Bladder and Bowel DysfunctionNCT05318365
Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction in Children
A study testing Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Urotherapy in people with Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction, run by University of Aarhus at 3 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
Background: Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is characterized by lower urinary tract symptoms accompanied by bowel complaints. BBD is a common condition in childhood. The present treatment strategy for BBD is a step-wise approach starting with management of bowel symptoms before initiation of standard urotherapy… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 5 to 15 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Urotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2022to 1 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 5 to 15 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age 5-14 years and 9 months at time of inclusion
- Diagnosed with urinary incontinence and/or enuresis nocturna defined by the ICCS criteria
- Diagnosed with constipation and/or faecal incontinence defined by the ROME IV criteria
- Normal clinical examination
- Parents/guardian can understand the written and spoken information
- Informed assent to participation from both parents/guardian
Who cannot join
- Neuropathic or anatomical abnormalities in the urinary tract or gastrointestinal canal
- Earlier surgical intervention of the urinary tract (except circumcision)
- Neurological illness or earlier cerebral surgical intervention
- On-going urinary tract infection
- On-going treatment with anticholinergics and/or β3-adenoceptoragonist
- On-going treatment with laxatives in correct dosage (PEG3350 1-2 g/kg/day)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Inflammatory bowel disease
- Other disorder affection bladder or bowel function
- For Study 2 (microbiome): Systemic antibiotics within the past 3 months
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Denmark3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, 9000
Søren Hagstrøm, M.D., professor, soha@rn.dk
- Recruiting
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, 8000
Konstantinos Kamperis, M.D., kostas.kamperis@clin.au.dk
- Recruiting
Goedstrup Regional Hospital
Herning, 7400
Sofie Axelgaard, M.D., +45 61460024, sofiaxel@rm.dk
Luise Borch, M.D., luise.borch@rm.dk
About this study
Background:
Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is characterized by lower urinary tract symptoms accompanied by bowel complaints. BBD is a common condition in childhood. The present treatment strategy for BBD is a step-wise approach starting with management of bowel symptoms before initiation of standard urotherapy and further medical treatment of LUTS symptoms. This is, however, based on clinical experience and few retrospective, non-randomized studies and high-level evidence of the succession of the elements in treatment of BBD children is missing.
Read more
Our microbiome, and its role in health and disease, has gained increased focus during the past years. Studies suggest the urine and gut microbiome to be critical for maintenance of a well-functioning bladder- and bowel system. The microbiome in children is only sparsely investigated and its role in BBD is to the investigator's knowledge still unexplored.
Study 1:
Aim: To investigate if combination therapy is more effective in treating urinary incontinence in BBD children.
Materials and methods: A prospective randomized multicentre study on children with BBD (n=100) between 5-14 years and 9 months old. They are randomized to: 1) Medical treatment of bowel symptoms (n=50) or 2) Medical treatment of bowel symptoms combined with standard urotherapy.
The effect of treatment will be evaluated after 3 months. Primary endpoint: Resolution of incontinence after treatment. Secondary endpoint: Improved quality of life after successful treatment of urinary incontinence.
Study 2:
Aim: To investigate the urofecal microbiome in children with BBD
Materials and methods:
- A cohort study to investigate, whether the urofecal microbiome can predict response to treatment and whether it changes during treatment period
- A case control study to investigate whether the urofecal microbiome is different in children with BBD and recurrent UTI 's and children with BBD without recurrent UTI 's.
The study population consists of children with BBD included in study 1. A urine-, stool sample and a perineum swab will be collected from all participants before and after treatment. Bacterial DNA will be extracted and the microbiome will be determined.
Perspectives:
BBD is a common condition in childhood. It is associated with a considerable psychological burden and a risk of more severe physical complications.
The studies will provide basic knowledge about characteristics of the BBD patients and contribute new information about the optimal treatment of BBD children.
Read the detailed description
Background Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is characterised by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) accompanied by bowel complaints, primarily functional constipation and/or faecal incontinence. To standardise the terminology used for BBD, LUTS symptoms related to the disease have been defined by International Children's Continence Society (ICCS).
