Overactive BladderINTENSENCT05309993
INvestigation of TENS Efficacy Versus Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder
A study testing PTNS and TENS in people with Overactive Bladder and Overactive Bladder Syndrome, run by University of New Mexico at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this research is to perform a non-masked, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to assess the quality of life (QOL) of women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) before and after treatment with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Overactive Bladder, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Urinary Urge Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- PTNS and TENS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2022to 1 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female Subjects ≥18 years of age
- OAB, UUI or Mixed Urinary Incontinence with urgency predominant symptoms and more bother from UUI than stress urinary incontinence
- Failed trial of conservative therapy (including bladder training, fluid modification, diet modification, caffeine restriction, or pelvic floor training) -Failed trial of at least one pharmacologic treatment (anticholinergics, β3- adrenoceptor agonist) either due to inability to take the medication, adverse reaction to medication, or no improvement on medication
- Willing to complete study questionnaires
- Willing to adhere to 12 office visits for PTNS over 3 months if randomized to that arm
- No contraindication to undergoing PTNS or TENS therapy
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years
- Presence of urinary fistula
- Male genital anatomy
- Undergoing evaluation or treatment of recurrent (2 or more infections in the last 6 months or 3 or more infections in the last 12 months) or current urinary tract infection
- Current Bladder stones
- Bladder cancer or suspected bladder cancer
Show all 22Show fewer
- Gross Hematuria
- Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study
- Cognitive impairment
- Central or peripheral neurologic disorders such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spina bifida, spinal cord lesions, etc.
- Metal implants such as pacemaker, implantable defibrillator, or metal implants where PTNS or TENS device needs to be placed (ankle/leg)
- Uncontrolled diabetes
- Diabetes with peripheral nerve involvement
- Current use of anticoagulants (excluding aspirin)
- Current use of anticholinergics or use within the last 4 weeks
- Current use of botox bladder injections or bladder botox injection within the last year (12 months)
- Current use of sacral neuromodulation therapy or currently implanted sacral neuromodulation device or leads
- Bladder outlet obstruction
- Urinary retention or gastric retention
- Painful Bladder Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis
- Unable to be contacted for follow up by telephone
- Inability to speak/read/understand English or Spanish
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
About this study
The objective of this research is to perform a non-masked, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to assess the quality of life (QOL) of women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) before and after treatment with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of tibial nerve. The target population is patients with OAB who previously failed first- and second-line treatments and desire non-surgical management.
Read the detailed description
The investigators plan to perform an unmasked, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to determine if the quality of life is improved with the use of TENS compared to PTNS for urgency urinary incontinence and overactive bladder. Women will be informed of the arm of the study to which they are randomized, as the intervention is unable to be masked. All women will give written consent prior to enrollment.
The investigators will recruit women with OAB and/or UUI who present to the University of New Mexico Urogynecology practice at UNM Eubank Clinic (UNM) or Sandoval Regional Medical Center (SRMC) with OAB, urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) without other types of incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence with urge predominant-symptoms who have failed a trial of at least one medication. To confirm diagnosis and eligibility, the investigators will conduct a standard intake history and physical, complete with cough stress test, POP-Q pelvic examination, urinalysis and urine culture. If the potential participant predominantly complains of OAB or UUI, she will be introduced to the study and provided with written information that may help her decide if participation in the study is right for her. All potential participants will be counseled about possible treatment options for OAB and UUI including non-surgical and surgical techniques. If a woman is withdrawn from the study either by her desire or that of the research staff, or does not desire to participate, she will be offered the same treatment options.
Recruitment will take place either in private exam rooms at these clinics or over HIPAA compliant telephone or Zoom conversation. After recruitment, they will undergo the informed consent via the same means as recruitment and complete initial questionnaires in clinic or will be sent a copy (digital or mail) to complete if enrolled virtually. Patients in the TENS group will be given their TENS device in clinic and research staff will assist in educating participants on proper placement and use of the device, as well as provide a standardized treatment protocol they will complete at home. The patients randomized to PTNS will have their sessions at the UNM Eubank Women's Primary Care Clinic.
