Young Adult CancerNCT05314803
Yoga for Young Adults Affected by Cancer
A study testing Yoga in people with Young Adult Cancer and Young Adult Oncology, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Yoga may enhance physical and psychological outcomes among young adults affected by cancer. Yet, yoga has rarely been studied in this population. We developed and piloted a yoga program, which is now ready for implementation and evaluation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Young Adult Cancer, Young Adult Oncology
- What is being tested?
- Yoga
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to 1 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult aged 18 years or older;
- Diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18-39 years;
- At any stage of their cancer experience (i.e., on- or off-treatment);
- Able to safely engage in yoga, as assessed by completing the Get Active Questionnaire and obtaining medical clearance (if indicated).
- Willing and able to complete informed consent, questionnaires, physical assessments, and an interview in English.
Who cannot join
- 1. Previous enrolment in the study, to avoid contamination and/or ceiling effects.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4
S. Nicole Culos-Reed, PhD, 403-220-7540, nculosre@ucalgary.ca
Wellness Lab, 403-210-8482, wellnesslab@ucalgary.ca
About this study
Official title: Yoga for Young Adults Affected by Cancer: Exploring Implementation and Effectiveness of an Online Program
Yoga may enhance physical and psychological outcomes among young adults affected by cancer. Yet, yoga has rarely been studied in this population. We developed and piloted a yoga program, which is now ready for implementation and evaluation. This single-group, mixed-methods project will explore effectiveness and implementation of the yoga program.
- Conditions
- Young Adult Cancer, Young Adult Oncology
- Being tested
- Yoga
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
YogaBehavioural
Participants receive the yoga program, which is delivered by a trained yoga instructor (completed at least a 200-hour yoga teacher training, Yoga Thrive Teacher Training Certification (or similar), and/or practical experience working with individuals affected by cancer). The first class of the week is comprised of 45 minutes of gentle, progressive, hatha-based yoga sequencing and postures with the last 15 minutes focused on guided behaviour change and mindfulness techniques that varies week-to-week, based on the participants in the class. The second class of the week is 60 minutes of gentle, yin-based yoga sequencing and postures with an element of opening and relaxing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Yoga | Experimental | Participants receive online, group-based yoga classes 2 times/week for 60 minutes/class over 12 weeks. Receives: Behavioral: Yoga |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reach
The number of people who participate, and reasons why or why not.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Secondary outcomes (22)
Attendance
Number of classes attended out of the number of classes offered by study staff.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Adherence
Number of classes attended out of the number of classes offered by study staff.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Missing data
Percentage of missing data on quantitative measures and completion of qualitative interviews.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Barriers and facilitators to exercise participation
Change in Barrier Self-Efficacy Scale (1). Scale range 0-100; higher scores indicates less barriers to participation.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Physical activity levels
Changes in Godin Leisure Time Scale (2). Individuals indicate how many times per week and how long per session they exercise at certain intensity (mild, moderate, high). Higher scores indicate higher levels of physical activity.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Fatigue
Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale (3). Scale range 0-4; selected items are reverse scored; higher score indicate less fatigue.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Cognition
Changes in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Scale (4). Scale range 1-4; some items are reversed scored; higher scores indicate less cognitive impairment.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Cancer-related symptoms
Change in Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (5). Scale range 0-10; lower scores indicate fewer/less severe symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
General health-related quality of life
Change in EuroQual - 5Dimensions (EQ-5D) Scale (6). Scale range 1-5 with lower scores indicating greater quality of life; visual analogue scale range 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
General well-being
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Scale (7). Scale range 0-4; selected items are reversed scored; higher scores indicate greater quality of life.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Mindfulness
Change in Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (8). Scale range 1-6; higher scores indicate higher levels of dispositional mindfulness.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Self-compassion
Change in Self-Compassion Scale (9). Scale range 1-5; higher scores indicate greater self-compassion.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Stress
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (10). Scale range 0-4; some items are reverse scored; higher scores indicate more perceived stress.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Group identification
Change in Group Identification Scale (11). Scale range 1-7; higher scores indicate greater identification with the group.
