AzTrials
AzTrials

Opioid Use DisorderPharmICONCT05310786

Implementing a Pharmacist-Integrated Collaborative Model of Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder

A study testing Pharmacist-integrated Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (PrIMO) in people with Opioid Use Disorder and Substance Use Disorders, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 4 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project will provide novel empirical information about how to optimally engage pharmacists and pharmacies as key partners in collaborative integrated care models designed to expand access to evidence-based medication treatment for OUD which may inform a larger experimental design that seeks to evaluate best ways… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Opioid Use Disorder, Substance Use Disorders
What is being tested?
Pharmacist-integrated Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (PrIMO)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
149 participants
Where
4 sitesUnited States
Study dates
18 Aug 2022to 5 Feb 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Site Staff
  • 18 years of age and older.
  • Employed at the clinic as an identified stakeholder role (provider, pharmacist, pharmacy technician, or administrator).
  • Patients
  • 18 years of age or older.
  • A patient of the participating clinic who is receiving or has received MOUD from a provider employed by the clinic.
  • Exposed to the PrIMO model at the clinic site for at least 14 days.

Who cannot join

  • Site Staff
  • Unwilling or unable to provide consent
  • Are currently in jail, prison, or other overnight facility as required by court of law; or have pending legal action that could prevent participation in study activities.
  • Patients
  • Not able to speak English sufficiently to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent.
  • Unable or unwilling to provide consent or to participate in study procedures.
  • Are currently in jail, prison, or other overnight facility as required by court of law; or have pending legal action that could prevent participation in study activities

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

United States4 sites
  • UNM Truman Health Services

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102

  • Harbor Health Care

    Nashua, New Hampshire, 03062

  • Sugar House Health Center

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106

  • Community Health Care

    Tacoma, Washington, 98404

Other trials in United States

About this study

This project will provide novel empirical information about how to optimally engage pharmacists and pharmacies as key partners in collaborative integrated care models designed to expand access to evidence-based medication treatment for OUD which may inform a larger experimental design that seeks to evaluate best ways to scale-up this model across the nation. This Phase 1 project seeks to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of implementing a pharmacist-integrated model of MOUD into approximately four diverse outpatient clinical sites.

Read the detailed description

Pharmacists remain an underutilized resource in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Although studies have engaged pharmacists in dispensing medications for OUD (MOUD), few studies have evaluated collaborative care models in which pharmacists are an active, integral part of a primary care team offering OUD care. In this Phase 1 project, the investigative team seeks to implement a Pharmacist-Integrated Medication Treatment for OUD (PrIMO) clinical model and will evaluate its feasibility and acceptability as well as its impact on clinical sites' capacity for MOUD care and on patient outcomes in OUD care.

This project will provide novel empirical information about how to optimally engage pharmacists and pharmacies as key partners in collaborative integrated care models designed to expand access to evidence-based medication treatment for OUD which may inform a larger experimental design that seeks to evaluate best ways to scale-up this model across the nation.

The PrIMO model is standard of care at a federally qualified health center in Maine and is based on the primary care pharmacist role utilized at health clinics around the US and internationally. This study will explore the implementation of this model at diverse clinics.

This Phase 1 project seeks to leverage the PrIMO model to:

Aim 1: Employ a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a pharmacist-integrated model of MOUD into approximately four diverse outpatient clinical sites.

Aim 2: Evaluate the acceptability and impact of implementing the pharmacist-integrated model.

Primary Outcome Measure: The Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) is a measure of implementation process and milestones. The SIC is the overarching measure used to assess progress towards successful implementation (i.e., extent to which each collaborating clinical site implements and sustains the numerous key activities within the PrIMO model).

Secondary Outcome Measures: The study's secondary outcomes are to explore the acceptability and impact of the PrIMO model. To assess acceptability, the study will utilize the Applied Mental Health Research Dissemination and Implementation (AMHR) tool, Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT), Medical Conditions Regard Scale, Substance Use Stigma Mechanism Scale, Beliefs on MOUD Survey, Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale, PrIMO Fidelity Checklist, Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS) tool, and qualitative interviews. To assess impact, the study will explore treatment outcomes and capacity for MOUD via electronic health record (EHR) data extraction at each site.