The primary aim of the study is to determine if symptoms and quality of life related to overactive bladder are improved similarly with TENS use versus PTNS in women with OAB/UUI. If the patient is interested in non-surgical management with PTNS and fulfills study inclusion criteria, the investigators will then offer her the choice of volunteering for the study. All women will give written and/or electronic consent prior to their enrollment at this time and fill out baseline questionnaires in the clinic. Research staff and clinicians will obtain consent and administer study. After enrollment, participants will fill out a baseline OAB-q and will be given a 3-day voiding diary to complete prior to starting their intervention. Urinalysis and urine culture will be obtained to rule out urinary tract infection. This is routinely done on all new patients in the clinic and would be performed on patients not participating in the study as well. Data collected in addition to the above outcome measures includes patient demographics, medical/surgical history, and contact information, which are attached as supporting documents. This information will be collected from the patient on the day of enrollment and the investigators will review the patient's medical record if information is missing or unclear.
The randomization sequence will be generated by computer-based randomization in a sequence that preserves 1:1 randomization and also preserves allocation concealment (likely with randomly alternating block sizes of 6-10 in blocked randomization). Randomization assignments will be completed via REDCAP by a research coordinator. Randomization will only occur after consent has been signed and all baseline data has been obtained.
This is a single-center study at the University of New Mexico, and this site will recruit up to 130 patients.
Outcomes collected: Outcomes will be collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, and will involve patient questionnaires such a the OAB-q (overactive bladder questionnaire), a validated tool to assess the patient's perceptions of symptom bother and impart on HRQL among patients with both continent and incontinent OAB. It is comprised of 8 symptom bother questions and 25 HRQL questions that form 4 subscales (coping, concern, sleep, and social interaction) and a total HRQL score. OAB-q is widely utilized in OAB/UUI. It will also include a voiding trial, which is a patient completed record of micturition behavior to obtain objective data on subjective symptoms. The International Continence Society (ICS) recommends use of voiding diaries in the clinical assessment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms2. It is a chart where patients record their urinary habits for at least 24 hours and is widely used in OAB/UUI. Lastly, the study will measure the Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ), which is a validated tool to assess patient satisfaction of treatment. It is comprised of a single question and is widely used in OAB/UUI.
Data Analysis:
Between and within group differences will be evaluated using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables, as the investigators expect the data will be normally distributed. Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used for continuous variables that are not normally distributed. If there are any baseline differences between groups, a multivariate analysis will determine the contribution of these differences to observed differences (if any) between groups.
Intention-to-treat analysis: The investigators plan to perform the primary analysis as "intention-to-treat" indicating that patients will be analyzed in the group to which they were randomized, regardless of compliance with study procedures, unless they asked to be withdrawn or were withdrawn by investigators due to safety or validity concerns. For example, PTNS patients that miss more than one session or do not make up a missed session of their office PTNS would still be analyzed in the "intention-to-treat" analysis as being in the PTNS group.
Per protocol analysis: The investigators plan to perform a secondary analysis as "per protocol" indicating that patients will be analyzed in the group to which they were randomized only if they complete a full 12 weeks of treatment in compliance with study procedures, meaning that women assigned to the PTNS arm completed 12 weekly PTNS session in the office in 13 weeks or less, and women in the at-home TENS arm performed TENS stimulation at least 5 days per week for 12 weeks, as averaged over 12 weeks. For example, PTNS patients that miss more than one session or do not make up a missed session of their office PTNS will not be analyzed in the "per protocol" analysis as being in the PTNS group.