The prevalence of BBD is probably underestimated but studies suggest BBD to be present in up to 20 % of school children and to represent up to 40% of paediatric urology consults.
Embryological, anatomical and functional interactions between the rectum and urinary bladder are well known. Bladder and bowel are anatomically closely related and share innervation from the parasympathetic S2-S4 and sympathetic L1-L3 nerve roots.
Research on successful treatment of BBD is sparse, with only few retrospective, non-randomized studies, documenting that treatment of defecation problems in children with BBD enhances successful management of lower urinary tract disturbances such as daytime urinary incontinence (DUI), enuresis and urinary tract infections (UTI's). Based on this knowledge and clinical experience, the present treatment strategy for children with BBD is a step-wise approach starting with management of bowel symptoms before initiation of standard urotherapy and further medical treatment of LUTS symptoms. Standard urotherapy encompasses information and demystification of the disorder along with behavioural modification such as timed voiding, proper voiding posture, avoidance of holding manoeuvers and balanced fluid intake. Standard urotherapy is well-established as first-line treatment for children with LUTS. However, high-level evidence of the succession of the elements in treatment of BBD children is missing.
BBD is commonly associated with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and recurrent UTI's, which may lead to renal scarring , kidney failure and hypertension. It is a potential cause of significant physical and psychosocial burden for children and families. Therefore, optimization of treatment is critical to avoid secondary comorbidities.
Our microbiome, and its role in health and disease, has gained increased focus during the past few years.
Studies suggest the urine and gut microbiome to be critical for maintenance of a well-functioning bladder- and bowel system.
Dysbiosis is defined by the presence of unbalanced and disease-promoting composition of the microbiome. It is well-established that dysbiosis is associated with constipation in children and the condition is suspected to be involved in urological disorders such as overactive bladder, urge, incontinence and recurrent UTI's in adults. However, the composition of the urine microbiome in children is only sparsely investigated and its role in BBD and childhood UTI's is to the investigator's knowledge still unexplored.
Study 1: Does successful treatment of bowel symptoms resolve urinary incontinence in children with BBD? Aim and hypothesis Aim: To investigate if effective treatment of bowel problems resolves urinary incontinence in BBD children.
The hypothesis of the investigators is:
- Treatment of bowel symptoms resolves urinary incontinence in BBD children.
- It is more effective to initiate urotherapy from the beginning in combination with treatment of bowel symptoms instead of the present regime where bowel symptoms are managed before urotherapy is started.
- Succesful treatment of urinary incontinence in children with BBD improves their quality of life.
1.2 Materials and methods A prospective multicentre randomised study on children with BBD referred to the Pediatric Incontinence and Gastroenterology outpatient clinics at the Department of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg University Hospital and Regional Hospital Goedstrup.
Children (n=100) between 5-14 years and 9 months diagnosed with BBD at their first visit to the outpatient clinic will be included if they meet in- and exclusion criteria.
The included children will be randomised to one of the following treatments:
- Medical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the guidelines of The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) (n=50)
- Medical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the ESPGHAN guidelines combined with standard urotherapy (n=50)
At first visit to the outpatient clinic, enrolled children will undergo physical examination including neurological examination. Data on medical history will be collected including number of and time for UTI's. Participants will be asked to fill in a 48-hour flow-volume chart and in case of enuresis nocturna the chart will also include registration for 7 nights. Participants will also fill in "Toerfisk" which is a validated tool to monitor severity of urinary incontinence. Routine uroflowmetry will be performed for further evaluation of lower urinary symptoms. A urine sample will be collected for diagnosing on-going UTI and for microbiome analysis in study 3. The children will be screened for constipation in accordance with the ROME IV criteria. Rectal examination will be performed or transrectal diameter will be evaluated with point-of-care ultrasound. Stool sample and perineum swab will be collected for microbiome analysis.
The psychological burden from the children´s BBD condition will be evaluated by PinQ, a validated questionnaire used for assessment of quality of life according to the incontinence issue of the patients.
