AzTrials
AzTrials

Abortion in First TrimesterTENS 2 0NCT05320432

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pain Control During First-trimester Abortion

A study testing Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in people with Abortion in First Trimester and Pain, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

First-trimester abortion aspiration procedures are painful and sedation is typically provided. It is unsafe to drive after sedation due to the prolonged motor delay from some anesthetic agents. Without a known escort, most clinics do not allow patients to use public transportation, taxis, or rideshare services. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Abortion in First Trimester, Pain
What is being tested?
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 Jan 2023to 21 Mar 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years old or older
  • English- or Spanish-fluency
  • <12 weeks gestation
  • Presenting for aspiration abortion

Who cannot join

  • Planned use of oral or IV sedation
  • Contraindications to office-based procedure as determined by attending physician
  • Fetal demise
  • Requiring pre-procedure use of misoprostol
  • Contraindication to TENS units use (pacemaker or epilepsy)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Stanford University

    Palo Alto, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pain Control During First Trimester Abortion: a Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

First-trimester abortion aspiration procedures are painful and sedation is typically provided. It is unsafe to drive after sedation due to the prolonged motor delay from some anesthetic agents. Without a known escort, most clinics do not allow patients to use public transportation, taxis, or rideshare services. Arranging a ride may be harder for those seeking abortion care than other surgical procedures given privacy concerns and the need to travel far distances. Additionally, some people have medical reasons that makes sedation in an outpatient abortion clinic unsafe. As abortion restrictions increase and more people need to travel far distances to access care, it is important to investigate non-pharmacologic pain control options.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivers a low-level electrical current through the skin. By activating the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system, these pulses of electrical current reduce sensitivity to pain. TENS has been shown to be effective in decreasing pain with menstrual cramps and during medication abortion, and it was found to be non-inferior to IV sedation for first-trimester procedural abortion. However, it remains unclear if TENS is better than ibuprofen and local anesthesia via paracervical block alone.

The overarching goal of this research is to identify an inexpensive, non-pharmacologic, alternative pain control strategy for those with a medical or social contraindication to IV sedation. The specific aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of TENS to prevent pain during first-trimester procedural abortion. To achieve this objective, a blinded, randomized superiority trial comparing the use of TENS to sham for management of pain during first-trimester aspiration abortion is proposed. This research is significant because the validation of a non-pharmacologic pain management technique would decrease barriers to accessing abortion care.

Read the detailed description

Abortion is common: one in four individuals will seek this care during their reproductive lifetime. Most abortions occur in the first trimester and nearly all - greater than 95% - occur in the outpatient clinic setting. Uterine aspiration is painful; most patients desire additional analgesia beyond local anesthesia. However, not every patient is a candidate for office sedation since multiple medical conditions are a contraindication and patients must have a ride home. The prolonged motor delay from some anesthetic agents makes driving after sedation unsafe. Without a known escort to monitor for surgical and anesthetic complications as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesia, most clinics do not allow patients to use public transportation, taxis, or rideshare services. Arranging a ride may be harder for those seeking abortion care than other surgical procedures given privacy concerns and the need to travel far distances. As abortion restrictions increase and more people need to travel far distances to access care, it is important to investigate non-pharmacologic pain control options. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) delivers an electrical current through the skin to activate the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system, effectively reducing sensitivity to pain. A previous trial comparing TENS to IV sedation found similar postoperative pain scores with a significantly shorter recovery time in the TENS group; however, this study did not evaluate or report intraoperative pain scores. It was found in a randomized controlled trial comparing TENS to IV sedation (in conjunction with local anesthesia) for first-trimester surgical abortion and that TENS had non-inferior pain scores to IV sedation and was considered an acceptable modality for pain control among participants. Through this proposed double blinded randomized controlled trial, it is hoped to demonstrate that TENS is a superior, non-invasive alternative pain control option for people undergoing surgical abortion in the first trimester who otherwise are not eligible for or decline IV sedation. Ultimately, the hope is to identify an inexpensive, alternative, non-pharmacologic pain control strategy for those with a medical or social contraindication to IV sedation in an effort to decrease barriers to accessing abortion care.

Being tested
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), Sham
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Device

    A low-level electrical current through the skin activates the descending inhibitory systems in the central nervous system.

  • ShamDevice

    No current applied through pads.

Study groups in NCT05320432
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)ExperimentalPrior to the procedure, the patient will have two sets of two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord at the T10-L1 and S2-S4 levels for TENS administration. For participants randomized to the experimental group, the non-blinded study coordinator will turn on the TENS unit 5 minutes prior to the procedure and monitor stimulating frequency level (80-100 Hz and pulse duration of 400 microseconds; intensity or frequency will be monitored to be administered to a non-painful level).
Receives: Device: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
ShamSham comparatorFor the participants randomized to sham, the same placement of electrodes will occur, but the unit will not be delivering electrical stimulation.
Receives: Device: Sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain During Cervical Dilation

    Pain with manual cervical dilation, assessed by visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100mm; 0 being "no pain" and 100 being "worst pain imaginable")

    Measured: Intra-operative, collected during procedure (up to 30 seconds)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Pain During Procedure

    Pain during aspiration assessed by visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100mm; 0 being "no pain" and 100 being "worst pain imaginable")

    Measured: Intra-operative, collected during procedure (up to 30 seconds)

  2. Overall Experience

    Patient experience assessed by visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100mm; 0 being "worst experience possible" and 100 being "best experience possible")

    Measured: Post-operative, collected following procedure (up to 20 minutes)

  3. Procedure Time

    Measured: up to 20 minutes

  4. Provider Perceived Ease of Procedure

    Provider experience assessed by visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100mm; 0 being "easiest to use" and 100 being "most difficult to use")

    Measured: Post-operative, collected after procedure (up to 30 seconds)

  5. Time Spent in Recovery

    Measured: up to 1 hour

  6. Number of Participants Who Correctly Identified Whether They Received TENS or Sham

    This outcome is to measure the participant's perceived group allocation.

    Measured: Post-operative, collected after procedure (up to 30 seconds)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2022
  2. Study start20 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion21 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion21 Mar 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05320432
Sponsor's protocol ID
62478
Acronym
TENS 2 0
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
1 Apr 2022
Last updated
25 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in people with Abortion in First Trimester and Pain, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain During Cervical Dilation (time frame: Intra-operative, collected during procedure (up to 30 seconds)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Feb 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in