Sample size calculation: The primary outcome for this study is the change in the OAB-q HRQOL score from baseline to 3 months. The study team used the means and standard deviation for this questionnaire from an unpublished pilot RCT study from Walter Reed that compares PTNS and TENS for the treatment of OAB (unpublished work). The investigators have powered the study based on a 10-point difference as significant between groups. This 10-point difference used for the power calculation is based on the previously established minimum important difference. To achieve power for this non-inferiority RCT study showing that the difference between groups is less than 10 points, the study will require 40 patients per group (80 total) to detect no difference with alpha = 0.05 and 80% power. Allowing for dropout of up to 30%, the investigators aim to randomize 114 patients, and will plan to recruit up to 130 to allow for potentially higher drop-out, as the study primary outcome is at the 12 weeks' time point. As the investigators plan to perform both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, the sample size must be met for both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, with the per-protocol patients (those in the PTNS group completing at 12 treatments in a total of 13 weeks) being expected to be a lower sample size.
Data Management/Confidentiality:
Participants will be given a de-identified study subject number. Data collection sheets and questionnaires will contain the subject number. No other patient identifiers will be collected on study forms. PHI including patient name, date of birth, phone number, email address and medical record number will be collected to track appointments and ensure patient follow-up. The data collection, HIPAA and consent forms will be maintained in a locked file cabinet in the locked Eubank research office or via REDCap. A separate folder will be designated for each participant. PHI will not be entered into the study database. The link between PHI and study IDs will be kept on a password protected computer on a secure UNM OBGYN department server.
The study database does not include sensitive information or information requiring additional protection.
Study binders will be kept in a locked cabinet in the research administrative area. In order to further ensure patient confidentiality, the identifying information will be kept separately from the numbered study files in a locked cabinet. Electronic data entry will be performed on REDCAP, using the de-identified subject study number. The electronic data and subject link will be encrypted, password protected, and stored on the secure UNM OBGYN department server. This server's electronic security is monitored / maintained by the Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center (HSLIC). A REDCAP database will be created to collect, store and manage the data. REDCAP databases are reposed securely and all data entered is de-identified. The REDCAP database is only accessible using an individual unique login and password and access is only provided to co-investigators. Access is restricted to co-investigators and research staff and will be protected using the unique REDCAP login and password provided to each co-investigator. Access to the files and REDCAP will be restricted to research personnel and Investigators and will be locked or password-protected using the unique REDCAP login and password provided to each co-investigator. The data will be stored for 6 years after completion of analysis and study closure and then will be destroyed.
A Certificate of Confidentiality will not be used to protect data from forced release. No identifying or study related data will be transported to outside locations. There will be no audio or video recordings or photographs taken.
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Urinary Urge Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
- Being tested
- PTNS, TENS
- Keywords
- overactive bladder, urinary frequency, urinary urgency, urge incontinence, electrical stimulation, TENS, PTNS, nerve stimulation, bladder treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PTNSDevice
Also called Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation
See arm description
TENSDevice
Also called transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
See arm description
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) | Active comparator | Women randomized to the PTNS will be scheduled for sessions once weekly for 30 minutes, for 12 weeks total. The patient sits reclined with their legs elevated on a foot rest. After alcohol swab, a 34 gauge needle is inserted percutaneously 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus of the right or left ankle (patient's choice) at a 60 degree angle. A surface electrode is placed on the medial ipsilateral heel. The needle and electrode are connected to a low voltage (9V) electrical stimulator. Stimulation current with a fixed frequency of 20 Hz and a pulse width of 200 μsec is increased until flexion of the big toe or fanning of all toes visualized, or until the woman reports a tingling sensation across the heel or sole of the foot. The current is then set to the highest level of tolerable to the patient (0-10 mA) and then she undergoes therapy for 30 minutes. Receives: Device: PTNS |
| Home transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) | Experimental | Women randomized to the TENS group will be asked to purchase a TENS 7000 device (estimated cost $30) and will administer self-treatment at home, daily for 20 minutes, for 12 weeks total.