All participants will be informed about bladder and bowel function in order to demystify the disorder. Daily defecation will be induced by reconditioning to normal bowel habits through timed toilet sitting and daily administration of laxatives (e.g. PEG3350) in relevant dosage according to the ESPGHAN guidelines.
Participants randomized to combined medical treatment for bowel symptoms and urotherapy will be instructed in urotherapy in accordance with earlier description.
After 1 month of treatment the participants will be contacted by telephone to ensure compliance and for adjustment of laxative dose depending on the bowel symptoms.
The second visit in the outpatient clinic will be after 3 months of treatment. Before the consultation, the participants will be asked to fill in a second flow-volume chart as well as "Toerfisk" and PinQ questionnaires. Uroflowmetry will be repeated and a second urine sample will be collected for stix, culturing and microbiome analysis. Bowel symptoms will be evaluated using ROME IV, rectal examination and transrectal diameter and a second stool sample and perineum swab will be collected for microbiome analysis for study 3.
Data storage Data will be entered into RedCap, which is a secure web platform for building and managing online databases.
Power estimation The sample size (n=100) was calculated for each group to achieve a power of 80% for detecting a difference in proportions of 0.30 between the two groups (test - reference group) at a two sided p-value of 0.05.
Study 2: Urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD before and after treatment Aim and hypothesis To investigate the urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD before and after treatment.
The hypothesis of the investigators is that
- Response to treatment can be predicted by the composition of the urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD.
- The composition of the urine, perineal and gut microbiome is different in BBD children with recurrent UTI's compared to BBD children without recurrent UTI's.
- The urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD will change when bladder and bowel symptoms successfully treated.
Materials and methods
The study is a multicentre study consisting of two elements:
- a cohort study to investigate, whether the urine, perineal and gut microbiome can predict response to treatment and whether it changes during treatment period
- a case control study to investigate whether the urine, perineal and gut microbiome is different in children with BBD and recurrent UTI 's and children with BBD without recurrent UTI 's.
The study population consists of children with BBD included in study 1.
Collection and analysis of samples A urine-, stool sample and a perineum swab will be collected from all participants before initiation of treatment and after 3 months of treatment as described in study 1. Bacterial DNA will be extracted and the microbiome will be determined.
Data storage Biological material will be pseudonymised and stored in a -80 degree fridge until analysis is performed.
Statistical analysis for all 3 studies Distribution and variance will be analysed by QQ plot, Shapiro-Wilks test and Bartletts test. Microbiota alpha-diversity will be addressed by ASV richness, Faith's phylogenetic diversity, Shannon diversity index, and Pielou's evenness index. Beta-diversity analysis will include principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, weighted and unweighted UniFrac. Parametric data will be compared using Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA and Tukey´s post hoc test, while non-parametric data will be compared with Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Chi Squared test will be used for proportions. Level of significance will be as following *: p <0.05, : p<0.01 and *: p<0.001.
Ethics The studies will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All side effects will be handled in accordance with the actual legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to urotherapy or medical treatment of bowel symptoms. No risk, side effects or discomfort is expected from collection of urine, stool and perineum samples or from uroflowmetry or transabdominal ultrasound.
Perspectives BBD is a common condition in childhood. It is associated with a considerable psychological burden and a risk of more severe physical complications.
The term BBD is recently defined and therefore only sparsely investigated. The studies will provide basic knowledge about characteristics of the BBD patients and contribute new information about the optimal treatment of BBD children.
- Conditions
- Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Polyethylene Glycol 3350, Urotherapy
- Keywords
- Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome, Urinary Incontinence in Children, Functional constipation in Children, Gut Microbiome, Urine Microbiome
- Medical subject headings
- Intestinal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Polyethylene Glycol 3350Drug
Also called Magnesia, Laxoberal, Glyoktylklysma
PEG3350, klysma, laxoberal and magnesia will be administered in accordance with actual guidelines for treatment of constipation in children
UrotherapyBehavioural
Information and demystification of the disorder along with behavioural modification such as timed voiding, proper voiding posture, avoidance of holding manoeuvers and balanced fluid intake
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment of constipation and/or faecal incontinence | Active comparator | Medical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the guidelines of The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Receives: Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 3350 |
| Treatment of constipation and/or faecal incontinence combined with urotherapy | Active comparator | Medical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the guidelines of The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition combined with standard urotherapy in accordance with International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) Receives: Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 3350; Behavioral: Urotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with reduction in weekly episodes of urinary incontinence
No-response: <50% reduction, Partial response: 50 to 99% reduction, Complete response: 100% reduction.