Measured: Post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Balance
Change in one legged stance test (seconds) (see 12).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Shoulder range of motion
Change in active shoulder flexion range of motion (degrees) (see 12).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Lower extremity flexibility
Change in sit-and-reach test (cm) (see 12).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Functional performance
Change in sit-to-stand (number of repetitions in 30 seconds) (see 12).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Aerobic endurance
Change in 2 minute step test (steps) results (see 12).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Adverse events
Adverse events will be defined as any negative effect caused (or suspected to be caused by) the yoga program.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Time to implement and deliver
Time and expertise to deliver the intervention and physical assessments will be tracked.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Yoga program fidelity
Fidelity of the physical activity program implementation will be assessed via randomly video-auditing a subset of classes.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Young Adult CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- S. Nicole Culos-Reed, PhD, Study director, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05314803
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HREBA.CC-20-0098 (sub-study)
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Verhulst S, Markwell S, Lanzotti V, Shah P. Exercise barrier and task self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0851-2. Epub 2005 Jul 9.
PubMed 16007455Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
PubMed 4053261Acaster S, Dickerhoof R, DeBusk K, Bernard K, Strauss W, Allen LF. Qualitative and quantitative validation of the FACIT-fatigue scale in iron deficiency anemia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 May 17;13:60. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0257-x.
PubMed 25980742Wagner L, Sweet J, Butt Z, Lai J-S, Cella D. Measuring patient self-reported cognitive function: development of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function instrument. J Support Oncol, 2009. 7(6): W32-W39.
Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M. Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer. 2000 May 1;88(9):2164-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000501)88:93.0.co;2-5.
PubMed 10813730Pickard AS, De Leon MC, Kohlmann T, Cella D, Rosenbloom S. Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients. Med Care. 2007 Mar;45(3):259-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254515.63841.81.
PubMed 17304084Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
PubMed 8445433Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
PubMed 12703651Neff KD. Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Ident, 2003. 2: 223-50.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
PubMed 6668417Sani F, Madhok V, Norbury M, Dugard P, Wakefield JR. Greater number of group identifications is associated with lower odds of being depressed: evidence from a Scottish community sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;50(9):1389-97. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1076-4. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
PubMed 26058588McNeely ML, Sellar C, Williamson T, Shea-Budgell M, Joy AA, Lau HY, Easaw JC, Murtha AD, Vallance J, Courneya K, Mackey JR, Parliament M, Culos-Reed N. Community-based exercise for health promotion and secondary cancer prevention in Canada: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029975. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029975.
PubMed 31519676Wurz A, McLaughlin E, Janzen A, Cripps H, Huang L, Molina H, Cowley L, Dreger J, Culos-Reed SN, Quinn K, Currey IMOL, Pacelli MH, Coombs M, Shamshad S. A Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Single-Arm, Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial Evaluating a 12-week Yoga Intervention Delivered by Videoconference for Young Adults Diagnosed With Cancer. Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2024 Dec 22;13:27536130241305130. doi: 10.1177/27536130241305130. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
PubMed 39717073
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Yoga for Young Adults Affected by Cancer: Exploring Implementation and Effectiveness of an Online Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05314803
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HREBA.CC-20-0098 (sub-study)
- Conditions
- Young Adult Cancer, Young Adult Oncology
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Yoga may enhance physical and psychological outcomes among young adults affected by cancer. Yet, yoga has rarely been studied in this population. We developed and piloted a yoga program, which is now ready for implementation and evaluation. This single-group, mixed-methods project will explore effectiveness and implementation of the yoga program.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Yoga | Experimental | Behavioral: YogaParticipants receive online, group-based yoga classes 2 times/week for 60 minutes/class over 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult aged 18 years or older;
- Diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18-39 years;
- At any stage of their cancer experience (i.e., on- or off-treatment);
- Able to safely engage in yoga, as assessed by completing the Get Active Questionnaire and obtaining medical clearance (if indicated).