TENS treatment will be performed as follows (adapted from the most common setting from a s systematic review of TENS for OAB):
- Surface electrodes, 2 x 2 in diameter, will be placed 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus of the right or left ankle (patient's choice). The second surface electrode is placed on the medial aspect of the ipsilateral calcaneus. The electrodes are connected to the TENS device with pre-set settings.
Women will complete 20-minute daily TENS treatment for 12 weeks total. Receives: Device: TENS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overactive bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) score
Change in OAB-q HRQOL score from baseline to 12 weeks, score range 0 to 100, higher scores indicating higher quality of life (higher scores good)
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother subscale score
OAB-q Symptom Bother subscale score change from baseline to time point, scores ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicating higher bother/worse symptoms (higher scores bad)
Measured: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Overactive bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Health-Related Quality of Life
Change in OAB-q HRQOL score from baseline to 12 weeks, score range 0 to 100, higher scores indicating higher quality of life (higher scores good)
Measured: 6 weeks
Number of urinary incontinence episodes
Number of urinary incontinence episodes on 3-day voiding diary
Measured: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Number of voids per day
Number of voids per day on 3-day voiding diary
Measured: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Number of voids per night
Number of voids per night on 3-day voiding diary
Measured: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Patient satisfaction question (PSQ)
Patient satisfaction question is a single question asking: "How satisfied are you with your progress in this program?", where patients answer on a Likert scale the possible responses of "completely", "somewhat", and "not at all".
Measured: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Patient compliance
Number of treatment sessions completed
Measured: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Adverse events
Adverse events reported during research
Measured: Weekly for 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2022
- Study start30 Jun 2022
- Primary completion1 Aug 2025
- Study completion1 Aug 2025
Why it stopped: Inadequate recruitment with expiration of funding and futility of enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Overactive BladderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kate V Meriwether, MD, University of New Mexico
- Investigators
- Kate V Meriwether, MD, Principal investigator, University of New Mexico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05309993
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-003
- Acronym
- INTENSE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gopal M, Haynes K, Bellamy SL, Arya LA. Discontinuation rates of anticholinergic medications used for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1311-1318. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818e8aa4.
PubMed 19037041Monga AK, Tracey MR, Subbaroyan J. A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Aug;23(8):993-1005. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1691-5. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
PubMed 22426872Lightner DJ, Gomelsky A, Souter L, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline Amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):558-563. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000309. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
PubMed 31039103Sutherland SE, Lavers A, Carlson A, Holtz C, Kesha J, Siegel SW. Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):19-28; discussion 36. doi: 10.1002/nau.20345.
PubMed 17078071Kraus SR, Shiozawa A, Szabo SM, Qian C, Rogula B, Hairston J. Treatment patterns and costs among patients with OAB treated with combination oral therapy, sacral nerve stimulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, or onabotulinumtoxinA in the United States. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2206-2222. doi: 10.1002/nau.24474. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
PubMed 32827230Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
PubMed 20171677Peters KM, Carrico DJ, MacDiarmid SA, Wooldridge LS, Khan AU, McCoy CE, Franco N, Bennett JB. Sustained therapeutic effects of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: 24-month results of the STEP study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Jan;32(1):24-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22266. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
PubMed 22674493Staskin DR, Peters KM, MacDiarmid S, Shore N, de Groat WC. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: a clinically and cost effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care. Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Oct;13(5):327-34. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0274-9.
PubMed 22893501Peters KM, Macdiarmid SA, Wooldridge LS, Leong FC, Shobeiri SA, Rovner ES, Siegel SW, Tate SB, Jarnagin BK, Rosenblatt PL, Feagins BA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus extended-release tolterodine: results from the overactive bladder innovative therapy trial. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1055-61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.045. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
PubMed 19616802MacDiarmid SA, Peters KM, Shobeiri SA, Wooldridge LS, Rovner ES, Leong FC, Siegel SW, Tate SB, Feagins BA. Long-term durability of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160.