Measured: Evaluation after 3 months of treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of participants with a change in quality of life after succesful treatment of urinary incontinence
Tool: PinQ Questionnaire
Measured: Evaluation after 3 months of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2022
- Study start1 Sep 2022
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bladder and Bowel DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sofie Axelgaard, MD, Study chair, Department of Childhood and Adolescent Medicine, Regional Hospital GoedstrupSoeren Hagstroem, Professor, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Childhood and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University HospitalLuise Borch, MD, PhD, Study director, Department of Childhood and Adolescent Medicine, Regional Hospital GoedstrupKonstantinos Kamperis, MD, PhD, Study director, Department of Childhood and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05318365
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BBD_Children
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 8 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Conway PH, Cnaan A, Zaoutis T, Henry BV, Grundmeier RW, Keren R. Recurrent urinary tract infections in children: risk factors and association with prophylactic antimicrobials. JAMA. 2007 Jul 11;298(2):179-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.2.179.
PubMed 17622599Aguiar LM, Franco I. Bladder Bowel Dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2018 Nov;45(4):633-640. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
PubMed 30316317Shaikh N, Hoberman A, Wise B, Kurs-Lasky M, Kearney D, Naylor S, Haralam MA, Colborn DK, Docimo SG. Dysfunctional elimination syndrome: is it related to urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux diagnosed early in life? Pediatrics. 2003 Nov;112(5):1134-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.5.1134.
PubMed 14595058Dos Santos J, Varghese A, Koyle M. Recommendations for the management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children. Pediatr Therapeut, 2014;4:1.
Halachmi S, Farhat WA. Interactions of constipation, dysfunctional elimination syndrome, and vesicoureteral reflux. Adv Urol. 2008;2008:828275. doi: 10.1155/2008/828275.
PubMed 18604297Kaplan SA, Dmochowski R, Cash BD, Kopp ZS, Berriman SJ, Khullar V. Systematic review of the relationship between bladder and bowel function: implications for patient management. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Mar;67(3):205-16. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12028.
PubMed 23409689Koff SA, Wagner TT, Jayanthi VR. The relationship among dysfunctional elimination syndromes, primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections in children. J Urol. 1998 Sep;160(3 Pt 2):1019-22. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199809020-00014.
PubMed 9719268Chase JW, Homsy Y, Siggaard C, Sit F, Bower WF. Functional constipation in children. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 2):2641-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000109743.12526.42.
PubMed 15118440Erickson BA, Austin JC, Cooper CS, Boyt MA. Polyethylene glycol 3350 for constipation in children with dysfunctional elimination. J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 2):1518-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000083730.70185.75.
PubMed 14501649Borch L, Hagstroem S, Bower WF, Siggaard Rittig C, Rittig S. Bladder and bowel dysfunction and the resolution of urinary incontinence with successful management of bowel symptoms in children. Acta Paediatr. 2013 May;102(5):e215-20. doi: 10.1111/apa.12158. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
PubMed 23368903Hoebeke P, Bower W, Combs A, De Jong T, Yang S. Diagnostic evaluation of children with daytime incontinence. J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.038. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
PubMed 20022025Loening-Baucke V. Urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection and their resolution with treatment of chronic constipation of childhood. Pediatrics. 1997 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):228-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.2.228.
PubMed 9240804Hagstroem S, Rittig N, Kamperis K, Mikkelsen MM, Rittig S, Djurhuus JC. Treatment outcome of day-time urinary incontinence in children. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(6):528-33. doi: 10.1080/00365590802098367.