- Willing and able to complete informed consent, questionnaires, physical assessments, and an interview in English.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1. Previous enrolment in the study, to avoid contamination and/or ceiling effects.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| YogaParticipants receive the yoga program, which is delivered by a trained yoga instructor (completed at least a 200-hour yoga teacher training, Yoga Thrive Teacher Training Certification (or similar), and/or practical experience working with individuals affected by cancer). The first class of the week is comprised of 45 minutes of gentle, progressive, hatha-based yoga sequencing and postures with the last 15 minutes focused on guided behaviour change and mindfulness techniques that varies week-to-week, based on the participants in the class. The second class of the week is 60 minutes of gentle, yin-based yoga sequencing and postures with an element of opening and relaxing. | Behavioural | Yoga |
Primary outcome
Reach
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
The number of people who participate, and reasons why or why not.
22 secondary outcomes
Attendance
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Adherence
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Missing data
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Barriers and facilitators to exercise participation
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Physical activity levels
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Fatigue
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Cognition
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Cancer-related symptoms
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
General health-related quality of life
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
General well-being
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Mindfulness
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Self-compassion
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Stress
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Group identification
Time frame: Post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Balance
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Shoulder range of motion
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Lower extremity flexibility
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Functional performance
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Aerobic endurance
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), post-program (week 12), 6-month follow-up (week 24), 1 year follow-up (week 52)
Adverse events
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Time to implement and deliver
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Yoga program fidelity
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 16007455Rogers LQ, Courneya KS, Verhulst S, Markwell S, Lanzotti V, Shah P. Exercise barrier and task self-efficacy in breast cancer patients during treatment. Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):84-90. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0851-2. Epub 2005 Jul 9.
- Background: PubMed 4053261Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
- Background: PubMed 25980742Acaster S, Dickerhoof R, DeBusk K, Bernard K, Strauss W, Allen LF. Qualitative and quantitative validation of the FACIT-fatigue scale in iron deficiency anemia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 May 17;13:60. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0257-x.
- BackgroundWagner L, Sweet J, Butt Z, Lai J-S, Cella D. Measuring patient self-reported cognitive function: development of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-cognitive function instrument. J Support Oncol, 2009. 7(6): W32-W39.
- Background: PubMed 10813730Chang VT, Hwang SS, Feuerman M. Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Cancer. 2000 May 1;88(9):2164-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000501)88:93.0.co;2-5.
- Background: PubMed 17304084Pickard AS, De Leon MC, Kohlmann T, Cella D, Rosenbloom S. Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients. Med Care. 2007 Mar;45(3):259-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254515.63841.81.
- Background: PubMed 8445433Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
- Background: PubMed 12703651Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Apr;84(4):822-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
- BackgroundNeff KD. Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Ident, 2003. 2: 223-50.
- Background: PubMed 6668417Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26058588Sani F, Madhok V, Norbury M, Dugard P, Wakefield JR. Greater number of group identifications is associated with lower odds of being depressed: evidence from a Scottish community sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;50(9):1389-97. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1076-4. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 31519676McNeely ML, Sellar C, Williamson T, Shea-Budgell M, Joy AA, Lau HY, Easaw JC, Murtha AD, Vallance J, Courneya K, Mackey JR, Parliament M, Culos-Reed N. Community-based exercise for health promotion and secondary cancer prevention in Canada: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e029975. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029975.
Related trials for Young Adult Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Obesity Treatment With Phentermine-Topiramate ER in AYA Surviving Leukemia and Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Hodgkin Lymphoma in Remission
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingObservational study
NCI Childhood Cancer Data Initiative (CCDI) Led Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Rare Cancer Registry for Very Rare Solid Tumors
Very Rare Tumors, Very Rare Cancers
Recruiting
High-Intensity Interval Exercise in Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Pediatric Brain Tumor
Recruiting
Virtual Home-based Exercise Intervention (RISE) to Improve Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment and Gut Microbiome in Adolescent and Young Adult Brain Tumor Survivors
Cancer-related Cognitive Dysfunction, Primary Brain Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
S. Nicole Culos-Reed, PhD study director
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Yoga in people with Young Adult Cancer and Young Adult Oncology, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact S. Nicole Culos-Reed, PhD (403-220-7540, nculosre@ucalgary.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reach (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05314803, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2022.