PubMed 19913821Burton C, Sajja A, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1206-16. doi: 10.1002/nau.22251. Epub 2012 May 11.
PubMed 22581511Schreiner L, dos Santos TG, Knorst MR, da Silva Filho IG. Randomized trial of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to treat urge urinary incontinence in older women. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Sep;21(9):1065-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1165-6. Epub 2010 May 11.
PubMed 20458465Schreiner L, Nygaard CC, Dos Santos TG, Knorst MR, da Silva Filho IG. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to treat urgency urinary incontinence in older women: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Mar;32(3):687-693. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04560-6. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
PubMed 33057739Booth J, Connelly L, Dickson S, Duncan F, Lawrence M. The effectiveness of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) for adults with overactive bladder syndrome: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Feb;37(2):528-541. doi: 10.1002/nau.23351. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
PubMed 28731583Daly CME, Loi L, Booth J, Saidan D, Guerrero K, Tyagi V. Self-management of overactive bladder at home using transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: a qualitative study of women's experiences. BMC Womens Health. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01522-y.
PubMed 34706709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- INvestigation of TENS Efficacy Versus Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Overactive Bladder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05309993
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTENSE / 22-003
- Conditions
- Overactive Bladder, Overactive Bladder Syndrome, Urinary Urge Incontinence, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
- Keywords
- overactive bladder, urinary frequency, urinary urgency, urge incontinence, electrical stimulation, TENS, PTNS, nerve stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Inadequate recruitment with expiration of funding and futility of enrollment
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of New MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this research is to perform a non-masked, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to assess the quality of life (QOL) of women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) before and after treatment with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of tibial nerve. The target population is patients with OAB who previously failed first- and second-line treatments and desire non-surgical management.
Detailed description
The investigators plan to perform an unmasked, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to determine if the quality of life is improved with the use of TENS compared to PTNS for urgency urinary incontinence and overactive bladder. Women will be informed of the arm of the study to which they are randomized, as the intervention is unable to be masked. All women will give written consent prior to enrollment.
The investigators will recruit women with OAB and/or UUI who present to the University of New Mexico Urogynecology practice at UNM Eubank Clinic (UNM) or Sandoval Regional Medical Center (SRMC) with OAB, urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) without other types of incontinence, or mixed urinary incontinence with urge predominant-symptoms who have failed a trial of at least one medication. To confirm diagnosis and eligibility, the investigators will conduct a standard intake history and physical, complete with cough stress test, POP-Q pelvic examination, urinalysis and urine culture. If the potential participant predominantly complains of OAB or UUI, she will be introduced to the study and provided with written information that may help her decide if participation in the study is right for her. All potential participants will be counseled about possible treatment options for OAB and UUI including non-surgical and surgical techniques. If a woman is withdrawn from the study either by her desire or that of the research staff, or does not desire to participate, she will be offered the same treatment options.
Recruitment will take place either in private exam rooms at these clinics or over HIPAA compliant telephone or Zoom conversation. After recruitment, they will undergo the informed consent via the same means as recruitment and complete initial questionnaires in clinic or will be sent a copy (digital or mail) to complete if enrolled virtually. Patients in the TENS group will be given their TENS device in clinic and research staff will assist in educating participants on proper placement and use of the device, as well as provide a standardized treatment protocol they will complete at home. The patients randomized to PTNS will have their sessions at the UNM Eubank Women's Primary Care Clinic.
The primary aim of the study is to determine if symptoms and quality of life related to overactive bladder are improved similarly with TENS use versus PTNS in women with OAB/UUI. If the patient is interested in non-surgical management with PTNS and fulfills study inclusion criteria, the investigators will then offer her the choice of volunteering for the study. All women will give written and/or electronic consent prior to their enrollment at this time and fill out baseline questionnaires in the clinic. Research staff and clinicians will obtain consent and administer study. After enrollment, participants will fill out a baseline OAB-q and will be given a 3-day voiding diary to complete prior to starting their intervention. Urinalysis and urine culture will be obtained to rule out urinary tract infection. This is routinely done on all new patients in the clinic and would be performed on patients not participating in the study as well. Data collected in addition to the above outcome measures includes patient demographics, medical/surgical history, and contact information, which are attached as supporting documents. This information will be collected from the patient on the day of enrollment and the investigators will review the patient's medical record if information is missing or unclear.