PubMed 18609267Mulders MM, Cobussen-Boekhorst H, de Gier RP, Feitz WF, Kortmann BB. Urotherapy in children: quantitative measurements of daytime urinary incontinence before and after treatment according to the new definitions of the International Children's Continence Society. J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Apr;7(2):213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
PubMed 20541978Keren R, Shaikh N, Pohl H, Gravens-Mueller L, Ivanova A, Zaoutis L, Patel M, deBerardinis R, Parker A, Bhatnagar S, Haralam MA, Pope M, Kearney D, Sprague B, Barrera R, Viteri B, Egigueron M, Shah N, Hoberman A. Risk Factors for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection and Renal Scarring. Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):e13-21. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0409. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
PubMed 26055855
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction in Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05318365
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BBD_Children
- Conditions
- Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction
- Keywords
- Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome, Urinary Incontinence in Children, Functional constipation in Children, Gut Microbiome, Urine Microbiome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AarhusUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is characterized by lower urinary tract symptoms accompanied by bowel complaints. BBD is a common condition in childhood. The present treatment strategy for BBD is a step-wise approach starting with management of bowel symptoms before initiation of standard urotherapy and further medical treatment of LUTS symptoms. This is, however, based on clinical experience and few retrospective, non-randomized studies and high-level evidence of the succession of the elements in treatment of BBD children is missing.
Our microbiome, and its role in health and disease, has gained increased focus during the past years. Studies suggest the urine and gut microbiome to be critical for maintenance of a well-functioning bladder- and bowel system. The microbiome in children is only sparsely investigated and its role in BBD is to the investigator's knowledge still unexplored.
Study 1:
Aim: To investigate if combination therapy is more effective in treating urinary incontinence in BBD children.
Materials and methods: A prospective randomized multicentre study on children with BBD (n=100) between 5-14 years and 9 months old. They are randomized to: 1) Medical treatment of bowel symptoms (n=50) or 2) Medical treatment of bowel symptoms combined with standard urotherapy.
The effect of treatment will be evaluated after 3 months. Primary endpoint: Resolution of incontinence after treatment. Secondary endpoint: Improved quality of life after successful treatment of urinary incontinence.
Study 2:
Aim: To investigate the urofecal microbiome in children with BBD
Materials and methods:
- A cohort study to investigate, whether the urofecal microbiome can predict response to treatment and whether it changes during treatment period
- A case control study to investigate whether the urofecal microbiome is different in children with BBD and recurrent UTI 's and children with BBD without recurrent UTI 's.
The study population consists of children with BBD included in study 1. A urine-, stool sample and a perineum swab will be collected from all participants before and after treatment. Bacterial DNA will be extracted and the microbiome will be determined.
Perspectives:
BBD is a common condition in childhood. It is associated with a considerable psychological burden and a risk of more severe physical complications.
The studies will provide basic knowledge about characteristics of the BBD patients and contribute new information about the optimal treatment of BBD children.
Detailed description
Background Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is characterised by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) accompanied by bowel complaints, primarily functional constipation and/or faecal incontinence. To standardise the terminology used for BBD, LUTS symptoms related to the disease have been defined by International Children's Continence Society (ICCS).
The prevalence of BBD is probably underestimated but studies suggest BBD to be present in up to 20 % of school children and to represent up to 40% of paediatric urology consults.
Embryological, anatomical and functional interactions between the rectum and urinary bladder are well known. Bladder and bowel are anatomically closely related and share innervation from the parasympathetic S2-S4 and sympathetic L1-L3 nerve roots.
Research on successful treatment of BBD is sparse, with only few retrospective, non-randomized studies, documenting that treatment of defecation problems in children with BBD enhances successful management of lower urinary tract disturbances such as daytime urinary incontinence (DUI), enuresis and urinary tract infections (UTI's). Based on this knowledge and clinical experience, the present treatment strategy for children with BBD is a step-wise approach starting with management of bowel symptoms before initiation of standard urotherapy and further medical treatment of LUTS symptoms. Standard urotherapy encompasses information and demystification of the disorder along with behavioural modification such as timed voiding, proper voiding posture, avoidance of holding manoeuvers and balanced fluid intake. Standard urotherapy is well-established as first-line treatment for children with LUTS. However, high-level evidence of the succession of the elements in treatment of BBD children is missing.