The study will engage approximately four clinical outpatient sites. At each site, the study team will enroll participants in two subgroups: (1) site staff (including providers [may include MD, DO, PA, NP, nurse, behavioral health clinician, and/or social worker pending site variation], pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, administrators [may include CEO, CFO, CMO, medical assistants, front desk staff, clinic and/or team manager pending site variation]) and (2) patients.

Site Staff (range per site) Providers n=5-20 Pharmacists n=2-6 Pharmacy Technicians n=2-10 Administrators n=2-10

Patients (per site) n=12-40

Consented and enrolled participants will be 18 years or older, not considered prisoners at enrollment, and either employed by (site staff) or receiving MOUD (patients) from the site clinic implementing the PrIMO model.

Feasibility (Phase 1) Approximately four sites in the United States representing diverse patient populations (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity, geography) and at least one clinic-based pharmacist, at least one X-waivered primary care provider already providing MOUD treatment and a retail pharmacy (optimally employed by the clinic organization and/or co-located with the clinic) will be selected. The pharmacy and clinic staff must have shared access to each other's EHR systems, and sites must agree to provide clinic and pharmacy EHR data to the study team.

As the PrIMO model is considered standard of care in the originating clinic and is based on the national recognition of the role pharmacists play in collaboration with primary care, this is not a study evaluating an experimental intervention. And there is no experimental manipulation in this study. It is a study of the feasibility of implementing the PrIMO model of care in a diverse array of clinical sites.

As this is a minimal risk study examining the implementation of a standard of care clinical model, there will be no safety monitoring, and safety reporting will be limited to patient participant deaths.

Statistical methods will be largely descriptive, as this study is not testing a formal hypothesis. As a longitudinal mixed methods implementation feasibility study, analyses will include quantitative and qualitative analyses at the site, site staff, and patient levels. Analyses at the site level will be purely descriptive in nature and precision estimates for key secondary outcomes at the staff, provider and patient level will be conducted.

Data collection will begin approximately 3 months prior to sites launching the PrIMO model and will continue through 12-months post-launch. Patient participants will be enrolled beginning at implementation launch (after at least a 2-week exposure period to the PrIMO model) and will be asked to participate for 6 months' time, allowing for approximately 6 months of patient enrollment at each site (depending on actual date of launch). These timelines should ensure 15 months for collection of study outcome measures.

EHR data will be collected from each site for up to 12 months pre-launch and 12 months post-launch.

Site Staff participants will engage at approximately 3 months pre-launch, launch, and 3, 6, 9, and 12-months post-launch, totaling 15 months of study participation for those engaged throughout the full period.

Recruitment of patient participants will begin at launch. Patients will be enrolled after at least 2 weeks' exposure to the PrIMO model (whether new or existing prior to launch) and will follow-up at 3- and 6-months post-baseline, totaling up to 6 months of study participation.

Being tested
Pharmacist-integrated Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (PrIMO)
Medical subject headings
Opioid-Related Disorders, Substance-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pharmacist-integrated Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (PrIMO)Other

    This is not a true intervention, but rather a clinical model of care established at an FQHC in Maine.

Study groups in NCT05310786
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Site StaffOtherProviders, Pharmacists, Pharmacy Technicians, Administrators to receive survey assessments
Receives: Other: Pharmacist-integrated Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (PrIMO)
PatientsOtherSubset of patients receiving PrIMO care to receive survey assessments
Receives: Other: Pharmacist-integrated Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (PrIMO)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) Tool

    The SIC is a date-driven measure of implementation milestones spanning activities from the Pre-implementation through Competency stages of implementation.

    Measured: Up to 100 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Applied Mental Health Research Dissemination & Implementation (AMHR) Tool

    The AMHR will be used to assess acceptability of implementing the PrIMO model. The AMHR is a tool that assesses stakeholder perceptions of implementation across a variety of settings. The AMHR has three separate scales for use with specific populations: leadership, providers, and consumers. The items within these scales are all rated on a Likert system of Strongly disagree (0) to Strongly Agree (3). Generally, an increase in scale rating indicates higher levels of acceptability.