The randomization sequence will be generated by computer-based randomization in a sequence that preserves 1:1 randomization and also preserves allocation concealment (likely with randomly alternating block sizes of 6-10 in blocked randomization). Randomization assignments will be completed via REDCAP by a research coordinator. Randomization will only occur after consent has been signed and all baseline data has been obtained.
This is a single-center study at the University of New Mexico, and this site will recruit up to 130 patients.
Outcomes collected: Outcomes will be collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, and will involve patient questionnaires such a the OAB-q (overactive bladder questionnaire), a validated tool to assess the patient's perceptions of symptom bother and impart on HRQL among patients with both continent and incontinent OAB. It is comprised of 8 symptom bother questions and 25 HRQL questions that form 4 subscales (coping, concern, sleep, and social interaction) and a total HRQL score. OAB-q is widely utilized in OAB/UUI. It will also include a voiding trial, which is a patient completed record of micturition behavior to obtain objective data on subjective symptoms. The International Continence Society (ICS) recommends use of voiding diaries in the clinical assessment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms2. It is a chart where patients record their urinary habits for at least 24 hours and is widely used in OAB/UUI. Lastly, the study will measure the Patient Satisfaction Question (PSQ), which is a validated tool to assess patient satisfaction of treatment. It is comprised of a single question and is widely used in OAB/UUI.
Data Analysis:
Between and within group differences will be evaluated using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables, as the investigators expect the data will be normally distributed. Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used for continuous variables that are not normally distributed. If there are any baseline differences between groups, a multivariate analysis will determine the contribution of these differences to observed differences (if any) between groups.
Intention-to-treat analysis: The investigators plan to perform the primary analysis as "intention-to-treat" indicating that patients will be analyzed in the group to which they were randomized, regardless of compliance with study procedures, unless they asked to be withdrawn or were withdrawn by investigators due to safety or validity concerns. For example, PTNS patients that miss more than one session or do not make up a missed session of their office PTNS would still be analyzed in the "intention-to-treat" analysis as being in the PTNS group.
Per protocol analysis: The investigators plan to perform a secondary analysis as "per protocol" indicating that patients will be analyzed in the group to which they were randomized only if they complete a full 12 weeks of treatment in compliance with study procedures, meaning that women assigned to the PTNS arm completed 12 weekly PTNS session in the office in 13 weeks or less, and women in the at-home TENS arm performed TENS stimulation at least 5 days per week for 12 weeks, as averaged over 12 weeks. For example, PTNS patients that miss more than one session or do not make up a missed session of their office PTNS will not be analyzed in the "per protocol" analysis as being in the PTNS group.
Sample size calculation: The primary outcome for this study is the change in the OAB-q HRQOL score from baseline to 3 months. The study team used the means and standard deviation for this questionnaire from an unpublished pilot RCT study from Walter Reed that compares PTNS and TENS for the treatment of OAB (unpublished work). The investigators have powered the study based on a 10-point difference as significant between groups. This 10-point difference used for the power calculation is based on the previously established minimum important difference. To achieve power for this non-inferiority RCT study showing that the difference between groups is less than 10 points, the study will require 40 patients per group (80 total) to detect no difference with alpha = 0.05 and 80% power. Allowing for dropout of up to 30%, the investigators aim to randomize 114 patients, and will plan to recruit up to 130 to allow for potentially higher drop-out, as the study primary outcome is at the 12 weeks' time point. As the investigators plan to perform both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, the sample size must be met for both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, with the per-protocol patients (those in the PTNS group completing at 12 treatments in a total of 13 weeks) being expected to be a lower sample size.