BBD is commonly associated with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and recurrent UTI's, which may lead to renal scarring , kidney failure and hypertension. It is a potential cause of significant physical and psychosocial burden for children and families. Therefore, optimization of treatment is critical to avoid secondary comorbidities.
Our microbiome, and its role in health and disease, has gained increased focus during the past few years.
Studies suggest the urine and gut microbiome to be critical for maintenance of a well-functioning bladder- and bowel system.
Dysbiosis is defined by the presence of unbalanced and disease-promoting composition of the microbiome. It is well-established that dysbiosis is associated with constipation in children and the condition is suspected to be involved in urological disorders such as overactive bladder, urge, incontinence and recurrent UTI's in adults. However, the composition of the urine microbiome in children is only sparsely investigated and its role in BBD and childhood UTI's is to the investigator's knowledge still unexplored.
Study 1: Does successful treatment of bowel symptoms resolve urinary incontinence in children with BBD? Aim and hypothesis Aim: To investigate if effective treatment of bowel problems resolves urinary incontinence in BBD children.
The hypothesis of the investigators is:
- Treatment of bowel symptoms resolves urinary incontinence in BBD children.
- It is more effective to initiate urotherapy from the beginning in combination with treatment of bowel symptoms instead of the present regime where bowel symptoms are managed before urotherapy is started.
- Succesful treatment of urinary incontinence in children with BBD improves their quality of life.
1.2 Materials and methods A prospective multicentre randomised study on children with BBD referred to the Pediatric Incontinence and Gastroenterology outpatient clinics at the Department of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg University Hospital and Regional Hospital Goedstrup.
Children (n=100) between 5-14 years and 9 months diagnosed with BBD at their first visit to the outpatient clinic will be included if they meet in- and exclusion criteria.
The included children will be randomised to one of the following treatments:
- Medical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the guidelines of The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) (n=50)
- Medical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the ESPGHAN guidelines combined with standard urotherapy (n=50)
At first visit to the outpatient clinic, enrolled children will undergo physical examination including neurological examination. Data on medical history will be collected including number of and time for UTI's. Participants will be asked to fill in a 48-hour flow-volume chart and in case of enuresis nocturna the chart will also include registration for 7 nights. Participants will also fill in "Toerfisk" which is a validated tool to monitor severity of urinary incontinence. Routine uroflowmetry will be performed for further evaluation of lower urinary symptoms. A urine sample will be collected for diagnosing on-going UTI and for microbiome analysis in study 3. The children will be screened for constipation in accordance with the ROME IV criteria. Rectal examination will be performed or transrectal diameter will be evaluated with point-of-care ultrasound. Stool sample and perineum swab will be collected for microbiome analysis.
The psychological burden from the children´s BBD condition will be evaluated by PinQ, a validated questionnaire used for assessment of quality of life according to the incontinence issue of the patients.
All participants will be informed about bladder and bowel function in order to demystify the disorder. Daily defecation will be induced by reconditioning to normal bowel habits through timed toilet sitting and daily administration of laxatives (e.g. PEG3350) in relevant dosage according to the ESPGHAN guidelines.
Participants randomized to combined medical treatment for bowel symptoms and urotherapy will be instructed in urotherapy in accordance with earlier description.
After 1 month of treatment the participants will be contacted by telephone to ensure compliance and for adjustment of laxative dose depending on the bowel symptoms.
The second visit in the outpatient clinic will be after 3 months of treatment. Before the consultation, the participants will be asked to fill in a second flow-volume chart as well as "Toerfisk" and PinQ questionnaires. Uroflowmetry will be repeated and a second urine sample will be collected for stix, culturing and microbiome analysis. Bowel symptoms will be evaluated using ROME IV, rectal examination and transrectal diameter and a second stool sample and perineum swab will be collected for microbiome analysis for study 3.
Data storage Data will be entered into RedCap, which is a secure web platform for building and managing online databases.
Power estimation The sample size (n=100) was calculated for each group to achieve a power of 80% for detecting a difference in proportions of 0.30 between the two groups (test - reference group) at a two sided p-value of 0.05.