    Measured: 3 months pre-model launch through 12 months post-model launch

  2. Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool for PrIMO

    The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) is a 35-item tool spread across seven sustainability domains, with five items per domain. For this study, the CSAT has been modified to incorporate PrIMO and renamed the "Sustainability Assessment Tool for PrIMO". The CSAT uses a Likert system of "To little or no extent" (1) to "To a very great extent" (7). Generally, an increase in scale rating indicates higher levels of sustainability.

    Measured: 3 months pre-model launch through 12 months post-model launch

  3. Medical Conditions Regard Scale

    The Medical Conditions Regard Scale (MCRS) is a non-condition-specific scale to capture biases, emotions, and expectations generated by medical condition descriptors. The MCRS uses a Likert system of "Strongly Disagree" (1) to "Strongly Agree" (6). Generally, an increase in scale rating indicates negative perspectives of patients with specified medical conditions.

    Measured: 3 months pre-model launch through 12 months post-model launch

  4. Substance Use Stigma Mechanism Scale

    The full SU-SMS contains subscales related to Enacted (how people have treated you in the past), Anticipated (how likely is it that people will treat you this way in the future), and Internalized (how do you feel now). For the purposes of this study, only the Internalized subscale will be utilized. The SU-SMS uses a Likert system of "Strongly Disagree" (1) to "Strongly Agree" (5). Generally, an increase in scale rating indicates negative feelings of internal stigma.

    Measured: 3 months pre-model launch through 12 months post-model launch

  5. Beliefs on MOUD Modified

    The survey will be used to understand prescriber perceptions of and barriers to utilizing medication treatment for opioid use disorder.

    Measured: 3 months pre-model launch through 12 months post-model launch

  6. Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale

    The Implementation Citizenship Behavior Scale measures the behaviors that exceed expected tasks performed by employees at the site to support the implementation of the PrIMO model. The ICBS uses a Likert system of "Not at All" (0) to "Frequently if not always" (4). Generally, an increase in scale rating indicates positive implementation citizenship.

    Measured: 3 months pre-model launch through 12 months post-model launch

  7. Qualitative interviews

    Interviews with a subset of participants will provide additional context and salient themes of implementing the model that may not be captured through the quantitative measures.

    Measured: 3 months pre-model launch through 12 months post-model launch

  8. Electronic health record data

    Limited data will be collected from EHR records according to a study-specific Data Dictionary.

    Measured: Model launch through up to 18 months post-launch

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2022
  2. Study start18 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion5 Feb 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
149 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05310786
Sponsor's protocol ID
CTN-0116
Acronym
PharmICO
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
14 Mar 2022
Last updated
25 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Homsted F, Fiellin DA, Ghitza UE, Gardner VT 3rd, McLeman B, Joudrey PJ, Cochran G, Moore SK, Saldana L, Chongsi E, Kramer K, Vena A, Ottesen RA, Harris J, Boggis JS, Rao D, Murray O, Gerlach S, Gauthier P, Osterhage KP, Baldwin LM, Marsch LA. Feasibility of Implementing a Pharmacist-Integrated Collaborative Model for Opioid Use Disorder: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2026 Oct 14. doi: 10.1007/s11606-026-10924-3. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42875616
  • McLeman B, Gauthier P, Lester LS, Homsted F, Gardner V 3rd, Moore SK, Joudrey PJ, Saldana L, Cochran G, Harris JP, Hefner K, Chongsi E, Kramer K, Vena A, Ottesen RA, Gallant T, Boggis JS, Rao D, Page M, Cox N, Iandiorio M, Ambaah E, Ghitza U, Fiellin DA, Marsch LA. Implementing a pharmacist-integrated collaborative model of medication treatment for opioid use disorder in primary care: study design and methodological considerations. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2024 Mar 18;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00452-y.

    PubMed 38500166

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pharmacist-integrated Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder (PrIMO) in people with Opioid Use Disorder and Substance Use Disorders, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 4 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) Tool (time frame: Up to 100 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05310786, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in