Data Management/Confidentiality:
Participants will be given a de-identified study subject number. Data collection sheets and questionnaires will contain the subject number. No other patient identifiers will be collected on study forms. PHI including patient name, date of birth, phone number, email address and medical record number will be collected to track appointments and ensure patient follow-up. The data collection, HIPAA and consent forms will be maintained in a locked file cabinet in the locked Eubank research office or via REDCap. A separate folder will be designated for each participant. PHI will not be entered into the study database. The link between PHI and study IDs will be kept on a password protected computer on a secure UNM OBGYN department server.
The study database does not include sensitive information or information requiring additional protection.
Study binders will be kept in a locked cabinet in the research administrative area. In order to further ensure patient confidentiality, the identifying information will be kept separately from the numbered study files in a locked cabinet. Electronic data entry will be performed on REDCAP, using the de-identified subject study number. The electronic data and subject link will be encrypted, password protected, and stored on the secure UNM OBGYN department server. This server's electronic security is monitored / maintained by the Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center (HSLIC). A REDCAP database will be created to collect, store and manage the data. REDCAP databases are reposed securely and all data entered is de-identified. The REDCAP database is only accessible using an individual unique login and password and access is only provided to co-investigators. Access is restricted to co-investigators and research staff and will be protected using the unique REDCAP login and password provided to each co-investigator. Access to the files and REDCAP will be restricted to research personnel and Investigators and will be locked or password-protected using the unique REDCAP login and password provided to each co-investigator. The data will be stored for 6 years after completion of analysis and study closure and then will be destroyed.
A Certificate of Confidentiality will not be used to protect data from forced release. No identifying or study related data will be transported to outside locations. There will be no audio or video recordings or photographs taken.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) | Active comparator | Device: PTNSWomen randomized to the PTNS will be scheduled for sessions once weekly for 30 minutes, for 12 weeks total. The patient sits reclined with their legs elevated on a foot rest. After alcohol swab, a 34 gauge needle is inserted percutaneously 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus of the right or left ankle (patient's choice) at a 60 degree angle. A surface electrode is placed on the medial ipsilateral heel. The needle and electrode are connected to a low voltage (9V) electrical stimulator. Stimulation current with a fixed frequency of 20 Hz and a pulse width of 200 μsec is increased until flexion of the big toe or fanning of all toes visualized, or until the woman reports a tingling sensation across the heel or sole of the foot. The current is then set to the highest level of tolerable to the patient (0-10 mA) and then she undergoes therapy for 30 minutes. |
| Home transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) | Experimental | Device: TENSWomen randomized to the TENS group will be asked to purchase a TENS 7000 device (estimated cost $30) and will administer self-treatment at home, daily for 20 minutes, for 12 weeks total. TENS treatment will be performed as follows (adapted from the most common setting from a s systematic review of TENS for OAB): - Surface electrodes, 2 x 2 in diameter, will be placed 5 cm cephalad to the medial malleolus of the right or left ankle (patient's choice). The second surface electrode is placed on the medial aspect of the ipsilateral calcaneus. The electrodes are connected to the TENS device with pre-set settings. Women will complete 20-minute daily TENS treatment for 12 weeks total. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Female Subjects ≥18 years of age
- OAB, UUI or Mixed Urinary Incontinence with urgency predominant symptoms and more bother from UUI than stress urinary incontinence
- Failed trial of conservative therapy (including bladder training, fluid modification, diet modification, caffeine restriction, or pelvic floor training) -Failed trial of at least one pharmacologic treatment (anticholinergics, β3- adrenoceptor agonist) either due to inability to take the medication, adverse reaction to medication, or no improvement on medication
- Willing to complete study questionnaires
- Willing to adhere to 12 office visits for PTNS over 3 months if randomized to that arm
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Age < 18 years
- Presence of urinary fistula
- Male genital anatomy
- Undergoing evaluation or treatment of recurrent (2 or more infections in the last 6 months or 3 or more infections in the last 12 months) or current urinary tract infection
- Current Bladder stones
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PTNSAlso: Posterior Tibial Nerve StimulationSee arm description | Device | Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) |
| TENSAlso: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulationSee arm description | Device | Home transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) |
Primary outcome
Overactive bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) score
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in OAB-q HRQOL score from baseline to 12 weeks, score range 0 to 100, higher scores indicating higher quality of life (higher scores good)
8 secondary outcomes
Overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother subscale score
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Overactive bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Health-Related Quality of Life
Time frame: 6 weeks
Number of urinary incontinence episodes
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Number of voids per day
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Number of voids per night
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Patient satisfaction question (PSQ)
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Patient compliance
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Adverse events
Time frame: Weekly for 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 19037041Gopal M, Haynes K, Bellamy SL, Arya LA. Discontinuation rates of anticholinergic medications used for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;112(6):1311-1318. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818e8aa4.