Study 2: Urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD before and after treatment Aim and hypothesis To investigate the urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD before and after treatment.
The hypothesis of the investigators is that
- Response to treatment can be predicted by the composition of the urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD.
- The composition of the urine, perineal and gut microbiome is different in BBD children with recurrent UTI's compared to BBD children without recurrent UTI's.
- The urine, perineal and gut microbiome in children with BBD will change when bladder and bowel symptoms successfully treated.
Materials and methods
The study is a multicentre study consisting of two elements:
- a cohort study to investigate, whether the urine, perineal and gut microbiome can predict response to treatment and whether it changes during treatment period
- a case control study to investigate whether the urine, perineal and gut microbiome is different in children with BBD and recurrent UTI 's and children with BBD without recurrent UTI 's.
The study population consists of children with BBD included in study 1.
Collection and analysis of samples A urine-, stool sample and a perineum swab will be collected from all participants before initiation of treatment and after 3 months of treatment as described in study 1. Bacterial DNA will be extracted and the microbiome will be determined.
Data storage Biological material will be pseudonymised and stored in a -80 degree fridge until analysis is performed.
Statistical analysis for all 3 studies Distribution and variance will be analysed by QQ plot, Shapiro-Wilks test and Bartletts test. Microbiota alpha-diversity will be addressed by ASV richness, Faith's phylogenetic diversity, Shannon diversity index, and Pielou's evenness index. Beta-diversity analysis will include principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity, weighted and unweighted UniFrac. Parametric data will be compared using Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA and Tukey´s post hoc test, while non-parametric data will be compared with Kruskal-Wallis test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Chi Squared test will be used for proportions. Level of significance will be as following *: p <0.05, : p<0.01 and *: p<0.001.
Ethics The studies will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All side effects will be handled in accordance with the actual legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to urotherapy or medical treatment of bowel symptoms. No risk, side effects or discomfort is expected from collection of urine, stool and perineum samples or from uroflowmetry or transabdominal ultrasound.
Perspectives BBD is a common condition in childhood. It is associated with a considerable psychological burden and a risk of more severe physical complications.
The term BBD is recently defined and therefore only sparsely investigated. The studies will provide basic knowledge about characteristics of the BBD patients and contribute new information about the optimal treatment of BBD children.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment of constipation and/or faecal incontinence | Active comparator | Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 3350Medical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the guidelines of The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition |
| Treatment of constipation and/or faecal incontinence combined with urotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 3350, Behavioral: UrotherapyMedical treatment of bowel symptoms in accordance with the guidelines of The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition combined with standard urotherapy in accordance with International Children's Continence Society (ICCS) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 5 to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 5-14 years and 9 months at time of inclusion
- Diagnosed with urinary incontinence and/or enuresis nocturna defined by the ICCS criteria
- Diagnosed with constipation and/or faecal incontinence defined by the ROME IV criteria
- Normal clinical examination
- Parents/guardian can understand the written and spoken information
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Neuropathic or anatomical abnormalities in the urinary tract or gastrointestinal canal
- Earlier surgical intervention of the urinary tract (except circumcision)
- Neurological illness or earlier cerebral surgical intervention
- On-going urinary tract infection
- On-going treatment with anticholinergics and/or β3-adenoceptoragonist
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Polyethylene Glycol 3350Also: Magnesia, Laxoberal, GlyoktylklysmaPEG3350, klysma, laxoberal and magnesia will be administered in accordance with actual guidelines for treatment of constipation in children | Drug | Treatment of constipation and/or faecal incontinence, Treatment of constipation and/or faecal incontinence combined with urotherapy |
| UrotherapyInformation and demystification of the disorder along with behavioural modification such as timed voiding, proper voiding posture, avoidance of holding manoeuvers and balanced fluid intake | Behavioural | Treatment of constipation and/or faecal incontinence combined with urotherapy |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with reduction in weekly episodes of urinary incontinence
Time frame: Evaluation after 3 months of treatment
No-response: <50% reduction, Partial response: 50 to 99% reduction, Complete response: 100% reduction.
