifiable high-risk COPD or undiagnosed patients with potential modifiable high-risk COPD, and support their management through a multicomponent package incorporating Clinical Decision Support (CDS).
Parallel to this, the pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial - "PREVAIL" (PRagmatic EVAluation of a quality Improvement program for people Living with modifiable high-risk COPD) will be conducted evaluating the effectiveness of the CONQUEST intervention compared to usual care. Primary care teams will be the cluster unit of randomization.
Because of the established relationship between risk of major cardiac events and exacerbations, the effectiveness of the CONQUEST program will be evaluated in terms of COPD exacerbations and cardiovascular or respiratory events. The design of this trial presents a unique opportunity to compare major adverse cardiac or respiratory events (MACRE) outcomes in a naturally-occurring group of patients who are both frequent exacerbators and either treatment-naïve or undertreated at trial baseline, and to measure these outcomes over a period of time comparatively longer than the standard 52 weeks of many clinical trials of COPD medications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A total of 126 primary care teams (PCT) will be enrolled in the trial; 63 PCTs will be randomized to the intervention arm and receive the CONQUEST QIP, and 63 to the control arm where they will receive care as usual.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CONQUEST Intervention Arm | Experimental | Other: CONQUEST Quality Improvement ProgramIntervention arm clusters will receive the CONQUEST quality improvement program. |
| Delayed Intervention Arm | Other | Other: CONQUEST Quality Improvement ProgramThe CONQUEST quality improvement program will be rolled-out to the delayed intervention practices at the end of the outcome evaluation period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Primary Care Teams (PCTs) must be able to function as a single randomization unit with low risk of contamination between participants and physicians due to the absence of blinding in the intervention (see section 8.8 for details on blinding).
- PCT must have a sufficient number of patients meeting modifiable high-risk patient criteria (see section 8.1 on sample size estimates).
- PCT must express willingness to be randomized to either receive the CONQUEST program initially, or usual care until program roll-out to the delayed intervention arm.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- PCTs that are in the process of, or planning to change EHR software provider or practice ownership within the trial outcome evaluation period
- PCTs engaged in active research studies or COPD related Quality Improvement Programs which might impact the ability to implement CONQUEST program.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CONQUEST Quality Improvement ProgramCONQUEST supports primary healthcare professionals to diagnose, assess, and optimize the management of their patients with modifiable high-risk COPD, through the promotion of guideline-based care. CONQUEST will promote management according to four "Quality Standards" for the care of modifiable high-risk COPD patients. The Quality Standards can be summarized as the timely and appropriate: Identification of high-risk patient groups for assessment; Assessment of disease and quantification of future risk; Non-pharmacological and pharmacological intervention; Follow-up. CONQUEST program will promote adherence to these standards through the use of electronic medical record -based algorithms for the identification of high-risk patients and clinical decision support resources. All decisions regarding patient management are made entirely at the discretion of the clinicians and patients who together negotiate the preferred course of action during consultations. | Other | CONQUEST Intervention Arm, Delayed Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
1a: COPD Exacerbations and 1b) major cardiac or respiratory events
Time frame: During the 2-year outcome evaluation period
To evaluate the effectiveness of the CONQUEST program on 1a) the annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations and on 2b) the annual rates of major adverse cardiac or respiratory events (during the outcome evaluation period).
1 secondary outcome
Systemic corticosteroid use (SCS)
Time frame: During the 2 year outcome evaluation period
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40300198Hickman K, Tarabichi Y, Dickens AP, Pullen R, Kerr M, Couper A, Evans A, Gatenby J, Alves L, Ariti C, Bafadhel M, Carter V, Chalmers J, Chen R, Devereux G, Drummond MB, Gibson JM, Halpin DMG, Han M, Hanania NA, Hurst JR, Kaplan A, Kostikas K, Make B, Mapel D, Marshall J, Martinez F, Meldrum C, van Melle M, Miravitlles M, Morris T, Mullerova H, Murray R, Muro S, Nordon C, Ohar J, Pace W, Pollack M, Quint JK, Sharma A, Singh D, Singh M, Trudo F, Williams D, Wilkinson T, Winders T, Price D. Pragmatic Evaluation of an Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-Risk COPD Versus Usual Care: Protocols for the Cluster Randomized PREVAIL Trial. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025 May 27;12(3):223-239. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0564.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CONQUEST Quality Improvement Program in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact David Price, FRCGP (+65 3105 1489, dprice@opri.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1a: COPD Exacerbations and 1b) major cardiac or respiratory events (time frame: During the 2-year outcome evaluation period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05306743, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2023.