- Background: PubMed 22426872Monga AK, Tracey MR, Subbaroyan J. A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Aug;23(8):993-1005. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1691-5. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 31039103Lightner DJ, Gomelsky A, Souter L, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and Treatment of Overactive Bladder (Non-Neurogenic) in Adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline Amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):558-563. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000309. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 17078071Sutherland SE, Lavers A, Carlson A, Holtz C, Kesha J, Siegel SW. Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):19-28; discussion 36. doi: 10.1002/nau.20345.
- Background: PubMed 32827230Kraus SR, Shiozawa A, Szabo SM, Qian C, Rogula B, Hairston J. Treatment patterns and costs among patients with OAB treated with combination oral therapy, sacral nerve stimulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, or onabotulinumtoxinA in the United States. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2206-2222. doi: 10.1002/nau.24474. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
- Background: PubMed 20171677Peters KM, Carrico DJ, Perez-Marrero RA, Khan AU, Wooldridge LS, Davis GL, Macdiarmid SA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus Sham efficacy in the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome: results from the SUmiT trial. J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 22674493Peters KM, Carrico DJ, MacDiarmid SA, Wooldridge LS, Khan AU, McCoy CE, Franco N, Bennett JB. Sustained therapeutic effects of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: 24-month results of the STEP study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Jan;32(1):24-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22266. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 22893501Staskin DR, Peters KM, MacDiarmid S, Shore N, de Groat WC. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: a clinically and cost effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care. Curr Urol Rep. 2012 Oct;13(5):327-34. doi: 10.1007/s11934-012-0274-9.
- Background: PubMed 19616802Peters KM, Macdiarmid SA, Wooldridge LS, Leong FC, Shobeiri SA, Rovner ES, Siegel SW, Tate SB, Jarnagin BK, Rosenblatt PL, Feagins BA. Randomized trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus extended-release tolterodine: results from the overactive bladder innovative therapy trial. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1055-61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.045. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 19913821MacDiarmid SA, Peters KM, Shobeiri SA, Wooldridge LS, Rovner ES, Leong FC, Siegel SW, Tate SB, Feagins BA. Long-term durability of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of overactive bladder. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.160.
- Background: PubMed 22581511Burton C, Sajja A, Latthe PM. Effectiveness of percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Nov;31(8):1206-16. doi: 10.1002/nau.22251. Epub 2012 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 20458465Schreiner L, dos Santos TG, Knorst MR, da Silva Filho IG. Randomized trial of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation to treat urge urinary incontinence in older women. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Sep;21(9):1065-70. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1165-6. Epub 2010 May 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Overactive Bladder
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Mirabegron Response in Women With Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kate V Meriwether, MD principal investigator
University of New Mexico
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PTNS and TENS in people with Overactive Bladder and Overactive Bladder Syndrome, run by University of New Mexico at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overactive bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) score (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05309993, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2026.