1 secondary outcome
Number of participants with a change in quality of life after succesful treatment of urinary incontinence
Time frame: Evaluation after 3 months of treatment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 17622599Conway PH, Cnaan A, Zaoutis T, Henry BV, Grundmeier RW, Keren R. Recurrent urinary tract infections in children: risk factors and association with prophylactic antimicrobials. JAMA. 2007 Jul 11;298(2):179-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.2.179.
- Background: PubMed 30316317Aguiar LM, Franco I. Bladder Bowel Dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2018 Nov;45(4):633-640. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
- Background: PubMed 14595058Shaikh N, Hoberman A, Wise B, Kurs-Lasky M, Kearney D, Naylor S, Haralam MA, Colborn DK, Docimo SG. Dysfunctional elimination syndrome: is it related to urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux diagnosed early in life? Pediatrics. 2003 Nov;112(5):1134-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.5.1134.
- BackgroundDos Santos J, Varghese A, Koyle M. Recommendations for the management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children. Pediatr Therapeut, 2014;4:1.
- Background: PubMed 18604297Halachmi S, Farhat WA. Interactions of constipation, dysfunctional elimination syndrome, and vesicoureteral reflux. Adv Urol. 2008;2008:828275. doi: 10.1155/2008/828275.
- Background: PubMed 23409689Kaplan SA, Dmochowski R, Cash BD, Kopp ZS, Berriman SJ, Khullar V. Systematic review of the relationship between bladder and bowel function: implications for patient management. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Mar;67(3):205-16. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12028.
- Background: PubMed 9719268Koff SA, Wagner TT, Jayanthi VR. The relationship among dysfunctional elimination syndromes, primary vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infections in children. J Urol. 1998 Sep;160(3 Pt 2):1019-22. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199809020-00014.
- Background: PubMed 15118440Chase JW, Homsy Y, Siggaard C, Sit F, Bower WF. Functional constipation in children. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 2):2641-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000109743.12526.42.
- Background: PubMed 14501649Erickson BA, Austin JC, Cooper CS, Boyt MA. Polyethylene glycol 3350 for constipation in children with dysfunctional elimination. J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 2):1518-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000083730.70185.75.
- Background: PubMed 23368903Borch L, Hagstroem S, Bower WF, Siggaard Rittig C, Rittig S. Bladder and bowel dysfunction and the resolution of urinary incontinence with successful management of bowel symptoms in children. Acta Paediatr. 2013 May;102(5):e215-20. doi: 10.1111/apa.12158. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
- Background: PubMed 20022025Hoebeke P, Bower W, Combs A, De Jong T, Yang S. Diagnostic evaluation of children with daytime incontinence. J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):699-703. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.038. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
- Background: PubMed 9240804Loening-Baucke V. Urinary incontinence and urinary tract infection and their resolution with treatment of chronic constipation of childhood. Pediatrics. 1997 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):228-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.100.2.228.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors, Lymphomas, or Multiple Myeloma (The MATCH Screening Trial)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Determining the Biodistribution of an Imaging Tracer (68Ga-FAPi-46) in Patients With Solid Tumors or Hematologic Cancers
Anal Carcinoma, Bladder Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Vaccine Therapy and Pembrolizumab in Treating Patients With Solid Tumors That Have Failed Prior Therapy
Adult Solid Neoplasm, Bladder Carcinoma
Recruiting
Sacral Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract, Bowel and Sexual Dysfunction
Neurogenic Dysfunction of the Urinary Bladder, Multiple Sclerosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sofie Axelgaard, MD study chair
Department of Childhood and Adolescent Medicine, Regional Hospital Goedstrup
Soeren Hagstroem, Professor, MD principal investigator
Department of Childhood and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital
Luise Borch, MD, PhD study director
Department of Childhood and Adolescent Medicine, Regional Hospital Goedstrup
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Urotherapy in people with Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction, run by University of Aarhus at 3 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sofie Axelgaard, MD (+45 61460024, sofiaxel@rm.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with reduction in weekly episodes of urinary incontinence (time frame: Evaluation after 3 months of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05318365, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2024.